Wylted

What i dont like is you saying you soft-claimed like it means something when your soft claim was, "my role is like something i played in an unwritten book that nobody here has or could have read because its unwritten." 

I don't really care tbh. Fuck it, I have lost the good fight

You are all idiots and should flip scum on Budda

Unvote VTL Supa

With all the Marylanders, would any of y'all be up for a live meetup and do in person debates? 

yes, i am off this weekend. The debate would have to be informal. I actually got laid in highschool. I wasn't a loser who had time to join the debate club, so I have a huge disadvantage with anything formal.

"Thinking with the Heart" It literally means the same thing as saying "He uses right brain thinking"Are you responding to this

I think you are idiotically responding to the above phrase, and are off topic. No the word literal there is not figurative language, But the phrase it refers to is using figurative language. Wow you are dumb. You don't realize "Thinking with your heart is a figure of speech, and then you randomly point out that my use of the word "literal" was literal.

Okay dumb ass. You should have made that clear instead of repeatedly writing "literally is not figurative". I assumed with how stupid you are, you kept mistakenly splelling "is" Instead of "it's". Now I get that you are so dumb that you don't recognize a figure of speech and then you just randomly start talking about the word literal not being used as figurative speech for some unknown reason.

Please tell me you are a non native english speaker with your lack of reading comprehension here.

SO YOU DON'T WRITE WHAT YOU MEAN TO WRITE AND THEN BLAME THE READER FOR READING WHAT YOU DID WRITE and call me mentally retarded, you poor little thing.

It's actually pretty common to use figures of speech and to not use your words in a literal way.  You are dumb lol. I wonder if when old people called you a little booger (Or whatever pet name they used)< if you actually thought you were a booger.

Did you not mean what you wrote? I get the impression you have nothing to think with, or maybe it is the blood pump.

You must be mentally retarded to think I was being literal, LOL.

Honestly if we could sterilize people with autism and maybe some progressives (which is not to say they aren't interchangable) society would be far more tranquil.

My guess is that autistic people would be more likely to lean right. They are extremely logical. The left typically use the more creative hemisphere in their brain causing them to be artsy or think with their heart, even when thinking with their heart is not conducive to their goals and can in fact can have the opposite effect they desire.

People who are ultra rational are easy to turn into political allies, if they are not allies already.

Dont limit yer mother like that

I'm just concerned her back won't hold up. Maybe if she wears like a back brace I would support it

Im not riding a buddha lynchtrain, sorry.

This is silly, I can't stand people who play like this. It doesn't matter if one of your scum reads is driving a train on another one. I guess if there are 2 scum and they both just fight to lead trains on each other all game, you'll let them get a free pass and survive another dp.

I think we shoukd get a claim from Vaarka. Still have another day on the Dp

I think a claim from vaarka is unneccesary, but it seems pretty clear if it doesn't happeen neither will the lynch on supa, so I reluctently do this.

Unvote VTL Vaarka

As in, he had forgotten, so he didn't know, so please TR him for something easily contrivable. The point is its obviously contrived, but he has tried/is trying to pass it off like it was a genuine post.

It wasn't contrived, but I was curious if anyone would be afraid to answer the question because of what it might say about them. I genuinely did not remember, that chatzy was used in that game I failed to play. I also kinda knew that group PM's used to not be possible, but I wasn't sure thaat has improved, and if it has improved, have I just not figured out how to do it yet. I now know that group chat is still not a thing.

So what's the next step in all this? Obviously accusing people of being suspicious and finding problems with their analysis of the situation isn't enough to definitively say if someone is  guilty or not. Also if I could get a little help concerning all the acronyms being used, I would greatly appreciate it. 

It's rare that you can find somebody who is definitively guilty in this game. This is similar to how minesweeper is played. Sometimes you know but mostly you just make educated guesses.

Is there any chance we can come up with a summary of what we've learned so far? It's getting a bit difficult to recall everything that's been said in the chat so far. 

Just skip the first ten pages and start then. Better you participate at a level you can keep up with, than not at all.

Buddha is completely off his meta this game

I agree, but right now Supa Has so many red flags it isn't even funny

Agreed. Grey's reaction is good. Wylted's question on the other hand I actually find mildly concerning. How did you know that there aren't group PMs on this site? I didn't until now.

It was a big point of discussion among the mafia players when everyone started to migrate here.

Argent outting character without any sort of prompt to do so is either townie or mafia have fake claims and their partner said they should do this.

If Argent ever flips scum at least on of their partners is an experienced player.

You didn't have to give names in your examples, but you did.

Me: "I want to kill Karla Homolka" (Or some power broker)"

her: "I understand that, you want to make the world safer for your child, Do you have any plans or intentions to murder somebody?"

Me: "Why are you asking me that, knowing you have a duty to report?" "Are you loyal to me or to Karla Homolka's safety"

Her: "I don't want you to be hurt by any extreme actions you take"

Me: "Do you know how high my IQ is?" "Do you know 35% of all murders go unsolved, the other 65% are people of average or lower IQs getting caught" "You can't protect me from something I would never get caught doing"

Her: "You don't know what effects the trauma of killing somebody could cause you to do" "You might be able to plan the perfect murder, but will your psychological state allow you to act accordingly in the aftermath of the event"