Yassine

Ok.

So,

Bro,

Or wife.

Hypothetically,

What would Allah tell you to do?

And you did that,

And we did this

And people have been killing each other in the name of some difference or another, for millions of years.

Remember when,

Ug killed Og,

Because Og was from a different cave and f**ked Ug's cavewoman, and worshipped the Moon and not the Sun.

Same old shit Eugene.

We haven't left the cave yet.

(Albeit a cave with voice activated smart windows).

Will we ever?

I agree that the entire concept is absurd from the perspective of justice. The classic scholastic definition of usury in the Western tradition is 'profit without risk or labor', and that's precisely what a limited liability for-profit corporation provides to its stockholders. I think it's absurd that it arose out of some healthy 'evolution' of Western law; the limited liability corporation was first created in Delaware as a scheme to attract corporations looking to headquarter in the most friendly legal environment possible. It worked, and other American states adopted it in order to regain equal economic footing. That's a just a race to the bottom as far as corruption is concerned, not some profound advancement.

How is that administered? The idea has been floated in America, but people always say it would be a nightmare to actually implement. For example, how do you deal with capital flight and offshoring?

This is actually probably why China hasn't started any hot wars yet - the one child policy lead to what the Chinese call 'princeling syndrome': their conventional forces have a huge handicap because all the soldiers that they have are both solely financially responsible for all of their living ancestors and their family's only hope for an enduring legacy. In military engagements, these soldiers are incredibly risk averse, trying to return alive at all costs, which is horrible for military competence. The government is rolling back that policy rapidly, trying to encourage stay-at-home moms and ramp fertility up exponentially. Over 80% of Chinese GenZ moms are staying at home, which is a huge increase. I think that once the new generation comes of age you're going to see China become much more aggressive on the world stage. 

I am strongly opposed to the types of inheritance taxes  you see in European countries, which often kick in at very low thresholds of around $100-$300k. I would contend that a person should ABSOLUTELY be able to inherit millions of dollars without the government getting involved at all. Something I don't think most people would agree with. 

Would love to see a debate between you two.

you mean piss/urine

allah is f*cking idiot for claiming that women can give birth in 6 months 

17 million black slave are few ?

I'd love to see the sources of his claims that black slaves were a rarity under islam 

I've provided mine and he claim that both are inadequate but he made many claims and provided no evidence whatsoever 

while mamluke (slav/white) slaves did have an islamic dynasty there were no black slaves dynasty

 , I can't help but wonder why ?

 I mean even the turk got the ottoman empire  

 I searched and found nothing supporting his claims

also black slaves are called abd which translate into -slave-

while white slaves are called mamluk which translate into -owned- 

just wanted to mention this trivia 

The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery, and bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves himself.

But he insisted that slave owners treat their slaves well and stressed the virtue of freeing slaves.

ISIS are largely Salafist Islam. It's a fringe school that used to be relegated to one tiny backwater of Arabia and for much of Islamic history was not very influential or mainstream. It was the school adopted by the house of Saud in the Najd. When the British put the house of Saud in power (hence Saudi Arabia) this school of Islam also came to power, and the royal family of Saudi Arabia has been using their vast oil incomes to finance its promulgation throughout the Middle East and beyond ever since. They view other Muslims as infidels, which is a pretty unique understanding in the Islamic world, and leads to a lot higher levels of inter-religious violence. Groups like ISIS are often even more extreme than mainsteam Salafist thinkers, so using what they say about slavery as some sort of example of Islamic thought at large, or especially historically, is not advised.

for the millionth time america is not a religion nor a religious group it's country feel free to discuss it on the political fourm

the us is a country and not a religion , islam took over 17 million black slaves from africa and distributed them into muslim countries

islam killed and accused arabic thinkers , inventors and discoverers of  blasphrmy , heresy and many of them got executed 

islam took slavs and turks as slaves 

islam is known for bombings and harem where each man can marry four wives or 10 wives also the 72 virgins in heaven 

islam is known for anti Semitism and the jews choose palastine as retaliation for mufti of palastine supported adolf hitler in his holocaust 

https://time.com/4084301/hitler-grand-mufi-1941/ 

grand mufti ahmad of palastine declared 

"Al-Husseini began the conversation by declaring that the Germans and the Arabs had the same enemies: “the English, the Jews, and the Communists.”"

muhammad kicked the jews out of maddina , killed all the men in another jewish trib and took all the children and women as slaves 

how did that crusader reach egypt , no crusader ever set foot on africa

and if islam is as perfect as you claim it to be why is everyone running away from it to the west ?

even the syrian refugees in turkey are getting kicked out , let me point here that they didn't get kicked out from any other European country.

why didn't saudi arabia took the syrian refugees if islam is as perfect as you claim it to be ? isn't sharia law the law of saudi arabia as saudi arabia claim ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNiNbZSbHdQ&ab_channel=AlJazeeraEnglish

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Menkaure#:~:text=Menkaure%20was%20mummified.-,Attempted%20demolition,to%20destroy%20as%20to%20build

Let's focus on this primarily as this is the most wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_under_Muslim_rule

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Muslim_conquests

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_Armenian_genocide

https://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/69132

I can tell you what I am fully aware of.

Unlike the Masai in Kenya which were never force into Christianity,

the native tribes in Tanzania and Nigeria (in the Islamic part of Nigeria) had to bow down and conform to Islam.

More importantly, there are basically 0 places the Brits colonised where native tribes have been totally destroyed of their native sacred sculptures and such.

Hinduism in India was in fact made by the Brits, uniting Shaivism with Vaishnavism to reduce internal conflict and even fusing Pagan religions in with it too.

Can you give me examples of the British destroying native scultptures and blackmailing the population into Christianity as opposed to merley introducing it?

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldcivilization/chapter/islamic-conquest-of-the-maghreb/

https://www.britannica.com/place/North-Africa/From-the-Arab-conquest-to-1830

the people living in mecca the quraysh tribe were very open to religious freedom and around mecca before islam came lay many Idols uniting all the arabs as each tribe worshiped multiple idols depending on time , the existence of both christians like waraqa bin naufal and jews like :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_tribes_of_Arabia

the freedom of religion in pre-islamic times in the Arabian Peninsula along with the diversity of the gods worshipped shows a great example of freedom of religion , as long as no one insult the gods of the other that's until muhammad came with his new religion and insulted his tribes god and tried to destroy their idols,

muhammad was caught before he could do anything

, being of high born in his tribe he managed to leave with slab on the rest however his followers suffering have just began since the holy book of islam which they need to recite contains insults towards the idols of the tribe claimed that those idols couldn't defend themselves therefore they are not gods  .

now let us analyze this, imagine a person walk into a church 1500 years ago in the middle of the sermon breaks the cross and claim that jesus isn't god otherwise the cross would have defended itself , what would happen to that person ?

let me give you another example , imagine that I rode a bulldozer and used it to demolish a mosque, burned all the qurans in there and then I claimed that allah doesn't exist otherwise the mosque would have defended itself  , how would muslims feel especially in a muslim majority country .

after Conquest of Mecca by islam muhammad prohibited all the arabic tribes from worshiping their idols

 muhammad also destroyed all the idols

before islam the Arabian Peninsula had many cultures , many religions 

after islam it had only one religion and one culture islam , 

this tradition of destroying the land marks of other cultures like what isis did in iraq came from muhammad destroying the idols back in mecca and then in the entire  Arabian Peninsula , 

you might not now this but one of islamic caliphate's son tried to destroy egypt pyramids sadly or luckly he failed after only managing to leave a massive gash at one of them  

In AD 1196, Al-Aziz Uthman, Saladin's son and the Sultan of Egypt, attempted to demolish the pyramids, starting with that of Menkaure. Workmen recruited to demolish the pyramid stayed at their job for eight months, but found it almost as expensive to destroy as to build. They could only remove one or two stones each day. Some used wedges and levers to move the stones, while others used ropes to pull them down. When a stone fell, it would bury itself in the sand, requiring extraordinary efforts to free it. Wedges were used to split the stones into several pieces, and a cart was used to carry it to the foot of the escarpment, where it was left. Despite their efforts, workmen were only able to damage the pyramid to the extent of leaving a large vertical gash at its northern face.

The one boundary the British (and most European) colonists had when colonising was to not blackmail the inhabitants to Christianity and also to not directly destroy statues or sculptures that the natives found sacred.

I'm not saying they didn't sin in other ways but this was just a fact, fact-check me if you want.

The Ottoman Empire and all Islamic invaders completely blackmailed the populace into Islam and destroyed anything sacred to them if they felt like it.

still no mention of the female Ovum

also we can create children without the men and women using artificial womb we just need the ovum of a woman and some semen sadly that's considered un ethical

a god makes a mistake at the numbers of months women need to give birth 

while the child birth success is high it's survivability is low it would also endanger both the mother's health and the baby's and might damage the mothers reproduction organs.

if it proves something it proves that I'm a f*cking idiot

A square is a circle with corners.

On the spot.

And scholarly tone diminishes,

Into the background hiss,

Of recrimination,

And cheap jibes.

From which,

Ironically,

A message,

Is received.

Roger that Yas

Over and out.

people like yassine who are extremely hateful and obsessed  of the west and america are the reason for 9/11 and similar acts , he gets out of his way to change the subject from talking about islam to talking about the west , 

I mean the USA thrown a nuke at the japanese yet they aren't this hateful

, he probably suffers from inferiority complex and extremely jealous that

the westren countries are developed while most muslim countries are third world countries 

don't feel bad many muslim dynasties suffered from worse problems sadly all the evidence and books mentioning that are in arabic

also the arabic islamic history isn't as well documented in english as that of Europe  

this allows many muslims to bullshit  and tell people whatever they want about their religion including making whatever story they like 

Free will contradicts theism because a creator God necesarily prohibits free will.

P1: An omniscient God knows the complete history of every possible universe; (by necesity including all choices made every universe)

P2: A creator God decided which of the possible universes to create

C: God literally decided how history would turn out and what choices people would make

There is no way around this conclusion. God decided to create a universe where Adam and Eve would eat from the fruit of knowledge. God decided that Adam and Eve would sin, because literally nothing is outside his controll. By definition, nothing happens that conflict with God's decisions. Adam and Eve did not have free will; their choice was no more free than a clock is to show the correct time or not. The creator of the watch is responsible for the watch dysfunctioning, not the watch istself. Blaming a human for a crime is like blaming a gun for a murder --- sure it was the gun who shot the bullet, but the gun was controlled by someone else. This is just an analogy of course, but the point is important. 

The problem of evil is so often dismissed without further elaboration by pointing to free will, and that humans (and/or demons), not God, cause evil and suffering in this world. When used to solve the problem of evil free will is nothing short of magic being invoked to dodge the disturbing implications of God's magic.

If we remove the "magic" from the equation we can confidently say that all humans have choice --- but that CHOISE IS NOT FREE FROM EXTERNAL CONTROLL AND CAUSALITY

How many women "suffer domestic abuse" under Islam?

Well, I suppose that if the domestic abuse of women isn't deemed to occur, then the answer will be zero.

Let me ask you a simple hypothetical question.

If your brother was to rape your wife, who would you embrace first?

Your brother or your wife.

would love to see those hadiths along with their source 

We have commanded man to be good to his parents: his mother struggled to carry him and struggled to give birth to him- his bearing and weaning took a full thirty months. When he has grown to manhood and reached the age of forty he [may] say, ‘Lord, help me to be truly grateful for Your favours to me and to my parents; help me to do good work that pleases You; make my offspring good. I turn to You; I am one of those who devote themselves to You.’

2:233

Mothers suckle their children for two whole years, if they wish to complete the term, and clothing and maintenance must be borne by the father in a fair manner. No one should be burdened with more than they can bear: no mother shall be made to suffer harm on account of her child, nor any father on account of his. The same duty is incumbent on the father’s heir. If, by mutual consent and consultation, the couple wish to wean [the child], they will not be blamed, nor will there be any blame if you wish to engage a wet nurse, provided you pay as agreed in a fair manner. Be mindful of God, knowing that He sees everything you do.

(31:14)

We enjoined upon man to be dutiful to his parents. His mother bore him in weakness upon weakness, and his weaning lasted two years. (We, therefore, enjoined upon him): “Give thanks to Me and to your parents. To Me is your ultimate return.

do you think that without the technology and medicines would any child survive after 6 months  also the child would be unhealthy 

https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/how-many-weeks-is-it-safe-to-give-birth#earliest-safe-week

and you're accusing me of sexism

empty claims with not even a shred of evidence

very shocked by the stupidity of your claims 

and yet in ancient china they were given rights

 , why are you comparing , what are you getting into by comparing what islam did with what happened in  Europe , they were bad yes , does that make your case better no

1. islam is a religion , euorpe is a country -a group of countries- , IDK but I think that christianity was not ok with such acts

according to whom ? you , muhammad ? 

he had children with them they just died before their birth ,

just read your holy book 

your responses are extremely dumb are you comparing WW 2 with some stuipd religious war between muhammad and his clan , his entire clan doesn't amount to more than 14 thousand people , the scale itself makes your example extremely stupid

all I see in my comments is insults and empty claims that I'm making up , and I'm the nasty one here

I've yet to figure out what does the US have to do with this religious discussion since the us is a political country and NOT a theocracy  

I'm talking about diacritics in arabic and their effect on the meaning of the word 

I'm not discussing saudi arabia here nor iran , since most countries don't move due to religious reasons -unless they are theocracies- but move due to political reasons 

also no comment here

every single case I've provided came with it's source

and I have yet to see where's the evidence supporting your claims 

for all I know you could be making tall tales about those people

also mentioning what they achieved and their expertise doesn't disprove that they got accused of heresy by muslim shekhs and imam

some of them even excuted  

are you running away from the question , I've already told you I believe that the holocaust did happen and the jews were victims of it what about you

 christians don't criticize judaism , atheists do ,  The term Judeo-Christian is used to group Christianity and Judaism together, either in reference to Christianity's derivation from Judaism, Christianity's borrowing of Jewish Scripture to constitute the "Old Testament" of the Christian Bible, or due to perceived parallels  

victim mentality of muslims , the west doesn't even have the time to care about any of this non sense and you people keep pining the blame on them 

and what does WW 2 have to do with anything , for all I know the US fought to stop adolf hitler and nazis from ruling the world

half of those if not all are caused by muslims 

there's a differnce between colonization and crusades , colonization wasn't led by a theocracy

isis is trying to establish an islamic theocracy  and restore the caliphate

a continuous non-stop 1000 years of Western aggression against Muslims , what kind of nonsense is that what about the 1400 years of non stop jihad against the west and Europe?

evidence again , also I'm not interested in conspiracy theories 

as the war on terror, is the term that refers to an ongoing international military campaign launched by the United States government following the September 11 attacks. The targets of the campaign are primarily extremist groups located throughout the Muslim world, with the most prominent groups being al-Qaeda, as well as the Islamic State 

I'm discussing the use of islamophobia to stop people from criticizing/satire Islam

If you don't want to discuss that get lost   

A vile woman is an assumption.

You might be vile.

And people are usually vile for a reason.

As a generalization,

Focussing on individuals, doesn't address the collective ideology.

And not all women are angels,

As are not all men,

But all women and all men are individuals,

And not property to be silenced and separated.

Silence and separation,

Is the work of a vile person.

also many people criticize Judaism , but since  Judaism don't have preaching like islam and christianity and you need to go to them and ask them if you want to join their religion less people criticize them compared with islam and christianity

9/11

syrian refugees

isis 

al qaida

the killing of the teacher in france 

من زاوية تاريخية ، ما قاله الدكتور الإخواني خالد الخالدي يثير في أعماق من غاصوا قليلاً في تاريخ الأمة بحاراً من الشجن، حيث ترجعنا تهمة الزندقة إلى سجل طويل من جرائم إقصاء المفكرين والعلماء، فهي تهمة ابتدعها الخلفاء العباسيين بداية في القضاء على كل معترض على ظلهم وجورهم ، ورغم ما قاله " الخالدي" أدان فيه نفسه، إلا أنه نكأ فينا جرحاً اتصل بكل أعلام الأمة الذين أعٌدموا بسبب خلاف سياسي قبل أن تلصق فيهم تهمة الزندقة .

وهذه هي قائمة بأبرز أعلام الأمة الذين يطلق عليهم الناس لقب علماء الإسلام ، ويسترشدون بزمانهم وما قدموه للبشرية هؤلاء العلماء تم قتلهم بصورة بشعه و تكفيرهم وحرق كتبهم وعلومهم على يد متحجري وداعميهم من الحكام :

1-ابن المقفع : اتهم بالزندقة و قتل بعدها على يد سفيان بن معاوية حيث قام بصلبه و تقطيع لحمه قطعة قطعة و شيها في النار أمام ناظريه حتى مات . * المصدر : البداية و النهاية لابن كثير( 96/10) .

2-الفارابي : من أكبر الفلاسفة و أتهم أنه "أشدهم إلحاداً وإعراضاً كان يفضل الفيلسوف على النبي و يقول بقدم العالم و يكذب الأنبياء و له في ذلك مقالات في إنكار البعث و السمعيات و حتى ابن سينا على إلحاده كان خيراً منه .

*المصدر : المنقذ من الضلال : ص 98 + البداية و النهاية : 224/11 + إغاثة اللهفان : 601/2

. 3-ابن سينا : اتهم أنه (إمام الملاحدة فلسفي النحلة ضال مضل من القرامطة الباطنية كافر بالله و ملائكته و كتبه و رسله و اليوم الآخر و له من الضلالات و الكفريات ما تنشق له السماوات .

*المصدر : المنقذ من الضلال : ص 98 + البداية و النهاية : 42/12 + سير أعلام النبلاء : 531/1 - 539

4-أبو العلاء المعري : اتهم أنه (مشهور بالزندقة على طريقة البراهمة الفلاسفة و في أشعاره ما يدل على إلحاده و انحلاله من الدين ، ذكر بن الجوزي أنه رأى له كتاباً سماه " الفصول و الغايات في معارضة الصور و الآيات " على حروف المعجم و قبائحه كثيرة .

 * المصدر : المنتظم 148/8 + البداية و النهاية : 72/12 .

5-أبو بكر الرازي : اتهم أنه "من كبار الزنادقة الملاحدة يقول بالقدماء الخمسة الموافق لمذهب الحرائيين الصابئة و هي الرب والنفس و المادة و الدهر و الفضاء و هو يفوق كفر الفلاسفة القائلين بقدم الأفلاك و صنف في مذهبه هذا و نصره و زندقته مشهورة "

*المصدر : در التعارض : 346/9 + مع منهاج السنة : 209/1 + مجموع الفتاوى : 304/6

-6 يعقوب بن اسحاق (الكندي ) : فيلسوف من أوائل الفلاسفة المسلمين "منجم ضال متهم في دينه كإخوانه الفلاسفة بلغ من ضلاله أنه أنكر الوحي و حاول معارضة القرآن بكلامه . "

*المصدر : لسان الميزان : 373/6 + مقدمة ابن خلدون : 331 + مجموع الفتاوى : 186/9

-7 ابن النديم : كان كما اتهمه البعض أنه "رافضي معتزلي و قال فيه بن حجر العسقلاني : أن لابن النديم مصنف " فهرست العلماء " ينادي على من صنفه بالاعتزال و الزيغ .

* المصدر : لسان الميزان : 83/5

8-ابن طفيل : اتهم أنه (من أئمة ملاحدة عصره من الفلاسفة يقول بقدم العالم و غير ذلك من أقوال الملاحدة .

*المصدر : درء التعارض : 11/1 ، 56/6

9- ابن الهيثم : التهمة="من الملاحدة الخارجين عن دين الإسلام من أقران ابن سينا علماً و سفهاً و إلحاداً و ضلالاً كان في دولة العبيديين الزنادقة كان كأمثاله من الفلاسفة يقول بقدم العالم و غيره من الكفريات .

* المصدر : درء التعارض : 281/2 + في تاريخ الفلاسفة : ص 270 + فتاوى شيخ الإسلام : 135/35 .

10- الطوسي : وتهمته من هؤلاء المتطرفين أنه "نصير الكفر والشرك و الإلحاد فيلسوف ملحد ضال مضل كان وزيراً لهولاكو و هو الذي أشار عليه بقتل الخليفة و المسلمين و استبقاء الفلاسفة والملحدين و حاول أن يجعل كتاب " الإشارات " لابن سينا بدلاً من القرآن و فتح مدارس للتنجيم و الفلسفة و إلحاده عظيم . "

* المصدر : درء التعارض : 67/5 + البداية و النهاية : 267/13 + إغاثة اللهفان : 601/2 .

11-الجاحظ : واتهم أنه (كان سيء المخبر رديء الاعتقاد تنسب إليه البدع و الضلالات و ربما جاز به بعضهم إلى الانحلال وحكى الخطيب بسنده أنه كان لا يصلي و رمي بالزندقة )

* المصدر : البداية و النهاية : 19/11

12-عباس بن فرناس : فيلسوف موسيقي مغنٍ منجم نسب إليه السحر و الكيمياء و كثر عليه الطعن في دينه و اتهم في عقيدته و رمي بالزندقة و كان بالإضافة إلى ذلك شاعراً بذيئاً في شعره مولعاً بالغناء و الموسيقى-على ما اتهموه . * *المصدر : المقتبس من أهل الأندلس : ص 279 + نفح الطيب : 348/4

13-ابن رشد : اتهم من المتطرفين الماضويين أنه (فيلسوف ضال ملحد يقول بأن الأنبياء يخيلون للناس خلاف الواقع و يقول بقدم العالم و ينكر البعث و حاول التوفيق بين الشريعة و فلسفة أرسطو في كتابيه " فصل المقال " و " مناهج الملة " و هو في موافقته لأرسطو و تعظيمه له و لشيعته أعظم من موافقة بن سينا وتعظيمه له و قد انتصر للفلاسفة الملاحدة في " تهافت التهافت " و يعتبر من باطنية الفلاسفة و إلحادياته مشهورة . )

*المصدر : سير أعلام النبلاء : 307/21 + درء التعارض : 11/1 – 127 – 152

14- محمد بن الشاكر : وتهمته (فيلسوف زنديق اشتغل بالموسيقى و التنجيم من الذين ترجموا كتب اليونان و أبوه موسى بن شاكر و أخواه أحمد و الحسن منجمون فلاسفة أيضاً )

*المصدر : سير أعلام الأعلام : 117/7

15-ثابت بن قرة : واتهم كما غيره أنه (صابئ كافر فيلسوف ملحد منجم و هو و ابنه إبراهيم بن ثابت و حفيده ثابت بن سنان ماتوا على ضلالهم . )

* المصدر : سير أعلام النبلاء : 485/13 + البداية و النهاية : 85/11 

you know that khadijah was a businesswoman and owned a caravan before muhammad married her ?

isn't this prove that women weren't oppressed back before islam ,

it's one supported by muslims themselves unless khadijah was oppressed back then too and didn't own a caravan and wasn't a rich businesswoman , an example of very successful woman in the times of which you claim that women were oppressed by men your claims -of women being oppressed back then is destroyed by her existence.

you claim that women were oppressed and weren't given any rights until muhammad came and gave them their rights , provide evidence supporting your claim  of women being oppressed

the very convenient claim of I forgot where I read it , just tell me you made that up no need to spin tall tales about it 

I also had evidence claiming that more than 50% of the stories quran stories were mentioned in the bible and tulmod too 

He cannot support anything he says if he means to suggest that women have equal rights in Islam, that is the truth of it.

However, I am genuinely afraid to mess with this religion so I'll shut up for now. I am serious, it is not a joke how violent they will get if they know who speaks against them.

What I will do is just post this, regarding women and Islam.

1. a woman is given half the inherence of that of a man

2. can women marry four men too ?

3. can women divorce her husband  in islam? the answer is yes but is it as easy as when her husband want to divorce her the answer is no

4.Allah's Messenger said, "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning."

6.The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "A woman should not fast (optional fasts) except with her husband's permission if he is at home (staying with her).

for all I know you could be making this up and spinning tall tales

funny that this is coming from you , when you've yet to provide any evidence supporting your claims

and I would love to see where did this estimation came from , the source , the book mentioning it, the study mentioning it ?

In order to avoid discussing where I myself have or have not visited, I will say that I can guarantee you with absolute certainty that in a bookstore in any Islamic nation not one single book in any store is anti-Islam unless it is neutrally against religion and even then it will not make the shelves most likely.

the link was provided by you , and it seems like you really hate america

, not that I care but I would love to see evidence supporting those empty claims of yours , that would really help

they were his very own clan and his direct relatives

, also all those claims of muhammad getting tortured , maimed , burned , pillaged ,,,,,,,,,,,,etc came from muhammad -very unreliable

muhammad and crying trees

The Prophet (ﷺ) used to stand by a tree or a date-palm on Friday. Then an Ansari woman or man said. "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Shall we make a pulpit for you?" He replied, "If you wish." So they made a pulpit for him and when it was Friday, he proceeded towards the pulpit (for delivering the sermon). The datepalm cried like a child! The Prophet (ﷺ) descended (the pulpit) and embraced it while it continued moaning like a child being quietened. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It was crying for (missing) what it used to hear of religious knowledge given near to it."

food talking

We used to consider miracles as Allah's Blessings, but you people consider them to be a warning. Once we were with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on a journey, and we ran short of water. He said, "Bring the water remaining with you." The people brought a utensil containing a little water. He placed his hand in it and said, "Come to the blessed water, and the Blessing is from Allah." I saw the water flowing from among the fingers of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) , and no doubt, we heard the meal glorifying Allah, when it was being eaten (by him).

you claim so but have yet to provide any evidence supporting your claim 

which is women back then were oppressed  

Women were very oppressed back then, however he is extremely wrong if he thinks Islam liberated them.

how did khadijah came to own that business if women back then didn't have those rights ? 

I see that I've read nothing about Confucianism

1.A number of verses collectively demonstrate a belief that the earliest, nutfah stage of development is made of semen, perhaps mixed with a female fluid, which is placed in the womb for a known term, and where it undergoes various stages of development (as also taught by Galen and in the Jewish Talmud).

See this article for the most comprehensive explanation and evidence. Furthermore, there is no sign that the author of the Quran was aware of the female egg (ovum).

In reality, a single sperm cell penetrates and fuses with the female ovum. This fertilised egg, called a zygote, is then pushed down the fallopian tube for a few days. On the way, cell division begins, and this multi-celled cluster, now called a blastocyst, implants in the uterus (womb).

2.The embryo is then said to be congealed blood.  All the classical tafsirs (exegetical commentaries) understood the meaning of 'alaqah to be blood or congealed blood, and clotted blood is a definition of the word in classical Arabic dictionaries. Regardless of alternative meanings for this Arabic word, it does not make sense to interpret a word whose main definitions include an explicit biological meaning (clotted blood) in a description of a biological process (embryology); certainly, from the point of divine authorship of the Qur'an, such imprecise meaning would throw into doubt the Qur'an's claim to be "clear." The choice of word now causes a well justified suspicion of inaccuracy, and for centuries misled people into thinking that the embryo is at one stage congealed blood (an actual embryo is at no point blood or a clot of blood). Similarly, again from the divine authorship and clarity perspective, for the same reason it would not make sense to use this word while intending blood clot as a mere visual analogy.

3.The Quran claims that bones are formed before being clothed with flesh. In fact cartilage models of the bones start to form at the same time as and in parallel with surrounding muscles, and this cartilage is literally replaced with bone.

The author of the Quran described a sequence of stages, which when examined without the false definitions and arbitrary assumptions made by apologists, clearly has no resemblance to the actual development process of a child in the womb, according to critics.

Someone with a modern, scientific knowledge of embryology can instead marvel at the exquisite complexity that results from a process of co-ordinated cell differentiation and signaling, encoded in our genetic instruction set by millions of years of evolution, and devoid of any apparent divine design.

the story of muhammad splitting the moon is very famous and muslims claim that nasa mentioned that along with the disgrace of discovering that nasa never mentioned that is well known

the story of al isra and al maarij is also very famous and how muhammad went to outer space on the back of al buraq , a donkey with wings is mentioned 

, you're yet to point towards where max/maximum is mentioned in any of those verses as you claimed in your previous comment

and it's 10 sets of four weeks or 40 weeks and not 6 months or 26.0715 weeks

I'm not running away

an you've yet to provide any evidence that those stories didn't exist in islam because muhammad went with the caravan

هو ورقة بن نوفل بن أسد بن عبد العزى بن قصي، وهو ابن عم خديجة بنت خويلد، زوجة النبي محمد حيث أن والده نوفل بن أسد هو أخ والدها خويلد بن أسد.

christianity was already established in mecca and even jews lived around there so it's no wonder that muhammad copied many stories from both the bible and tulmod 

I also forgot to mention the story of Cain and Abel

I see that've not read about Confucianism it came long before christianity and Islam and gave both women and men their rights and responsibilities , a very long time before both islam and christianity like about  551–479 BC

what do you say about khadijah the first wife of muhammad she was a woman a businesswoman  , she owned a caravan long before marrying muhammad or muhammad having his midlife crisis ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, cough I mean started his own religion 

you don't understand what Communism  is

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxb4kN06XGk&ab_channel=CNN

this is what islam have done to the arabs every time someone critcise or satire islam

they get accused of blasphemy and they get put to death if not physically then socially and now using islamophobia and hating of islam they are trying to make everyone shut up .

islam have caused many problems in the world ironically most of them are plaguing muslims

, and when anybody/anyone tries to address those problems they accuse them of islamophobia or hating muslims 

introducing a course challenging Secular Liberal Capitalism ?

do I even need to introduce that  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Left

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_USA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders

an entire party exist in america which stands against Capitalism including the current american president 

Not really, they shoot you down if you dare.

I am not asking you about the truth , I am asking you how do we judge religion ? what parameters should we use ?

what does the truth have to do with judging religion ?

and let me ask you what is the 

 probabilistic evaluation

of a man living in the iron age , in the middle of a desert 1500 years ago , getting to outer space and beyond (outside our universe) and then getting back ?

and what is the

 probabilistic evaluation

of the moon getting cut into two halves because a man living 1500 years ago prayed to his god

and NOT a single testimony about that existing in any country or group of people who lived back then other than his followers ?

do women give birth in 6 months ?

"The quran provides that the length of a normal gestation (pregnancy) is six months 

(Luqman 31:14; al-Baqarah 2:233; al-Ahqaf 46:15). Luqman 31:14 and al-Baqarah 2:233 provide a nursing period of 24 months. Al-Ahqaf 46:15 provides a total of 30 months for both gestation and nursing combined. This leaves only six months for the period of gestation .

correct me if I am wrong but they need 10 sets of four weeks to give birth 

a person hears about islam and watches a video explaining that islam mentioned how the embryo develops and it's stages and how people 1500 years ago shouldn't have known that , they decide to join islam 

while being totally not aware that it's totally wrong the embryo doesn't start as a clot of blood then a leech then it becomes bones before the bones are covered with flesh .

the person judgement of joining islam is the outcome of a lie , the truth/or lack of the truth effected that person into joining islam

https://www.quora.com/How-come-the-Bible-and-the-Quran-have-many-similarities