Total posts: 9,115
Posted in:
Savant was not lynched for behavioral reasons last game honestly. It helped confirm mharman and was practical for a few more reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
but I could see him avoiding doing the percentage thing as scum largely because it would be hard to fake. I feel like it would require more effort as scum.
Before this game started me and Pie said on the phone that he can't keep that up if he is scum and that we should probably just lynch him the second he abandons that just to be safe
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Here was never a registered democrat, you're either being manipulated or you're lying.
Yeah he was too young to register to vote prior to the 2024 election but he gave money to the democratic party.
To claim that somehow every left wing minded individual Isa part of this is beyond stupid.
Nobody claimed this but I am on Twitter so i know how much most of you celebrate political violence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
That's a secret bro but I agree. And his reads look surprisingly good
Unvote VTL savant
It's my tradition to lynch savant dp1
Created:
Posted in:
I think the main issue is no justification from RM but more importantly asking Casey to visit him
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
If it's unlimited I always want to claim it's x shot to prevent my death and if it's x shot I always want to claim unlimited to draw the NK.
I would rather just not say anything at all since scum is getting better and they are smart enough to assume the opposite of what I say now.
If it comes down to helping more accurately read RM for me to put that information I will but if it's not going to help them I would just rather not
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
To clarify my role. I invite somebody to my chat and we get to investigate a person collectively. It isn't called a mason in my PM. I don't die if I choose scum I just basically give scum too much power to choose to misdirect the investigation target if I fuck up.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Bro no I am legit getting an investigation off tonight and it doesn't even matter because me and Pie both get the results so it can't be stopped. It's why I don't mind claiming. DP2 the scum pool should be narrow as fuck unless pie is scum but I town read him which is why I put him in the chat
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
If Mikal's town I think he's gonna carry, so I'm fine sheeping him. If he's wrong twice (or maybe once), I'll be fine going after him.
It's one thing to sheep somebody you town read but this is silly
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
I think there is a pretty solid 50/50 with him or rm though
We agreed. If somebody claims cop you lynch RM
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
This is as far as I break it down
---
You are Balgruuf, Jarl of Whiterun — a pragmatic leader who sides with the Imperials when it protects your city. Recognizing trusted allies means you get to make somebody your thane to help you choose investigative targets.
---
You are Balgruuf, Jarl of Whiterun — a pragmatic leader who sides with the Imperials when it protects your city. Recognizing trusted allies means you get to make somebody your thane to help you choose investigative targets.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
The name of the role is deputizer but it sounds like it's legit both things
Created:
Posted in:
I appoint a player as my thane because I am good at finding allies or something
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Balgruuf-
Apparently I always end up choosing the right side.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Are you claiming mason?
A cop mason and a chat invite was just sent for somebody to confirm me if they choose
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
If there is a cop I have serious questions for him
I am a cop and I can prove it because it allows me to add somebody to a PM to help me choose a target.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Sure. So who ccs me as investigative?
Your ability is 1x . Nobody with an investigative role is coming out
Created:
Posted in:
That's fucking absurd. 1x dreamer and you ask Casey to visit.
Created:
Posted in:
That was honestly a reaction test but the panic from AR is definitely scummy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
We already got scum. No need to explain yourself we don't even need this dp to play out . Let's deny scum information and just lynch
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Adaptable ratman
For buddying Casey and being obvious scum.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
That's exactly why only moderates were targeted for attack. If the no kings flyers and close relations with Waltz wasn't a hint just look at the targets. Liberals who were moderates. I hardcore conservative would target far left loonies
Created:
The economic freedom index is how I defend my world view and the results of being anti freedom are apparent in Venezuela, North Korea and China.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
By "they" you mean one deranged conservative kid who researched killing multiple celebrities before landing on Trump, and another conservative who was deciding between supporting Vivek Ramaswamy or Nikki Haley?
The kid switched parties to vote for Nikki Haley to vote against trump. A relatively easy process while actually committing his hard earned dollars to the democratic party . I don't know why you think trump supporters are tying to murder trump or what type of weird cope that is.
The other guy had a bunch of Ukrainian contacts and even discussed with Ukrainian official plans to buy a surface to air missile to target Trump's planes.
Besides Nikki Haley is a Democrat. we know the Democrats are fascist and Nikki Haley openly supported a plan to eradicate internet anonymity by requiring everyone online to be IDed for every site they visit.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Far more of a Catholic than Trump.
Well Trump is a protestant so.......
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Wasn't Biden supposedly Catholic himself?
Yes probably a Jesuit so not really.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
It's a trend people have noticed even to the point of the Biden administration having FBI field offices label Catholics as radicals and an internal threat.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
It's the only branch of Christianity that honestly doesn't ask you to shut off your brain. It also makes you a part of something immortal and unchanging (theoretically).
It's also the fact that everything branches off of Catholicism as far as Christianity is concerned so you start realizing the only argument anyone has for not being heretical is the Orthodox
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Lying is not a bannable offense. Barney asked me to keep extravagant lies in the COC for edge cases but let's say it was in the official COC which is currently unlisted. Lying by definition requires intent. It is an intentional act of deception. Obvious jokes lack intent as does obvious mistakes.
Created:
Posted in:
WTF did you really think savant was multi accounting as literally every user?
Created:
Posted in:
The only one I heard of us Skyrim but since I don't know shit about any of this I have no preference and in
Created:
Posted in:
Savants role was not town confirmed. What is that dude talking about. Its potentially a very good fake claim.
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
He was appointed by time waltz, the police discovered flyers for no kings and he was involved with a group helping African refugees
He also targeted moderate Democrats most likely to break party lines instead of far left Democrats like a Republican would
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
So ypu trust every conspiracy theory except that Trump and Blackrock worked together to arrange the shooter to aim to perfectly miss Trump?
Given how much black rock contributes to liberal causes I would think that's a little silly also the precision to hit the ear would be crazy but good on that kid to sacrifice his life to make a shot that perfectly anticipated Trump's head movement to take his ear off.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
The shooter was a Democrat who left no kings flyers. It doesn't surprise me it's coming from that side. They also tried to kill trump
Created:
Yeah they attempted it with Trump so anything he does is really fair game. Don't want to be assassinated don't be a part of the team that does assassinations
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
So even though anti freedom initiatives always end bad you think the problem is the leaders being focused on revenge and if they focused on other stuff than maybe just maybe it would end up different despite all historical evidence to the contrary and the more free modern societies being the most just and economically advantages in modern times.
Well I would say thank God we have people like you who do not divide the world into victim and bullies and who would never seek to abuse your power to go after oppressors.
Hopefully the next Hitler that you will inevitably support because those types hate freedom will also be focused on their utopia and their attacks on freedom won't be motivated by revenge but be motivated by altruism which humans are really fucking good at.
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
That sort of anti freedom perspective always ends up in Nazi Germany, North Korea current Venezuela etc. It is never different and in every society that anti freedom initiatives like that occur than it always turns into those things. There is zero exceptions to that rule. Now that you know there is zero exceptions to that rule, you know precisely what you are advocating for, so cut it out
Created:
We can form a community that dares not disrespect each other for they are tamed and loving or we can be a community freedom-first abusers.
It's actually possible to value freedom and be respectful. We don't have to turn into Nazi Germany and have control issues to have respect be a thing. This is a silly dichotomy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Pie then banana and win is definite. Do not be gay next DP and even discuss alternatives unless the alternative is the order of those 2 but scum is very narrow
Created:
Posted in:
Scum would jump on my lynch with 2 votes so it confirms scum is already on the wagon BTW. earth is probably town just naive. And banana isn't on which explains why the lynch is slow going .
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
The difference is one tries to explain why something happens and find a solution even.
The other is said solely to offend and incite hatred.
What do the stoics say? You strip the beauty from it so you can approach it logically. The second statement doesn't offer a solution it just softens what you are saying.
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
So when you run around ridiculing black people, using N word and saying they never ever contributed a lot to science that is not racist?Whereas when I go no, some did but here is why it has wound up being less common for them to excel at it, that is more vindictive?
My statements are generalizations and do not contradict your statement that it was less common due to the racism of the time or lack of opportunities given the environment many found themselves in. You use rhetoric that is less offensive but they both mean the same thing.
There is literally no difference between the following two statements
1. Niggers commit a lot of crime
2. due to high levels of poverty and the mentality of many black people who see a lack of opportunity, crime is often seen as a reasonable option.
Both statements also lead to the same conclusion. We need to create opportunity for these populations and create environments that foster hope and reward good citizenship. Like I said both statements mean exactly the same thing.
Why do you reply to several messages and only choose 3 sentences maxinum each time to reply to rather than the core of what I said and clarify your own stance.
Yes sorry about that. When I do that I am hoping I am addressing the core of what you are saying and not tidbits that are irrelevant. The truth is my time is extremely limited. I am moving, doing college at least 5 hours a day and working about 10 hours a day. I was just in the comment section of a debate where somebody was writing 10k word essays complete with APA citations and things like that are just too much to keep up with. I will see if I can come up with a way to be more thorough so I am not disrespecting the conversation
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
said the terrain and ecosystem whites had to evolve in pressured them to work better as teams. It also then led to innovation and more sophisticated language.
This is literally the premise scientific racism starts with as an explanation for racial differences.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I think the fact that you have openly used the word n*ggers to refer to black people on this site quite recently makes that clear.
Why would a specific combination of sounds be more important to you than whats in somebody's heart? Are you some sort of nigger or something? You know I have black friends that call me cracker and yet I still don't nig out about it. You have to be bigger than that.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Whether your movement qualifies as a fascist movement is irrelevant to whether you succeed in cancelling an election genius.
This is why you are low IQ.
Imagine me saying fascist movements have to pretend to not be fascist until they cancel elections and then somebody being enough of a brainlet to say that somehow means I am stating a group isn't fascist.
Created:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
What do all those traits women seek in men they want as life partners imply they feel even about themselves, let alone men?
I think what you are feeling and what a lot of people are feeling is that leadership = superior
Men are stronger naturally so yes they are meant to fight to defend the women they live if it comes to that and a lot of the payment if failure comes from men so they lead the household but my wife has domains she leads in. If she is cooking and yells at me to do something to help her, I jump to it. So the leadership is split a lot just we as a society are kinda sexist so we value the contributions that men are better at giving more.
Equality isnt gained by making women men but with tits, it is obtained by putting what they are best at on a pedastool. Men are stronger not better in fact it is my opinion we are inferior but also stronger etc.
Created:
I think I am a bit sexist so I cannot answer about sexism.
It doesn't make you sexist to realize men and women have different strengths and weaknesses. If you don't see them as inferior and hold a special place for them in your heart than you are fine
Created: