Total posts: 354
Posted in:
A populist appeals with real issues in society. Whereas little donny fabricates issues and convinces his worshipers that they need fixed.
I wouldn't say he is a conservative or libertarian or a populist but rather just a piece of feces.
Created:
Me personally, i hate when he sucks off his daddy trump in public.
I mean, sir! Please keep it in your intercourse room!!!!!
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Or is it where Charlie Kirk opposes cutting the dicks off of children and turning them into females?
I shall not open any link consisting of charlie dirk running his klappe!
Although i have never heard him talk about children's dicks. I suspect it is something he would say.
His likes have a reputation to opposing inexistent problems. Such as children undregoing sex change operation. A big, brutal and monstrous accusation to his opposite political party.
The fact itself that you believe anything that charlie kirk's pie hole produces tells me a lot about your person.
However, this topic is a question and not an assertion. If you like charlie durk then please consider proposing your rating to his hateability.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
I don't know. Maybe next time you post questions i am gonna like them.
Is that fine with you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Okay mall. After having thought it through, i have come to the conclusion that these questions are not very intellectually engaging.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Could it be that they are just dumb questions?
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Yes. I believed one would get stoned for leaving islam but now i learn that they actually get 3 chances to get back.
You see! You live and you learn!!!
The intensity of the stoning is not relevant here.
What matters to me is the increasing tolerance.
Don't you agree?
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
"Just stone them"How gentle do you believe stoning is?
Relaxy!
I am here to learn
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
Now they ask him 3 times???
That's progress
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
And i though they just stone them
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
Since the apostate gets a chance to return
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
@LucyStarfire
I dont get it. You think death penalty for apostasy is fine?
Less bitter means better not worse. Now i have a better opinion about islam.
Why did you reply to this thread if you are not interested?
who said i am not?
What do you mean?
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
Wowowow that is wholesome!
Thanks for making islam a bit less bitter in my eyes!
I am sure ratman will be furious!!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Do you actually have a basis of your own for co signing?
What does this obnoxious question mean?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Ok so you support orphans that obey their guardians, is that right?
I said i would support orphans money wise. As in a contribution. Support.
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
Ratman talking about apostasy punishment in islam
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
You are so immersed in your arrogance that you haven’t even considered what I pointed out as your mistake. This demonstrates how you are too arrogant to learn anything, you are clueless, you don’t understand what you are talking about, in short, you are stupid and uninformed, and because you are arrogant, you will always be stupid and uninformed. Because you are arrogant, you don’t understand abiogenesis or entropy, and because you are arrogant, you never will.
I am indeed an arrogant.
But i doubt you even knew anything about abiogenesis and entropy before seeing my post.
Considering you hit me with a deepak chopra line and invoked einstein needlessly.
You will get there one day mate.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
It was a physical transition that required a staggering increase in organization and complexity, which, by definition, is a REDUCTION in Entropy. Your hopelessly uninformed assertion that life could have resulted from the maximization of Entropy is about as wrong as any assertion could be. The truth of the matter is the OPPOSITE of your contention.
Yes, that is reduction in entropy. In the future, when all this organization and complexity (which we call life) is extinct, and earth has let away all of its energy. The energy let out will be higher than it would have been if life had not been present on earth.
Which means, earth, as a system, will have been driving towards higher entropy.
Now, it is clear that you just saw something on google about this and just want to argue here without any reason, but do not make it this obvious.
And yes we can have a debate about anything you want anytime.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
LOL, I don’t need to go study anything to recognize that you are blathering pure, uninformed nonsense. You just need to go Google the word entropy again; you really shouldn’t propose theories about abiogenesis and entropy with having a clue about either one.
I did not propose this theory. I found it. It is not nonsense dumbass.
If you do not like it then keep listening to chopradopra and self reflecting consciousness.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
No, I’m rebutting with logic and actual knowledge about the subject matter, but I may as well be trying to play chess with a cat because you don’t understand the first thing about the subject matter.
How does logic invoke eistein in thermodynamics?
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
I said refuting the laws of physics takes us nowhere. You say einstein got a lot of mileage out of it, which is an absurd statement in its own.
He did not refute newton. Have you heard about general relativity? He generalized newton's laws so that we can apply them when studying the universe and not only for earthly settings.
About the 2nd law of thermodynamics, it is not incomplete. it is a well-established and experimented law in physics.
Do you intend to imply here, that philosophy- instead of science- can achieve a big discovery? Or are you still arguing in the context of science?
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Yes, just as anybody with even a cursory understanding of physics knows that, when he refuted Newtonian physics, he completely revolutionized the field.It's how science progresses.
I don't know who that anybody is. Einstein did discover general relativity. He made some newtonian laws more general in the universal sense than they currently were.
He did not refute them, because if he did then we would have been taught the einstein laws of motion at school and not newton's.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Are you serious that einstein got a lot of mileage out of refuting the laws of physics?
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
@LucyStarfire
We did not ruin earth we just made it a bit less habitable. Honest mistake i call that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Do you support anything?
Of course i do. But why support wives who obey their virtuous husbands when i can support the orphans or volunteer at the church or spend my support for something more optimal?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
'Obey' seems a pretty rough word. Let's say children who listen to their parents. I of course agree that a child should listen to his parent. Although i still do not understand why i would have to cheer for him or 'support' him or whatever you mean by this.
Created:
Posted in:
Should wives obey their virtuous husbands?
LOL! just saw this
OBEY TO YOUR VIRTUOUS HUSBAND!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
The exceptions are for those not yet confirmed or without access to confess to a trustworthy Priest yet. They may get to just confess to God and beg.
Rough sentence.
"Check out our cult, maybe you could join or something"
Created:
Posted in:
So long story short, would you or would you not support women in their obedience to their husbands?If you can't support that, speak on it.
Support is not the correct word here. Am i supposed to cheer for her? Would i mind? Not at all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Oh, that's right, Trump is now a Christian. What would Jesus do?
Trump is the new prophet now by consensus.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Of course it is to be challenged. I do not present this as truth.
Although it is science that challenges scientific theories and not philosophy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
Women who declare their intent to be the submissive partner tend to attract men who meet the above description.
A very rough way of putting it but it just might be true
Created:
-->
@n8nrgim
The average person ua pretty stupid and uninformed and half of people are even more stupid and uninformed
Unfortunately i have no other option but to agree with that.
Created:
-->
@LucyStarfire
All other politicians are so bad that he looks good in comparison.
If you mean his administration then yes. He has surrounded himself with people even dumber than him
If you mean the democrats then no. Most of them are genuine politicians. i do not like them that much but they are far better than the reps.
Donny only won with nationalist propaganda. People love that.
Created:
All the right people hate him and the enemy of my enemy is my friend
I am getting confused...
Didn't you support trump?
Are there 2 wylted?
Created:
I dont know what spamming means. That i am posting to much? Or what?
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Sifting order from randomness – from the very beginning, this has been the driving force of life, organizing haphazard collections of molecules and cells into these creatures with their sciences and faiths.
That is correct. Order from ramdomness. The problem is to find out how did order emerge from randomness. That is to be studied. I posted a theory that was interesting. Of course there are other theories even more interesting.
And refuting the laws of physics takes us nowhere
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
@Sidewalker
For zed:
There seems to be a big missunderstanding.
I do not imply that this is the purpose of life or life has a purpose at all.
For sidewalker:
Saying the laws of thermodynamics are incomplete or invoking einstein or self reflective consciousness just lets me understand that you are either some deepak chopra fan or do not know anything about science.
You are just rebutting without making sense.
Of course all matter tends toward higher entropy. That is a well known law of thermodynamics. You cannot changer that.
Evolution does not tell us to look at anything. Evolution just happens. We study it.
I did not say anything about evolution.
I was talking about the emergence of life.
I am glad this topic attracts people, but making just using jargon does not make your rebutals right. You need to understand that it is not the laws of thermodynamics to be challenged; but rather the theory itself.
I am not going to reply to your every sentence.
Here is the theory again:
Life causes earth to waste more of sun's energy. That, in the long run, translates to higher entropy.
The theory says: life may be nothing but the laws of thermodynamics driving this system(earth) towards a higher entropy state. We call it life. Someone calls it self reflective consciousness. That to me does not matter.
I was talking about how it could have emerged.
If you do not agree then okay. Please give me some counterarguments. Go study the theory and then come back. Your arguments which challenge the laws of thermodynamics do not stand. They are well known and tested laws.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Entropyapplies to closed systems
No. entropy applies as a law everywhere. in a closed system entropy never decreases. But in open systems like the earth it is volatile because we have to consider energy inflows from the sun. But entropy takes place. sun is not eternal.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
No, it doesn’t.
Yes it does. The universe and everything in it is driving towards a higher entropy state. the sun will run out of energy some day.
Why on earth would the existence of life result in greaterentropy in the end? Your ideas about therole life plays in the physical process of entropy make no sense at all.
It is not my idea, it is a theory i found interesting. the existence of life makes earth absorb more energy from the sun. in the distant future, When all the energy on earth has spread out in the universe, the earth will have let out more energy than it would have let out without life. Because life absorbs more energy from the sun. Causing the total energy absorbed from earth to increase. When earth decays, it will let out all this energy.
Nope, that isn’t what “higher entropy states” means, itmeans the opposite, greater disorder and the deterioration of complexity in a physicalstate. The second law does nothing whatsoever to explain the emergence ofcomplex chemicals and organic molecules that became the building blocks oflife. The process of “emergence ofaminoacids and other DNA/RNA components “ progressed in direct violation of the2nd law of thermodynamics, they represent an increase in order andcomplexity, violating the expected statistical trend towards greater Entropy
The link i provided was not about entropy. did you even read it? i meant the molecules that form in those conditions (which are explained in the link) might come together as a way of driving towards a higher entropy state. They are not forming life. they are just obeying the laws of thermodynamics. life emerges as a consequence. the second law does not state anything about life. but molecules obey that law. and when transitioning toward higher energy states, they might have given rise to life as we know it. because life is a waste of energy.
.You want to be a little moreexplicit about this preposterous statement, explain how we can be considered an“instrument to increase earth's total entropy”. This I want to see.
Of course it means nothing. it was meant in a figurative way. i did not mean to say that that is our purpose or any religious thing you might think.
I just shared this theory for fun. It is not proven to be true. it is interesting to think about if you are familiar with physics. of course there are other more logical theories to the emergence of life provided by biology. But this one can be countered with more than just religious arguments.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Will you support women that decide to naturally allow their husbands to lead them, guide them and be the head of them for their own good?
Now this question is a bit odd.
Wouldn't we all want someone to lead, guide us and care for our own good?
That's some kind of disney prince fairy tale.
Of course that if you love someone you try to support them and guide them and care for them.
But then the question arises: Does that woman that wants to be carried around really love you?
She might. But why not carry her own as an adult. Why add an unnecessary burden to the person she loves?
What life is even that. That feels like prison.
Why would she want to be led by her man?
Anyway. I think this statement might better appeal to when raising a child.
But even then, it sounds more like a 'love bomb' manipulation technique than a real 'care and guide'.
After a few seconds of thinking this becomes even more absurd: women that NATURALLY allow....
NATURALLY ALLOW?
It sounds like: i am your property. do whatever you want with my life.
I would understand a woman that wants a disney prince. But NATURALLY ALLOW.
The word 'allow' itself makes it sound like she is approving to something forbidden.
And then 'naturally'. What do you mean naturally? That this woman does not take decisions of her own but simply 'naturally' succumbs to that?
I am sorry but i had to analyse this sentence thoroughly.
Created:
It got pretty famous after lynch's death. Absolute failure as a film.
I posted this as a debate before.
Created: