zedvictor4

@Tarik

Data transfer is a subjective process.

Therefore transferred data is inherently subjective.

Notwithstanding that everything is an internal simulation.

Sieg heil mein Fuhrer.

Ze fibre is good for ze goosesteppen.

There's this Italian one who is media popular at the mo.

But they've stopped showing full length pictures of it in running gear, because you can clearly see it's todger.

And it's seemingly got something to do with Harry Potter.

No...Not Harry Potters todger.

Though it wouldn't make much of a difference in the egg and spoon race.

Thanks Deb.

Yep, people keep saying stuff as if they know something we don't.

And we keep telling them that we don't know exactly the same stuff that they don't know.

But they keep on and on.

GOD this,

And GOD that.

But all that they've got is a book that some blokes cobbled together a while back.

Yep, burning bushes...WTF.

What's wrong with hello Moses and how are you today?

Nope, burning bushes...What sort of omni-sensible creator does that?

OK...Perhaps he was having a daft laugh.

Perhaps GODDO likes scaring old men in the wilderness.

Though...Methinks that Old Moses was regularly of his trolley on some substance or another.

Skippy the Bush Kangaroo...Now there's a Aussie euphemism.

Did they ever mention Australia in the Bible.

I'm pretty sure that Wales didn't get a mention.

So who collected the Koala's and put them on the Ark?

And the Penguins.

Good day Bruce.

@ Tarik

For sure, the context of discussions is very limited.

Though function and process dictates, that all output is subjective.

I came

I saw

I thought

I commented.

First things first.

It should be noted, that the existence of a Middle Eastern magical creator bloke, cannot be verified.

Let alone magical fantasy lands called heaven and hell.

I'm guessing that my dead relatives have in the main been retuned to the Universe in particulate form, save for a few tougher components of the buried ones.

We will have to wait and see.

Or not, of course.

Donny or Kammy?

There will be two biases and others.

Relative to a four year period of media led entertainment.

Wherein, schoolboys will shoot their enemies

And no one will be able to do anything about it.

Constitutions and amendments, and all that.

There is always the Weather Channel.

If you want more flannel.

Simply

Defeating

Dreams

Wistfully

They dabble

Into

Memory

And history

Pass the baton

Pass the buck

Iamanabanana

Good luck.

Blah Blah Blah.

Perhaps.

A Universe is the re-initiation of a previous Universe.

There could have been billions of them.

So GOD is matter that possesses the ability to evolve.

And thinking blob and it's successors necessarily develop.

Perhaps.

Why?

Blah Blah Blah.

One is never as smart as a Jehovah's Witness. 

A GOD has never instructed anything about anything.

Though some old geezers supposedly met a GOD in private.

And hey presto, a list of instructions.

No mention of abortion or touching kids though.

Just, leave my missus alone and don't fiddle with my ox or my ass.

Handily presented on a lump of rock.

At the time, Mr Omni clearly hadn't thought about ink or a handier piece of paper.

Nor a photocopier.

And for sure, take the word theist and suffix or prefix to suit one's fancy.

Me, I'm an acrobatitheistaphobe.

I have a very disturbing somersault reaction to organised religion.

Natural food is no good if it is radioactive.

Though I am of the opinion that everything that occurs within a Universe at any given moment, is naturally occurring.

So radioactive food and subsequent death would be natural.

GOD is good with an O missing.

Good is GOD with an extra O.

Good GOD is a exclamation of surprise.

As is Jesus Christ.

Stored data, converted into contrived sounds and understandable noise, or symbols presented as a visually appreciable narrative.

As far as we know, nothing more nothing less.

Blah Blah Blah.

And atheism is theism with an A at the beginning.

Oops.

That's sort of assuming that ones position is assured.

Though all that one should really bother with are 2. and 9.

Food and a good blow job.

Atheism.

Theism.

Two of many,

States of mind relative to variable programming.

So you are an absolute pacifist?

Gadzooks.

Living organisms have an inbuilt tendency to be pro-life.

And then for thinking man, there are a 101 other things to consider.

Which allows for thinking man to also be pro-choice.

And also allows them to be selectively moral.

So I doubt that many anti-abortionists are absolutely pro-life.

And similarly,  I doubt that many pro-abortionists are absolutely pro-choice.

Such is the human ability to make more complex and variable decisions.

Rights are made up.

As is Law.

We tread a fine line between tolerant civility and brutal selfishness.

For some, abortion is a beneficial surgical procedure...For others it is something to pontificate about.

Thinking Man as it were.

Yep, such is the question.

I'm living because, parents blah blah blah.

And I continue to live because the alternative as yet, isn't applicable.

There either is or isn't a reason for any of this.

Though, one can speculate variously, simply or imaginatively.

Shila gone.

Is that binary for bullshit?

I did wonder.

The person on DebateIsland claims not to be the Bro, but I'm sure that it is.

Anyway, nice to see you taking up the mantle.

Nope, GOD loves Anime.

That's why it's creation was preordained, all those billions of years ago.

Enjoy.

Ethang is in Philadelphia, I expect.

And fancy being named for a pork based product.

Hey, Stephen...Starting to sound like the Bro.

Have a good Sunday and Monday.

Regards.

Zed.

Some might suggest that limitations cannot be overcome, such is the nature of limitations.

The greatest limitation of all, is being an Earthling aboard a tiny speck of cosmic dust.

You will need to explain the Maths more clearly

As it is, looks like numbers to fit, rather than fitting numbers.

For sure, that's how society works.

But I'm not sure that we were discussing motoring related rules.

Very true Stephen.

People don't offend.

People pretend to be offended.

Though, I expect that most of the 2 billion don't give a monkey's

Don't log in.

You've never been to Wales then?

Thanks for that Wylted, are you Owen_T's spokesperson?

One way or another rules is oppression.

And man makes rules to oppress his fellow man.

And I don't need to prove that there isn't a GOD, because currently there isn't one.

You stated that "God commanded", which is therefore incorrect.

So I know, that what you think you know and what you actually know are two different things.

How can something appear from nothing?

Look.

Before people come out with tosh, like GOD restricted diet and commanded circumcision.

They really need to prove unequivocally, that a GOD exists.

As far as we know, men restricted diets and men command circumcision.

Just like some perverse men still command circumcision, and some stupid people still restrict diet for ideological reasons.

Which is of course not to say that some people should restrict their diets  for size and health related reasons.

Actually, he must possess a certain amount of smartness.

What he lacks is statesmanship

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

They just bleat along with the rest of the flock.

No thought required.

Hello Shila.

What's your point?

Nonetheless:

To be liked, is a fickle state of affairs.

And to be liked by most, would require one to be known by most.

And celebrity for example, comes with just as much resentment as it does with adulation.

Though adulation of celebrity, tends to be shallow sycophancy.

Because to seek widespread adulation is shallow and vain.

Better to be appreciated and tolerated by ones immediate connections. 

In my opinion.

Most people don't know you.

Debt is the norm.

I thought you were Bono.

Begorrah!

White robes, longish hair and beard.

These Middle Eastern types all looked the same.

It's obvious that they used a stunt double.

If you remember, he was well documented, and referred to as Brian.

Satirical maybe.

But nonetheless as Feasible as any other nonsense.

The trolley problem is a purely hypothetical, unrealistic, philosophical proposition.

There are no rules.

My trolley was in good working order, with effective brakes, so no one got hurt.

Previously, I was simply pointing out that your statement, "the trolley prevents zero deaths" did not make sense.

Prior to that I only stated "hypothetically, 0 deaths".

I wouldn't accuse anyone of being retarded, but nonetheless, getting worked up over a ridiculous philosophical hypothesis is a tad silly.

True, a trolley neither prevents nor causes deaths...It's just a trolley.

Though a trolley that prevents zero deaths, is therefore inaccurately perceived to prevent some deaths.

In which case, unless we can accurately predict how many deaths might have occurred before the trolley intervened, we can not accurately say how many deaths either would have or would not have occurred either before or after the trolley's intervention.

There is nothing either objective or therefore correct, in relation to the trolley problem.

It wouldn't matter if there were 10 trillion hypothetical deaths.

I say the trolley should have been fixed in accordance with the laws of longtermism...Hypothetically, 0  deaths.

HaHa.

Someone put long and term together, stuck an ism on the end, and came up with longtermism.

That's a becauseyoucanism.

But for sure, with thebenefitofhindsightism, longtermism would be a sensiblestrategyism.