zedvictor4

Stopping the ageing clock will one day no doubt be a possibility.

It will then be necessary for a highly intelligent, ageless super-race to take control.

And the production of  purposeless, resource consuming human dross must cease.

For sure.

Get rid of all the rest and just save yourself and a cute Asian babe or a few cuties...Might as well make a harem of it.

The younger the better really, simply so that you can educate them to your standards.

As you will be in charge the morality angle will be up to you.

To assume that humanity can sin, is to assume that humanity is answerable to a greater authority

So to prove that sin is real and therefore a  human flaw, you must first prove that there is a greater authority to answer to.

Notwithstanding that, the notion that the greater authority is the creator of humanity must also be validated.

You seem to be suggesting that bestiality is exclusively a man thing.

Though Welsh farmers are/were renowned for their proclivities.

Though I stress that I am neither Welsh by birth nor a farmer.

Though for sure, in the interests of equality and diversity...LGBTBQ

Plus....

N for necrophilia.

Or M/W for the self abuse angle.

Anything else?

Oh! Almost for got H for heterosexual.

Boring old straightish sex.

And then roll over and go to sleep.

Was humanity created?

Need to answer the basics first Trade, before you go on to secondary hypotheses.

I would suggest that in terms of species development, Darwinian theory explains the explainable.

How life came about is another question.

Maybe it was deposited by advanced extra-terrestrials or maybe it was the result of a spontaneous electro-chemical reaction here on Earth.

Though if we plump for your UFO option, it still begs the same primary questions...When and where and how did the first life occur.

Because I would further suggest that even advanced extra-terrestrials must have developed from a primary life source.

As for science and scientists, they do exactly as the words define.

So with regard to the extra-terrestrial deposition of life theory, what do scientists actually have to work on, to be able to test the theory?

Species evolution theory and UFO deposition theory are two completely different ball games, in terms of what they set out to achieve.

The former attempts to explain B to Z, whereas the latter attempts to explain A.

Camel toe is the new normal.

Weather is.

And will be.

Crises are human internal dilemmas relative to survival and associated fears.

 Coping strategies are variable.

My point entirely.

Evolution is theoretical, though material development is discernible.

Whereas deism though hypothetical, is not discernibly evidenced.

And for sure, someone who reads old books a lot and thereby makes a lot of subjective assumptions, might be regarded as scholarly.

Especially within what might be  regarded as a scholarly environment.

Nonetheless there is no necessity for the basis of the associated data to be scholarly.

Though one must concede that scholarly today is not the same as scholarly was 2000 years ago, nor what scholarly has been over the intervening centuries.

Yet still no closer to proving deistic hypotheses.

Within the context of Universal development, why is it likely that there is another more advanced intelligence that is capable of interstellar travel.

Maybe we are the most intelligent lifeform in the Universe.

Maybe other intelligent lifeforms are at the same stage of material development as us.

Even so...If the seeds of life were sown here long ago by a UFO, then why wouldn't Darwin's theory of species evolution still be relevant?

Scum of the Earth indeed.

Though I sometimes refer to it as organic fluff.

Fragile, but persistent for now.

So what is the better UFO theory?

And as I see it, evolution started at the beginning and is ongoing, and will be to the end.

I refer to it as material evolution...Which is a universal process.

The development of life and living organic structures is one small part of the sequence, and I see no reason why as a part of a universal process, extra-terrestrial intervention should not play a part. UFO's and all.

Though I  think it unlikely, given the difficulties of interstellar travel, that we would have been visited by UFO's.

But if we have been visited, then I think it odd that we are not already an integral part of interstellar species evolution.

Why are still stuck here on little old planet Earth with nowhere else to go?

Other than an ageing space station, and little old Mars perhaps...Such is the evolutionary rate of human driven flying objects.

Yep.

All of history would have been played out differently if all of history had been played out differently.

History didn't begin in the 1930's...Nor did history begin with Homo-sapiens.

So for instance, if a mass extinction event hadn't played out back in the day, then ongoing events and development would have been different.

Notwithstanding that a whole load of stuff occurred previously.

The formation of our solar system for example.

Well.

A UFO is a UFO, therefore an unidentified object flying and not evidence to negate Darwin's theory of species evolution.

Species evolution is just as likely to have applied to the development of advanced extra-terrestrial life forms.

And atheism/ atheist is more of a general term that is used by those who see no logic in the idea of worshipping fantasy MANGODS, especially the fantasy MANGODS that developed relatively recently amongst the peoples of the Arabian peninsular.

Atheists do no presume to know the meaning of everything nor the specific processes of the GOD principle.

Therefore most atheists would not dismiss non-fantastic hypotheses out of hand...Extra terrestrial intervention for example.

Though one should not confuse theism with deism. Deism being the fantasy and theism being the associated nonsense that consequently develops 

Thoughts.

That other stuff inside your head that no one gets to hear about.

How long before that is accessed?

As Orwell the Prophet predicted.

LGBTT

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans-sexual and Trojan.

Sound advice.

Prostitutes with strap-ons then.

Perhaps you're too old and refined to understand the concept of a strap on.

Though you seem to understand the concept of prostitutes.

Or do you mean a thorough and reciprocal massage with a pert young Asian thing.

Sounds good to me.

No lady-boys though?

Know what you mean Deb

I would be lying if I said I didn't overfunk too.

I bet that Bro D overfunks when no one is looking.

I bet that even Mother Tersa overfunked when she was younger.

Catholic priests are renowned for their overfunking.

Especially when alter-boys are concerned.

Q. How many alter-boys fit under a priest's  cassock.

A. Only one...Kneeling...Either facing forwards or backwards and not praying to God.

Hope that you didn't find this Q and A session too funking much.

People are programmed to think in a certain way and therefore are likely to return to default settings.

Some people are programmed more rigidly that others, hence responses will vary.

Thereby we conclude that someone who refuses to agree or accept an alternative point of view is stubborn, when in fact they just lack the wherewithal to be open-minded.

So stubbornness is our perception of others, rather that someone else's behaviour.

I reject the idea that anyone can be scholarly about about  non-scholastic assumptions.

Which isn't to say that non- scholastic assumptions don't evolve into broader subjects.

So I would differentiate between a hypothetical text and  the ongoing  historical and social ramifications  of a hypothetical text.

Underwear overthink.

Thanks for the info Bro.

A. Who?

B. Who?

Yep, interesting Japanese style guy.

Presumably one can be a monodeist polytheist.

And therefore also a polydeist monotheist.

Such are the wonders of swapping around symbolic representations of abstract concepts.

Do they mention lingerie in the bible?

Q. When are multi-verses not a universe?

A. As a collective.

I basically explained this.

Though theory also suggests that as Middle Eastern Shaman, they probably used hallucinogenic substances as a means of connection with another realm.

Good day Bruce.

Wasn't asking anything Deb.

Was a relative statement.

Bulls kick dirt when they're pissed off.

If you see a bull kick dirt,

Then it's time to piss off.

Or a Kangaroo.

I reject the scholars.

Shame really.

A few million people who have grabbed a lot of sympathy from around the World, but a few million people who the sympathisers wouldn't really want to share their backyard with.

Can you blame them?

3 mobile data processing units that get a mention in a book.

They shared  an imaginative solution to a conundrum.

Lot's of that about for sure.

But still no tangible MANGOD as such.

Just the same old imaginative metaphor.

Thinking that,

Now is,

Yesterday was,

And, 

Tomorrow might be.

Good stuff.

Don had a thing for Slovenians.

Or perhaps they had a thing for his money.

Nice little country Slovenia.

The Julian Alps are a great place to hike.

Celtism is something of a myth.

The people in question are thought to have been of Central European origin. As were their Pigs.

Though ancient Central Europeans would share a common ancestry with every other homo-sapiens that migrated to the  four corners of the globe.

Not that a globe is big on corners.

And for sure, old British pagans did ritualistic stuff that they imagined would be of some metaphysical significance.

And for sure also, archaeologists dig  up stuff and speculate about what ancient pagans might have speculated about.

And people went to a lot of trouble to lug 25 ton stones from Pembrokeshire to Wiltshire.

Why?

We can only speculate.

And they brought their diner with them.

LOL.

So.

Theory is a tad futile.

Because human theorising can be wildly speculative.

Quantum entanglement springs to mind.

So how does one  ascertain everything within the context of human data acquisition and management systems.

An Alternative Intelligence perhaps.

Though alternative systems will be similarly restricted in terms of an indirect attachment to everything.

Perhaps alternative systems will be able to convert everything into mathematical sequences.

I often wonder,

If everything was broken down into it's finite state.

Would it disappear.

And perhaps reappear.

Not so much a BIG BOOM

But more of a WHERE THE FU*K DID THAT COME FROM.

There are already people who know how to successfully send rockets into space.

So why do people who can't, bother to try?

Ok, if it was a cheap hobby.

So much effort to travel 62 miles.

What we actually need is something new and less volatile.

So engage sincerely.

What is GOD that must be served?

Britain's are a mongrel race.

Pretty much a global phenomena

Though a lot of people choose to jump on and off the human timeline when and where it suits them.

So some like to think that they are special, because they also think that they do special things in special places.

Pretty much  common global misconceptions.

Me:

I'm primarily Earthling and then British, and inhabit a small demarcated area of the globe known as Wales or Cymru.

Functionally I'm just about the same as any other Earthling of the species Homo Sapiens.

And also physically similar in a lot of ways to not just other Mammalia but also all other organic living structures.

One Earth

One common ancestor.

Probably.

Labelled as such.

Though my suggestion was, that most non-labelled or differently labelled with a common nationality, would share similar basic ideas and values when confronted with an external threat of war.

How distant is the partner, and how does a researcher know where to find and observe it.

And how can the researcher view both particles simultaneously.

Presumably the universe contains billions of spinning  particles, so isn't it inevitable that there would be two or more  spinning similarly at the same time.

True dat.

As long as internal systems function.

With no perceivable external threat.

Everything is or not.

As it is impossible to validate incoming data

Nonetheless, everything is as it is.

And maybe also a simulation thereof,

Which in itself is everything.

Intelligence is as intelligence does.

Whereas logical common sense is as logical common sense does.

No one is actually a communist.

People are essentially the same

Communism is labelled output that evolves from a comparative assessment of social ideas and values.

Just because I enjoy milky puddings, it doesn't mean that I am a raspberry blancmange.