Total posts: 4,340
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I meant links.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
The 14th was not written just for former slaves and their offspring; but rather it provides due process and equal protection of the laws upon "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..."
This was written this way because of African Americans, who were born in the US. Otherwise it would be impossible to immigrate to the US.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Except that the people that advocate socialism tend to be middle class college kids that don’t want to work for what they get and just want it for free. The dirt poor have to work for their money, so they see the value in hard work (and if you believe that being a CEO is easy, try being one; I’m not stopping you). It’s why socialism doesn’t really take off in places like Africa despite the poverty.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
USA is a country of democracy. People will naturally be more willing to vote for wealth redistribution.
Has it ever occurred to you that the democracy in America is right wing on economics? Even our poor people relieze that the rich tended to earn their wealth by making the world a better place, so they don’t want to take what is not theirs. Private property is respected in America.
People become greedy and want the wealth.
Nothing wrong with this. I’m richer than 95% of my generation; it’s MY money; I earned it. I’m not giving it to others. If you think that’s wrong, adopt a homeless person.
It reduces their wealth, so that others may have some too.
You are not entitled to someone else’s money without their consent.
If great majority of people become poor and you become rich, and you live in democracy, it’s obvious that people will take the wealth for themselves.
Nope; I tell people that I have $32,000 in net worth. They are impressed; not jealous.
The people will bring socialism to USA. There is no "Cuba is failing" in their minds, when capitalism destroys their wealth and doesnt allow them to aquire wealth.
It’s allowed me to aquire $32k in net worth and growing. This is why American communists should be sent to Cuba and capitalist Cubans should be sent to America; so we let the communists destroy their economy and we benefit from hard working people moving here. The people that spend get good quality products and services from capitalism.
Usually takes a lifetime for that. People want results now, not having to wait 50 years until some capitalist dies.
Over 700 billionaires live in the US. If they have about 30 years of life left on average, every 60 days, a billionaire dies and donates their money to charity.
No democracy respects private property of a buisness, not the US nor any other. It’s not in nature of democracy.
The American democracy is right wing and hyper capitalist (and this is BASED). Democracy isn’t inherited left wing.
Well, if she respects private property, she shouldnt have come to USA. The USA is becoming more and more socialist.
Where was she going to move? Republicans who didn’t embrace Trumps big lie did very well in elections, implying America is becoming more right wing. Socialism is cancer and socialists like yourself don’t belong in America; go to Cuba; where your ideology belongs.
So people shouldnt be jealous?
That is correct; envy is bad if you use it to steal from the well off.
Tell that to the people who suffer their entire life while the capitalists have it easy.
No matter how much you are suffering, it doesn’t justify theft.
Also, the system is made so that the vast majority of people cannot succeed.
This is inaccurate; America has a per capita income about 6x that of Cuba and a poverty rate significantly less than Cuba.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
What source(s) did you use?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@CoolApe
Sounds like you’re more of a die hard personal autonomy/property rights libertarian.
I lean libetarian on immigration, war vaccines, weed, and drugs in general, but I don’t think abortion is the same. If abortion does indeed kill a human being, it needs to be prosecuted to some extent. You just can’t make it a big penalty because it’s common unfortunately. If you have the death penalty for all abortions, even those that are 6 weeks into pregnancy, one in six women are getting executed. Everyone knows someone that had an abortion, so it’s not pragmatic to kill ANYONE who has had an abortion. But late term abortions (24 weeks or later) are rare enough to make the death penalty for them feisable.
Personal autonomy outweighs right to life. Same old arguments for abortion repeated.
This belief taken to its logical conclusion would legalize abortion up until the moment of birth (which Roe did not protect and only 19% of the country agrees with). So there are limits to bodily autonomy. It also would legalize assault, since me assaulting someone is an expression of my bodily autonomy if you value bodily autonomy so much that your willing to kill someone to exercise it.
A right to Abortion needs to be addressed in the Constitution.
If there was an amendment that outlawed abortion, the pro choicers are going to want it repealed and if there is an amendment that legalized abortion to any extent, the pro lifers are going to want it repealed. Such an amendment wouldn’t last. But I think you can get away with a constitutional amendment that outlaws abortion beyond 12 weeks everywhere in the country (and prosecuted late term abortion like murder).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Let's say a dude gets into a car crash and gets into a coma. The doctors know for sure that the man will wake up in approximately 9 months but won't retain any memories of his past. But he is in a coma, so he is not viable on his own, so he must be hooked to machines for that 9 months in order to stay alive.The question is:Would it be morally acceptable to kill this man?
If you answer no to this question, I wouldn’t want my taxes raised to pay for him being on a machine. Life support costs like $10,000 a day. I’m not paying that with insurance hikes.
At conception, life is created.
Do you have any peer reviewed evidence that confirms a zygote is a human being? If a zygote was a human being, then scientists wouldn’t do IVF because of all the embryos that have to die for it.
People may care a lot about abortion and politicians talk about banning abortion, but IVF isn’t talked about to nearly the same extent even though many embryos die from IVF. Texas both banned abortion but legalized killing embryos if it’s for IVF. This is inconsistent. The scientists know what is a human being better than either of us, and if they kill embryos for pregnancy, it’s safe to assume they don’t believe embryos are human.
Yea, sure a baby might not make it, but it's more like than not that it will. But if you abort it, that chance becomes 0. You literally just took away a chance of human life, for what?
Your sperm cells have the potential to be a human life. You’re not treated as a human being until you are in fact a human being. Just like I’m not going to treat a college student as a college grad until they actually become one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Wrong. Typical uneducated opinion of the 14th.
If that was the only way someone became a citizen, then it would be impossible to become a citizen from a foreign country. The 14th amendment was written for slaves; not to exclude the unborn.
Honestly, I do not think/believe there is ANY precedence that would support such a punishment. Personal autonomy is paramount in the freedom of human individualism.
If you don’t believe in punishment for late term abortion, this is the same as legalizing late term abortion. If you have this opinion, only 19% of the country agrees with you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
The 14th Amendment makes it perfectly clear, that all the laws, rights, privileges and equal protection of all laws does not apply until BIRTH!
The 14th amendment merely states one way to obtain citizenship. It does not state who has the right to life or not.
That would have to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
If someone who could carry the baby to term without dying or having a fetal health condition aborted out of convienience, how specifically would you punish them?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
ONLY so-called "punishment" they should receive is being forced to give birth and adopt if they do not want the birthed child.
But they could abort illegally, so then you would have to punish the female that got the abortion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
I do NOT agree with this penalty
What is your ideal penalty then? If abortion is banned and tried as murder (which I’m assuming you believe late term abortion is murder), then you have to punish it just like murder.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
My final line is fetal viability. And THAT should be the ONLY line for EVERYONE!!!
Not everyone agrees with your pro choice stance.
But if you support banning late term abortions, how would you punish those that do late term abortions?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I would say that USA is on the path of becoming socialist.
Yeah, because our schools never taught the evils of socialism that well. Hitler was a socialist. If our education system did that, people would be arguing being pro socialist is hate speech to buisiness owners.
People are less and less happy with capitalism. They dont want a society of rich and poor.
It’s because they want to steal from the makers (the buisiness owners; without whom people would be hunting for food). I’m a stock owner with $30k worth of stocks. My generation spends their money while I Invest; it’s why Im in the top 5% for my generation. I don’t want to give my wealth to spenders.
People are less and less happy with capitalism.
Socialism failed in Cuba. I think you should tour Cuba and see the effects of socialism. You don’t want that brought here.
They dont want a society where someone inherits millions and gets to have the best of everything, while the little guy suffers.
Usually, billionaires donate the vast majority of their wealth to charity. The government is the worst charity source on the planet because it steals to survive and it gives money to inefficient causes. This is why poverty is very common in places that don’t respect private property (Haiti, Africa). A Haitian immigrant told me this. She votes red because she experienced American freedom and she respects private property.
Competition makes people jealous, since it creates winners and non-winners. The wealthier the winners, the more jealous is everyone else.
This competition creates better products and services for we the people. Don’t be jealous if other people’s success; instead generate your own.
Capitalism could even fail on another thing. As AI becomes implemented, there will hardly be a need for workers. Why pay a worker when you can buy a robot that can work for 24 hours a day and better than human. At that point, any country that invests in robots to replace workers will have great advantage in its economy and production.
AI should be treated as a hypothetical while it has not taken half the country’s jobs. When AI comes and does this, we will need more government intervention in people’s lives. But AI has not made the vast majority of human unemployable, so cross that bridge when we get there.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Gay Parrot
I’m LGBT and I’m offended at your homophobia!!! Jk; getting offended is for liberals.
and he hasn’t read the Inflation Reduction Act
Have you read that bill? I haven’t, so I don’t have an opinion on it.
Created:
https://costplusdrugs.com. If you need any life saving drugs, go to Cuban for them.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
You are assuming a competitive market. I assure you, the 3 insulin monopolies pay the government enormous sums of money to artificially keep the price high by eliminating competition through pay to play regulations. You cap the prices without subsidies, those companies go on "strike"
I think there is a competitive market for insulin. Mark Cuban started a company where he sells drugs for cheap.
Created:
Posted in:
I don’t believe a zygote or embryo is a human being. But I think a fetus is a human being.
In addition, Forbes states only 34% of the US population supports abortion being legal for 2nd trimester or more.
Because of this, I support a national abortion ban at 12 weeks into pregnancy. If a state wants to ban all abortions (except for rape and maternal life), that’s fine; 39% of the country agrees with them.
Here is the compromise try at I support: National abortion ban at 12 weeks. Every state must legalize abortion for rape victims up until 12 weeks (because abortion at that point is self defense; if I got raped, I’m not paying child support) and for maternal life up until the moment of birth (because I think maternal life outweighs fetal life for these rare cases).
The states are going to make their own laws regarding abortion in this framing. If you want an abortion and you live in a red state, you must travel to a state that will perform your abortion.
Punishments for illegal abortion:
Any woman that gets a late term abortion (24 weeks or more) when their life or health did not require it and if there was no fetal defect should be put to death; that’s murder, and the penalty for murder should be death. Since this is very few people, it’s pragmatic to implement this. The fetus endured pain from that abortion (and it was a lot of pain), and since they had plenty of time to abort beforehand, the proper penalty is the same as stabbing an infant; the death penalty; especially when you can do a c section and be fine; late term abortions of healthy babies without the mother dying without an abortion should be punished with death.
The penalty for illegal abortions that aren’t late term should be a lifetime sales tax imposed upon both genders of the aborted baby equally (10%). These abortions are common so they have to be treated as such.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Putting a price cap on a drug with no subsidy means massive shortages, so there's no free lunch here.
I disagree because the demand for medical drugs is almost perfectly inelastic. Insulin could cost $100 a unit, and people are still going to buy it if they need it.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
@YouFound_Lxam
Anarcho communism is an oxymoron; you can’t have no government and then a government that takes from the productive and gives it to the people that don’t earn a lot.
And communism is evil; it killed 71 million people. Capitalism never killed anybody; people may have died under capitalism, but nobody got killed under capitalism. Capitalism lets a small number of homeless people die. Socialism and the evils of communism and Nazism (Hitler bashed capitalism), killed 100 million people. To be a socialist is to be anti America and pro Russia as America believes in freedom, while Cuba, China, and Russia believe in the opposite; communism. You can call it anarcho communism or state communism, it die matter; it is still an ideology that steals people’s lives and steals people’s assets.
And even America has failed; we should be teaching the horrors of Nazism and communism (very similar ideologies) to our youth to absolutely make sure America does not become a communist society.
America should be the place where woke, communism, socialism, social democracy, and any fiscally left ideology goes to die, because there is freedom, and then there is leftism, the opposite.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
How does lower insulin prices equal corporate welfare? I think there should be price ceilings on drugs and surguries to make them more affordable for the working man.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I’m okay with letting every county decide their own undocumented policy. It’s best to let local solutions work. What works for rural Texas doesn’t have to work for NYC or Fairfield county. Let every county decide its own undocumented policy and the undocumented can move to a county where they are accepted.
But I know some undocumented immigrants in my county that I would not kick out. Roughly 3% of the US population is undocumented; so it’s like deporting the population of Georgia. Just not practical.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Rules are put in place for a reason. If you purposely break them, whether your intentions are good or not, it's still breaking a rule.
So are you okay with the government kicking you out of the country for speeding? After all, you broke the law. You can still drive, just drive legally and below the speed limit.
What happens when a sophisticated group of criminals from Mexico come over the border, and have no documentation.And this wouldn't be a small group, I'm talking about a couple hundred of people, maybe even a thousand.Having no documentation would cause a lot of damage to us.
It depends on the crime that made them criminals. If it’s murder or rape, Mexico would tell us, “You have some of our murderers” (just like what we would do if American murderers fled to Canada). Then you can send them back and I don’t think it violates open borders anymore than someone committing a murder in Nevada, fleeing the state to avoid prosecution, and then the murderer getting deported back to Nevada. All open borders means harmless people are allowed entry into the United States just like harmless people are allowed to cross state lines. It is group justice to prosecute in any way the 11 million undocumented immigrants based on the murders done by 50 or so of them. Group justice is social justice; and SJW justice is woke. America is where women goes to die.
You have to be an American citizen to enjoy your freedoms.Americans have freedoms.Illegal immigrant's don't.
Everyone in the United States provided they didn’t harm anyone else has the unalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That’s why the constitution says, “we the people” and not, “we the citizens”. We the people are pissed.
You can't compare driving 10 mph over the speed limit, to crossing and international border illegally.Your not just breaking American laws, your breaking international laws as well.I think that our law enforcement can determine threats, and if they think the person who was driving 10 mph over the speed limit was being a threat, then they should charge them, but breaking international law is most definitely a threat, and has to be charged.
Speeding is a biggger threat than the undocumented; 30,000 people die per year from speeding; less than 300 people die per year from the undocumented. Being undocumented should be less prosecuted than speeding.
Also The FCE wouldn't be able to take any legal action, because they are the Fondo de Cultura Economica.
Speak English; this is America. If you don’t know English, the solution is google translate; not deportation and the loss of labor and money.
This is obviously ridiculous.If someone makes the decision to drive a car, they are taking the risk that they might get into an accidents whether or not they caused it or not.It's consensual. You are consenting to the possibility that you might crash.
If you’re a child in the backseat, it’s not consensual. A child is way more likely to die in a car accident than they are to get murdered by someone that’s undocumented.
Well with vaccinations it becomes a little weird. The government told us that if we get the vaccine, then we would be safe. Then changed the narrative and said if we don't get the vaccine then others with the vaccine will die.
The government didn’t make that argument. But being unvaccinated makes other people at risk. But those willing to tread on huge amounts of liberty for a false or small sense of safety deserve neither and will lose both. Sic semper tyrannis.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
They can still produce energy that offsets coal energy.
And the politicians want us to pay huge sums for solar power. But they don’t do this themselves. It’s hypocritical.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
We installed solar panels onto our previous property.
You live your values. This is good. But most pro solar people don’t have solar panels.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
Wanting to push people out of the house at 18
I’m 20; I still live with my parents.
I perfer America encouraging people at some point to get their own place so it helps mix up the country and prevent sepratist movements. Its also why America has a very high per capita income compared to the EU.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Do you own solar panels? If not, it’s pretty hypocritical for you to be pro solar for others, but not for yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
I don’t think the standard for adulthood should be based on any age.
If you are living on your own or with a partner, then you’re an adult. Otherwise, you could be 30 and if you live with your parents still, you wouldn’t be an adult with my classification.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
that kind of thinking is what would prevent somebody like him ever getting into power again.can you read between the lines on that
Based; Nazis don’t deserve power.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
People don't obey rules.People don't obey laws either.That doesn't mean we should just take away precautions for people's safety.
We also shouldn’t punish people for breaking the rules either if they don’t harm someone else by doing so, whether it’s not wearing an ID card, speeding 10 mph above the speed limit, or being undocumented.
Let me help you out:Plus the murderer was caught afterward because of drug related charges, not from DNA analysis, and searching for him.They found him because of drugs, and linked him to the murder with DNA. They did not find him simply with just DNA.
Alright; so prosecute JUST that murderer and don’t prosecute any undocumented immigrant for that murder charge.
This is referring to losing freedom for safety. Taking precautions that don't affect the American people is not taking away anyone's freedom.
Deporting people without their consent is taking away their freedom. Those willing to trade liberty for safety deserve neither and will lose both.
But when you have a rise in crime and it’s coming from a source, you have to do your best to take out that source.
You prosecute merely the INDIVIDUAL who did the victim producing crime, not anybody else. Being undocumented is a victimless crime.
It's common knowledge that most people who cross the border illegally aren't going to follow our law.Because they already purposefully decided to break it by crossing the border illegally.The broke our laws even before entering into our country.What do you think they will do when the get in.
You broke the law the last time you decided to drive over the speed limit. But just like with the undocumented, you breaking a victimless law shouldn’t face prosecution (unless your okay with giving $500 to the state every time you drove above the speed limit).
That is Mexican origin population, not immigrant settlement population.
The Mexicans who moved to the US tended to settle where there would be a lot of Mexicans and that was close to Mexico, saving money on transportation. If I wanted to move to New York (I’m from CT), I’d be more likely to move somewhere close to the CT border.
We don't have jurisdiction in Mexico, to go after the cartels.So we have to instead defend our borders from those cartels.
So go after the cartels with FCE; just not undocumented immigrants caught in the crosshairs with ICE.
With cars, it's an individual's decision to drive a car, or live next to a city, so it's different than making a law where the border is not an individual choice.
With cars, many people that die in accidents didn’t cause the accident. Did you watch the video? When one does whatever it takes to save even one human life at the expense of significant amount of liberty, they become authoritarian.
Not being vaccinated against COVID causes some vaccinated people to die. But I’m not going to force people to get vaccinated to save a small number of lives since the freedom treaded upon would be too significant. The undocumented are in the same situation. If you deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants based on 1 murder done by 1 undocumented immigrant, that is group justice/social justice. Social justice is bad.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
If Hitler was in power, the Halocaust would get repeated.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
depends on what his manifesto would be
His manifesto's main content:
Jews are evil
what party he would run for
Doesn't matter. If he's a democrat or republican; I don't want millions of dead Jews, so I'm not voting for him. Parties shouldn't matter.
I'm just going to assume your pro Hitler.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Schools are implementing ID tags because of the Uvalde shooting in Texas. I'm in school right now. I have to wear an ID as well.Identification is for the safety of others and yourself.
At the school I was at, there was a rule that said you had to wear an ID, but nobody ever did. And nobody ever shot up my high school.
"The Biden Administration’s dangerous immigration policies, as well as the soft on crime policies of the 9th Circuit State Attorney’s Office (Orange and Osceola counties), have once again resulted in the needless deaths of innocent Floridians."This article is literally smashing down against open borders.
The argument I made was that if an undocumented immigrant committed murder, it would be easy for the state to prosecute them. Murderers deserve death; deportation is too easy for them.
I am talking about American safety first.
"Those willing to trade liberty for safety deserve neither and will lose both."(Founding fathers).
The economy would get worse actually because of the rise in crime, that we have seen from the border crisis.
Define, "rise in crime". The only things that should be crimes in a country that values liberty are crimes that harm another person. If one undocumented immigrant commits a crime that harms somebody, they ALONE should be prosecuted for it, not every other undocumented immigrant.
Immigrants who want to get away from the Mexican government tend to move further away.
R.0085fcb08899eff0a47eb730373b6013 (1190×774) (bing.com) states the opposite.
American people/citizens, are dying because of Fentanyl coming over the border.
So go after Fentanyl and the INDIVIDUALS that bring it in; not every undocumented immigrant that had nothing to do with fentanyl.
Economic opportunity should not be at the cost of even one American death.
I'm just curious as to how does this argument go. Every single year, over 30,000 Americans die from car accidents. Are we going to ban cars and make people take public transit? No; the economic opportunity of saving all that money on building trans is a tradeoff to 30,000 lives per year; otherwise cars would be banned.
Here is a video you should check out:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
If he was alive today, would I support him? Do you mean for election to political office?
Yes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
If Hitler was alive today, would you support him? Your dodging the question.
I have a positive opinion on Lincoln because he freed the slaves. If he ran for public office today, he might be a democrat ore republican; it doesn't matter to me; he freed the slaves and I like him for that. It doesn't matter if he is dead or alive.
Whether or not someone is alive has no bearing on your opinion of them. If my dad died tomorrow, in a week, I'm going to have a positive feeling about him because he raised me since I was a baby.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
Oh, that's the question.Hitler is dead. So, neither.
You can have opinions about people that are dead.
With all the horrible genocide that Hitler is responsible for, do you or do you not support Hitler?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
You didn't answer the question. Do you or do you not support Hitler?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
same with the ridiculous idea of Hitler 'hating' the masses and the worst one of all, that he was a racist. lies and myths... but sure it's the truth if all you know of him is from quotes and Hollywood. nice one. loving that somebody's dead even though you don't know who he was. sad
Are you pro Hitler?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Fair point, after reading some quotes by Hitler:
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I support the corporal punishment of children and not dogs and here's why:
1) Children can be told why they fucked up. They will understand you. They will take the beating and learn from it. The dog will not. The dog can't speak or understand nearly as much vocabulary as a human. The dog (if beaten) won't know why, won't be able to change course, and would be traumatized from it.
It's kinda like, "If you support giving stressful HW to kids, would you give it to dogs?" Kids can learn much more effectively than dogs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
Adolf Hitler Quotes about Jewish - Lib Quotes is a bunch of Hitler's anti sematic quotes.
I'm glad Hitler is dead and his ideology is only accepted by the fringe of society.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Just like North Korea is the Democratic people's republic of Korea. Is your argument that North Korea is a democracy?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@fivesix
How so? He blamed Jews for the economic problems of Nazi Germany, so the Germans voted to kill the Jews. I don't agree with it, but it's what happened.
Created:
Posted in:
Where I stand on issues - Google Sheets is where I stand on every issue I could think of. I've updated it since last time. I think I changed my stance on transgenderism thanks to YouFoundLxam. I may have changed my stance on a few other issues as well.
If you disagree with anything I said here; feel free to let me know.
Created:
Most left wing voters are against:
1) Fossil Fuels
2) Nuclear energy
When asking them their ideal energy source, they say renewable energy sources. If they REALLY supported renewable energy sources, they would own solar panels if they could afford it. But they don't, implying that they want OTHERS to use solar energy and to pay for panels but they personally don't want solar energy. This seems hypocritical.
Every pro solar politician should be required to buy solar panels out of their $174,000 a year salary if they tell the rest of us to get panels. Otherwise, why should I get solar panels?
I think America with our current population should build 300 more nuclear power plants to provide clean and cheap energy and to make Ameria more energy independent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Save the forests.Save the trees.Fix the climate.Make life better for everyone.Bring world peace.Save the world.Sound like someone you know on the WEF (World Economic Forum)?
Hitler didn't promise these things. He promised death for Jews and the Nazis voted for him. Don't compare left wingers or right wingers to the Nazis.
Being Jewish is freedom.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
To solve the school shooting problem, should we have more security in the schools?
I’d be fine with that, but I don’t think it’s the same. To provide security, all people have to do is walk through a metal detector. No fees equaling thousands of dollars have to be paid every time someone enters the school. An easy solution to mass shootings (that unfortunately my HS hasn’t implemented when I went there). If security costs thousands of dollars every time someone entered the school, that would be bad security. If the security involved just a metal detector, I would support that.
The border crisis right now is proof that we need precautions.
So if the ONLY requirement to come into the US was you couldn’t bring in fetanyl, would you be cool with that? If that was the only requirement to not get deported, the vast majority of the undocumented would show they don’t have fetanyl and be granted citizenship or a green card.
Give me one example of an immigrant with no documentation whatsoever that was caught using DNA analyzation.
https://www.flgov.com/2022/03/30/man-who-brutally-murdered-daytona-beach-couple-during-bike-week-was-an-illegal-immigrant-with-multiple-prior-drug-charges/. If the undocumented murder, they can get caught by our wonderful police and the undocumented should have their head cut off for it; deportation is too easy for them (and too dangerous; they might murder people of their home country).
Now don't get me wrong, it's not that I hate people who want to come to the US, but in the end, it's the American people who come first, and you can't just jeopardize the American people for other nations people.
I would argue my immigration policy is America first because we are able to pay off the debt with a policy that allows anyone who doesn’t bring in fetanyl in the country. I can send you my notes to prove it.
Immigrants tend to move away from the border further into states like Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California.
I don’t think this is true. Mexican immigrants tend to live close to Mexico (just like how Cuban migrants tend to live close to Cuba).
But you have to put into account the coincidence of the border crisis, and the fentanyl crisis, happening at the same time.
In your view, this is the same thing. There is a fetanyl crisis, but I perfer the term, “border economic opportunity”, because of the potential of freedom of movement getting the US out of debt. Here’s the plan:
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I do think this is hypocritical since Schlapp is publicly anti gay. Even if he wasn’t, it’s adultury kind of. It also wasn’t consensual. If he was a democrat who did this, I would call it out for adultury and sexual harassment (not the gay part because the democrats are very pro gay). I hope you would too, but you probably wouldn’t because it hurts your team.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
However, what is special and worthy of observation is the muslim actually uploaded the debate to his channel too, but he blured the woman's face entirely.
If he wants to not look at women because he thinks it’s a sin, that’s his right.
This same muslim argued for death penalty for apostasy in this debate:
I don’t agree with this though. People should be free to be as religious or non religious as they want.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
We have to remove the problem from the U.S. does not do something to chase them.Letting the undocumented in, would do just that.
Making life harder for the 11 million undocumented immigrants based on drug cartels that are out of their control is group justice. Group justice is bad, whether through reperations or deportations. Deporting an undocumented immigrant who did not sell fetanyl won’t help the fetanyl crisis get resolved.
You can't find someone who doesn't exist on any records in the U.S. just by DNA analyzation, and other things.
There have been enough undocumented murderers that have been found (and should be put to death for murder) for me to think that the undocumented can be prosecuted if they harm someone else in the US.
If good people/immigrants really wanted to come to the U.S., they would be willing to go through the paperwork.
A lot of the undocumented can’t afford it because it costs I think tens of thousands of dollars to go through legalization fees and if you don’t have a job to begin with, you can’t afford it. Remove the buerocratic waste, and you will get the undocumented to afford their legalization (which wouldn’t be needed if not required by our many state government). How about let the counties decide their own undocumented policy. An undocumented immigrant can settle in a blue county, afford the legalization fees, get legalized, and settle in any red county?
You talk about immigrants helping to pay off debt, but that won't work unless they are citizens.
They will get jobs as long as they don’t have welfare. I support eliminating welfare for the undocumented 100%.
Not the exact number, but around 60 are red, and 20 are blue.
Most counties that border Mexico vote blue.
How do you explain the fentanyl crisis then?
War on drugs. Making it harder for people to get access to weed has caused them to do to shady dealers to get their weed, which was often laced with fetanyl. If the war on drugs ended, you would get more legal weed, but since the weed is obtained at a drugstore instead of a shady dealer, people get safe weed. This is how Portugal eliminated their drug problem; they let people get safe drugs at regulated stores.
Created: