Do you mind voting on this?, Warren forget my other debate can you vote on this one instead. so far 2 votebombs in opposite directions and no honest analysis
You took all that time to analyze his votes, can you vote on this debat. So far it has 2 vote bombs that will likely get removed and no honest analysis
Omar's vote is based on his own arguments against my positions and not onanything mentioned in the debate, For example the reference the voter made to hong kong did not occurr in the debate, the length of the vote should not be considered when judging whether he weighed both sides and judged in a tabula Rasa style
This is obviously an incorrect vote please do not decide a winner until you have weighed the arguments and don't vote based on how well you like each contestant.
One point of contention. Illegal Latin American immigrants are spreading TB, the latin Americans who come in legally have lower levels of disease and our generally healthier than the native population
Your voting privileges should be banned. We don't need vigilante justice here. Just report his through the normal means and the mods will remove them. I think rap debates are unmoderated so that may be a problem, but vigilante justice is wrong in this instance
Your counter vote on the rap debate should be removed. Counter votes are ignorant. Let the mods dispense justice, do not be a vigilante. If you want to help with justice, be honest and place an honest vote for the legitimate winner, but do not counter vote.
I don't support anything, but I don't want people to start getting justice on his behalf by brigading over to this debate. I only looked at one of those votes, but the vote gave points to neither side, so the vote looked harmless, but yes they should be removed based on the site rules even if they do not award points
How is it different. They were treated the same way, given slave names, whipped for not obeying their master. Most were kept as slaves and not given land like promised. This is the same things slaves went through. Now you want descendants of the Irish who almost zero of them owned slaves to pay repairations. retarded
The debate is over. During the debate I am just an actor. It is like asking Heath Ledger when the Joker's birthday is. He doesn't know and he doesn't care once he is done with the role. If you want to ask about my strategy here, I can discuss it in PM out of the view of judges, and maybe you will learn something
Most judges do not count arguments in the final rounds, none really should. I have judged hundreds of debates and have never allowed new arguments in the final round. Any judge who does needs to learn more about how to judge a debate before attempting to do. Ask any competent experienced debater on the site and they will tell you the exact same thing. It is a fact.
I don't care about your criticisms of my arguments, because none of it is constructive. You should care about my criticisms of yours though, because I am decently skilled at debate. Most of my criticisms will honestly not be said until after judging is over in case judges read the comments. I do not wish to bias them, and the criticisms will only be upon request, though any decent judge will likely offer the same advice as I would with the exception of the unorthodox points that make my personality and style unique
Nope, I never said all of them got property most just worked for free and never capitalized on their deal, amd it is entirely possible they were treated like slaves and still got property. Slaves got property from their master as well many times. Out of curiosity what percentage of whites were slave owners compared to blacks? Do you know?
How the hell did my ancestors who fought to free slaves in the civil war and who were also a part of the underground railroad, die because their gravy train was running out? What is your IQ LOL
Nope, most of the indentured servants got jack shit, and even the ones who actually got land, did not get it for free they worked for it for 5 to 7 years. The system has never given me a freebie lol.
By the way, I have a PHD in Forensic Anthropology and own 3 businesses. Learn your history so you can perhaps win a debate in the future
Dude there are accoubtants working at wal-mart. Right next to a psychology degree this is one of the worst degrees at getting you a job. Most businesses just hire their wife to do the QuickBooks.
My ancestors died to pay for the freedom of slaves, and you think I owe blacks money. What the hell is wrong with you? Also if the Irish weren't slaves why were they treated exactly identical to what the slaves were treated?
Life hack don't waste your time with college. I have worked myself up to 6 figures twice, my only problem is that I am a perfectionist and usually end up quitting when I do something that exposes me as imperfect
The Jews like us supporting their foreign policy by having out men die for things that are of no benefit to the United States. As long as they are enemies with those countries, our leaders under the influence of their campaign contributions and control of popular media, we will be forced to have enemies that would mean us no harm otherwise.
Sorry about that. It would be much appreciated. If you need a fair vote on something from me also do not hesitate to ask. I have like another 2 weeks before work starts getting ridiculous again.
I have seen neither and no the vote would be more fair from people completely ignorant of the shows (which I am). If one had seen the shows they would be more likely to have inherent biases and use rationalization to place a vote.
I am glad you accepted. You are one of the few active debaters who I actually respect the skill of. The structure of the debate with 30000 characters and 2 week arguments are tough. Are you sure you are up for it?
I tjink I put some links up to some guides to the objectively correct way to vote in my border wall debate if you are interested in looking at them. I had forgotten about this debate until now but remember trying to teach you the stuff written in those guides.
Take the character count down to 3000 and give me 7 days to argue and I will accept this debate. I need these concessions because I don't speak Russian and this is an unfamiliar topic, which will make research harder for me.
Obama caufht shit from Hillary for saying he would have a dialogue with dictators as well. They say it showed his inexperience. It is completely retarded for any head of state to be opposed to dialogue with another head of state. Kim Jung UN was visibly frightened sitting across from Trump. Putin seems to be putting on a front in front of Trump. No Democrat could get this type of respect. They don't understand that his reckless demeanor gives him an advantage over every head of state he sits across from. Reagan used the same tactic. Pretending he had dementia, intentionally spreading rumors of it so they would think they were dealing with an unpredictable dangerous entity. Democrats are scared Putin has black mail material on Trump. They are too stupid to know Trump is the real teflon don and there could be footage of him killing a 5 year old and fucking its severed head and he would still come put looking like roses.
I read your arguments upwards of ten times, researched for 2 pomodoros (1 hour) and spent 4 pomodoros (2 hours) writing while simultaneously researchibg my response. I showed your arguments a lot of respect
You published your argument 49 minutes after I published mine. It probably takes an hour just to really digest what I said in the debate, and another couple of hours to devise a competent response. Please take your time. From what you wrote it is clear their is some comprehension problems on your side. Reread what I wrote, check my sources. Go for a walk so everythibg can settle in and resonate with you. This is incredibly disrespectful to write a response before you even give yourself a chance to comprehend what was discussed so far
The Democrats already had a memo sent out to each other that said to oppose him on every front, even on policies they agree with, so pretty clear they are pieces of shit
The term best is supposed to be vague in this debate. It allowers debaters to argue what measures matter more etc. Debates if done properly will not be over establishing an ultimate fact but in determining what facts matter more on an opinion, philosophy or policy question.
Do you mind voting on this?, Warren forget my other debate can you vote on this one instead. so far 2 votebombs in opposite directions and no honest analysis
You took all that time to analyze his votes, can you vote on this debat. So far it has 2 vote bombs that will likely get removed and no honest analysis
I'm sure that is meant as a vote bomb but I talked to the vote mods and they are removing the bomb. You should vote honestly
Omar's vote is based on his own arguments against my positions and not onanything mentioned in the debate, For example the reference the voter made to hong kong did not occurr in the debate, the length of the vote should not be considered when judging whether he weighed both sides and judged in a tabula Rasa style
This is obviously an incorrect vote please do not decide a winner until you have weighed the arguments and don't vote based on how well you like each contestant.
One point of contention. Illegal Latin American immigrants are spreading TB, the latin Americans who come in legally have lower levels of disease and our generally healthier than the native population
Thanks for taking your time to read the debate
Just place a fair vote on this debate and remove your bombs. It will still piss him off if the debate is voted on fairly.
Your voting privileges should be banned. We don't need vigilante justice here. Just report his through the normal means and the mods will remove them. I think rap debates are unmoderated so that may be a problem, but vigilante justice is wrong in this instance
Your counter vote on the rap debate should be removed. Counter votes are ignorant. Let the mods dispense justice, do not be a vigilante. If you want to help with justice, be honest and place an honest vote for the legitimate winner, but do not counter vote.
I don't support anything, but I don't want people to start getting justice on his behalf by brigading over to this debate. I only looked at one of those votes, but the vote gave points to neither side, so the vote looked harmless, but yes they should be removed based on the site rules even if they do not award points
How is it different. They were treated the same way, given slave names, whipped for not obeying their master. Most were kept as slaves and not given land like promised. This is the same things slaves went through. Now you want descendants of the Irish who almost zero of them owned slaves to pay repairations. retarded
The debate is over. During the debate I am just an actor. It is like asking Heath Ledger when the Joker's birthday is. He doesn't know and he doesn't care once he is done with the role. If you want to ask about my strategy here, I can discuss it in PM out of the view of judges, and maybe you will learn something
I reported the vote. It should get removed, but you can bite his shiny metal ass for the time being
Votes please. $1 for every vote placed, just need your paypal account numbers
Did you seriously just vote on a full forfeit whose winner had already secured the win instead of this debate? Get your shit together.
You judge a lot of debates, can you judge this one or refer me to other active voters on this site who can?
Care to vote on this shit. A fair and accurate vote would be appreciated
Most judges do not count arguments in the final rounds, none really should. I have judged hundreds of debates and have never allowed new arguments in the final round. Any judge who does needs to learn more about how to judge a debate before attempting to do. Ask any competent experienced debater on the site and they will tell you the exact same thing. It is a fact.
I don't care about your criticisms of my arguments, because none of it is constructive. You should care about my criticisms of yours though, because I am decently skilled at debate. Most of my criticisms will honestly not be said until after judging is over in case judges read the comments. I do not wish to bias them, and the criticisms will only be upon request, though any decent judge will likely offer the same advice as I would with the exception of the unorthodox points that make my personality and style unique
Nope, I never said all of them got property most just worked for free and never capitalized on their deal, amd it is entirely possible they were treated like slaves and still got property. Slaves got property from their master as well many times. Out of curiosity what percentage of whites were slave owners compared to blacks? Do you know?
Did you prepare for that argument
How the hell did my ancestors who fought to free slaves in the civil war and who were also a part of the underground railroad, die because their gravy train was running out? What is your IQ LOL
Nope, most of the indentured servants got jack shit, and even the ones who actually got land, did not get it for free they worked for it for 5 to 7 years. The system has never given me a freebie lol.
By the way, I have a PHD in Forensic Anthropology and own 3 businesses. Learn your history so you can perhaps win a debate in the future
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Dude there are accoubtants working at wal-mart. Right next to a psychology degree this is one of the worst degrees at getting you a job. Most businesses just hire their wife to do the QuickBooks.
Dude is asking for reparations because he doesn't want to work. Probably collects welfare also.
My ancestors died to pay for the freedom of slaves, and you think I owe blacks money. What the hell is wrong with you? Also if the Irish weren't slaves why were they treated exactly identical to what the slaves were treated?
Life hack don't waste your time with college. I have worked myself up to 6 figures twice, my only problem is that I am a perfectionist and usually end up quitting when I do something that exposes me as imperfect
The Jews like us supporting their foreign policy by having out men die for things that are of no benefit to the United States. As long as they are enemies with those countries, our leaders under the influence of their campaign contributions and control of popular media, we will be forced to have enemies that would mean us no harm otherwise.
If you are aware of any voter that doesn't suck, could you recruit them to vote on this.
Can you possibly vote on this debate please?
That was with like 30 minutes remaining. Like a true pro
A try hard will be beaten but it is not as easy as somebody who is also incompetent but who doesn't try hard. That is how I interpret it
Sorry about that. It would be much appreciated. If you need a fair vote on something from me also do not hesitate to ask. I have like another 2 weeks before work starts getting ridiculous again.
I urge the judges to not judge grammar points since this gentleman is not a native english speaker.
How exactly is 30,000 a precaution? A precaution against what?
I have seen neither and no the vote would be more fair from people completely ignorant of the shows (which I am). If one had seen the shows they would be more likely to have inherent biases and use rationalization to place a vote.
I am glad you accepted. You are one of the few active debaters who I actually respect the skill of. The structure of the debate with 30000 characters and 2 week arguments are tough. Are you sure you are up for it?
I tjink I put some links up to some guides to the objectively correct way to vote in my border wall debate if you are interested in looking at them. I had forgotten about this debate until now but remember trying to teach you the stuff written in those guides.
Take the character count down to 3000 and give me 7 days to argue and I will accept this debate. I need these concessions because I don't speak Russian and this is an unfamiliar topic, which will make research harder for me.
Yeah, I should not have let that one slip. I'll do better next time.
Ramshutu gave a fair vote so there is no need for me to vite especially considering my limited tine
Obama caufht shit from Hillary for saying he would have a dialogue with dictators as well. They say it showed his inexperience. It is completely retarded for any head of state to be opposed to dialogue with another head of state. Kim Jung UN was visibly frightened sitting across from Trump. Putin seems to be putting on a front in front of Trump. No Democrat could get this type of respect. They don't understand that his reckless demeanor gives him an advantage over every head of state he sits across from. Reagan used the same tactic. Pretending he had dementia, intentionally spreading rumors of it so they would think they were dealing with an unpredictable dangerous entity. Democrats are scared Putin has black mail material on Trump. They are too stupid to know Trump is the real teflon don and there could be footage of him killing a 5 year old and fucking its severed head and he would still come put looking like roses.
Cause you didn't make a good argument and now winning is a formality, when winning is easy it makes debating boring.
I read your arguments upwards of ten times, researched for 2 pomodoros (1 hour) and spent 4 pomodoros (2 hours) writing while simultaneously researchibg my response. I showed your arguments a lot of respect
You published your argument 49 minutes after I published mine. It probably takes an hour just to really digest what I said in the debate, and another couple of hours to devise a competent response. Please take your time. From what you wrote it is clear their is some comprehension problems on your side. Reread what I wrote, check my sources. Go for a walk so everythibg can settle in and resonate with you. This is incredibly disrespectful to write a response before you even give yourself a chance to comprehend what was discussed so far
The Democrats already had a memo sent out to each other that said to oppose him on every front, even on policies they agree with, so pretty clear they are pieces of shit
The term best is supposed to be vague in this debate. It allowers debaters to argue what measures matter more etc. Debates if done properly will not be over establishing an ultimate fact but in determining what facts matter more on an opinion, philosophy or policy question.
You mind giving me a vote on this full forfeit debate real quick please?
I think Andrew Jackson was better. Richard Nixon was pretty good though. Almost as Good as Trump