janesix's avatar

janesix

A member since

3
3
3

Total posts: 2,049

Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
SKIP
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Try it, you might learn something
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@EtrnlVw
In physics, energy is defined as the ability to "do work", whatever that is supposed to mean. But I have felt energy, including spiritual energy, and it is definitely a "thing" to me. Still hard for me to grasp what it actually is though. It seems to be tied in with will and emotions somehow. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@EtrnlVw
Do you think energy is a "thing" which can exist independantly of matter?
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@EtrnlVw
This would fit sense energy is described as being neither created or destroyed, but the question begs then why does it act as an intelligence or like it has an awareness?
I'm not sure what you mean here. What do you mean, that energy acts like it has intelligence or awareness?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@BrutalTruth
Give me an example of you changing your beliefs.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
And what have you accomplished so far?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
I like you, and don't want you to leave. 

Just don't see why you have to constantly push your ideas on everyone else.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@WisdomofAges
What ancient civilizations?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
It is not your job to "reason" with atheists. They will find their own way. That is between them and God.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Truth
There have been thousands of different religions throughout human history. Everyone thinks they are right. How likely is it that EVERYONE has the truth? About zero.

That some one has stumbled on the truth, or that God has given someone the Truth, is possible but I doubt it has happened. 

That we are all stumbling around in the dark trying to figure things out is more likely the case. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Should anti-theists be allowed to express their opinions ?
-->
@Mopac
Yes, EVERYONE is projecting, mopac

lol
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Could be I said that. If I did, it was an exaggeration.
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@Outplayz
That it evolved is something I can comprehend.(Not that I necessarily believe that though, it is just comprehensible in my mind, might be a holdover from my former materialism)

That an all-knowing intelligence always existed as is  is not comprehensible to me. But that very well may be the case.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
I've never said it is impossible to know. 

There could be some humans that do know. I doubt that very much though.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Really? I am not the one pretending to KNOW. 


Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
-->
@Outplayz
I have watched a lot of Campbell,, he certainly thinks he "knows" what he is talking about. I take it with a grain of salt. He does have interesting ideas though.
Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations

Created:
0
Posted in:
The Game of Life: Consciousness, Cellular Automata, and Quantum Fluctuations
Reposted from letterpile

I was excited last night as I watched a video on YouTube with Tom Campbell. He had almost the same idea I have had on the beginning of consciousness. The basic idea is this: there was nothing except a void, with random fluctuations of information. Then there was, out of randomness, a pattern. This pattern was able to sustain itself, a cellular automaton. This became the first consciousness.
My idea is nearly the same. Except that the "void" is space, and the random fluctuations of information are quantum fluctuations. If you add in Panpsychism, everything falls together. There is no "first" consciousness, there is always consciousness in the universe. If every particle already has consciousness, just a tiny spark of awareness, then awareness is popping in and out of existence all the time. Patterns occasionally form out of randomness. This is a slightly higher awareness for a brief time. Even more rarely, you get the occasional pattern that forms a sustained (not indefinitely) pattern, a cellular automaton. Usually these automata peter out after a while, as in the Game of Life.
I first heard of the Game of Life in a science fiction novel called "Courtship Rite" by Donald Kingsbury. You start with initial conditions, usually two different color tiles in a rectangular or square bordered frame. There is a simple rule set, such as "black flips to white if three corners are touching white". Then when the game starts, the tiles begin to follow the rules, flipping or staying the same, creating "moving" patterns that seem to move with a life of their own. Sometimes, a pattern will repeat many times, staying in place, or moving across the board. These little pockets of pattern are called cellular automata.
If this actually happens in the quantum world, and I don't see why it couldn't, then the consciousness of these automata would be a little more aware. The entire automata may have it's own separate consciousness from each individual part, as each human has a separate consciousness than each individual cell in the body. This idea is called "holons", coined by Arthur Koestler.
The automaton, like all consciousness, has a sense of survival. It may then figure out how to keep it's pattern going. Eventually, it may learn other things, such as how to evolve in order to stay "alive". It may begin to learn how to manipulate other automata or particles, perhaps incorporating them into it's own patterns. It may learn how to create new patterns. It builds the first simple atom, them molecules, eventually there are clouds of dust, and finally, suns.
Then eventually, we get the universe we see today. We are all nodes in this larger consciousness, as is each particle, molecule, animal, sun, galaxy.
But there is still the overarching consciousness, that incorporates all into itself. I call it God.
If this is true, and I don't know if it is, then we really are all connected. It perfectly explains entanglement and nonlocality. There is a consciousness that connects everything.
The first automata must have had only base instincts. Perhaps only the survival instinct. I can't imagine it having higher emotions such as love or guilt. These must have evolved much later. I can see it may have felt an instinctual fear of it's demise. at first. Then as it evolved and progressed, higher emotions evolved,and that's why we have them today. As an overarching consciousness, it may experience even higher emotions we can't even imagine.
It must also be at a much higher level of consciousness than a human being. With everything in the universe connected, there must be many, many more connections than in the neural networks in our brain. The whole universe is like a giant brain. Although consciousness doesn't require a brain, higher intelligence might
If all this is true, then this ultimate consciousness must be much older than the age of the known universe, 13.7 billion years. It must have taken billions of years of evolution to get to the point of being able to create suns. This consciousness has been around for a long time indeed.
I can't imagine being conscious for billions of years. What it must have gone through! Did it create us, other intelligent beings, to have someone to talk to? That seems a bit silly, but I wonder.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
Mopac isn't crazy. He is stubborn.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
I suspect I made him uncomfortable. He likes to think he knows ALL.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Then don't respond to my posts. 


Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Existence itself is sufficient evidence for Ultimate Reality. 
Of course there is an "ultimate reality". Your claims to knowing anything about it are false. You can't possibly know.

The idea that there is no evidence is simply another delusion perpetuated by atheists who prop up some strawman god and declare this as God.
I didn't say there was no evidence. I said atheists believe there is insufficient evidence. 
Why?
Because atheism is a position of ignorance. It isn't valid. 
Every position is a position of ignorance.
Who else? Nihilists. Nihilists are a joke.
I don't see how that pertains to our conversation.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
I suspect you have never been in the position of changing your worldview. Otherwise, you would know what I mean.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
No, it requires an emotional adjustment, not just thinking. Feelings seem to have little importance to you. 

You seem to have very little charity towards your fellow human beings. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Denial of God is certainly a delusional position.
No, it isn't.
It is a disservice to God denier to tell them otherwise. It is not right to lead them on to believe that such a position is even possibly valid.
Of course atheism is a valid position. There is little evidence for God, and what there is is not compelling to atheists. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
Emotional attachment to beliefs stand in the way. Changing your worldview is a huge deal to most people. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
It is a hard thing to "un"indoctrinate yourself. Some people are capable of reevaluating their beliefs as they grow older. I would say that is very rare though. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Goldtop
Nearly everyone has been indoctrinated as a child to some belief. For some, it was materialism.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
Atheists are not deluded. 

Some are indoctrinated into materialism. 

Some are rational thinkers who have decided there isn't enough evidence for God.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@EtrnlVw
I understand what you're saying, and what Mopac is saying. I just don't think humans have enough information, and possibly the lack of comprehensive ability, to know what the Utimate reality consists of. Who knows? Conscious entities may be late players in the game. I may send you a link of my earlier thoughts on this.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@EtrnlVw
We don' know what Ultimate reality consists of, and what part God plays in that. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Delusion In Most Atheists?
-->
@Mopac
What you "accept" as God and what God truly is may be two different things. Have you thought of that?
Created:
0
Posted in:
why should we take the story of noah as literal?
-->
@Mopac
There are religions much older than your church.
Created:
0
Posted in:
why should we take the story of noah as literal?
-->
@linate
It isn't a glaring error. It is a copied story from the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Created:
0
Posted in:
why should we take the story of noah as literal?
So what is the story's allegorical or metaphorical meaning then?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
-->
@PGA2.0
What makes you think the bible is God's word
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
-->
@Goldtop
I have doubts that God is the God of the bible
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
-->
@Fallaneze
Yes

Do you?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
-->
@Fallaneze
I didn't say that.

Other people might understand the "meaning" of the word God. I know almost nothing about God. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
-->
@Fallaneze
no i cant
Created:
0
Posted in:
Can we comprehend God?
I can't.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
ok.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
Not sure how I'm supposed to accomplish that, or even what that means.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
Yet you claim to. why wouldn't i recognize Him?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
I would recognise His presence if He came to me.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
So if you have not really experienced the reality of Jesus in any personal, experiencial way, I don't understand why you believe.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
-->
@Mopac
But how do you know that?

Have you ever had Jesus talk to you?

Have you felt His presence? 

How has Jesus worked in your life?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Christians
How do you know Jesus is real?
Created:
0
Posted in:
merry christmas
I kind of missed christmas as I was on a train home from visitting my parents. 

My dad was hospitalized due to acute respitory failure, and now probably has lung cancer but we are not sure yet. 

He is home now on permenant oxegen. doing a bit better, enough to come home. we were able to get all of the family together for christmas eve. 

I am not a christian but I have always loved christmas a s time together with my family. 

Tell them you love them, hug them, keep in touch. Because you never know if it's the last time.
Created:
0