Total posts: 15,922
Posted in:
I don't debate here like I used to so I can't speak on those issues. From the forum side of things, I think it's a bit unique and odd, but like other updates I think I will just adjust over time. There's gonna be Group PM's in the future, making mafia life way easier for the site. I think once we fix some issues it will be an improvement to the site.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Granted, but the parrot can only talk in slurs
I wish to never lose in anything gambling related
I wish to never lose in anything gambling related
Created:
Posted in:
My role allows me to reverse the majority vote of the town within 4 hours of the lynch. I can't confirm it now but I can 100% confirm it next DP if we want
My role talks about how I denied a lot of common majority agenda and followed my own agenda in the state. It's 1 x
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I do not know. 9 votes seems a bit ridiculous and either way, it is not affiliation indicative
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
That's 100% a lie. 9 votes to lynch??? In a game like this?? There's 11 people in the game. That means you'd need either all of town or all of town + 1 scum. Essentially immortal. That seems way too town sided to be an actual role.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
VTL RM
My role is Governor. I am Ron DeSantis
Created:
Posted in:
RM's analysis of Whiteflame is pure comedy because of how bad it is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Ill vote before the Super Bowl. I'm still just trying to decipher some of the post to make a decision
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
No. WF is usually calm and tends to operate with caution
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I had BK on slight scum so I am not opposed. I'll read into it though
Created:
Posted in:
I woke up violently ill on Saturday so I essentially just sat around and didn't have energy. Woke up and checked with 700+ posts . Ill try my best to catch up
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
I was comment on this but I agree with this analysis on SA. However I'm looking for a more emerging pattern in order to fully write them as a scum read because if it really is issues with site connection
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
You tunneled Pie to death in your most recent game you've played and I don't remember the last games you've played before. You can happily link them to me if you would like, but I am not going out of my way to find mafia games you've been in
Created:
Posted in:
Also RM is a special null because I believe his behaviors are more FOS, but if his role is testable and there's reason to believe it confirms affiliation, I am willing to keep him alive
Created:
Posted in:
Overall Reads:
Slight Town:
- Austin: I just believe he is acting noob. His soft claim being more hard char claim seems like something a noob would do
- Whiteflame: For the amount he has contributed, I think he has put valuable and effort time into making and deciphering reads and unlike RM's saying. Whiteflame typical says one thing and then types his reads into another
Null: Whoever is not included in the OP,
FOS: (finger of suspicion)
Best Korea: His gameplan does a complete 180 in this game from last time. Even a new mafia player understands that stats are not good mafia analysis in a RANDOM game
badger: I can write this off as him playing Hogwarts game, but he usually contributes something vs nothing
That1: A bit more active than I've usual seen with short responses that don't effect a lot of the game
Slight Town:
- Austin: I just believe he is acting noob. His soft claim being more hard char claim seems like something a noob would do
- Whiteflame: For the amount he has contributed, I think he has put valuable and effort time into making and deciphering reads and unlike RM's saying. Whiteflame typical says one thing and then types his reads into another
Null: Whoever is not included in the OP,
FOS: (finger of suspicion)
Best Korea: His gameplan does a complete 180 in this game from last time. Even a new mafia player understands that stats are not good mafia analysis in a RANDOM game
badger: I can write this off as him playing Hogwarts game, but he usually contributes something vs nothing
That1: A bit more active than I've usual seen with short responses that don't effect a lot of the game
Created:
Posted in:
Overall thoughts
======
======
- Wylted is not confirmed town by his logic #7
- Wylted pressuring newer players to soft claim. Not an overall fan of his original push but nothing out of the norm
- RM says he has a testable/verifiable role for #26-27. If town is 9-2 or 8-3, the worse scenario we can be in 5-2 or 4-3 in DP3. So I am willing to keep RM alive to verify that his role is confirmable looking at the logistics of the game
- RM's eagerness to vote and claim hunt on #34 stirs me the wrong way. I don't think I have seen RM this hyper aggressive in trying to get lynches off or hunt for lynches
- Austin soft claims in #41. This seems townie, as being forced to soft claim with that amount of info through pressure makes me believe Austin is giving in to town and players when they ask, which is nooby behavior that reads more town than scum
---->As a build to this. My role that Pie gave me correlates to the description that he gave me, so I am a little bit suspicious of that
- B.K has been silent and only gives a 1/22 odds comparison as his only analysis so far, coming off as lazy to me in #55
- B.K sudden shift of statistics is a bit off compared to his last game where he tried to be way more analytical. This switch up leads me to an FOS because as much as you can write this off to noob play, I do not think noobs would rely on statistics in a random sample case
- I am a bit thrown off of RM's persistence to try get a lynch in DP1, considering that when I played with him, he tunneling the living shit out of Pie as town. He seems to be opening up to more lynches as a whole versus sticking to one person, which is deviating from his norms
----->Side note, this is from the one game I've personally played with him, so I am not relying too heavy on that read
- RM says he has a testable/verifiable role for #26-27. If town is 9-2 or 8-3, the worse scenario we can be in 5-2 or 4-3 in DP3. So I am willing to keep RM alive to verify that his role is confirmable looking at the logistics of the game
- RM's eagerness to vote and claim hunt on #34 stirs me the wrong way. I don't think I have seen RM this hyper aggressive in trying to get lynches off or hunt for lynches
- Austin soft claims in #41. This seems townie, as being forced to soft claim with that amount of info through pressure makes me believe Austin is giving in to town and players when they ask, which is nooby behavior that reads more town than scum
---->As a build to this. My role that Pie gave me correlates to the description that he gave me, so I am a little bit suspicious of that
- B.K has been silent and only gives a 1/22 odds comparison as his only analysis so far, coming off as lazy to me in #55
- B.K sudden shift of statistics is a bit off compared to his last game where he tried to be way more analytical. This switch up leads me to an FOS because as much as you can write this off to noob play, I do not think noobs would rely on statistics in a random sample case
- I am a bit thrown off of RM's persistence to try get a lynch in DP1, considering that when I played with him, he tunneling the living shit out of Pie as town. He seems to be opening up to more lynches as a whole versus sticking to one person, which is deviating from his norms
----->Side note, this is from the one game I've personally played with him, so I am not relying too heavy on that read
Created:
Posted in:
I have a long list of reads im typing out btw. I'm on page 3 and rn I have an FOS on BK
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
Gonna read this DP to see if I pick up on anything
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Granted, but the bagel is moldy and has raisins instead of chocolate chips
Created:
Jordan is still #1. To never lose a final, be the main undisputed #1 guy, better statistical averages in the playoffs, and facing defense that were 100% tougher with less restrictions and where defense thrived, and the average player was a good-->great defender in today's game
Created:
I have him over Kobe because it can be argued that for the first 3 championships, Shaq was the main guy in LA and Kobe #2. LeBron was clear #1 for all his appearances, so I say that he is better than Kobe in that regard + longevity. Kobe was washed in his last season while LeBron is still averaging ridiculous numbers
Created:
-->
@Athias
Yes. I have him as #2 on my all time ranking. No matter what, LeBron is 40% in NBA finals.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Pie quick lynched because he faked Watcher. He voted and so me and mhar just hammered to win. Not rlly other town fault
Created:
Posted in:
Bears:
Drafted Justin Fields. Surrounded themselves with a young core. Still a great team that drafted amazingly this year offensively. Amazing defensively. Potential division champions if Fields pans outYet to see. New management is OK and while Fields has looked rough, he had a good game vs the Vikings
Fields has become the future. A lot of potential
Bulls:
New management. Acquired Lonzo Ball, Demar DeRozan, and other assests. New starting 5...Lonzo BallDemar DerozanDemar RozanPatrick WilliamsNikola VucevicAlso Caruso and Coby White are on the bench.Aged like fine wine. Still one of the best teams in the league with some nice young pieces
And then it aged like milk. Lonzo is mysteriously hurt, the team is 10th and barely play in. Win vs good teams but lose to bad teams. Not a good team where the GM =/= trade
Blackhawks:
Just acquired Venzina winning goalie Marc Andre Fleury from the Golden Knights. Also acquired Seth Jones from the Blue Jackets (though he was overpayed). They could make a playoff push this year with some of the key core still in tactAged as well as milk
Aged even worse. #1 pick potential
White Sox:One of the best teams in baseball right now with a 62-44 record. There roster includesC. Yasmani Grandal1B. Jose Abreu2B. Cesar HernandezSS. Tim Anderson3B. Yoan MoncadaLF. Eloy JimenezCF. Luis Robert (when healthy)/Brian GoodwinRF. Adam EngelDH. Gavin SheetsTheir pitching is looking insane as wellLance LynnCarlos RodonLucas GiolitoDallas KeuchelDyan CeaseOh and their bullpen is arguable the best in the MLBLiam HendriksCraig KimbrelGarrett CrochetAaron BummerRyan TeperaMichael KopechFuck Tony La Russa. Bad year with injuries in 2022 and had incompetent managing, and then they lost to the Stros the year I made that post
RIP Jose, couple of nice pieces added too with La Russa gone. It's gonna be a 50/50. Kimbrel gone too
The only team that is in rebuild mode is the Cubs and they got a good return for their plays for the most partChicago might be a big sports city in 2020's
Created:
Posted in:
This NFL year was so weird. I think I was so bad at predictions this year
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tarik
They’re the New York Giants FYI.
They play in New Jersey though (i should clarify the sarcasm w/ me saying the NJ Giants)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Tbh sometimes it's just best to not big brain and play by the book. He also had no clue that scum didn't have any roles and we 100% knew. I said in the discord but I don't rlly think what you did was "scumslip" but it does lurk some suspicion because even if I were to self insert myself as town, I still would've been hesitant to vote you because of your analysis
Created:
Posted in:
So now we are at an impass. I was fully expecting Pie to say "I was role blocked," which then I would 100% be willing to vote him. But he does have a result. I'm still skeptical about his role though, considering we have a cop already. My theory is that Pie is a 3P and trying to get a lynch so he can win with the mafia, but to lynch over what I believe is a theory might just be plain useless
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Ill eventually VTNL later when I get back from a meeting, and even if I don't no lynch is going to happen anyway. Why are you rushing to vtnl when only 5 hours are left?I haven’t even voted…I’ve said we need to talk it out and VTNL eventually.
Yet you are pressuring a vtnl vote out of me???
I never said I wasn't going to vtnl, I did say that unless there is some VERY damning evidence against a players that is greater than a scumslip, I will not be changing my voteThat is false. You said: “Mhar is scum because of scumslip and I am not going to remove my vote on him this DP because this is a clear scumslip on his end.
At the beginning of the DP I said this because it is the beginning of the DP and I am not going to remove a vote on what I consider a scumslip. This means my vote will not be placed on anyone but Mharman as a person. Not on the VTNL in of itself
Why are you lying?
I didn't lie thought. I never once removed my vote for Mharman this DP. I will end up switching it to vtnl but that is not changing my read on Mhar. If town wanted to suddenly lynch Mhar I would vote Mhar. But my vote is not on someone else. VTNL'ing =/= voting for someone else
Did I remove my vote at all this DP?
Created:
Posted in:
Here are my reads. I will vtnl after my meeting (so around 7:30ish est) as that is simply the best thing for town to do at this point besides lynching Mharman.
Town
Earth
Lean Town
Lean Town
Luna
Slight Scum
Slight Scum
Austin
Scum
Mhar
Pie
I stated my reasonings as my belief into why I think Pie is scum and I already stated my reasons as for Luna
Earth being an un CC'd cop is a 9 person is essentially town confirmation
Luna analysis of Austin has been consistent and his overall behavior is a town lean. From DP1 behavior to the overall play. Gives insightful reads and analysis but is not overly active, it's town lean
Austin is my wild card. Tbh I could 100% see Austin being scum over Pie. Austin knowing a lot more about the game and proclaiming to be a noob at the start, the self defense of Luna requesting to lynch him, but at the same time, his behavior and reactions at a glance would highly suggest him just being "rusty." But I am also not throwing out the idea that Wylted put 1 town "noob" and one "rusty" player on opposite teams, but I am not banking on that logic
Pie
I stated my reasonings as my belief into why I think Pie is scum and I already stated my reasons as for Luna
Earth being an un CC'd cop is a 9 person is essentially town confirmation
Luna analysis of Austin has been consistent and his overall behavior is a town lean. From DP1 behavior to the overall play. Gives insightful reads and analysis but is not overly active, it's town lean
Austin is my wild card. Tbh I could 100% see Austin being scum over Pie. Austin knowing a lot more about the game and proclaiming to be a noob at the start, the self defense of Luna requesting to lynch him, but at the same time, his behavior and reactions at a glance would highly suggest him just being "rusty." But I am also not throwing out the idea that Wylted put 1 town "noob" and one "rusty" player on opposite teams, but I am not banking on that logic
Created:
Posted in:
Ill eventually VTNL later when I get back from a meeting, and even if I don't no lynch is going to happen anyway. Why are you rushing to vtnl when only 5 hours are left?
I never said I wasn't going to vtnl, I did say that unless there is some VERY damning evidence against a players that is greater than a scumslip, I will not be changing my vote
I never said I wasn't going to vtnl, I did say that unless there is some VERY damning evidence against a players that is greater than a scumslip, I will not be changing my vote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Your post contradicts what you said in dp1
"of a 3v2 instead of a 4v2."
This is under the assumption that u knew badger was gonna flip town. You also said he was your second scum read, so you still actively voted against him despite this statement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Now you are lying. I am not asking you to vote nor did I ever suggest for you to vote. I am voting who I believe is the top scum candidate. You are not reading
Created: