Total posts: 5,432
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
You said that the goal of democrats is to save the planet by not having as many humans. I was saying if the left was consistent with it, then they would get their tubes tied or vasectomies.
False again, and again and again. Here again is the quote you posted of Ebuc, ---#16--
-Eb---Tend toward global considerations in long term survival of humanity = democrat Republican is opposite of democrat, for the most part in the above, they only consider of the financial buck nationality.
No where is there a "goal of democrats" stated by me, anywhere in this thread, and this is third or 4th time you project a false narrative on me. Sad :--((
When you want to address what I stated, then please do so and stop with all of the false narrative projection on to me. Please
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Udog...This is what you said:
Ebuc...Longer term survival of humanity is many issues involving human over population for the operating systems we have in place, that, are a detriment to ecology that sustains humanity and many related biological species. Ex 50% of coral of the Great barrier reef is gone. Or so I just read or heard few days ago.Republicans are for most part clueless on ecological issues and the primary causes of these issues. Sort of brain dead erego, my comment above as you quoted
That is not the quote you posted in reply to me in post #16. Do you still not understand the my reply to you in those regards in post #21. Apparrently you do not. Trumpeteer with false narrative or, your still confused. I think your a Trumpeteer who prefers false narrative over truth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next we go on to your new posted quote of ebuc above. So again, nothing there regarding your choice of words regarding "prochoice".
If the sole goal of democrats is to prevent overpopulation to save the planet and this includes abortion laws, then why do the vast majority of democrat voters have kids?
I never stated "sole goal" so again, this a false narrative your trying to project on to me. Typical Trumpeteer behaviour from you over a few posts now, and that is just today. You need to go back --and re-read-- to your quoting of me in you post #16, and specify where that quote is from, for starters. No "prochoice" and no "sole goal" is posted by me, only you.
This is about you learning how to play fair.
If democrat voters have kids, they would be going against what their party stands for if this is indeed what their party stands for. Every democrat man would get a vasectomy and every democrat woman would get her tubes tied if this is what the parties stood for.
I never stated anything about "every democrat man would get a vasectomy", this again more false narrative on your part. You fear addressing what I state, and prefer going off on some false narrative trying to project it on me. Typical Trumpeteer foul play. Sad Udog is not the the underdog, just a dog who likes to play under-handedly.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
You addressed none the errors in your remarks to me{ post 21 }, that, I pointed out clearly to you. I think your Trumpeteer and the kind of behaviour weve come to expect from them.
False narrative is the name of the game for most if not all Trumpeteers. You were confused at best and at worse___?__
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
.Eb---Tend toward global considerations in long term survival of humanity = democratRepublican is opposite of democrat, for the most part in the above, they only consider of the financial buck nationality.
Udog...If democrats cared just about long term survival of humanity, then they would be pro life because that helps humanity survive. If your pro choice, that's fine, but don't claim the pro choice position helps humanity survive; it harms humanity surviving.
Huh? Udog your confused at best and at worse ____?_____ You need to re-read what you quoted comment above, from ebuc. Nowhere are your words "prochoice" in the quote from ebuc. So you off base and I just tagged you as being out, and sending you back the bunker with other right-wing conservatives, many of which are Trumpeteers { !@#$%^&*()_+ }
If you want to have "prochoice" vs other disscussion, then there are plenty of threads on abortion you can address me in, as ive participated in most of them and very clear as to what I think.
Longer term survival of humanity is many issues involving human over population for the operating systems we have in place, that, are a detriment to ecology that sustains humanity and many related biological species. Ex 50% of coral of the Great barrier reef is gone. Or so I just read or heard few days ago.
Republicans are for most part clueless on ecological issues and the primary causes of these issues. Sort of brain dead erego, my comment above as you quoted
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
In 2008 Borgnine told Fox & Friends that the secret to his longevity was masturbating -- a lot -- so take from that what you will.He lived until he was 95.
There is a few scandanavian studies that show men who masturbate more frequent have less prostate cancer, if I recall correctly, they surmise by more frequent masturbation the gonads are flush out better, not stuff sitting around stagnating for longer periods of time
Created:
Posted in:
......960.03..."Time is the only dimension. In synergetics time-size is expressible as frequency."....
ex /\/\/\/ or as OOOOO or as ( )( )( )( ) or as (---)(---)(---)(---) with this latter my version for 2D view of quantum tunneling between black holes
Part 2: The science of pattern is geometry
1} nodal event, 2} vertexial event, 3} lines-of-relationship, 4} resultant Meta-space angle { degrees between lines-of-relationship }
Understanding the nodal event { > or ^ or v < } i.e. intersection of twolines-of-relationship { /\/\/ }, in the 2D { areal ] lattice presentation of the quantum space-time torus
...( )( )....
(> <) = outer Gravitational invagination { as > or v } from outer positive geodesic surface of quantum space-time tube
top peak { ^} of resultant sine-wave inside quantum tube as observed { quantised } time reality
bottom peak { v } resultant sine-wave inside quantum tube as observed { quantised } time reality
<)(> = inner Dark Energy invaginations as > or ^ from inner surface o fquantum space-time tube
...note:the small p identifies prime number associated with some nodal events, all of which occur on the outer Gravitational set --except for 2p on inner most level as .....Dark Energy with the 3p that occurs on bottom peak level of the sine-wave pattern of physical reality
.......v................5p......vp...........vp.....vp.............13p....Gravity outer surface of tube
-
-
0............................^.......................v.........................minimal not a closed torus..Reality inside tube
...............3p.........................v.......................^...........Reality inside tube
-
-
............2p.......^................^.....^...............^....................DE.inner surface of tube
Minimal quantum of Universe is the single unit as graviton-darkEon an composed of 14 { see 13p aslast node } nodal events, and three of those 14 events are in the sine-wave pattern with a total of 3 nucleations { 3p..6..9 } as nucleus of 2D set of hexagons ex 0..1...5p...6....6..2p...3p is nucleus of this initial 2D hexagon { in 2D lattice format }
.............>^ v < > ^ v < ^ v > ^ v <.......ergo 91lines-of-relationship , via 14^2, minus 14, divided by 2 = 91 ---only 14 of the 91 lines-of-relationship are shown
….note: this pattern does not inherently close-off as a torus, ergo, my belief, that, a single graviton-darkion is not possible to be isolated out from space and time Universe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
And human life is defined as human life.
The topic is abortion of the human life.
1} starts with sex education and much scientific know how ---like putting humans on the moon--- to create birth control measures for men and women and actively seek to have less unwanted pregnancies, duhh ...*O*...., h,mm makes sense, unless were dealing with imbeciles,
...note: religous and non-relious right-wing conservatives has fought this for thousands of years....sic-n-head humans
2} unless requested by pregnant woman, others should keep their noses out of her bodily business and avoid label of virtual rape,
3} abortion pills should be easily availble ---duhh, logical, commnon sense, critical thinking resultant--- as least intrusive method for the pregnant woman, and can be done within the privacy of her home via health care providers,
4} keep all other sickos, and necessary political debate out of the obvious, logical common sense ans what should be, the primary concerns of the pregnant woman, unless she asks for assistance.
8 billion humans on Earth and rising, as 50% of great barrier coral reefs have died off, and 14% increase in deforestation of Amazon last year, and the long list of ecological destruction is only getting worse, due to human activity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Stuff happens, we move on, the future of personal transport in the short term will be a transition from the internal combustion engine to electric.
More people { 8 billion currently } = more cars = more traffic congestion = more road rage { ecological dangers }
More people = requires more transport energy resources = more nukes, more wind, more solar, more hydro, more mining the of the Earth precious metals { ecological dangers } >>> 50% or great barrier reef coral has vanished >>> 2022 we saw 14% increase in deforestation of Amazon rainforest = more fishing
More people = more safe food, safe air, safe fresh water safe ecology t sustain us
More people = more conflicting needs for limited resources = less privacy = more disease transmission = deperate measures for more and more desperate peoples
More human = ______* ? *________
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Zed, you know why the easter bunny hides his eggs?
~~~~o~~~~~o~~~~~~~0~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~0~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~0~~~~~~0~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He doesnt want anyone to know, that, he has been messin with a chicken :--))
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Oh shoot! This entire time I thought you meant that your definition somehow included my definition. Now I understand that you just mean that it falls into that category. Yes. I agree. It does. I apologize for causing confusion.
Bingo! All that you, other { includes me } have to offer, will fall within the Cosmic Trinary Set/Outline/Table of Contents etc in one or more of them. Simple
Then the Cosmic Trinary Set/Outline/Table of Contents has trinary sub-sets.
0} Spirit-1, Meta-space has trinay subset of 0a} relative truth, 0b} absolute truth, 0c} false narrative, that, can be unintitional false narrative or intentional mixture of false and truth to mis-lead or mis-direct others. Ok? Understand?
----------conceptual line of demarcation---------------------
1] > 1a} macro infinite, and truly non-occupied space, is also 1b] micro-infinite, and is 1c] shaped/formed where it meets the outer nodal event surface of our finite, occupied space Universe i.e. where the macro-infinite embraces our finite, occupied space and dynamic Universe Ok? Understand?
2} Spirit- 2, 3, 4 as our finite, occupied space and dynamic Universe,
....2a] Spirit-2 is physical reality ergo energy in two primary and instrumentally quantised forms,2aa} fermionic matter and 2aaa} bosonic forces, tho, there is a new 2aaaa} hybrid set of these two, to that maybe can considered a trinary sub-set of Spirit2. Ok? Understand?
...note: observed time i.e. quantised frequency as a energetic paricles is associated with 0{ Meta-space pattering of a sine-wave /\/\/ or as ^v^v^....
...2b} Spirit-3, meta-physical { because not yet quantised by humans } Gravity ( ) ---positive geodesic outer---
....2c} Spirit-4, meta-physical { because not yet quantised by humans, Dark Energy )( ---negative geodesic inner---
Note: above we have primary, trinary sub-set of 2 and of 2a. Ok? Understand?
So once you grasp the above, then, we find we have covered all of the primary and 2ndary fundmentals of our most Wholistic Set of Existence, that includes 0} Spirit-1 Meta-space, 1} truly non-occupied space, 2} dynamic occupied space Universe. Ok? Understand?
Now, whatever you want to disscuss, I can begin by knowing which one or more of the above catagorys ---table of contents-- were dealing with, and develop more sub-catagories as they become self-evident, and/or with others input.
Also, once you truly grasp the above, then I would direct you too Arthur Youngs ---inverntor of the Bell helicoptor--- Reflexive Universe site, to see that he and i used a similar starting point --four levels/lines of sequential numbers--- to come to similar ideas, but still differrent. And where his lead to primary set of seven, and sub-sets of seven, Ive found primary, trianary sub-sets that precede his seven-ness apporach.
So Math Enthusiats so glad you and I are in less confusiion. Synergetic effect of two people working as a team is 95 more effective and effiecient.
Created:
Posted in:
Cosmic Trinary Set is valid and youve shown nothing, zip,nada that invalidates it. Place a quote here, from you LINK that invalidates the cosmic trinary set aka the most wholistic set of existence, that starts with a set of three.
You provided no quote that directly address 0}, 1} or 2} that invalidates them as presented, much less added any validity to them. I offer zilch, nada, zero.
0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts{ abstractions }, ego math and geometric patterns, ergo, concepts of Concepts, God, Time, Space, Love, Dogs, Cats, Toyotas etc, are not actual space, or dogs or cats etc i.e a a concept has no mass, no charge, no color, no spin etc. Ok? Understand? So valid as presented
------conceptual line of demarcation clarifies distinction of the above from the below------
1} macro-infinite and truly non-occupied space, that, is outside/Meta of ergo, embraces the following, catagory
...note: valid as presented
2} Spirit-2, 3 and 4, finite occupied space Universe,
.. 2a} } Spirit-2, physical reality { energy }---associated with sine-wave pattern /\/\/ or as ^v^v^--- falls in catagory of Spirit-2 aka fermionic matter { energy } and bosonic forces { energy } and yes there is new third catagory/set that is hybrid of those two,
...2b} Spirit-3, non-quantised,ergo Meta-physical Gravity ( ),
....2c} Spirit-4, non-quantised ergo Meta-physical Dark Energy )(.
This above primary, trinary subset is valid as presented.
Your spiritual logicism fall into catagory 0}. Simple.
And ive pointed out that your "real" in catagory 2A}. Simple, if you no ego based mental blockages occur.
Ive addressed your statements directly as presented in this thread and others, and expect same from you. Your mind games, driven by your ego, to avoid obvious truths, logic, common sense critical thing is becoming to much of chore, requiring to much time and effort.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The reason is that I respect your ideas, and want to learn from you. I can see that you have some interesting things to bring to the table. Try to have that same respect for me.
If truly respect them then, --for the umteenth time--- directly address then, as I have done with you, to no avail.
Ok then first this ....Physical reality {is an occupied space } " what is real " = energy { an occupied space } = what we can humans quantise via iour nstrumentation ergo an occupied space. And to clarify for you, we believe Gravity and Dark Eenergy exist, however, we have not and may never ever be able to quantise them. Ok, understand? Ergo they remain in Spirit-3 and Spirit-4 subsets of occcupied space as Meta-physical phenomena.
If so you can see further below the fall in catagory of Space > occupied space > specifically defined as Meta-physical becaue not quantised by humans. This is laid out clearly in the table of contents as follows
IVe also addressed your "Spiritual logicism" directly #9 and again below, til you grasp that is falls in catagory of:
.......0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego i.e. that which exists beyond/Meta our finite, occupied space Universe, and,
beyond/Meta the macro-infinite, and truly non-occupied space, that,
again exists beyond/Meta our finite occupied space Universe,
ex abstract concepts of Space, God, Time, Universe, Toyotas, Concepts, Dogs, relative truth, absolute truth and false narrative, etc...i.e. abstract logic, common sense and critical thinking pathways of thought, or even not logical, not common sense, and no critical thinking all fall in this 0} Spirit-1, Meta-space catagory. Simple
So now we go back to top of the Table of Contents, of conceptual book entitled Cosmic Trinary Set:
0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts{ abstractions } and ego ergo, concepts of Concepts, God, Time, Space, Love, Dogs, Cats< Toyotas etc, are not actual space, ergo, have no mass, no charge, no color, no spin etc. ok? Understand?
------conceptual line of demarcation clarifies distinction of the above from the below------
1} macro-infinite and truly non-occupied space, that, is outside/Meta of ergo, embraces the following, catagory
2} Spirit-2, 3 and 4, finite occupied space Universe,
.. 2a} } Spirit-2, physical reality { energy } falls in catagory of Spirit-2 aka fermionic matter { energy } and bosonic forces { energy } and yes there is new third catagory/set that is hybrid of those two,
...2b} Spirit-3, non-quantised,ergo Meta-physical Gravity ( ),
....2c} Spirit-4, non-quantised ergo Meta-physical Dark Energy )(.
First and foremost, what Ive tried to make clear to you, that whatever definitive descriptions of existence you have to offer, fall within this Cosmic Trinary Set { 0, 1, 2 }. Do you understand that? Ex lets say fermion, well fermionic matter is an occupied space of phyiscal realtiy { quantised } ergo, falls within 2} spirit and specifically 2a} Spirit-2.
Created:
Posted in:
Biologic life has value. Cars have value. Money has value --until is doesnt---. Gold has value. Dirt has value. Concepts ergo Meta-space info has value.
How we arrive at value varys i.e. there exists no cosmic absolute truth regarding value.
Value is in the eye-of-the-beholder, and that value can change, just as circumstances altar cases.
Those who chose to create a false narrative have a value to themselves that allows them to mislead others, by posting words made to appear as tho their quoting some one else, yet the words are not what other stated. All that exists has a value of one sort or another. All that exist has pros and cons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The reason is that I respect your ideas, and want to learn from you. I can see that you have some interesting things to bring to the table. Try to have that same respect for me.
Ok then first this ....Physical reality {is an occupied space } " what is real " = energy { an occupied space } = what we can humans quantise via iour nstrumentation ergo an occupied space. And to clarify for you, we believe Gravity and Dark Eenergy exist, however, we have not and may never ever be able to quantise them. Ok, understand? Ergo they remain in Spirit-3 and Spirit-4 subsets of occcupied space as Meta-physical phenomena.
If so you can see further below the fall in catagory of Space > occupied space > speifically defined as Meta-physical becaue not quantised by humans. This is laid out clearly in the table of contents as follows
If so you can see further below the fall in catagory of Space > occupied space > speifically defined as Meta-physical becaue not quantised by humans. This is laid out clearly in the table of contents as follows
IVe also addressed your "Spiritual logicism" directly #9 and again below, til you grasp that is falls in catagory of:
.......0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego i.e. that which exists beyond/Meta our finite, occupied space Universe, and,
beyond/Meta the macro-infinite, and truly non-occupied space, that,
again exists beyond/Meta our finite occupied space Universe,
ex abstract concepts of Space, God, Time, Universe, Toyotas, Concepts, Dogs, relative truth, absolute truth and false narrative, etc...i.e. abstract logic, common sense and critical thinking pathways of thought, or even not logical, not common sense, and no critical thinking all fall in this 0} Spirit-1, Meta-space catagory. Simple
So now we go back to top of the Table of Contents, of conceptual book entitled Cosmic Trinary Set:
0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts{ abstractions } and ego ergo, concepts of Concepts, God, Time, Space, Love, Dogs, Cats< Toyotas etc, are not actual space, ergo, have no mass, no charge, no color, no spin etc. ok? Understand?
------conceptual line of demarcation clarifies distinction of the above from the below------
1} macro-infinite and truly non-occupied space, that, is outside/Meta of ergo, embraces the following, catagory
2} Spirit-2, 3 and 4, finite occupied space Universe,
.. 2a} } Spirit-2, physical reality { energy } falls in catagory of Spirit-2 aka fermionic matter { energy } and bosonic forces { energy } and yes there is new third catagory/set that is hybrid of those two,
...2b} Spirit-3, non-quantised,ergo Meta-physical Gravity ( ),
....2c} Spirit-4, non-quantised ergo Meta-physical Dark Energy )(.
First and foremost, what Ive tried to make clear to you, that whatever definitive descriptions of existence you have to offer, fall within this Cosmic Trinary Set { 0, 1, 2 }. Do you understand that? Ex lets say fermion, well fermionic matter is an occupied space of phyiscal realtiy { quantised } ergo, falls within 2} spirit and specifically 2a} Spirit-2.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Since you clearly didn't understand the first time I will spell things out a bit more clearly.
False. I not only understood I directly addressed it with the correct answer.
Would this set be an element of itself?
Yes, but it falls within a greater primary set ergo it is a set in of itself and it is a subset of the Cosmic Trinary Set. Your the one who doesnt grasp any of that.
The cosmic Trinary Set is a set onto them selves --elements are atoms 92 chemical elements---, and one or more of them over lap each other in some way. Ex 1} truly non-occupied space and occupied space are both of the catagory of Space: just ive presented in one or more threads and in the Revised Wholistic Set of Existence.
1} and 2} are both complemented by 0} Spirit-1 Meta-space. So and so on.
Yes, and it may have a trinary sub-set also. There a few if not many of those and again, whatever set you want to propose/present is subset/sub-catagory of the Cosmic Trinary Set. You can try all you want, and again, you nor anyone else can present a set that is not within the Cosmic Trinary Set. Please share if you think you can. You have not done that yet.
I did not say "would this set be an element of the cosmic trinary set?" I said "would this set be an element of itself?"
I didnt say that you said that. I said that it is. You dont seem to grasp, for the umpteenth time, any thing, element, molecule concept or etc will fall within the Cosmic Trinary Set. You stuck in loop of trying to get away from the truths ive presented from the start, and have to repeated bring you back to, over and over and over. Please stop running from obvious truths, as Ive clearly defined in a trinary set for you and others. Simple nnot complex yet you avoid these truths, over and over and over........etc.......
I'm not even claiming that there is something that doesn't fall into this set.
That is good, becuase you nor anyone else can do that, and ive been asking you to address that comment and others directly by understanding the above, showing evidence you understand, you accept what Ive presented as the top, most wholistic set of existence, and then we can move on. Some umpteen posts in umpteen various threads, later.
I'm claiming that it isn't even a valid concept. I am demonstrating this by showing that if it was, then that would lead to a contradiction. Perhaps you should read up on proof by contradiction. (Do you actually go to these links? I'm doubtful you know what Russell's paradox is as you read this right now.)
Huh? What exactly "isnt even a valid concept"? What specific are you talking about? Are addressing a comment I made? If I made such a, then present that comment I made that is invalid, regarding the Cosmic Trinary Set.
If not, then by definition it would be. If so, then by definition it would not be. This is a contradiction, and so our initial premise must have been false.I address this above. Subsets are sets, but that does not preclude them from being a sub-set of the more wholistic trinary set, and you obviously do not grasp this relatively simple concept. We could have moved on to more of what you have too offer, except you cant get past the the Cosmic Primary Set. Maybe you dont grasp the definition of the word primary.
You seem to think that just because I don't agree with you means that I don't know the definition of many English words.
You have shown no evidence that you have any clue of the obvious truths Ive presented in the Cosmic Trinary Set, and all of my comments directing you back to them. Ex you have nothing to present that does not fall withing one or more of the Trinary Set. Go ahead please try, drop the ego game and say you understand what Ive stated is true. You cannot invalidate, add a 4th primary or present anything that does not fall within one or more of those three.
You been running from truth since post#9 by me and Ive been chasing you to acknowledge the obvious truths. So round and round we go.
You been running from truth since post#9 by me and Ive been chasing you to acknowledge the obvious truths. So round and round we go.
Not everyone who disagrees with you is automatically stupid. I would have thought that someone on a debate site could respect differing points of view. Apparently not. That's sad. Now, let's break down your attempted refutation.
So you disagree with my response to you in post #7 in material and spiritual' that your comment falls with catagory 0} Spirit-1, Meta-space etc?
If so then your incorrect.
We could have moved on to more of what you have too offer, except you cant get past the the Cosmic Primary Set.
So basically you chose mocking me over providing an actual refutation.
Huh? False and you appear confused. What I state of above is amatter of fact. Your ego has run off trying to leave the cosmic trinary set in the dust, and that se includes definition of Universe.
I hate to break it to you, but it has actually been known for some time among mathematicians that you simply cannot put everything in a set without it leading to contradictions.
I never stated a single set. There are many catagorical sets. Ive started at the top i.e.the most wholistic sets of Eexistence and that begins with a trianary set, not a single set. Please share when you have something that does not fit into one or more of those three.
Ive been asking you for hours and hours now to present something thing. You and no one else ever has or ever will. C'mon, lets see you do it. Just as thought, you cant and your ego cannot accept this truth. Ive seen this ego game played out for 20 years or more.
(Actually read the Russell's paradox webpage which I linked to earlier please.) Therefore, defining a set as the "most wholistic" isn't even a valid concept.
Cosmic Trinary Set is valid and youve shown nothing, zip,nada that invalidates it. Place a quote here, from you LINK that invalidates the cosmic trinary set aka the most wholistic set of existence, that starts with a set of three.
Also, if you had actually read my posts over on Material and Spiritual, you would know that we are never going to get to move of what I have to offer, because I'm going to create my own forum topic once I have the qualification.
I read a line of text #7 and specifically addressed in #9. You need to go back there, so we can start all over. What a chore and waste of time and effort your proving to be. Ego is the problem here is my best guess. Maybe not understanding. Time may tell.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
MEn--post #18---Once again, your definition makes no reference to reality being founded in logic, so mine does not fall into that catagory.
To which I responded with this and other.
eB--Abstract concept of Space is not actual space, and same goes of concept of occupied space thing. Dogs, GOd, Time, Universe concepts are Meta-space not and actual space.This proves your point how?
I didnt say it proved a point. I presented to you then --and clearly laying out for you in several threads now---, the catagorical differrences/distinctions/differrentiations, between,
0} Spirit-1 Meta-space, mind/intellect/concepts and ego, and that of,
2} Spirit-2, occupied space physical reality as energy aka fermionic matter and bosonic forces.
It seems you dont grasp anything I present to you, so either you not reading, not understand and comprehending or you ego is in the way of accepting the obvious catagorically defined distinctions ergo I have to keep repeating and repeating and repeating the same comments to you until you get these catagorical distinctions.
It seems you dont grasp anything I present to you, so either you not reading, not understand and comprehending or you ego is in the way of accepting the obvious catagorically defined distinctions ergo I have to keep repeating and repeating and repeating the same comments to you until you get these catagorical distinctions.
I believe it is a ego based mental blockage.
EB--Please try and make a distinction between an abstract concept of a dog and an occupied space dog that will actually bite your leg you could get occupied space virus bacteria etc. Can you make that distinction? Do I have to lead you to a dictionary?
ME--Yes, I can. Why did you think I couldn't? How is this relevant? Once again, this proves your point how?
Because you have not address them specfically and you have shown zero evidence that you understand or accept anything ive presented. What a chore you have become.
EB--I will keep going over this untill you are able to make these distinctions at the top of cosmic trinary set. Simple, not difficult to grasp, unless your ego gets in the way, or you not taking the time to understand and comprehend what Ive stated from the get go --at the top of each thread-- to you
"Unless my ego gets in the way, or I am not taking the time to understand and comprehend what I've stated from the get go --at the top of each thread-- to you." Oh I'm doing that am I?
Yes, that is one option, and ive stated over and over other options, however, over time, since youve not addressed any of them directly and basically glossed over them, and showed no evidence of grasping them, and yes, then eventually, anyone will come to the conclusion I have, that you have ego based mental blockage to relatively clear defintions, catagories, as ive presented.
And any comment you make, present etc, is going to fall within one of those catagorical primary sets, as some immediate { 1st } subset/subcatagory, or 2nd or 3rd etc.
And any comment you make, present etc, is going to fall within one of those catagorical primary sets, as some immediate { 1st } subset/subcatagory, or 2nd or 3rd etc.
ME---You are the one who clearly either didn't fully read or didn't fully understand my posts, and you are the one who seems to be under the impression that your ideas are superior to mine by default. Need I remind you that you said this back in post #9?
I read and addressed your line of text in post #7, of text regarding Spiritual logicism andI then responeded in #9, to that told you what catagory/set it falls within, and you did not address my response directly, or if you did, you obviously did answer correctly, i.e. you went off without again addressing the specifics of the catagory you comment falls within.
EB---All that you have to offer will always fall withing my Cosmic Trinary Set.
The way I see it, you are the one whose ego is getting in the way, and you are the one who isn't taking the time to understand and comprehend what I said.
See above regarding post # 7 by you then #9 by me. I directly read and addressed on specific comment and you have pretty much had a mental blockage for the most since that response by me in #9.
This madness all started from me asking for you to respect my ideas as separate from your own. Respect.
Respect is 2-way street. You need to go back to #9 and start there. My response is directly in regards to your #7 and mine is very specific and very clearly defined and you have not showed much of any respect by showing how my comment to you was invalid. Your along ways from respect.
Respect for the time and effort that I put in to the ideas that I have shared with you here. That was all I ever asked for. Does wanting respect mean I have a big ego? Please just acknowledge that neither of us has thought of everything that the other has.
My ego read you comment in #7 and my ego responded in #9 by directly addressing your comment and showing you what catagory of the Cosmic Trinary Set it falls within, clearly defined.
When you want to drop you ego and directly respond, ---some umpteen posts in several threads now-- to those specific comments and show that there invalid, I'm here for you, as I have bee for every ego that has ever attempted to engage me with the Cosmic Trinary Set that, begins with 0} Spirit-1, Meta-space, mind/intellect/concepts and ego, ergo concepts of Space, Time, God, Universe, Spirit, Dogs, Toyotas etc.
When you want to drop you ego and directly respond, ---some umpteen posts in several threads now-- to those specific comments and show that there invalid, I'm here for you, as I have bee for every ego that has ever attempted to engage me with the Cosmic Trinary Set that, begins with 0} Spirit-1, Meta-space, mind/intellect/concepts and ego, ergo concepts of Space, Time, God, Universe, Spirit, Dogs, Toyotas etc.
You keep running from these obvious catagorical sets of truths. Learn what a table of contents is in any good educational book. Then apply that to what Ive presenting in this thread and others involving your and at least one other new one, ---Revised Wholistic Set of Existence-- that had even more specifics and other ways of presenting the same concepts
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Now that I am 18,...
When I was 18 this song by Alice Cooper came out and his words are eternally relevant to 18 year olds.
..." Lines form on my face and hands
Lines form from the ups and downs
I'm in the middle without any plans
I'm a boy and I'm a man
I'm eighteen
And I don't know what I want
Eighteen
I just don't know what I want
Eighteen
I gotta get away
I've gotta get out of this place
I'll go runnin' in outer space
Oh yeah
I've got a
Baby's brain and an old man's heart
Took eighteen years to get this far
Don't always know what I'm talkin' about
Feels like I'm livin' in the middle of doubt
'Cause I'm
Eighteen
I get confused every day
Eighteen
I just don't know what to say
Eighteen
I gotta get away
Whoa
Lines form on my face and my hands
Lines form on the left and right
I'm in the middle, the middle of life
I'm a boy and I'm a man
I'm eighteen and I like it
Yes I like it
Oh, I like it, love it
Like it, love it
Eighteen, eighteen, eighteen
Eighteen and I like it "...
And the tune is very good also.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Great your going to attempt to invalidate my comments of the invalidity of what ive presented for some 20 years now.
You can't put everything in a set. Here is proof:
Its called a Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concept of a table of contents regarding the most wholistic set, I label as the Cosmic Trinary Set
Suppose that we can indeed have everything in the same set.
It is the most wholistic set, that is no less than, and no more than the Cosmic Primary Set of catagories. All else is a sub-catagory/subset of those three. Simple, yet you have not taken the time to grasp this relatively simple concept.
Then we can obtain a subset which is the set of all sets which are not elements of themselves.
Yes, all else is a sub-set/sub-catagory of one or more of the primary set of three. Ive been very clear to you in a few of these threads today, and prior to today.
Would this set be an element of itself?
Yes, and it may have a trinary sub-set also. There a few if not many of those and again, whatever set you want to propose/present is subset/sub-catagory of the Cosmic Trinary Set. You can try all you want, and again, you nor anyone else can present a set that is not within the Cosmic Trinary Set. Please share if you think you can. You have not done that yet.
If not, then by definition it would be. If so, then by definition it would not be. This is a contradiction, and so our initial premise must have been false.
I address this above. Subsets are sets, but that does not preclude them from being a sub-set of the more wholistic trinary set, and you obviously do not grasp this relatively simple concept. We could have moved on to more of what you have too offer, except you cant get past the the Cosmic Primary Set. Maybe you dont grasp the definition of the word primary.
I suggest you do some reading into Russel's paradox and the ZFC axiom system. I'll leave it at this for now, as I hope it will be enough for you to realize that this "most wholistic set" you keep speaking of is not a valid concept.
You offered and proof of that which is not in the within --fall under-- the c Cosmic Trinary Set. You have not done that. You cant, and nor can anyone else. This is rather simple, logical common sense critical thinking. Unless there is ego issue, or truly do not grasp the concepts as defined by me.
Pull something out of you above lINKs that believe is not with the context of the Cosmic Primary Set. Please try. It cant be done. Again, what ever you present, I will tell you which of those or more three catagorical sets it falls into.
Created:
Posted in:
2} the egg or fertilized egg detaches from fallopian tubes { in pregnant woman } as it travels [ via muscle contractions } to uterus, where it attaches to womb/uterus wall for 9 months and nourished by pregnant woman until born-out and taken its first breath { in-spirited }, or,
...........is naturally aborted, for whatever reasons-- or aborted as choice of the pregnant woman. Any other, sticking their nose into her bodily business.
----without pregnants womans consent---, is virtual rape.
Biologic life has value. Cars have value. Money has value --until is doesnt---. Gold has value. Dirt has value. Concepts ergo Meta-space info has value.
How we arrive at value varys i.e. there exists no cosmic absolute truth regarding value.
Value is in the eye-of-the-beholder, and that value can change, just as circumstances altar cases.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Once again, your definition makes no reference to reality being founded in logic, so mine does not fall into that catagory.
Spirit-2, physical eality = energy = quantised stuff is occupied space ergo a subcatagory of our finite Universe. Ok you got that?
Spirit-1, Meta-space = mind/intellect/concepts ergo logic, common sense, critical thinking etc. And ego. You that.
Abstract concept of Space is not actual space, and same goes of concept of occupied space thing. Dogs, GOd, Time, Universe concepts are Meta-space not and actual space.
Please try and make a distinction between an abstract concept of a dog and an occupied space dog that will actually bite your leg you could get occupied space virus bacteria etc. Can you make that distinction? Do I have to lead you to a dictionary?
I will keeo going over this untill you are able to make these distinctions at the top of cosmic trinary set. Simple, not difficult to grasp, unless your ego gets in the way, or you not taking the time to understand and comprehend what Ive stated from the get go --at the top of each thread-- to you
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
I don't see categorization as doing anything but helping our limited minds to understand what the universe is made up of.
Any good education book has at very beginning a table of contents, that lays out in general the primary topics and the subcatagorical chapters. Again, think of the 0, 1 and 2 as the table primary set of in table of conents of a book entitled Cosmic Trinary Set, and then from there we have all other subsets/subcatagorical sets. You apparrently dont grasp the simple.
It seems that just as on the Material and Spiritual thread, you seem to think that no one could possible ever think of anything outside of what you have already come up with.
Thats true, and unless you can add to the Cosmic Trinary Set { 0, 1, 2 }, or invalidate it, then what anyone else has to offer, will begin by falling into one of those three primary catagories. Please share when you have something to present that does not fall into one of more of those three primary catagories. You cannot nor anyone else nor will you or others ever be able to .
Start with most wholistic set, and no parts can be excluded. Do you understand what that means? Apparrently you do not, as I have to keep repeating it to you, in this various threads.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
No. No I don't understand why you think that everyone else's ideas must somehow already be a part of yours. Please explain why you think that.
I did explain in post #9 today, you obviously disagree, and dont grasp the simple. So I have keep going back until you can grasp the simple, before we can move on.
Spiritual logicism: The belief that spiritual truths about the universe can be understood as, and fundamentally are, an extension of abstract logic. An extension of logicism to the nature of reality.
.......0} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego i.e. that whichexists beyond our finite, occupied space Universe and beyond the macro-finite and trulynon-occupied space, that, again exists outside/beyond/Meta ourfinite occupied space Universe, ex concepts of Space, God, Time, Universe, Toyotas, Concepts, Dogs, etc
Your Spiritual logicism falls in catagory of 0}above, or in post #1 i have it as 1b. Thenumerical labeling is irrelevant, the content of what I state clearly and I put that catagory in italics to help make the clear distinction from non-occupied space and occupied space. Your really need to start with the whole and grasp that first. So when i tell you what catagory you commment falls into, you will understand. Understand that?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
I don't grasp that, so apparently we can't move on. Your notion of the "most wholistic set of existence" doesn't necessarily contain mine.
Yes it does, So you really have no idea of the primary cosmic set " the most wholistic set', that Im presenting to you, and that is the place to start with the greatest whole ergo no parts can be excluded.
the trinary cosmic set is simple, not complex to grasp. You need to start there cause anything you have to offer false into one or more of those three primary catagories. Once you grasp that, then we can move on. you dont grasp that yet
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
0} Prior to your comments is pregnancy --either she is pregnant or not--- and what is overpopulated humanity on Earth, for the operating systems we have in place, going to do about that? To date religous right and right-wing have fought tooth and nail to fight preventive pregnancy, other than just say no to sex. Sex is primary and 95% pubescent animals are not going to just-say-no.
The mother does not have a right to kill a human life that is not part of her body, that she caused to exist.
1] False as usual. The egg and fertilized egg is in and of the woman, --not of Youfound_lxam or any male---, ergo she has all of the rights. The spermazoa is gift deposited by the male. Here you go and good luck, then male runs off, of the female runs off. See above about preventions
2} the egg or fertilized egg detaches from fallopian tubes { in pregnant woman } as it travels to uterus, where it attaches to womb wall for 9 months and nourished by pregnant woman until born-out and taken its first breath { in-spirited },
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The universe: All which physically exists, and all of the non-physical structures that are directly connected to it (like math or consciousness).
It is better --closer to absolute truth--- to make some catagorical distinctions:
2} Spirit-2, 3 and 4, finite, occupied space Universe
.. 2a} } Spirit-2, physical reality falls in catagory of Spirit-2 aka fermionic matter and bosonic forces and yes there is new third catagory that is hybrid of those two,
...2b} Spirit-3, non-quantised, Gravity,
....2c} Spirit-4, non-quantised Dark Energy
None ever have, nor ever will add too, or invalidate this trinary set. Ex a Spirit-5 does not exist. There may be a few other if not many trinary subcatagories.
Ex 0} Spirit-1 Meta-space 0a} relative truths, 0b} absolute truths and 0c} false narratives { a mixture of lies and truths }.
And here I have to point out the subcatgory of physical reality being a trinary set, wherein the third set is combination of the first two fermions, bosons and a newer catagory being a hybrid set of the previous two.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
The whole idea is to identify what is real. Saying "everything which exists in the universe" is not very useful to that end.
Physical reality { an occupied space } " what is real " = energy { an occupied space } = what we can quantise via instrumentation ergo an occupied space.
0} Spirit-1, Meta-space
-------conceptual line of demarcation------
1} macro-infinite non-occupied space, that, embraces the following,
2} Spirit-2, 3 and 4, finite occupied space Universe
.. 2a} } Spirit-2, physical reality falls in catagory of Spirit-2 aka fermionic matter and bosonic forces and yes there is new third catagory that is hybrid of those two,
...2b} Spirit-3, non-quantised, Gravity,
....2c} Spirit-4, non-quantised Dark Energy.
First and foremost, what Ive tried to make clear to you, that whatever definitive descriptions of existence you have to offer, fall into the Cosmic Trinary Set { 0, 1, 2 }. Do you understand that?
You need to start there, then we can get into specific subcatgories, as ive done for 20 years or more ex 2} 2a} 2b} 2c} as the primary trinary set of occupied space. Do you understand that? Any occupied space existence falls into one of more of those three sub-catagories.
If you can add to or invalidates any of those please share, otherwise, what I state above to you is the starting place, for all that you think exists. Understand?
Again, read the Cosmic Trinary Set as if it were a book containing the most wholistic set of existence. Start with most wholistic set and no parts can be exclude, i.e. anything you have to offer will fall into one of those The top Cosmic Trinary Set first and fore most. When you grasp that, then we can move on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Frankly the existence of a horizon - on its own - demonstrably obliterates flat earth.
Kudos to Ramshutu for having the closest correct answer. Correct descriptive answer is below at 1}.
0} If we imagine Earth as finite, flat plane and the sun orbit on a curved spherical trajectory, then we would see what we do see, and that is the sun-clipse --e-clipse-- in evening by flat Earths horizon as if the sun were sinking into the Earths flat plane. That would lead to a whole other crazy mess to say that sun sinks into flat Earths plane of existence.
1} we watch a ship { with its hight mast } sailing away in distance and with a binoculars, we will see the same vision of line 0} above, with the sun-clipse, however, the ship and its tall mast, are actually on Earths ocean, --not in orbit as is sun-- and as we see what appears to be the ship sinking --via the gradual clipsing from view-- we can radio the ship and ask them, are you sinking into ocean?
Of course there not because most often these ships come back --in days before radio--- and we know they do report sinking into the ocean, ergo, there is only one logical, common sense, critical thinking conclusion, and that is, the Earth is curved, and that is why we have the appearance of the ship and mast sinking --clipsing-- from our line of sight/view.
See the diffferrence there above. Our sun is in orbit, either around flat Earth or spherical Earth, we will have the same clipsing --sinking concept-- at the line-of-sight horizon.
Yet with ship and its mast, we know the ship is on Earth, not out in space, away from the Earth in an orbit, as is the sun,
2} or course we have satelites, that, orbit the Earth and with contineous photos that also prove Earth is spherical.
e-clipise > clipse > cipping in football is foul meaning we clip-off a below the waste on their forward movment/trajectory.
Fuller states it this way, it is more accurate to say in morning we have sun-sight, and evening sun-clipse as it is being clipped off/away by the horizon.
Created:
Posted in:
..PartOne: Associated with the Cosmic Trinary Set
...note:…." Startwith the whole and no parts can be excluded. "… parphrasingBucky Fuller
0} Meta-spacemind/intellect/concepts and ego ---definitive or generalized--- ex abstract concept of Space, Time, God, Universe, Dogs, Toyota's etc
-----------abstract conceptualline-of-demarcation-------
1} Space: 1a} macro-infinite and truly non-occupied space and 1b} } finite occupied space Universe.
2}definitive minimal space = 2a} area { triangle }, 2b} volume { tetra{4}hedron }
3} triangular area { V } = 3 nodal events { /\ } or, a central vertex { 3 lines-of-relationship intersecting } via the open triangular set 'Y'
4} tetra(4)hedron = 4 vertexial events { \Y/ }, or as 2D subdivision of triangular area { \Y/ }
5} 3D { XY, XZ, YZ } or in Synergetics as 4D great hexagonal planes of the Vector Equilibrium { powering ex 10*F^2 and F^2 etc }or as, 963.02
......" In synergetics, the first-power linear measure is the radius of the sphere".... oras,
......" In synergetics, second powering ...= point aggregate quanta = area. In synergetics, second powering represents the rate of system surface growth'...{ read surfacegrowth as outer area growth }
......964.30 " But what physics shows is very interesting: there are no continuous shells, there are only energy-event foci and quanta. They can be considered as points or "little spheres."
..note: actually interfering and overlapping tori with the invisible Gravity and Dark Energy via invaginations { (><)(><) } with resultant sine-wave patterns { /\/\/ } and what most humans have yet to discover is the the outer and inner surface of torus { Gravity and Dark Energy } remain unseen unmanifest to our instrumentation......
....965.01.."Since the original point was a tetrahedron and already a priori volumetric, the third powering is in fact sixth powering: N3 × N3 = N6.'....N^3 * N^3 = N^6 ex 4^6 * 4^6 = 4,096 and that is 1024 individual tetrahedra, aka minimal spheres.......
...5a} area diagonal 'd' { nodal event <--to--> line-of-relationship in triangle { \|/ } or as,
..........nodal event<--to->nodal event in square { [ / ] }
6} D { dimension } is ABCD areas/openings/portals/no-vents in tetra{4}ahedron or as, XYZ 90 degree cartesian cube/hexa{6}hedron
...6a} volumetric diagonal 'd' is perpendicular { 90 degree }, vertex<---to--->no-vent/portal/area in tetra{4}hedron, or as, 45 degree, vertex<---to--->vertex in hexa{6}hedron/cube
7} observed time { quantized occupied space } via frequency oftetra{4}hedra in the 4-fold Vector Equilibrium -- inherently contained in 10 Great Circles of the 5-fold icosa{2-}hedron---, LINK i.e. an overlapping set of 5 Vector Equilibria
........observed time{ quantized occupied space } via frequency as associated with of sine-wave { /\/\/ } patterning and especially as found in quantum space-time tori
......960.03..."Timeis the only dimension.In synergetics time-size is expressibleas frequency."....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Spiritual logicism: The belief that spiritual truths about the universe can be understood as, and fundamentally are, an extension of abstract logic. An extension of logicism to the nature of reality.
.......1b} Spirit-1, Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego i.e. that whichexists beyond our finite, occupied space Universe and beyond the macro-finite and trulynon-occupied space, that, again exists outside/beyond/Meta ourfinite occupied space Universe, ex concepts of Space, God, Time, Universe, Toyotas, Concepts, Dogs, etc
Ergo, your "spiritual logicism" falls within my definition above, as revised from post #1 in this thread.
All that you have to offer will always fall withing my Cosmic Trinary Set. This can also be seen in new thread i.e. there is not a definition of this or that, that, will not fall within my Cosmic Trinary Set, as its the most wholistic set of existence.
See my new thread, Revised Wholistic Set of Existence --always being developed/reveised-- that Ive posted for years as the Cosmic Trinary Set. Again all that say exists will fall within or under that tryinary set. Only a rare few have tried to invalidate what laid out clearly as if reading the Contents section at beginning of a educational book. The Cosmic Trinary Set.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
FLRW....Hundreds of studies have supported this hypothesis, and some have specifically shown that triggering thoughts of death tends to shift people towards the right.
Ultra-Right-conservative is not normal behavior and tends toward hate as racism { anyone who is not like them in skin, ethinicity etc }, hate against LBGT, hate against pregnant woman's bodily autonomy, respect of ecological environment that sustains biological life, and direct violence to all of those humans who oppose them, using lies, mis-leading, misdirecting false narrative etc.
...note: narrow minded band of humanity
Conservative in of itself is normal behavior for humans to conserve what they have and the ecological environment that sustains them.
..note: very broad set of humanity, that, is mostly ignorant to global realities for various reasons
Utlra-Left-wing conservative is not normal behavior and tends towards extreme hate of the ultra-conservative, or those normal humans that do not respect the ecological environment that, sustains biological diversity of Earth and tends toward violence against the operative systems ex machine mechanisms that lead to environmental degradation.
...note: narrow set humanity that may also be identified/associated with 'deep ecologists' who, at most extreme, see humans as cancerous blight on rare Earths biological diversity.
Fear mongering is not normal and easily fostered in ignorant humanity, ergo, education via moral integrity for truth, justice/fair-play for all is of prime concern.
Truth of our set of realistic, well informed set circumstance's and various anticipated futures on Earth, may lead to fear of death, and that is normal.
..."Let’s start with FDR. Certainly, at his 1933 Presidential Inauguration, Franklin D. Roosevelt did express such a sentiment:
So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is … fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and of vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. And I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days. "...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
IRoose...Which dictators has Biden cozied up to
PRes-Hil...Obama
Pres-hilt, how your nonsense ever got voted in as president of DArt 1st 2nd, 3rd etc set of phenomena for a general lack-of-moral-integrity here at DArt.
I could attach alot of labels _____?_____, to no avail. Youve obviously never lived under a true dictator. You could learn alot and maybe even change your tune if you did
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
That’s exactly what Giuliani did to take down the MOB in New York. He used low level mobsters’ testimony to take down the MOB bosses.
Thank you IRoose. It is very common to use crimminals testimony in court of law.
Of course immoral Trumpeteers will argue in immoral Trumpets defense. No Suprises there. Birds of immorality stick together.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I hope he goes to jail and becomes radicalized. Clearly this culture war won't end until somebody starts giving the left-tribe a taste of their own medicine. I'm talking Lincoln level shit.
I.e you think we need presidential assassination. Kennedy was last one and Martin Luther King falls directly afterword, then Bobby Kennedy etc. All conservative whacko's is fair assumption.
Why you advocate violence so much? Something must have happen to you as a child.
Trumpet has and his Trumpeteers have already resulted in enough violence. We dont ceertainly dont need you --a Trumpeteer voter I presume-- or others to keep using DArt fourm{ or other } pushing for more violence in USA. You need a chill pill.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Fusion power.
Talk about wishful thinking. ;--)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Poor Trumpet and his band of Trumpeteers legal issues in the pipeline, ergo, poor USA citizens who will continue to eat their lack of immoral integrity for many months to come.
The immoral insane should never have been elected to president of USA to begin. Ergo, all its karma is resultant of the lack integrity Trumpeteers who voted in this narcissistic nutter. Sad :--(. End-date-for-humanity 2065 aprox.
The immoral insane should never have been elected to president of USA to begin. Ergo, all its karma is resultant of the lack integrity Trumpeteers who voted in this narcissistic nutter. Sad :--(. End-date-for-humanity 2065 aprox.
Created:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
If a one world government --see Bucky Fullers world game, how to make the world work--- spirit intention is not all-for-one and one-for-all from the get go, then, it there significantly critical factors not being considered, for the least amount of sufferring going forward.
There is going to be much more suffering for coming to humanity in relative near future --barring every last resource is not used ak ' burning down the house ', just to maintain the status quo--- is my best guess, and of Fullers and Carl Sagan and my guess is many other top notch educated thinkers, who have earned their years of critical thinking knowledge base.
How does 250 nations integrate and even worse pandemic contagion?
..."Humans routinely anticipate future events and organize current actions accordingly. This capacity has been termed “episodic foresight” (Suddendorf and Moore 2011) and is fundamental to enabling humans to control the future by planning, preparing for, and shaping events in desired ways. "...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Try using your own brain, if you have one, and exercise a little humility and integrity for fucks sake. 🤦🏼♂️
how about just ' mental ', as in martin short LINK Was martin LBGT, intersex, hermaphrodite?
mentally disturbed about LBGT ---chek?--
mentally challenged about LBGT --chek?--
mentally deficit LBGT --chek?--
mentally handi-capped about LBGT --chek?--
Created:
Posted in:
Another Trumpeteer nutter ---pulls conferdate hat out of handbag{?}-- makes choice for Trumpet. Only 40 million more --or less-- to announce their insanity vote for Trumpet.
.." Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) announced she is endorsing former President Trump in the 2024 GOP presidential primary, offering a show of support for the former president ahead of his arraignment in Manhattan on charges from a hush money case. "..
..." Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith posed for a photo wearing a Confederate soldier’s hat and holding a rifle in a Facebook post that surfaced Tuesday. "..
Thats weird, I thought the confederate soliders had to give over their rifles to the Union. This senator has gone rogue?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
TWS is a very stable genius! He’s also unemployed and living on disability from the government
Thank you for the clarification IWRoose. That is relief for me as I was starting wonder of I was partially insane Trumpeteer, sharing a jail cell with TWS.
So when does the stable genus going to take time to google ' how many mass-murders done with poison in last 10 years '. For a genuis he appears to evade relatively simple questions in this age of google.
Can a genius be in jail cell? If he is in prison, then they may not allow access to google ergo, his inability to answer rather simple questions even for a genius troll.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Going for the ad hominem vs addressing the boy’s argument. Classic intellectual cowardice.
So if you not one of the three mentally challenged, ---or all three--, then that only leaves ' mentally disturbed ' about LBGT and perhaps cultist Trumpeteer troll with some degree of insanity issues. Ok.
Mentally challenged --check--
Mentally deficit --check--
Mentally handi-capped --check--
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
There are lots of tools that are easier to use than a gun, yet you idiots focus on the big bad ugly black piece of iron.
How many people were mass-murdered by poison in last 10 years? I think your a Trumpeteer troll at best, and at worst ____!____
There is ugly at DArt and most of it comes from the cultist, Trumpeteer nutters. My guess is that your a Trumpeteer ergo some degree of the nutter insanity involved. Old news
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
It wasn't a Trump that named a planet Uranus was it?
No. He coined the phrase ' up uranus ' when responding to any comments regarding his lies and other lack of moral integrity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
@TWS1405_2
Please choose which one of the these three fits you best, or choose all three if appropriate.
Mental disorder
Mentally challenged
Mentally handicapped
..." someone who is mentally handicapped is not able to learn or develop skills at the same rate as most other people because they have a problem with their brain. It is now considered more polite to say that someone has a developmental disability or that they are learning disabled. "...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
That's my basic belief.
We all have mental challenges in life. We understand your mental issue regarding LBGT and other.
There are professionals who can aid you, and better than average, everyday Josephine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Again, why are you here at DART? Troll.
To remind you that guns make it easy to kill people at A} close distance away
B} a medium distance away,
C} a further or far distance away.
Thats how easy, killing with a gun can be, as easy as 123, ABC, killing with a gun, easy as can be. Alternatively, there is Molotov cocktails for those who cant afford a gun.
..." A member of the pro-Nazi group White Lives Matter of Ohio was arrested Friday after he allegedly threw molotov cocktails at a church planning to hold a drag event."....
..." When his home was searched, investigators found Nazi paraphernalia including swastika flags, a While Lives Matter of Ohio shirt and materials like those used to create the Molotov cocktails."...
.." Neo-Nazi Arrested for Firebombing Church Hosting Drag Queen Story Hour"....
Created:
Posted in:
Are you being sarcastic? I have to wonder, in the face of such a stupid response.
Just becuase he very rude, does not mean he is not speaking truth regarding sanity vs Trumpeteer lack of sanity aka lies, etc immoral behaviour.
Just look at M Greene I posted in current events today. Lies, lies and more lies is all this Trumpeteers no best how to do. Their all sic-n-head to varying degrees on varying days. Anyone he keeps trying to sweep their immorality under the rug to hide or defend them, are no better than them.
Coal, I bet your a cultist Trumpeteer. Sad :---( O )--: very sad if you are. Part of th 60 million who voted for that pychotic nut case. Sad :--((
Coal, I bet your a cultist Trumpeteer. Sad :---( O )--: very sad if you are. Part of th 60 million who voted for that pychotic nut case. Sad :--((
The bad smell Trumpeteers expell is no where near as bad as what Roosevelt puts out at DArt. If you dont grasp that, then you need to do some recalibration in your moral integrity parts of you brain.
Oh thats right, I forgot that you blocked me. More evidence of your lack of moral integrity. Try to hide your shame, like dog with tail between its legs.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
@Intelligence_06
"Glass" Johnny Hart had one for that also. Peter comes running out of cave with his eye piece focusing tool, yelling, ' GLASS, GLASS Ive discovered glass, and the other guy says, ..' you nincompoop, that is just an ordinary diamond '.... apparrently they lived in place were lot of diamonds laying around, maybe exposed by the ice ages :--)) <> ((--:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I believe that she is a piece of Trumpeteer lying @___%___! and Leslie Stahl made it clear to M. Greene face.
You know I could go on and on about the lack of moral integrity these Trumpeteers exhibit. Lets see, the first big publicity stunt of lies was regarding Obama state of birth. Then the @____%___! just kept coming and coming out their exit waste hole. Talk about a stinky smell in emanating from USA. Sic-n-head
Created:
Posted in:
..."During an interview with CBS News’ Lesley Stahl broadcast Sunday on “60 Minutes,” Greene was asked for her stance on the 2018 massacre, which left 17 students and staff dead. Two years before she was elected to Congress, Greene responded to a comment on Facebook calling the shooting a “false flag” operation."...
Another Fox news nutter Trumpeteer shows nutter-n-head.
Lies to Leslie Stahl only to have her words fact checked on Facebook.."“We fact-checked,” Stahl replied. “Before I got to this interview.”
Greene offered a word-salad comeback, derailing the discussion."..
Greene offered a word-salad comeback, derailing the discussion."..
Integrity is not a word or behaviour many of these Trumpeteers are familiar, with. Nuts starts at the top and in this case as all the others, it starts with nutter Trumpet.
End-date-fro humanity 2065 aprox.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
The word ideology in this context means "boogieman", it's used to elicit fear, and justify bigotry..
Cultist trumpeteers is far more nefarious, scary, and sic-n-head{ ---to whatever degree--- type people humanity needs to be concerned with.
Intersex/hemaphrodites have always felt a need to hide, because of their unique sexual biologic differrence from most of humanity.
I believe it is men who perpetuate this fear of sexual orientation more than women and it is the males we more often find engaged in violent acts and mass-shootings.
Many peoples feel a need to hide from cultist trumpeteers and that is similar as hermaphrodites feeling need to hide from most of humanity that includes the most of the cultist trumpeteers.
Wasnt it the closet gay man --- FBI leader Hoover--- who persecuted gays, even as he himself was a gay man.
Think about it. ALan Turing broke the enigma code and then later was choose chemical castration and suicide, over prison madness he would endure if and most likely being killed with first few months, because of societies illogical fear regarding sexuality.
First they came for for the homosexuals and no one and no one spoke out, then they came for the handi-capped, and no one spoke out, then the came for me, and no one spoke out. If you cant figure out the truly most scary people are in the two USA party's, then your head is stuck in a hole in ground or elsewhere, hiding from truth.
Hiding because in fear of taking a side and speaking out against scary people. I get it. Totally.
Created: