drafterman

I have not heard anyone other than you say it would not be a legitimate position. I think this supports my theory there is a desire for a monopoly of power. Clearly it is meant to be a legitimate role with no formal powers.

The standards should be, anybody you would not hire in the real world for a leadership position, you should not hire here. I would push for a democratization of moderation power because of how poorly Mike has chosen. If he were more competent in his hiring processes, I would oppose that. MY statement that the creation of a presidential position not having a dual goal of becoming a moderator is accurate. My goal is to usurp power and then democratize it until Mike learns better judgement or gets lucky with one of his moderator decisions.

This is why it is so silly for you to be adamant that the democratization of power is bad and to be so insistent to monopolize it. I assume it is an ego thing. "Only I am responsible enough to sift through reported posts in a competent way".

Scheming is how you display superior competence in strategizing solutions when in a position decided by voters. A person who can run the most effective campaign is also going to be a superior strategist in creating solutions for a country. The lying part is bullshit. I commonly take a worse strategic position by saying honest things. I can afford to do so because of my superior strategic ability in other areas. When a small handful of people choose for a position you prove merit through your resume. SO it is just 2 different ways to display merit. The people who chose you for that position may have chosen you because of your merit but if so than it was just a lucky guess, they are too incompetent to actually make a wise decision, and even in choosing other people for moderation positions, I know for a fact they did not ask for or receive resumes. They went by gut. I have been successful in every leadership position I have ever been in, whether that is leading a team to victory in survivor or having jobs where I bring my division to the top in their district. Were they really seeking somebody based on merit, you would have lost.

Anybody looking for a successful campaign to the future presidential position should contact me, and I will once again prove my merit by winning. If I have to, I will create my own campaign, but as long as a candidate I approve of an who will listen to me approaches, I will get them the win here

That was already stated so pointless to bring up and is completely irrelevant to what I said.

It is useful though in showing the lengths people in positions of power will go to monopolize their power like literal Nazis, instead of acting as servant leaders. 

"Currently there is no role for a President within the moderation team."

No shit, nobody asked for there to be one, and again how closely you resemble a nazi is showing.

You must think this is the endgame and are fearing some sort of threat to your authority to randomly bring it up.

This is sad and pathetic on your parts is a small debating website and now that you feel like you have a bit of authority, you think you hold some sort of real power.

It goes to show that you hopefully are never handed  any power in real life. You will feel threatened whensomebody thinks power shouldn't be monopolized. You are an evil person and you need to take a close look at your soul and decide whether you want to remain evil or if you want to be a servant leader who works to democratize power

president: make rules

mods: enforce rules

Elect me president and I will abolish the coc

Falling in line with a policy that will otherwise get you lynched is basic survival instinct, it doesn't mean I support said policy.

You argued the same thing in south park mafia when you claimed vanilla without pressure. You didn't agree with it, but did it because that's what you thought the meta was.

Why do atheists hate an individual they claim never existed.

 Idek that's how my google translate said

No the implication is that as town, the player would recognize drafter's trap: scum would fall for it an actually post the Spanish for miller, but town would be quick to point out that their role "miller" is in English.

DD, why did you not do that.

Why do you think they haven't.

Btw policy lynches against millers are so dumb.

You are punishing a player for receiving a role as if they have control over that. It will start encouraging millers not to claim SOP and when they get caught guilty on cop results and mislynched they will get yelled at for not claiming miller lol. We are creating double standards for ourselves. Mods aren't going to stop using millers either.

That's a better question. The primary function of insemination during coitus is fertilization, which typically results in pregnancy.

Roles have been taken from Drafterman’s list and/or MafiaScum

Once again, your "state of mind" is not being scrutinized; if you're a heterosexual who engaged in coitus which resulted in insemination, then you engaged an act intended for pregnancy. Your "wanting" pregnancy is a moot point.

Once again, your "state of mind" is not being scrutinized; if you're a heterosexual who engaged in coitus which resulted in insemination, then you engaged an act intended for pregnancy. Your "wanting" pregnancy is a moot point.

intended alludes to plans, goals, purposes, and design which is relevant and more pertinent to the context of our discussion

Heterosexuals engage in coitus, so heterosexuals.

since women also can do this I don't see how it is a pure example of male anything.

talking over someone or not letting them interject isn't sex dependant nor a privilege, it's it rude and not socially acceptable, in fact that can get you chastised and possible excluded in the future, hardly a privilege.