Total posts: 1,979
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Bravo for wiki, now when you can actually bring forth any rational, logical common sense argument as to how horscopes are related to science, then please share.See the following Wikipedia article on pseudoscience in which astrology is explicitly mentioned no fewer than 17 times.
Oh wait, I know what you could offer but for some reason cant pull out of mental hats is horoscopes relation to planets and orbits etc.
Ok, so you ---or me-- partly got me there, however, beyond that there is not one shred of any connection between horoscopes and science, at least that I'm aware of. Please share if you have any.
If there are degrees of pseudoscience then again, I think horoscope are poor example because of so little connection between science of planets motion and orbits to all else involved with horoscopes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Mopac--There would always have to be some form of existence.
Stronn---Why? What is the justification for the statement in bold? Are you just giving an argument from incredulity, or is there some logical reason?
1) 1s law of thermodynamics. Physical/energy cannot be created nor destroyed ergo eternally exists,
....this can somewhat transpose as occupied space cannot be created nor destroyed...........
Sorry Stronn but you have no rational, logical common sense counter argument to this seeming eternally truth and you never will.
Please try if you have courage to be naive, if not look foolish.
2} macro-infinite non-occupied space eternally exists and embracs/surrounds our finite, occupied space Universe,
3} metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts exist and you will find reference to them in most all dictionaries and you access them all of the time and proof you access to their existence is your finger type those concepts here at DArt.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
Thank you bsh1 and I apologize for my counter spamming early today. This occurred on a few threads, that I created, where I felt DrF offerred absolutely no relevant significant info and so I temporary fell to his level of moral integrity. I did catch myself, after an hour, and I consciously did not counter in several of those threads since that time even tho his obvious intent was to incite me.Because I am deleting Franklin's spam, I am also going to delete the spammed replies to him you made, to declutter the thread. You're in trouble for the spamming in this thread, though I would encourage you to just report spam rather than to counter-spam.
Thanks again for your moderation and patience with my lack of integrity in these regards. I hope this sincere apology allow me the chance to regain any abilities I may have to be more circumspect in my replies to those who have nothing of seeming value to offer or attempt to antagonize myself and others.
If you choose to ban me for any period of time, I understand why you would do so.
Sincerely, Mustard
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
That has to be one of the worst examples ever. Horoscopes have nothing to do with science.Horoscopes.
You need to review the thread title and try again. Please
Created:
Posted in:
Acosta drops out. No surprises there and he should be in jail with many of the other Trumpanssees.
Many people sold their soul to Trumpanzee cult in return for what? Kavanaugh and ability to stick their noses into a strangers bodily business.
How much more indecency will these Trumpanzees sell their souls for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Take a Hike!no u
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Take a hike! Hit the road!yeet
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Take a hike!no u
Hit the road! Goodbye!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Yes, Please take a hike!no u
Hit the road!
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Please take a hike!0 friends, 19 friends for me
Hit the road!
Goodbye!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
This is irrelevant, im sorry
Were all sorry you exist. Please take a hike! Hit the road!
Please take a hike from all threads Ive created. You have absolutely no relevant significant intellectual integrity to offer this forum that I can see. Please share when you do, or just go back to the backwoods, desert island you came from. Thanks.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Goodbye from this thread. Take a hike!Wait you called me rude
You have no moral or intellectual integrity to offer any here at DArt. Hit the road!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Seriously. Are you and Wylted brain both on or off prescription medications?When do you support abortion rights up until?
Read my lips/text. Get you friggin nose out of a womans bodily business unless she gives gives your her consent to stick your nose in her bodily business.
What part of those comments do you not grasp?
PLease, have somehuman decency and
Keep your friggin nose
Out of a womans
Bodily business
Unless she gives you
Her consent, to allow you to
Stick your nose
Into her bodily business.
This above is simple to grasp, unless a human as mental issues and has been repeated for your problematic brains and lack of moral integrity.
Several people have made this clear, in many different ways, to your immoral, infantile brains. Now, STOP IT!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
There is 0 (2D), or there is spatial potential (3D).
..."No amount of their pseudo-scientific symbolism and jargonism gets close."...
And that is all you have to offer us.
The question is how do you get from one state to another.
No definitive clearity, as per your usual. More nonsense.
An oscillating universal sequence negates the infinite.
Huh? Is this actually suppose to have some definitive meaning? It does not.
Thereby allowing an instantaneous finality and re-initiation, ergo zero is momentarily achieved.
Huh? Lacks any definitive meaning or clarity.
1-0-1. A simple and logical hypothesis that can explain a zero state, within a sequence.
Meaingless. 1,2,3,4 ergo 3 is another one of your so called "states". It is meaingless.
Nonetheless 0-1 is the sticking point.
Meaningless.
Primary initiation. Something from nothing?
Has never happened and never will. Our eternally existent, fiinite, occupied space Universe is emrbaced by the macro-infinite non-occupied space.
This the primary duality of space and not a monism except as space. Yes its all ---macro-infinite space--- with some of it as occupied space Universe.
When we consider both states of occupied and non-occupied we use the word{s} " U "niverse/" G "od and that is what is simple, not your meaningless dribble.
No if you want to call macro-infinite non-occupied space 0{ zero }, that is fine, but you have not done that.
If you want to call occupied space Universe, 1{ one } that is fined, but you have not done that.
More definitive clarification and less meangingless dribble. Please.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Banning of landmines is far beyond your brains ability to form the two letters "ok"ok
Please take a hike from all threads Ive created. You have absolutely no relevant significant intellectual integrity to offer this forum that I can see. Please share when you do, or just go back to the backwoods, desert island you came from. Thanks.
Created:
Posted in:
Saw prelude to this final conclusion some years back before they had finnish the first quanit hut.
It is an amazing story as was Bill Kurtis's "Return To Chernyoble" 10 years after it happen.
Have not watched this latest one released on Netflix recently. I will tho.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Sure beats engaging with lack of immoral integrity lack of intellectual integrity you spew out on all threads 50 times before breakfest. Please take a hike from this thread as you have nothing of any relevant significance to offer. Your a waste of bandwidth and brain space Good bye.Talking to yourself?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
I don't think I got an answer from you but when do you want abortion to be legal up to?
i want you and Wylted brain to keep your friggin noses out of pregnant womans bodily business unless she gives you permisison to stick your noses there. Read my lips/text and stop your friggin immoral attack on pregnant women.
You need to go back to immoral backwooded-dessert -slands from which you came and stay there til you can learn to read my lips/text and begin to grasp what moral integrity is. Please
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Outplayz
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
Are you on or off some prescribed medication? A conceptualized egg or any term of fetus/baby is not and independent invidudal that breaths and conntected to woman via umbilichord and floating in womb of liquied....they don't murder babies....
Your obviously not playing with a full deck on this issue. When you want grasp reality and play fair, please share. We wont hold our breath waiting for any rational, logical common sense from you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DBlaze
Am I pregnant?
With twins?
Triplets?
Quadrulpets?
Is the person attacking me pregnant if so can I judge their weight and to bettern judge and attempt to outrun them?
Do they hae on running shoes?
What am I wearing? Flips flops wont do well in foot race.
Created:
Posted in:
.0.0077 .....* 66.4 = 0.51128 electron mass
.3.113.........* 66.4 = 206.7032 approximate muon-electron mass
26.61 26 5 * 66.4 = 1767.038 and approximate mass of tau-electron?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
66.4 { revolutions within helical torus? } / 0.0077 = 8623.37 66 233766 233766 233766 233766
8,623.37 66 233766 233766 233766 233766
8,623 - 2,000 = 6623
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
66.4 / 3.113 = 21.32 99 06 84 22 74 33344041117892708
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
66.4 / 26.6126 = 2.49 50 58 73 15782749524661250685765
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
@Ramshutu
The issue here is that you’re trying to manufacture some absolute line : there’s is no such line......There is no line that makes one okay and one not. It’s just people like you arbitrarily asserting that there is some magical line.
Consulting adults line
Conception i.e. fertilization of the egg line
Heartbeat line
Active brain nervous system line
Inside the woman or outside the woman
Breathing on own or respriatory
Umbilicahord still attached or not.
(*(i)*) have a natural right to life, but not birth, as my pregnant-woman-vessel for my birth, has the inherent right to terminate my non-breathing life, as it is attached to her in a most intimately physical way and (*(i)*) have to say, that, if she intends to terminate me, I prefer to be sooner rather than later.
This pregnant woman speaks for me because I am ONE with her and I have no voice ----in fact I dont breath air-- and barely know what a brain, heart, feet function is.
To breathe INward is become IN-spirited....( * (i) * ) i-breathe { ( o ) } initially IN then OUT ergo, I am somebody, with individual status and now that I am free, I choose to feed off the nearest breasts { (.)(.) } that I can get my lips around.
......(* (i) *)........bilateral
.....( . )( . )......bosom buddies
.........( . )........umbilicus connection point
........\*Y*/.........sex internalized or externalized
......../......\.........leg, fin or side arm
....._/........\_......leg, fin or tail fluke { cetacean }
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
What if the man is attacking you instead of children? Would you be willing to use lethal force to defend yourself?
Why a man and not a more generalized person?
Attacking with words, stones, knifes, bullets, atomic bomb?
Are their innocent people in the area?
What are the weapon options ---lethal and non-lethal-- available to me in this scenario?
Am I asleep, at breakfest, driving in my car attempting to escape someone else who appears to be chasing me?
Are their places to hide options available to me?
What are the circumstances for this person to be attacking me in the first place?
Do I have a cell phone to call emergency number?
Is this person smaller or larger than me?
Does this person appear to be mental crazed or just pissed off me for cause said something inappropriate?
Do I think I can out run this person on foot or in my vehicle?
hicle?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
2D = 0
2D = XY, XZ or YZ with no regard to integral finite-ness.
Your circle above equal a finite area ergo 2D integral
3D= Unlimited Potential.
False. 3D = XYZ with no given definities ergo not integrity and may infer/imply macro-infinite Space.
A finite ergo integral, occupied space exists in complement to a finite set of cosmic laws/principles ergo you Unlimited Potential is false in two reqards.
My guess is you have three mental issues keeping you from following rational, logical common sense;
1} religious,
2} ego,
3} prior education.
Occupied Space is limited to Total Mass Potential. Ergo Expansive Infinite is negated. (Though, in no way necessarily relative to 3D spatial potential)
Huh? Meaningless.. Finite occupied space is limited because of integrity. "expansive infinite" does not state what that is your specifically refering too. Again you lack clarity in what it is you think your trying to state. Why? Because you have nothing of rational, logical common sense that of relevant signifcance to offer.
No blames just stating what I see coming from you is greatly lacking. Please try until you can actually begin to make some definitive rational, logical common sense.
Regressed infinity becomes implausible. Ergo Total Mass at 2D State can only be temporary. (Given the accrued energy at fractional collapse events).
"regressed infinity". Your going off the deep end of irrelevant insignifcant ill-defined non-sense.
Ergo Universal oscillation = 101010101
Meaningless. Huh? Lacks clarity and definitive clarification.
Nonetheless we still rely upon primary magic for both God and creation and also presumably for extirpation.
...Huh? You really gone of deep end of illogical irrational lack of any specificied meaning or definition.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
@WyseGui
Uni = monismMonism is true.
Universe is synonym with G-o-d and is is the first subset of the most wholistic set " U "niverse/" G "od. LINK
It never ceases to amaze me how may seemingly rational, logical common sense adults, cannot follow even the most simple lines of rational, logical common sense conclusions and truth, when it comes to the most cosmically inclusive issues.
For some I think it is a religious mental block.
For others and ego based mental block,
And still others its an inability to get beyond the education on the subject.
Seek and you shall find --the truth-- only if the ego can be place to the side to let truth enter or not be refuted by the ego,
ABC, 123, thats how easy, Universe/God can be...sung to M Jackson song
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Ergo, over-think.
Contrary to lack of thought, I will take overthought any day of the week in search of truth. You, not so much.
PLease share when you have any rational, logical common sense that adds to or invalidates my comments as stated. You do not, becuase you have not anything of any relevant significance too offer. Good bye!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The truth exists for those who seek it and from what Ive seen on the net, only a rare few truly seek it. Go go figure.
1} Spirituality = support of self, then family, then others as the priorities
2} support of the ecological environment that sustains all biologicals which includes self, family and others.
Spirit-1 { spirit-of-intent } = metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts and ego { i },
-----------------line of demarcation---------------------
Spirit-2, physical/energy { Observed Time } ergo fermions, bosons and any aggregate collection thereof,
Spirit-3 = metaphysical-3 Gravity ( ) i.e. positive geodesic curvature
Spirit-4, metaphysical-4 Dark Energy )( i.e negative geodesic curvature.
...Space(Time)(Time)Space.......
....Space( >*<) i (>*<)Space.......
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
LINK Fullers Old Man River design allow for those who felt like socializing to go to inside part of the crater and with binoculars and if the people their looking for are out there, there is good chance you can visually see them and their specific local enviroment ex you could tell them that there is man with a gun or knife 30 ft to their left.Saying the U.S. has "the best per capita income" is extremely deceptive if you're mixing minimum wage workers with billionaires and then calculating an average
If were not feeling social we can go to our dwelling on outside of crater and see outward as far as the eye can see with any interaction with others.
Socialization { extroverted } takes place inside the crater.
Anti-socialization { introverted } takes place on outside of the crater.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
'Until death do we part' aka 'as long as we both shall live'.I will fight by your side til death
Long term marriage is on the way out, if I understand the statistics of USA correctly.
I dunno about globally.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Ironically, the concepts of "objectivity" and "freewill" make us complacent slaves.
The question becomes, are we slaves to our ego { i }?
Ego, like oxygen is a double-dedged sword. Cuts both ways, good and/or bad.
Winchester rifle was good for cavalry and bad for Indians, at least until the Indians got their hands on them and the ammunition.
Biology { * * } is the occupied space vehicle of determinsim.
Ego { i } is the metaphysical-1 { spirit-of-intent } resultant thereof.
Knowing or believing that, --or something similar to it--- may be why some fee,l that, what ever they do is justified in a more cosmic sense.
Their ego tells them they are operating-for-the-greater-good, or just their personal greater good, or both?
Created:
Posted in:
First, as always, a review of how we got here.
3.14 = Pi
3.113 * 66.4 = 206.7032 approximate muon-electron mass ...{ this latter being the value R P. Feynman says ever physicist has on his wall }......
0.0077 * 66.4 = 0.511 28 approximate electron mass is ok but does not associate rationally { whole number of tori } with even one whole numerical torus much less three, ergo I tried something new and got a surprise value.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
66.4 { revolutions within helical torus? } / 0.0077 = 8623.37 66 233766 233766 233766 233766
Yes, it is an interesting number as far as the 86 being close to the primary set of 87 great circle planes LINK but what to do with it, if anything.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The difference between 1 and 0.0077 is 0.9923.
The differrence between 1 and 0.511 is 0.489.
66.4 is an ultra{ extreme }-abstract resultant of Pi^4 - 31{ XYZ ergo 3D } automatically associate it with 66.4 revolutions ergo 66.4 inversions (>< ) of a single helically defined torus. Does that make 66.4 an absolute? A static absolute, that, we have to convert to a more dynamic { physical } and known{?} value ex 2nd powering of speed-of-radiation? Or whatever.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Created:
So the question becomes, wherein do we find the 'free will' within a cause > effect > resultant effects of motion, fluctuations, oscillations of Uni-V-erse of perpetual motion?
I find it as the seemingly 2D triangular tail wing { /\ } of the seemingly 2D flying hexagon { __/\ } via the jitterbug configurations of the 3D cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron.
1} The triangular tail wing stands erect as if to say I refuse to allow the totality of the 3D Vector Equilibrium to succumb to 2D existence only.
2} there is bounce away affect when the two triangles attempt to collapse into the seemingly 2D { one triangle } only tail wing i.e. when the two lower chords of the two triangles appproach each other the bounce off each other and return to the quasi-3D tetrahedral configuration and then,
back > to > the > complex quasi-2D ---and quasi-circular-- complex octahedral polygonal sine-wave configuration, and from there,
3} to the seemingly 2D saddle-shape associated with the negative curvature of a inner surface of a torus and from there, there are multiple possible pathways the jitterbug can transform into.
All of these above, plus the 5-fold quasi-icosaehedron configuration is partly why Fuller refers to the Vector Equlibrium as the Operating System of Uni-V-erse.
To CLICK! is to make a judgement aka collapse of the sine-wave and/or can be seen as the bounce away from two triangles above and that is all deterministic.
To click is to judge, to judge is to bring that which is more dispersed configuration { Out } into a point-to-able focus { In } via graviton, darkion, photon, neutrino, electron or and aggregate collective set thereof.
To click = BING! PING! RING! DING! etc and the appropriate collective set will move the eye, finger leg, etc.
Cause > effect > resultants > cause > effect > resultants is an eternal perpetual motion machine we call Uni-V-erse.
God/Uni-V-erse is best represented by the 4-fold cubo-octahedron{ Vector Equilibrium wherein we have the only polyhedron of Uni-V-erse that has exhibits perfect { static } balance between;
24 radii { radiating Outward }
24 chords { cohering Inward }
This becomes self evident when constructing the VE from four hexagonal planes were we find 24 radii and 24 chords LINK
This is perfect balance between the two primary forces of Uni-V-ese;
-->Inward<--- ex mass-attraction
<---Out---> ex EMRadiation
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Yes, I do say so and no one has ever offered any rational, logical common sense that adds too, or invalidates, my givens as stated. Please share if you ever find any and you could perhaps be the first, 2nd or 3rd in that catagory.Yep. If you say so.
The truth exists for those who seek it and from what Ive seen on the net, only a rare few truly seek it. Go go figure.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1} Spirituality = support of self, then family, then others as the priorities
2} support of the ecological environment that sustains all biologicals which includes self, family and others.
Spirit-1 { spirit-of-intent } = metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts and ego { i },
-----------------line of demarcation---------------------
Spirit-2, physical/energy { Observed Time } ergo fermions, bosons and any aggregate collection thereof,
Spirit-3 = metaphysical-3 Gravity ( ) i.e. positive geodesic curvature
Spirit-4, metaphysical-4 Dark Energy )( i.e negative geodesic curvature.
...Space(Time)(Time)Space.......
....Space( >*<) i (>*<)Space.......
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
"Some" is the key word there.Although there does seem to be some regional and contemporaneous consensus.Golden Rule Variatio
The golden rule --do unto others as you would have them doonto you---- has
a common variation in many countries and religions. I wondered if there
were any other rules with such commonality e.g,
Is there a silver rule also? "Seek fair and just resolution with
compassion and empathy for those who violate the laws and moral codes of
humanity or its distinct tribes. "
Perhaps a wooden rule? Forgiveness by God is instantaneous, forgiveness
by humans takes time.
Or the bone rule? Eye for eye and toothe for a tooth. [im not sure if
any animals other than humans practice this concept]
Molecular rule? "Share not with your cousin what you would not have
them share with you."
Quantum rule? "Know that the uncertainty of mind, being common to all
humans, does not neccessitate chaos."
Space-time Rule? ---Pee-Here-Now is rendition of Ram Dass’sBe Here Now
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Catch 22. How does one disprove, something that cannot be proven.
What exactly { specifically } cannot be proven?
You offer no proof of the existence of a "Catch 22" scenario and you offer no "Catch 22" scenario. Please share when you have one.
The conservative has a narrower set of parameters ergo more difficult for them to 'think outside the box' or to realize there in integral box of finite set of events.
"Dare to be naive" ..Bucky Fuller
"The biggest impediment to my learning has been my education"...A. Einstien
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Unpredictable maybe.
Only means we cannot find { map } the order of proccessing. A house owner looks inside their electric service panel and sees random mess of wires. Electricians sees orderly set of wires and connections thereof.
3Ru--Moral culpability.
Again this is differrence between those who can find more options ---should know better--- and those who know very little, whether because of brain dysfunction or too young to have broader base of experience and/or was never taught the differrence between what is ok and what is not ok.
The judge makes a judgement as to whether the person should have CLICKED! with a judgement of go or no-go.
I originally likened this to a 'making a judgement' and likened a judgement to collaspe of the sine-wave { /\/\/ } as a point-particle{ ex photon } with a definitive value.
To click is to judge, to judge is to bring that which is more dispersed configuration { Out } into a point-to-able focus { In } via graviton, darkion, photon, neutrino, electron or and aggregate collective set thereof.
To click = BING! PING! RING! DING! etc and the appropriate collective set will move the eye, finger leg, etc.
Cause > effect > resultants > cause > effect > resultants is an eternal perpetual motion machine we call Uni-V-erse.
God/Uni-V-erse is best represented by the 4-fold cubo-octahedron{ Vector Equilibrium wherein we have the only polyhedron of Uni-V-erse that has exhibits perfect { static } balance between;
24 radii { radiating Outward }
24 chords { cohering Inward }
This becomes self evident when constructing the VE from four hexagonal planes were we find 24 radii and 24 chords LINK
This is perfect balance between the two primary forces of Uni-V-ese;
-->Inward<--- ex mass-attraction
<---Out---> ex EMRadiation
So the question becomes, wherein do we find the 'free will' within a cause > effect > resultant effects of motion, fluctuations, oscillations of Uni-V-erse of perpetual motion?
I find it as the seemingly 2D triangular tail wing { /\ } of the seemingly 2D flying hexagon { __/\ } via the jitterbug configurations of the 3D cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron.
1} The triangular tail wing stands erect as if to say I refuse to allow the totality of the 3D VE to succumb to 2D existence only.
2} there is bounce away affect when the two triangles attempt to collapse into the seemingly 2D { one triangle } only tail wing i.e. when the two lower chords of the two triangles appproach each other the bounce off each other and return to the quasi-3D tetrahedral configuration and then,
back to the complex quasi-2D and quasi-circular, complex octahedral polygonal sine-wave configuration, and from there,
3} to the seemingly 2D saddle-shape associated with the negative curvature of a inner surface of a torus and from there, there are multiple possible pathways the jitterbug can transform into.
All of these above, plus the 5-fold quasi-icosaehedron configuration is partly why Fuller refers to the Vector Equlibrium as the Operating System of Uni-V-erse.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Either way, the truth is still the truth thatall energy has an associated frequency -- or vibration if allowed by those with narrower set of parameters?---.What is "frequencies of energy" and are they the same as "energetic frequencies"?
/\/\/\/ = frequency, vibration, oscillation between peaks and troughs highs and lows etc.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyseGui
IFF we live in a finite --ergo integral-- occupied space { structural } Uni-V-erse { One-Verse }, then there can exist only one logical conclusion as to what is beyond the finite, occupied space Uni-V-erse.
Simple minimal brainer with broad open mind and seeking rational, logical common sense. Rare find on the internet has been my experience.
Macro-infinite non-occupied space that, is available for the finite, occupied space Universe to expand into or contract from.
All other conclusions are irrational, illogical and lack common sense.
To date, the best response any human can state, is that we dont observe any part of this alledged macro-infinite non-occupied space Universe.
However, that is 2nd to the philosophical question and its conclusion vai rational, logical common sense search for the speculative truth, based on we do observe.
1} all occupied space things have a systemic and structural integrity, even if that integrity is very short lived mesonic particle,
2} finite space as definite 2D area or 3D volume has a definitive meaning that most humans agree too, irrespective of specific size
3} infinite space has not integrity, ergo and no definite area or volume.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
In light of recent posts, and the general rise of Pseudoscience
Just because if may appear to fall into the catagory of "pseudoscience" does not inherently make any conclusions or pathways of thought, irrational, illogical or lacking common sense much less invalid.
Etrl makes attempt to clarify these points in #7.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
The contentious nature of spirituality, make it one of the more problematic human concepts.
1} Spirituality = support of self and family priority
2} support of the ecological environment that sustains all biologicals.
Spirit-1 { spirit-of-intent } = metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts and ego,
-----------------line of demarcation---------------------
Spirit-2, physical/energy { Observed Time } ergo fermions, bosons and aggregate collection thereof,
Spirit-3 = metaphysical-3 Gravity ( )i.e. positive curvature
Spirit-4, metaphysical-4 Dark Energy )( i.e negative curvature.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
God createth the desire to shag. Therefore; they will shaggeth.
Luke Skywalker and Princess Lela, the desire to shag is strong. :--)
Go with the flow and steer with moral and practical resultants in mind, when possible to not have them overridden by desire.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
So what would a person without free will be like?
They are like you, RM, 3Br, M-tard etc.
The brain chemistry chooses no-go until something clicks and then there is yes-go.
I originally likened this to a 'making a judgement' and likened a judgement to collaspe of the sine-wave as a point-particle{ ex photon } with a definitive value.
Ergo to click is to judge, to judge is to bring that which is more dispersed into a point-to-able focus via graviton, darkion, photon, neutrino, electron or and aggregate collective set thereof.
To click = BING! PING! RING! DING! etc and the appropriate collective set will move the eye, finger leg, etc.
Cause > effect > resultants > cause > effect > resultants is an eternal perpetual motion machine we call Uni-V-erse.
The 24 chords of the 4-fold cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron aka jitterbug transforms { 3D collaspe }via spin-contraction of its convex { positive } shape and then linear { 1D expansion } into a double sine-wave /\/\/\/ at 90 degrees to each other { + }
Collectively the 6 and 8 adds to 14 surface polygons ergo 7 axi-of-spin LINK ;
4 axi-of-spin for diametric opposite surface triangles { /\ },
3 axi-of-spin for diametrically opposite surface squares { [ ] }.
What this tells me is that 4-fold cubo-octahedron --spherical?-- as some aspect of maximally dispersed Space and Time that contracts inwardly in 3D and then expands outward in 1D is some how associated with the mechanism-of-judgement. BING! at levels of Space and Time.
Remember that, the 4-fold cubo-octahedron{ VE } contracts to define the 5-fold icosa{20}|hedron LINK and the 5-fold icos{20}ahedron contains its own 10 great polygonal planes that define four differrent sets of the VE LINK.
I believe each of Fullers great circles are actually abstracts for a 3D torus { as vector }.
Space(>Time<)(>Time< )Space
....Space(>*<) i (>*<)Space
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I guess. Honestly I am pretty middle of the road on where we should recognize personhood during fetal development.
Middle of the road, sitting on the fence, etc GP, I think you must be from Alabama.
Personhood via 1st dictionary hit......'the quality or condition of being an individual person'......
Lets see now, Ive been making clear 30 years or more, ---to those with fuzzy brain syndrome--- the fetus is not an individual and somehow their fuzzy thinking, cant get their fuzzy heads, around this simple, direct line concept of umbiical chord attachment for sustenance.
Some people in TN may be developmentally dissabled { DD } but these some people in Alabama appear to be have DD and just plain backwards with much of their irrational, illogical lack of common sense.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A human that does not yet breath { respire } air on its own via is oral passages and is still attached to the mother via umbilical chord ergo not and independent individual human yet.
A baby that does not yet breath { respire } air on its own via is oral passages and is still attached to the mother via umbilical chord ergo not an independent individual yet.
A person that does not yet breath { respire } air on its own via is oral passages and is still attached to the mother via umbilical chord ergo not and an individual person yet.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
GP, as per your usual, you have nothing to offer us of any relevant significance so please, take a hike untill you do. thanks.Get your manpaw nose out of my fetus hole.
The woman was falsely accused of murder. She was not charged with stupidity. You and a grand jury in AL are not able to make this an obvious and relevant distinction.
To breathe INward is become IN-spirited....( * (i) * ) i-breathe { ( o ) } ergo I am somebody with a biologic status and now that I am free, I choose to feed off the nearest breasts { (.)(.) } that I can get my lips around the nipple thereof.
......( * i * )........bilateral
....( . )( . )......bosom buddies
......( . )........umbilicus connection point
.......\*Y*/.........sex internalized or externalized
......./......\.........leg, fin or side arm
...._/........\_......leg, fin or tail fluke
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
The number of options is the same for a beginner as an expert - if what you mean by option is 'legal move'.
Agreed, but
1} the number of many options for a valid move will take longer for a novice to see, if they can see/find at all, and especially so if the game has a time limit,
2] and with each option, that leads to seeing another set of manywin and/or loose the game options and the novice is just not going to see them as many as the master, ergo,
3} that is why AI wins, because it sees the most options for win or loose after each move.
So Ai sees more options than master and master sees more options than novice.
I regret saying anything as I don't really enjoy 'free will' threads any more!
Ive made clear from my first post and all subsequent posts, "free will" is irrelevant to this thread, even IFF free will exists, which it doesnt.
Seeing/finding the most options that win or loose is primary. Once that is found, then there exist, then we see a cause for a saying this or that move, or moving a finger, or whatever it takes to move the appropriate bit.
Created: