I have seen a few things like that come out that seem fake. That probably is as well. The o ly real leak I have heard of is one of the victims parents who saw the tapes made a secret recording in front of police without them noticing and then he played the clio in church I believe. I know that regardless of what ORO thinks the FBI has copies. It is still co sided an ongoing investigation and that judge has no authority to make them destroy their copy which they will neither confirm. Or deny they have. There is the common sense angle that the FBI would have copies or originals of the same evidence the local cops had since they were also conducting their own investigation, but there is evidence that multiple copies of each tape were made
You don't know what you are talking about LOL. First of all, all studies show correlation. Causation is something that is pretty much unprovable, but correlation does suggest causation many times. I think the whole causation does not equal correlation argument I the face of good evidence is just a technique to try and wave the evidence away without critically examining it. You are also wrong about sociopaths. People can be born without much capacity for empathy. In fact that is pretty much 100% of babies. All babies are sociopaths. So to say you can't be born one is silly. Not all sociopaths have antisocial conduct nor do all psychopaths though all people with antisocial personality disorder are pretty much at the least low level sociopaths. The DSM5 has left out the word sociopath but I am not talking about aspd like the term seems conflated with lately. I am referring to people who lack the ability to have empathy like normal humans do.
The debate is dead. It is okay to derail the section. I don't blame his parents. I would hope to sink into obscurity after something like that. I also think Dylan was a troubled teen but Eric Harris was a malevolent sociopath. Most of them are too self centered to intentionally ruin their life with a mass shooting but he had something unique about him. Also don't go to Starbucks tomorrow. I think you are pretty cool
I have no doubt some of that would exist. I think one of their moms did a Ted talk if that interests you. I think that there should be more openness by the government and I am okay accepting the increased danger of doing that when those things arise. Basically I want to see those fucking tapes. I'm sure they would bore me but I dig into these cases. Sometimes watching 12 hour interrogations in the public domain, or watching and reading through trial transcripts. I am so pissed I can't get into their heads. A transcript which we have no evidence is even legit and unaltered does not help me. As far as the personality of Eric Harris. I think it is the typical sociopathic personality. Those close to him may become susceptible to it but not over a video. The info provided in the video is also useless and easily obtained in the anarchist cookbook which they pulled it from themselves.
destroyed the question is, if high IQ people have a stated reason that is wrong, does that mean they are lying about the stated reason? I say it most likely has to mean that.
I think that is the stated reason, but they are wrong. This type of thing needed to be studied so we can fix the problem, but whoever decided to destroy them is likely responsible for several mass shootings because of what could have been learned to prevent these things was destroyrd.
I have never heard of that definition for ethical. I have used it as a synonym for moral, and yes depending on who I steal from, I would consider it ethical.
Most of my spare time is spent studying shit related to ethical hacking or programming at the moment, so I can at some point get a real job making 6 figures or use my skills to steal 6 figures a year
What does the Torah commanding you take care of the needy have to do with supporting policies that force others to do so. Show me where the Torah says to force your neighbor to give to the needy.
I hate how white people commit so much crime. I don't feel safe walking through white neighborhoods where there are people openly dealing drugs and lots of gang activity. Even though I am white. I try to stay in the ghetto because it is safer and virtually crime free.
He is trying to prove that the liberally biased FBI (as we can see from their attempted takedown of Trump), are lying about the crime statistics they collect, despite the fact their is a paper trail that would mean 10,000 or more providers of the information are lying.
No, voting is not about opinion, LOL. It is about weighing the arguments in an unbiased mamner to fairly judge a debate. You have cheated by not doing so. Your identity is now cheater instead of fair voter.
The whole reason I may not is because even if the debate is close, I have to win by a large margin to win. I am already a clear winner in the debate on this I just finished and I am getting people trying to justify points against me. It is sad people can not weigh arguments fairly. just because they disagree with one side.
I might consider it if we could do a judge debate, get two people to agree to judge, I know will be fair and have a very small character limit
No, I have always prodded in the comment section to test for how an opponent thinks, to better defeat them. This is the psychological warfare component of debate. I now realize you are one of those annoying opponents who wastes space complaining about the feasibility of a plan when it really is more important that you consider the impacts of a plan, seeing as how judges could give a shit less about feasibility. That's why idiots who argue for abolishing the electoral college or setting term limits can still win debates, because feasibility is not considered.
What is with you always doubting the FBI has shit. They have the basement tapes jerk. They made a copy because they assisted in the investigation and needed their own copy and some local retard judge who wants us not to be able to investigate the cause of mass shootings by examining the basement tapes, did not and could not order the FBI to erase their copy. It is still considered an open investigation so the FBI will not confirm or deny the existence of the tapes or any other columbine facts but common sense tells us they have them. This is why I hate debate. Do you know how many fucking characters it will take to prove they have child porn. You are a dick for raising that objection. Also how much time did you spend digging into this shit. i wanted a relaxing debate not one I had to put work into
I am sorry. I have bipolar disorder and entered a depressed phase where I laid in bed almost catatonic. I was also recovering from a bunch of bad decisions I made while manic, like quitting my job and playing poker like 20 hours a day and having pockets full of cash, which allowed me to live in fancy hotels and fuck multiple veautiful women, and do some really fun drugs. That shit was fun until I had to face my wife and kid while needing pampered and having to fight my way back to a respectable income level, which is where I am at. I would love a rematch, but I definitely want the debate deleted if you can find it in your heart. I was 100% responsible for my situation but I would still appreciate some pity here.
You need to call me master in the debate or I can't give you the free vote. Just call me master in the next round, and I won't be forced to punish you. Just do as you are told Kunta Kinte
Yes I did. I could argue the con position as well, and think the con position is less abstract giving it an advantage, but I have a legitimate interest in addressing the massive injustices caused by allowing people to plea bargain
Most of your shit revolves around insulting law enforcement and calling blue lives matter a scam. If you want to debate a clear resolution on that, than I will gladly take con to show why you need to grow a brain and stop blindly believing the anti American propaganda you read without critical judgement
Anyone studying the history of the party knows why this is the case. It was a party created not for any moral beliefs but merely to pander to enough groups to get power. It was only formed to gain power
Yes, but I obviously will keep my opinions on what is wrong with tjis to myself. I do support making sex dolls of children available and other similar things based on the arguments in this debate, but would be against the FBI hosting a child porn website.
They pretend like they are pro homosexual but they are supportive of Muslims who disproportionately believe that Gays should be stoned to death and institute the policy when they are the majority of a nation.
Their politicians make it easier for kids to be removed from their homes and placed in foster care, but they made sure to put me in an abusive foster home. Destroying the argument thay they give two shits about kids. Kids are still to this day abused in the system
Their senators ban guns but have personal security which is armed keeping them safe from the negative effects of their policies. They pretend like they want business out of government but pander to big business by making policies that harm small businesses and increase the market share of their much bigger competitors.
They also pretend to care about the poor for example but oppose Laisse Faire capitalism which would almost entirely wipe out poverty. I could go on and on.
For example they pretwnd kike the are friendly towards blacks but support abortions that disproportionately kill blacks, support minimum wage increases which disproportionately cause blacks to lose jobs at a higher rate than whites and they support a welfare state incentivizing black couples not to get married and as a result the traditional family structure is less common in black communities causing more black single mothers with their children feeling the effects.
I watched beheadings and killed a man, I think I will be fine. Then again. 2 guys one hammer I actually had to turn off and couldn't watch
I have seen a few things like that come out that seem fake. That probably is as well. The o ly real leak I have heard of is one of the victims parents who saw the tapes made a secret recording in front of police without them noticing and then he played the clio in church I believe. I know that regardless of what ORO thinks the FBI has copies. It is still co sided an ongoing investigation and that judge has no authority to make them destroy their copy which they will neither confirm. Or deny they have. There is the common sense angle that the FBI would have copies or originals of the same evidence the local cops had since they were also conducting their own investigation, but there is evidence that multiple copies of each tape were made
You don't know what you are talking about LOL. First of all, all studies show correlation. Causation is something that is pretty much unprovable, but correlation does suggest causation many times. I think the whole causation does not equal correlation argument I the face of good evidence is just a technique to try and wave the evidence away without critically examining it. You are also wrong about sociopaths. People can be born without much capacity for empathy. In fact that is pretty much 100% of babies. All babies are sociopaths. So to say you can't be born one is silly. Not all sociopaths have antisocial conduct nor do all psychopaths though all people with antisocial personality disorder are pretty much at the least low level sociopaths. The DSM5 has left out the word sociopath but I am not talking about aspd like the term seems conflated with lately. I am referring to people who lack the ability to have empathy like normal humans do.
No amount of parenting skill can make a malevolent sociopath no longer a sociopath.
The debate is dead. It is okay to derail the section. I don't blame his parents. I would hope to sink into obscurity after something like that. I also think Dylan was a troubled teen but Eric Harris was a malevolent sociopath. Most of them are too self centered to intentionally ruin their life with a mass shooting but he had something unique about him. Also don't go to Starbucks tomorrow. I think you are pretty cool
I have no doubt some of that would exist. I think one of their moms did a Ted talk if that interests you. I think that there should be more openness by the government and I am okay accepting the increased danger of doing that when those things arise. Basically I want to see those fucking tapes. I'm sure they would bore me but I dig into these cases. Sometimes watching 12 hour interrogations in the public domain, or watching and reading through trial transcripts. I am so pissed I can't get into their heads. A transcript which we have no evidence is even legit and unaltered does not help me. As far as the personality of Eric Harris. I think it is the typical sociopathic personality. Those close to him may become susceptible to it but not over a video. The info provided in the video is also useless and easily obtained in the anarchist cookbook which they pulled it from themselves.
destroyed the question is, if high IQ people have a stated reason that is wrong, does that mean they are lying about the stated reason? I say it most likely has to mean that.
I think that is the stated reason, but they are wrong. This type of thing needed to be studied so we can fix the problem, but whoever decided to destroy them is likely responsible for several mass shootings because of what could have been learned to prevent these things was destroyrd.
Sounds like an easy way to justify pretty much anything. Well I had good intentions. As long as my intentions are good,I can do whatever I want.
I have never heard of that definition for ethical. I have used it as a synonym for moral, and yes depending on who I steal from, I would consider it ethical.
Most of my spare time is spent studying shit related to ethical hacking or programming at the moment, so I can at some point get a real job making 6 figures or use my skills to steal 6 figures a year
I actually enjoy playing devil's advocate. I just overestimated how much free time I had
What does the Torah commanding you take care of the needy have to do with supporting policies that force others to do so. Show me where the Torah says to force your neighbor to give to the needy.
I hate how white people commit so much crime. I don't feel safe walking through white neighborhoods where there are people openly dealing drugs and lots of gang activity. Even though I am white. I try to stay in the ghetto because it is safer and virtually crime free.
He is trying to prove that the liberally biased FBI (as we can see from their attempted takedown of Trump), are lying about the crime statistics they collect, despite the fact their is a paper trail that would mean 10,000 or more providers of the information are lying.
Determinism also popped right into my head, but thought of the same problem. I hate that I am less creative than I think
No, voting is not about opinion, LOL. It is about weighing the arguments in an unbiased mamner to fairly judge a debate. You have cheated by not doing so. Your identity is now cheater instead of fair voter.
The whole reason I may not is because even if the debate is close, I have to win by a large margin to win. I am already a clear winner in the debate on this I just finished and I am getting people trying to justify points against me. It is sad people can not weigh arguments fairly. just because they disagree with one side.
I might consider it if we could do a judge debate, get two people to agree to judge, I know will be fair and have a very small character limit
These debates only arguments get weighed. Please stop trying to game the system to cheat so the side you agree with wins.
Paywalls are easy to get around for studies. Most colleges and libraries give you access to those for free, but yes they are a bit of a problem
10,000 is fair
No, I have always prodded in the comment section to test for how an opponent thinks, to better defeat them. This is the psychological warfare component of debate. I now realize you are one of those annoying opponents who wastes space complaining about the feasibility of a plan when it really is more important that you consider the impacts of a plan, seeing as how judges could give a shit less about feasibility. That's why idiots who argue for abolishing the electoral college or setting term limits can still win debates, because feasibility is not considered.
Make it 7000 characters and I will accept. 30000 is absurd
What is with you always doubting the FBI has shit. They have the basement tapes jerk. They made a copy because they assisted in the investigation and needed their own copy and some local retard judge who wants us not to be able to investigate the cause of mass shootings by examining the basement tapes, did not and could not order the FBI to erase their copy. It is still considered an open investigation so the FBI will not confirm or deny the existence of the tapes or any other columbine facts but common sense tells us they have them. This is why I hate debate. Do you know how many fucking characters it will take to prove they have child porn. You are a dick for raising that objection. Also how much time did you spend digging into this shit. i wanted a relaxing debate not one I had to put work into
I am sorry. I have bipolar disorder and entered a depressed phase where I laid in bed almost catatonic. I was also recovering from a bunch of bad decisions I made while manic, like quitting my job and playing poker like 20 hours a day and having pockets full of cash, which allowed me to live in fancy hotels and fuck multiple veautiful women, and do some really fun drugs. That shit was fun until I had to face my wife and kid while needing pampered and having to fight my way back to a respectable income level, which is where I am at. I would love a rematch, but I definitely want the debate deleted if you can find it in your heart. I was 100% responsible for my situation but I would still appreciate some pity here.
If you have an ounce of pride, you will delete this debate and not accept the free win,
It took a while to get there, it was a good dramatic conclusion
I would ask your mom, but she is on her knees in front of me.
My cotton needs some picking, do you know anybody who would be willing to help?
I have not insulted you, please do not insult me. Also refer to me as master, okay boy.
You need to call me master in the debate or I can't give you the free vote. Just call me master in the next round, and I won't be forced to punish you. Just do as you are told Kunta Kinte
Yes
Thank you for clarifying so I could understand your reasoning
Didn't he give the exact same reasoning as ragnar? Just worded differently for sources. This seems like a stretch
Yes I did. I could argue the con position as well, and think the con position is less abstract giving it an advantage, but I have a legitimate interest in addressing the massive injustices caused by allowing people to plea bargain
I just wanted your personal opinion, jerk.
Any chance you would do this debate again. It should be easy for you since your first round is already written?
Please address whether my arguments are relevant or not.
Most of your shit revolves around insulting law enforcement and calling blue lives matter a scam. If you want to debate a clear resolution on that, than I will gladly take con to show why you need to grow a brain and stop blindly believing the anti American propaganda you read without critical judgement
Which would make the healthcare system worse proving my point that it is not abput helping people get better healthcare
Anyone studying the history of the party knows why this is the case. It was a party created not for any moral beliefs but merely to pander to enough groups to get power. It was only formed to gain power
Yes, but I obviously will keep my opinions on what is wrong with tjis to myself. I do support making sex dolls of children available and other similar things based on the arguments in this debate, but would be against the FBI hosting a child porn website.
They pretend like they are pro homosexual but they are supportive of Muslims who disproportionately believe that Gays should be stoned to death and institute the policy when they are the majority of a nation.
Their politicians make it easier for kids to be removed from their homes and placed in foster care, but they made sure to put me in an abusive foster home. Destroying the argument thay they give two shits about kids. Kids are still to this day abused in the system
Thank you
Their senators ban guns but have personal security which is armed keeping them safe from the negative effects of their policies. They pretend like they want business out of government but pander to big business by making policies that harm small businesses and increase the market share of their much bigger competitors.
They also pretend to care about the poor for example but oppose Laisse Faire capitalism which would almost entirely wipe out poverty. I could go on and on.
For example they pretwnd kike the are friendly towards blacks but support abortions that disproportionately kill blacks, support minimum wage increases which disproportionately cause blacks to lose jobs at a higher rate than whites and they support a welfare state incentivizing black couples not to get married and as a result the traditional family structure is less common in black communities causing more black single mothers with their children feeling the effects.
Typically liberals are hypocrites, so when I debate for a liberal policy I will genuinely act like one.
This was on topic, but if it wasn't it would be a tied vote, unless conduct is counted.