zedvictor4

Commitment and devotion, taking care and protecting and all that stuff you just espoused.

So hypothetically Yas.

If your Brother raped your wife.

Who would you embrace first?

All that we can be pretty sure of, was that Jesus the boy/man, was the son of a man and a woman.

That's based upon an actual Jesus person of course.

Though, if the Middle eastern folk tales are purely fictional, then the Jesus character can be the son of anything that one cares to make up.

And DNA and Wikipedia hang ups are a waste of time.

Though I am aware of how much you enjoy each others company.

So sorry for the interjection.

But spare a thought for daft Joe.

He should have taken a tip from loose Mary,

And stuck to riding donkeys,

And got the hell out of town.

Must have cost a small fortune,

Stable hire and carpentry lessons.

And what did the lad end up doing?

Wandered about all day getting all spiritual,

With his boy friends.

Got himself arrested, and subsequently,

Nailed to a post.

Jesus Christ!!!!!

Exclaimed Joe.

Is as loose a concept as is the concept of GOD.

Primary sources do not exist.

Other than a fairly firm assumption that something happened quite a long time ago, that can variously be labelled as GOD or BOOM or KPOW or WHOOSH.....Or anything one chooses.

Never suggested that sui_generis was Stephen.

Punctuation is key.

Any amount and sequence of letters can be a word.

You choose.

How would you define SAANMONAOTTA?

Maybe.

Inadvertently.

And as expected,

You avoided the hypothetical question again.

Just be honest,

Your conditioning has become your justification.

Same for me.

Reprogramming is not that simple.

Offence is essentially make believe.

One does not offend,

One chooses to be offended.

There is money and gain to be made from being offended, on an industrial scale.

F**k free speech and freedom of expression.

It was literal.

Now that's a red rag to a bull.

Especially in the philosophy forum....LOL

All that is available anyway, so why does a genuine beggar* need to exchange money for these supposed essentials.

Isn't this just a manifestation of base human instinct.....Inherent selfishness, always one eye on personal survival and never real concern for those less fortunate.

Some might suggest that for this reason humanity is inherently immoral.

Not intending to denigrate those who have developed a strong sense of compassion.

Nonetheless, compassion also comes at a price.

Compassion becomes a social sub-system, inextricably tied to money, like everything else.

Maybe hardwired selfishness and the invention of a divisive tool (money), were inevitable.

If shelter, food, comfort, hygiene, safety and compassion were our only consideration,

Why would we necessarily motivate material evolution....Technological progress for example.

Maybe human purpose is greater than humanity.

Perhaps therefore, it is essentially moral to be socially immoral.

No free will methinks.

*Genuine Beggar.....You decide.

Subjective,

Provocative,

Divisive,

Insensitive,

Non-representative,

Etcetera,

Etcetera.

Oh my GOD!

Poly you're officially a Christian.

And that's politically correct.

Don't blame me,

Blame Reece 101.

Q.    When is spam, not spam.

Good.

Nonetheless, this Presidential thing has become a farcical parody.

So I will be abstaining.

Ok.

So,

Bro,

Or wife.

Hypothetically,

What would Allah tell you to do?

And you did that,

And we did this

And people have been killing each other in the name of some difference or another, for millions of years.

Remember when,

Ug killed Og,

Because Og was from a different cave and f**ked Ug's cavewoman, and worshipped the Moon and not the Sun.

Same old shit Eugene.

We haven't left the cave yet.

(Albeit a cave with voice activated smart windows).

Will we ever?

Is money moral?

Or more precisely,

Are the inherent social manifestations of money moral?

Money has long since been a representation of debt,

And is now a representation of hierarchical power.

What is morality anyway?

Other than a justification for something that we feel the need to justify,

Or the condemnation of something that we feel the need to condemn.

Why do we make up all this stuff?

Is it an evolutionary necessity?

Or do we do it just because we can?

Et tu, Brute?

DDO became a hopeless site.

Is that what we can expect on Dart?

Ok.

A shame, because they always made an interesting contribution to a discussion.

The inherent problems of strongly established ideology I suppose.

That's good then.

Had a quick read, and would seem to be the answer to all human power supply issues.

Let's hope that it's really that simple.

The more interesting philosophical question for me, is why has it become necessary for a species to be dependant upon electrical energy?

A different forum perhaps.

The Bible is what it is, and is what it has become.

It is a collection of Middle Eastern folk tales and creation myths.

And along with other similar compilations,

Have become the basis of  worldwide cultural, social and political ideologies.

Daft but true.

Yet probably an evolutionary certainty.

Popular religions and all fanciful creation hypotheses are analogies for something that a group of sentient organisms don't understand.

Best just leave them with their books and their ignorance.

Put yours in a skip if you wish.

Mine went into a metaphorical skip long ago.

Still makes for entertaining discussion though.

And not that I purport to understand the meaning and potential purpose of creation.

I just understand that religious books are what they are, and are what they have become.

GOD principle sound,

Floaty about blokes not so.

Amen.

Just a non-evolutionary system.

Which would seem to defy the laws of universal progression.

Probably would drive one mad.

I imagine,

That people who think that inheritance is immoral.

Are people who won't be getting one.

Unless they unexpectedly get one,

And then you can bet,

Morality would shine like a beacon of light from the heavens,

Out of their arses,

As it were.

@Airmax who.

Never heard of them before 2022.

Stephen loves contradictions.

And I think it is you.

And some fantastic terminology occurring.

Neoplatonic emanationism is f**king ace,

Must remember to slip that one in.

Old Plotinus was a right tart.

Nondual...Just the one then?

And what was odd about the twenty years before you transcended?

Or should I say more odd?

Though one could rightly argue,

That odd is, 

As odd does.

Interesting thought.

Without eyes, would the world be any colour at all?

Now.

The lack of punctuation,

Strongly suggests that,

You write poetry,

About your fetishes.

And.

I looked up fetish,

And I must be honest and say,

That definitively speaking,

I do have fetishes that get a mention,

Often metaphorically.

It's good that you appreciate the intended humour of my reflection.

It did just strike me that a square was a circle with corners.

Anything with a perimeter can be circulated.

Otherwise...Free will contradicts theism, is just more of the same.

And can be dipped into and out of, at leisure.

I would suggest that we are all inspired to be more than we originally were.

Good morning,

Where ever you might be.

Well,

DDO became a shambles.

And Ideological and emotionless...That's pretty much me.

Emotion is largely.

Acquired behaviour relative to,

Memory.

Being aware of this,

Makes me aware of that.

And I enjoy constructing poems, which the Doc referred to as Zedku's.

It's becoming a thing.

And so...Hypothetically who get's the hug?

Bro,

Or the whore that she has become.

Can you be emotionless?

And deconstruct the hypothesis,

Rationally.

Often as difficult as one cares to make them.

Independence can be both a curse and a blessing.

Obviously not a curse for Sadolite.

In terms of methodology.

How fictitious is erotic fiction?

Would that be a multiple entry dildo?

And will you be using a metaphorical lubricant?

Well, you didn't explain very clearly.

It is being suggested that the ban was self-requested.

Is that correct?

@Lemming

Yep...Formal debates are contests as you described.

I do the very occasionally debate, but only for amusement.

Check out my current debate with Intel.

Had a bit of spare time over the holiday period.

 

@SupaDudz.

Odd.

Mod.

Any more light to be shed.

Was this an act of self-flagellation?

The evolution of human systems.

Did you or Varoufakis expect things to stay the same.

Nothing works like that.

That's not a reason for banning.

What was the users request based upon?

But why were they banned?

Miscarriage.

Distress

Emotional overthink.

It's only human, I know.

Miscarriage.

Natural abortion

Old women having babies

It's the new natural, I know.

Miscarriage.

Vaccines

Gotta blame something 

It's modern blame culture, I know.

Big Tech.

Is

And what it will become

Distressless babies in a bubble, perhaps.

And so on.

Until

All energy is spent.

Baby it's cold outside, nothing more to know.

Thank GOD.

Maybe

Two chances

KABOOM, who knows.

#6.

A friend and I were wondering.

Sat and wondered.

Nope.

One account is enough.

Lived life fully awake, but so in touch with the unconscious.

There's your first contradiction in this particular hypothesis Stephen.

All sorts of names crawling out of the woodwork at the moment.

None of them with much to offer.

Other than coerced drivel.

Strikes me, 

If things didn't go on,

Then things wouldn't,

Yet you just did.

Odd.

So jerking off is the immediate option,

To the necessary itch,

And brain held imagery has always sufficed.

No Nip's required.

No offence intended

And Margorie Taylor Greene,

For sure,

On the platform,

Twittering

Bout some spiracy tosh.

And POTUS

Probably in bed.

Not jerking.

Testing testing,

1 

2

1

2

Yep,

Seems to be working.

That makes sense Poly,

If one reads it backwards, 

And replaces every fourth vowel,

With a Jaffa cake.

But  to be fair,

Christianity,

Is no clearer,

Or nearer,

To the beginning,

Or the end of,

Does your ideology include a clause,

That says you should raise hell,

Against evil religions.

Yep,

Santa clause.

A square is a circle with corners.

Currently, a GOD is not known to actually exist.

And true....If you wanna create spiritual, you'll create spiritual....But in your head.

So that sensation in your heart.

Could be serious.

Go see a Cardiologist.

I can do as many as is necessary.

And it would depend a great deal upon how long the words are.

I could probably type A, quite a few times in a minute.

Whereas Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch, probably a lot less.

DDO was never great.

Hi Doc.

Let's get pseudo political.

Faith and Begorrah.

Schism is clever people setting up their own club for personal gain.

Of course, if the new club is going to pay dividends, you need a considerable membership of gullible people

And you  also need to invest in the next generation of clever leaders.....Condition/tutor them appropriately and reward them accordingly.

Especially given the short turn around time of both leaders and members.

And fast forward 1700 years or so and nothing's really changed, other than the membership has grown and the stakes are considerably higher.

And the clever people can still  get the gullible numpties to do all sorts of stupid stuff in the name of the club.

sui-generis.

A well researched name that reminds me of someone.