Total posts: 6,549
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
... You're shitting me. That's literally the exact person that Savant softed.
Yeah, that's part of the reason I decided it's better just to give my claim. Didn't have a solid bead on Savant knowing my character.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
So, with all that in mind, I actually have a pretty narrow PoE pool of you, Savant, and Austin, which I'm fairly confident in.
Fair enough. I'm less certain of That2 even with their claim, but apart from that, my attention is mainly on those two as well.
I'll just go ahead and give my character since we have limited time this DP and it doesn't seem like we're honing in on a clear lynch. Like I said earlier, I think it's possible to intuit the role from my character claim, but I'll say now that it should not matter anyway given how my role works.
I'm Aileen Wuornos. As I said early in the DP, I didn't know this person before I heard about her associated movie, Monster.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I'm role confirmable. Claiming my role now doesn't help. I've been less active in the past few games, so idk why it's being seen as alignment indicative now.
I didn’t say it was alignment indicative, so I’m not sure where you’re getting that. My read on you was null, not scum. But as Casey pointed out, you did give a softclaim earlier, so I’ll accept that for now.
Unvote
I’d still like to get more insight into your reads before the DP ends.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
To be fair, Savant has already done both of those things. I'm 99% confident I know who he is (or who he's picked as his claim).
I just noticed the previous softclaim, don’t think I see a partial claim, but fair enough. Can’t say I know who it is, but my research this game has been limited so far.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Yes, I have a good reason not to provide one. Not going to say what it is right now.
Well, you’re going to need to give us something, whether that’s a partial claim or a decent softclaim. The lack of activity isn’t helping us.
Created:
-->
@WyIted
Yeah... I'm not touching this.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Unvote
OK, so now we've got confirmation. In terms of other additions since my last reads were posted, I'm good with letting Austin just confirm his role as he says he can, so I don't feel the need to push for additional information. Savant said yesterday that he'd post a set of reads but has only posted a couple, so I'd like to get more from him. That2 responded and backed off of Bullish, gave their character claim and then posted a vote on Vader to test his role, none of which really shifts my perspective all that much. That2 might be null, but that would still set them in my sights for this DP.
So I'm good with getting more information out of Savant and That2 at this point. Since we have less from Savant, that's where my vote is going:
VTL Savant
I think I'd prefer a full claim unless you have really good reason not to provide one.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm good coming back to That2 later. For now:
Unvote
VTL Vader
That should be four votes so far. Two more votes to test.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
I get your point on mass character claims, I'm just not convinced that my role in particular cannot be intuited easily. Maybe the rest of you are more difficult to determine. If enough people support it, I'll acquiesce.
It's too late this DP but next DP I want to go through with testing Vader's role.
Too late? We've got almost 36 hours left. We can do that if we wish and I'm good with it.
Created:
Posted in:
Alright, going to give some early reads.
WyIted - I feel kind of lost on his behavior so far. I wouldn't say I'm surprised with his choice for digging into themes, but it's such a random swing. The only thing that's setting me off is that he has now asked for character claims from two people on that basis, seeking a full claim from Austin. I also don't think he'd defend Austin's claim if that was his aim, but I'm unclear why he'd seek a claim from Austin if he believes his claim. Torn, but null so far.
That2 - Early reads are a bit scattershot. Not sure why That2 sees Casey as town, what's reasonable in my posts, or why they think Pie is "probably tp". Also unclear on why That2 pressed Bullish at all. The sole reason I can find is that Bullish said his justification is shit, which is a pretty poor basis for sussing someone. Doesn't help that That2's been absent from the discussion (they were on an hour ago) ever since despite Bullish claiming his character. Slight scum lean.
Bullish - A little defensive with one vote on him and a little quick to claim, but given the claim is John Wayne Gacy, I have a hard time believing it's a well-timed fake claim. I don't think we should assume that having a well-known serial killer makes their claims more likely to be true, even with the known absence of "fake claims, hints or anything," but for now I have slight town lean on him.
ILikePie (1 and 2) - We have no means to distinguish these two, so for now, their reads go together. I already gave my reasoning for believing that it's more likely they are both town than any of the other scenarios. Suffice it to say that none of his posts have materially affected that view, so he's a town lean. That being said, something's going on here and I can't write Pie off entirely based on likely mechanics.
Savant - Hasn't been involved much as of yet. Aside from interrogating Pie's alignment somewhat and softclaiming a female serial killer with rape involved, there's only the fact that he put a vote down on Austin. More likely than not, that's just what he said it was, an effort to get things moving. Just a little strange that he wasn't pursuing anything specific, even pushing back on the full claim a bit. Null.
Austin - Early focus of attention for some reason despite having only one post claiming Ed Gein. I can see this swinging either way despite how well known he is, so null to me. I would like to get more posts from him, but that has nothing to do with the claim.
Vader - Early Ted Bundy claim with the assumption that his Popular role is SOP makes me think he's town. Regardless of his affiliation, I think he correctly anticipated that a later Popular claim would look bad given recent examples. Luna including a Popular scum in his game just after I did so in mine seems exceedingly unlikely, so I sooner buy the Popular town for that reason as well. I know it's mainly mechanical, but right now I see less reason for Vader to be scum than anyone else beyond Pie.
Casey - The back-and-forth with WyIted has me thinking Casey's town, though that's a slighter read, particularly in a game where the split is supposed to be relatively obvious. The view that Ed Geins is an outlier is also just not something I would expect scum with a partner to present given that they or their partner would likely have done the research as soon as the claim was made. So slight town.
Alright, basic thoughts done. Would like to see That2, Savant and Austin participate more at this point, but since I'd particularly like to see That2's response to Bullish's claim:
VTL That2
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RemyBrown
Remy, I have noticed that you have made a recent habit of posting links with basically no analysis. You can post with a link like this as the focus of your OP, but you need to do more than just that for future threads.
Created:
Posted in:
Going to be out and about for a bit, but I’ll reread the DP and give some reads when I get home.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Honestly it would've worked out WAY better if things went better character wise. Full transparency I would 100% try it again.
It’s all good, will try another one of these days.
I generally hate early claiming in general in town unless I have to. Even then I don't think some people consider popular SOP but I still think it should be claimed based on the nature of how it's been used in recent games
Not sure if I would have treated this as SOP, but I get why you’d do it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I have to update whiteflame. I just learned Dahmer has had sex with corpses.
Cool, love that for him.
Created:
Posted in:
Alright, hopefully going to step up activity today, sorry I’ve been sporadic.
I’m also not getting this push for mass character claims. I wouldn’t say my role is obvious from my character, but it could be figured out and I’m not prone to just giving out who I am. Someone better give me a good reason if they want my claim at this point beyond just “scum don’t have access to fake claims” because the field is broad and scum have plenty of options, not to mention each claim makes it easier for them to avoid CC.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Giving it some more thought after reading your posts.
First off, I think it's interesting that this happened at all. Luna had two back-ups, so you're not simply filling an empty Town slot. He would have just given you a double voter role if he wanted you to have two votes. So that suggests that whatever role you have is specifically built with splitting you across two separate characters. They could share a role or they could be two separate roles that somehow interrelate. I haven't decided which yet. To be clear, I'm not fishing for an answer because I'm honestly more intrigued to see this play out right now than I am to just get an explanation from you.
As for how that could play out, I suppose it's not utterly impossible that you're scum. There could be a Lone Wolf in this game and one of you could be that role, while the other could be a TP. That being said, part of the reason I don't believe this is the same reason I don't believe you're a scum/town pair: I can't see you functioning at cross purposes for yourself to try and satisfy two entirely distinct wincons. It's the same problem with you being TP/town, though I guess the TP could be Survivor or something that just wins independently.
So most likely you're town/town. It's the easiest explanation anyway and one that doesn't invite a whole lot of other questions about why you'd have two separate characters that pursue distinct and potentially clashing ends. It's not impossible that that scenario would exist, particularly as this is new territory regardless, but that's my assumption right now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Yes there is a reason why my name shows up twice. Yes I have two votes right now. My character and justification lines up very well as well. And I’m pretty sure this makes me town unless you think both my positions are scum, which is possible but doesn’t make much sense
I don't see why Luna would make you two separate scum simultaneously, since it would mean one flip implicates the other. I could see a world in which one of you is a TP, like others have said, but not one in which both of them are scum or one of them is scum and you're somehow both in and out of scum chat.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
In a meeting right now but I am going to claim this (I feel like GP always claiming early nowadays but I keep giving SOP roles). I am Popular Townie. My role lasts til MYLO/LYLO. I am Ted Bundy. I can give justification when I am out of this meeting
Yeah, I buy this. It does fit Ted Bundy, but more importantly, I just can't see Vader claiming this as scum after last game. Maybe that's naive of me, but it didn't exactly work out well for WyIted, and Vader was on that scum team.
Created:
Posted in:
Apologies, I fell off from this while I was at work. I'll catch up now before I have to head to a show this evening.
Created:
Posted in:
Didn't even notice that. Pie's the area of a circle this game, he r squared.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Uh... maybe let's not give away or even talk about those kinds of details.
Anyway, beyond the very obvious ones, I can't say I'm terribly familiar with serial killers as a whole. This is more a subject for my wife who occasionally goes down the true crime rabbit hole. Regardless, I'll do some research over the course of this game to make sure I'm in the know on claims given, in particular because of this:
Mafia were not given fake claims, hints, or anything. There is a fairly simple theme split.
I'm guessing the reason for the former is just the existence of so many serial killers to choose from, which gives scum a large base to select from with little risk apart from the obvious choices (I'm good with making a running list of likely characters in this game, e.g. John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, Jeffry Dahmer, even Jack the Ripper). Given that this is a simple theme split, we should anticipate at least one scum giving a fake claim.
All I'll say about mine for now is that I know who this is, but only because there's an associated movie.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
/in. Been a while since we've done an anime theme, so Solo Leveling it is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
@That2User
@WyIted
@Casey_Risk
Endgame for all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@Barney
@ILikePie5
@AustinL0926
@Savant
Endgame's up.
Created:
Posted in:
1st place: Town (Pie, Savant, Lunatic, Austin, Barney, Casey, That2)
2nd place: Mafia (Vader, WyIted)
Night Actions (NP1):
Casey Doctored Luna (automatically silenced by PBO)
Austin Followed Vader
That2 Tracked Casey
Vader Tailored Barney for Cop flip
Vader NK'd Barney
So... huh. This was going to get pretty crazy based on how things were set to play out. Barney wasn't aware of it, but he was a Hidden Sleepwalker, and RNG had him visiting Luna, so both Casey and Barney would have been Silenced if the latter hadn't been NK'd. Was interested to see how the PBO would work out, but things came to a head early in DP2 with Austin's result.
I do think the Follower in particular made this a kind of swingy game and this game certainly swung on it. If not for that result, I think Vader could have survived significantly longer and made more use of his varied roles. Scum had a lot of counters to the Follower - part of the point of having the Tailor in play for them was to give them cover if the Follower visited them, giving a different result that could uphold their claim - but I understand why they wouldn't have bet on Austin using it on Vader in NP1. I also aimed to give some villainous characters out to town to throw people a bit, and Drolta in particular was meant to be a stretch for town to buy along with Isaac (who was in this game - that was Pie's character).
As for claims, yeah, I do think it was risky for WyIted to go with the Captain who was by far the most minor character claim in the batch. The Miller was a risky gambit, but it could have paid off assuming it didn't become clear that there were two investigative roles already in play. The more surprising choice was to not just straight up claim Alucard. The split, if it isn't obvious, was the Tepes family vs. everyone, but I'm not convinced that would have been obvious even with the Dracula flip. I did let scum know that there wasn't a Cop in the game (I only let them ask about one role in return) because of the nature of the Tailor role I gave them (it could only modify roles, not affiliations - I felt like saying it could Tailor affiliation too would give them the impression that there was a Cop in the game, so I chose to put my thumb on the scale a bit instead).
It was a quick game, but oh well, I had fun making it and seeing everything come together. It was great revisiting all the quotes from the show. I promise I'll do this again sometime. Thanks again to Mharman for all his help designing the game, and I welcome any and all feedback on the design and execution.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Vader (4/4): Austin, Savant, Vader, Pie
Luna (1/4): That2
Vader was lynched! He was... guilty!
Endgame... sometime soon. Damn, this ended fast.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Luna (1/4): That2/Owen
I fight wars. You have no idea, do you? War is when you kill so many of the other side that they can't fight you anymore. Prancing around on a meadow isn't war. Stealing into a tent and cutting every throat in sight is war. Poisoning wells is war. (pointing furiously at Varney.) Killing every baby in a town and disappearing, that's war. (squeezes his fist.) War is for winning. (points toward the ceiling.) And tracking that lunatic down into her secret rooms and surprising them to death, that's what I do. That's what I did. And you, standing there flapping and posing. You're everything I hate. You vampires who think it's all about wit. I use the word loosely, because you are a shithead for the ages. (points at Varney again.) Being charming, using clever words, desperate for people to admire you because you're special. Too much of the damaged, needy human on you. You're not a vampire. I'm a fucking vampire. I lie and I cheat, because lying to pigs is meaningless, and I'm hungry. I take anything anybody has, every last fucking drop, and then I hunt for more. I am not a criminal. I am fucking perfect.
-Ratko (from Castlevania S4)
Oh, forgot to mention this at the outset, but I have set That2 and Owen up to hydra the rest of this game. Just be aware of that if he starts posting in the thread. I'll add his name to the OP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
@That2User
@Casey_Risk
It's not the dying that frightens us. It's living without ever having done our best.
-Sypha's Grandfather (from Castlevania S1)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@ILikePie5
@AustinL0926
@Savant
Welcome back from hell!
-Erzsebet Báthory (from Castlevania: Nocturne S2)
Created:
Posted in:
Onward to DP2!
Lynched:
WyIted - You are Vlad “Dracula” Tepes! The central antagonist of the first two seasons of Castlevania and one of the most powerful vampires around, Dracula rained fiery hell down on the people of Targoviste for burning his wife at the stake as a witch before turning his gaze to the rest of humankind. Despite his crusade to end humanity for taking the love of his life, Dracula became one of the most sympathetic characters in the show as you watch a man deal with his grief in what his son Alucard describes as “history’s longest suicide note.” You are the Killing JOAT! Loved (permanently active until MYLO/LYLO): You require one extra vote to be eliminated than would otherwise normally be needed to achieve majority. In addition, you may use one of the following roles per NP. 2x Ninja: You are able to perform night actions without being detected as visiting others.2x Strongman: You have immunity against your night kill being manipulated or protected against. You win with the Mafia.
Died in the Night:
Barney - You are Saint Germaine! You come onto the scene as a normal human seeking information on the Infinite Corridor, a gateway to other dimensions into which he lost his partner before the events of the series. After getting lost in the Corridor, you are found and manipulated by the mysterious Alchemist into committing unspeakable acts, only to discover that it was in fact Death himself using him to return an ultimate evil to this world. Because of your attunement to the unseen and can discover disturbances that others overlook by glimpsing shadows, you are the Cop. Each night you may select one person to target. You will learn there affiliation. You win with the town.
- Casey has been SILENCED! They may vote up to three times today, but may not post otherwise.
Remaining Players:
1. Pie
2. Savant
3. Lunatic
4. Austin
5. Vader
6. Casey
7. That2/Owen
With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch. The DP ends Saturday, March 29 @ 10 PM EST.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
WyIted (6/5): Luna, Barney, Pie, Casey, Vader, That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
Luna (1/5): WyIted
WyIted was lynched! He was... guilty!
Submit your night actions! The DP will end in 24 hours, or at 4 PM on Thursday, March 27.
Created:
Posted in:
Note: I do see WyIted's above vote/unvote. The count stands.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Barney (1/5): That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
WyIted (4/5): Luna, Barney, Pie, Casey
Luna (1/5): WyIted
Sypha: Shit!
Trevor: What did you just say?
Sypha: I said "shit", okay?
Trevor: Yes, it's just that you never, you know, curse.
Sypha: I never used to, and then all this happened. And then you happened.
Trevor: Me?
Sypha: Yes, you. I was nice. And then I met you, and now I'm like you.
Trevor: Oh, so it's my fault.
Sypha: It's all your fault! You did this to me!
Trevor: I found you turned into a statue in a fucking tomb!
Sypha: And climbed all over me, and since that moment everything has been shit, and... [two more Fleaman lunge at her] AAH! I AM FUCKING TALKING HERE! [Sypha incinerates them] You turned me into someone who says "shit"! Fuckity-shit-hairy-arse-warts-giant-slimy-balls... SHIT!
-Exchange between Sypha and Trevor (from Castlevania S4)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Either way the public face of it looks the same: "whoopsies, we'll do better next time"
Honestly, would be nice if we at least got that as the consistent message coming from this administration.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
If nothing in the signal chat was classified. They should release the text to the public.
Agreed.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Barney (1/5): That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
WyIted (3/5): Luna, Barney, Pie
Luna (1/5): WyIted
FlysEyes: I lived as a man during a time in the empire that ruled Athens, changed its religion and laws. I believed Philosophy to be the Studies of the Systems of the World and our purpose in it. And yet discussions of the nature of the Divine became a crime.
Isaac: Who declared this a crime?
FlysEyes: Christians. To be a philosopher was a sin. And one important Christian was heard to say, that the people should hunt down sinners and drive them into salvation, as a hunter drives his prey into traps.
Isaac: To think about God would surely not be a sin in God's eyes.
FlysEyes: Perhaps. And yet... here I am.
Isaac: And perhaps you did not tell me all of your dream.FlysEyes: I was betrayed, Forgemaster. I was hunted, I was tortured, I lied for my life. In a church, before a judge. I gave up others, so that I may live. I became a sinner.
Isaac: And?
FlysEyes: They killed me... anyway. I woke up in Hell, because this world is insane, and I learned something about sin.
Isaac: [Looking disturbed by FlysEyes story] And what did you learn?
FlysEyes: I learned... to like it. [begins to crawl to Isaac] Yet here I am, back on the surface of the Earth... strong and free, in a world where thinking is considered something that should be tortured and murdered. [He stops crawling and then disturbingly begins to smile] Thank you for my second life. [Isaac looks at the Night Creature with remorse] I intend to use it well, and make wonderful new dreams of it.
-Exchange between FlysEyes and Isaac (from Castlevania S3)
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Barney (2/5): Pie, That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
WyIted (1/5): Luna
Luna (1/5): WyIted
Stone-eyed Cyclops, right out of the family bestiary... God shits in my dinner once again.
-Trevor Belmont (from Castlevania S1)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Judging from Tulsi's facial expressions during the Congressional hearing, it's likely someone knows.
Certainly looks like it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I don't disagree although I would say if the mistake is intentional we will never know and should never know. We don't want national intelligence of how we choose what to leak to be exposed.
Someone should know, even if it’s not the American public as a whole. There should be a means to determine whether or not this was a mistake and a means to hold the people who committed said mistake accountable if so.
Created:
Posted in:
I don’t really have anything else to add here in response. At this point, we’re talking about markedly different approaches to the problem of what could be either an intentional or unintentional leak.
It seems like ADOL wants to discuss an entirely different approach that doesn’t hold them to account for which it is, but rather tackles the problem by removing it entirely. Fair enough, but not something I want to discuss further. In the meantime, the alternative of not holding them to account at all seems problematic.
Not much to say with WyIted at this point. If it was an honest mistake, they’re sure taking their time copping to it and there should still be some degree of accountability. If it’s purposeful, then that should be verifiable to some degree and we can move on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Within the context of "even if all of them are planned." they have no intention of proving anything to you or anyone else.
Alright, so you don’t think they should have to prove they had a plan here and executed on it. Got it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Maybe there is nothing for them to learn.
If that’s the case, then it should be easy for them to prove that they did everything right. We’ll see what happens.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
It should appear sloppy tbh. The only thing that gives me pause is that Walz was the one to do it.
So there’s potential value in appearing sloppy. It looks sloppy. Ergo it was planned as sloppy. Forgetting about the fact that looking sloppy has created a shitstorm of a response, I just don’t love that there’s an inherent benefit of the doubt here. If your point is that sloppiness can be part of the plan, sure. If your point is that we should assume sloppiness was part of the plan rather than just poor planning on their part, then you’ve lost me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Why do you think it was slap dash and hastily done?
It looks like they weren’t paying attention to what they were doing and just didn’t see that they’d invited a journalist into this discussion without noticing. That comes off as slap-dash and hasty, since there seems to have been no rhyme or reason to the choice or the timing. If the goal was to deliver information to him in the chat, why bother leaving him in there for days at a time? Also, why does the lack of resulting harm suggest care was taken?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Once again, they are the executive branch of the government. If you can't assume they are judicious about what they pretend to want to keep secret, why would you assume they are judicious about what they openly declassify.There is no point you're making here.If you didn't trust them yesterday nothing has changed.
…not trusting them generally and not trusting them in this particular sense are two different things. I assumed that, at minimum, the delivery of classified information between members of the administration wouldn’t be a shit show that involved inviting a journalist to be a part of the process as it played out. I guess that was a silly assumption.
This is a "if you make a move you take a risk" observation.
That’s not my point. The nature of how they took that move and their position that nothing was wrong with how they did it strikes me as far more concerning because it tells me that they’re not going to put into place safeguards against this happening again or, if they do, that they won’t learn from the experience because any restrictions will be imposed externally. So, rather than just taking any kind of move, they’re going to continue to take these kinds of moves.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Things can go wrong with leaks but every intelligence agency on the planet engages in intentional leaks. Some is for misinformation some is to leak legitimate information for political gain.
And usually, those leaks are much more controlled, the people involved much more clearly on the same page, and it doesn’t involve inviting random journalists into a private chat. It’s not just about the information that’s being delivered, it’s about the slap-dash, messy nature of its delivery and how that speaks to what they’re likely to do in the future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Why?
Because we shouldn’t assume that they will be consistently judicious about what information they include. More leaks mean more opportunities for intelligence failures, even if all of them are planned.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I contradicted two assertions:1.) Signal is insecure2.) An intentional leak is a risk of unintentional leak (the dam analogy)
For the former, your responses largely came down to there being a lot we don't know about the accessibility of data from Signal vs. other methods of communication that they could be using internally. I accept that. I also acknowledged that Signal is secure in some ways from the start, so it's mainly a matter of whether it has vulnerabilities that their other methods do not. I presented evidence to that effect, you dismissed it as uncertain. I accept that there's information we don't know. I don't know where we go from there.
The latter is not a point I made. You criticized my dam analogy because you thought it implied unintentional leaks would happen, but I stated (now a few times) that that wasn't my intention with the analogy. I'll acknowledge that it's a poor choice for an analogy, but I thought I was pretty clear about what I meant: that an administration willing to engage in this kind of intentional information leak once would likely do so again, and that there's a substantial risk with each one.
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Barney (3/5): Pie, WyIted, That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
WyIted (1/5): Luna
God is standing before you! And soon... he's going to have sex again.
-Saint Germaine (from Castlevania S4)
Created:
Posted in:
Votes:
Barney (4/5): Luna, Pie, WyIted, That2
Casey (1/5): Austin
Trevor: Eat shit and die
Alucard: Yes, fuck you
-Exchange between Trevor and Alucard (from Castlevania S1)
Created: