zedvictor4

Other than having air to breathe 

One would still have to spend most of one's time cooped up indoors.

And eating Penguins.

Oh yeah....No Penguins on Mars either.

You're getting repetitive Doc.

First sign of dementia.

Nice self control Deb.

Dr Nigel Biggar

AKA

G.R. Bigdangler.

Geoffrey Robert Bigdangler.

Doctor of Philosoffy and a Angular Priest.

Geoffrey Robert Erectangular Bigdanglar Priest.

Coincidentally I took a look and listen  at a Jordan Peterson discussion just the other day.

And his nauseating whining eventually got me down.

I came to the conclusion that he was an institutionalised academic with a persecution complex.

What I was saying was.

GOD is a metaphor.

And so is MOTHER NATURE.

Surely an easily graspable bit of data?

The bible is a man made book that was once sort of relevant.

So what is the point of this topic.

If you're not comparing biblical standards with modern social standards.

I would suggest that BK is either very straightforward and honest or deliberately obtuse.

I'm inclined to think the former.

True.

But you were making comparisons between then and now.

So I was making a similar comparison to indicate the absurdity of using the bible as a modern user guide.

So, 2000 years ago life expectancy was very short.

Therefore breeding had to start much earlier.

Post-pubescent females were probably not considered to be children.

GOD is that which might give purpose to everything.

Nature is everything that might occur within a universe.....Or without.

Mother Nature is seemingly an appropriate phrase.

Two fat ladies 88.

A group of fat ladies 88,888,888.

Bingo.

It doesn't say anything in the bible about a lot of things.

Where does it mention the ethicality of guns or computer technology for example.

Fact is that blokes wrote the bible about bloke stuff,  relative to 2000 or so years ago.

If an omni-GOD compiled a user manual,  it would need to include instructions for every aspect of existence from  start to finish.

Which just goes to prove that the bible is bunkum and GOD is a tall tale made up by ignorant blokes.

And believed by the gullible.

Good old Joe.

I would suggest that he doesn't stand for another term though.

It would probably be better if he sat for it.

For sure.

I never believe anything.

And the question is unanswerable.

I just like to run with the idea of a purposeful universe these days.

Whereas previously I was firmly into purposelessness.

No God  necessary by the way.....As in a magical being.

Though you might catch me referring to a GOD principle.

Well.

We're pretty certain that humanity resultant of material development does exist and also participates in the further development of matter.

This as part of a developmental process is either necessary and purposeful, or it is not. 

Both possibilities will achieve an outcome, though the outcome may or may not be necessary.

Everything for a reason.

Or no reason for everything.

I'll just leave it at that.

You can pick one if you like.

But you won't be able to substantiate it.

Tiny small large are simply descriptions relative to appreciation relative to an appreciator.

All that we are doing in this discourse, is attempting to describe something we do not know and cannot directly appreciate.

As such tiny is relative to massive and therefore an atom is tiny when compared to a universe, and a universe is tiny within the immeasurably unlimited realms of infinite space.

Basic logical common sense language guys. 

Of course, whether or not there is such a thing as immeasurably unlimited infinite space is impossible to know.

I was just basing my idea upon Ebuc's idea.

They started it, as it were.

Nonetheless, I like the idea of  immeasurably unlimited infinite space containing trillions of comparatively miniscule universes.

But relative to a universe an atom is tiny.

And relative to an atom a nucleus is tiny.

Nope, I'm theorising that which cannot be observed,  

Same as you.

Which is the whole logical common-sense point of theoretical discourse.

So relative to macro infinite unoccupied space, how tiny is this universe.

It must be so small as to almost not exist.

A speck of dust in the infinite scheme of infinite space.

There could be trillions of them.

I'm on the ball then.

My sincerest respectful regards Mr Parrot.

Thank you for your kind and courteous support, respect, appreciation, approbation and acclamation.

Trouble is, if creation is the foundation of evolution why would the process suddenly stop after several billion years and the magic dude suddenly decide to make a unique animal.

Not that unique though.

Birth

Male or female

Food in.

Shit and piss out.

Sexual action, utilising the same bits of equipment.

Death.

Same format as most higher mammals, and other animals.

Nah....I think that someone misinformed you.

Free Willy.

Is that like a gay sex orgy.

And if Deb sits in a vacuum,

It won't be a vacuum,

Because Deb will be sitting in there.

Hey Deb if everything was a vacuum.

What would be outside the vacuum?

Something or nothing.

Because as John00 rightly points out,

Nothing is something.

And everything is something.

Sitting on a shelf.

Don't you just hate it when you do that?

Without thought there is neither nothing or something.

Even so, there maybe something that is not able to be considered.

Including ourselves perhaps.

Hmmmmmmm.

Probably best to run with what you think you know.

Of course.

Stuff is always relative to scale.

So this Universe might actually be very tiny.

Sat on a shelf somewhere.

In a jar.

Vainglorious is a brilliant word

Body building and tattoos will be our salvation.

All hail the vainglorious.

Am I being vainglorious too.

Will the meek inherit the Earth?

Meek is such a meek word.

It's a job to tell.

And one can never be 100% certain of anything.

Semantics.

Respect and courtesy CAN be synonymous, along with a load of of other similar words.

In this RESPECT it's about how we treat others irRESPECTive of how we feel towards them or how we perceive their feelings might be towards us.

See what I did there.

Just cannot rely on words and language to be consistent.

REGARDS

Zed.

I would suggest that creation and evolution are compatible theories.

And in the Middle East, the home of the Christian GOD story, people wore very similar clothing.

I don't think that lingerie was invented until much later.

So what about women who wear trousers then?

Exactly.

One should always try to avoid unequivocal statements if they cannot be proven to be unequivocal.

One should always temper ones wholly theoretical  opinions with phrases like.......In my opinion.

So for example........ In my opinion....A theoretical multiverse scenario arises directly as a consequence of Ebucs infinite unoccupied space theory.

Very true.

OK. 

So LBTQ all good then.

HaHa

Got to go walk the dog now.

Have a nice day BK.

And try not to get too hung up thinking about other peoples sexually active lives.

GOD told me I was correct.

That's what they tell you, and what you keep repeating.

So maybe GOD thinks that LGBTQ is for the greater good.

Let's be honest, if GODDO is tri-omni then he knew all about LGBTQ when he created the heavens and the Earth.

"Social outcasts".

Now that suggests to me, outcast by society.

Rather than self imposed social exclusion.

The clue is in the phrase "social outcast".

GOD liked to rape married virgins, don't you know.

Nope process and function is all internal.

You speak to yourself and then blame your hallucination.

Yep, he meant cigarettes.

He was speaking English don't you know.

No such thing as a real GOD, don't you know.

He's just another hang up of yours.

You're fretting about other peoples sex lives again.

Sexual gratification is what everyone strives to achieve.

It's all in our programming.

Go for it Marj.

So why are you so hung up on other peoples sex lives?

Hmmmmmm.

Do I see a softening.

Ebuc is now theorising multiverses.

And John is now suggesting barely graspable speculation.....AKA theory.

Q. When is a door not a door.

A. When it's a jar.

Easier than saying open a little bit

Yep, big catering sized mayo jar.

Vegemite is usually in those funny little brown jars over here.

Damn.

I was painting my windows and missed the deadline.

Fact is, you can put ism after any word.

Sooooooooo.

Better late than never.

Noism

F**k off is a noism.

As opposed to a yesism.

Cheers Bruce is a yesism.

And these delusions of grandeur you get whilst asleep.

When there's a dream sharing app I'll come and join in.

Homosexuality always was before it was tolerated and accepted.

Penis Vagina hang ups.

Get over it.

And then get yourself a snack and a drink.

And then do other stuff.

Dynamic originalism

Is

Unoriginally non-dynamic.

Hey, don't kid yourself.

Everyone is preoccupied with sexuality.

It's written in our DNA.

It's just that we have an amusing tendency to overthink it.

Pride and rainbows FFS.

All for the sake of 10 minutes of DICKSUCKCUM or PUSSYLICKCUM....Or whatever.

And then roll over and go to sleep.

If we were truly intelligent we would have overridden the sex thing years ago.

But we haven't yet developed the intelligence to be able to overthink the instinct.

When you get to my age you start to realise that the penis vagina thing was actually one big piss take.

Discovered or theoretically proposed?

The same trouble with theorists as with philosophers....Gotta keep coming up with new s**t.

Justification for the salary.

Not that I haven't recently proposed to Ebuc the Multiverse idea in response to their theory of infinite unoccupied space.

But I did that for free.

BIG BOOMITY BANG BANG as it might be.

Or it might have gone WHOOOOOOSH.

Though actually, without the presence of a listening device to convert it to noise the beginning was very silent.

The existence of humans as a part of a progressive universe may or may not be necessary.

Though as far as we are able to know, we are the only intelligent species that can manipulate matter  in a way that surpasses non-interventional development.

This may or may not be necessary, but we must assume the alternatives even if we don't personally run with one of them.

I believe neither alternative, but just accept that one is correct and the other isn't.

I like dreams.

Sleep reality.

Another simulated existence.

All that we consciously experience is the sensory perception of an external stimulus. the conversion of light and sound etc, into electro-chemical data.

As such we SUSPECT everything.

A Dream is an internal recreation and rearrangement of previously acquired information, relative to a sleep state and somewhat different to a conscious awake state.

Well.

26 million people have been or are being brainwashed into caring.

NK is one example of population control.

Though not sure how many of those 26million actually do care.

Because they wouldn't dare say for obvious reasons.

Which isn't to say that we are not all brainwashed to a certain degree.

It's just that content varies.

Absolutely Deb.

Hmmmmmmm.

Had to quickly look up hallucination.

So, absolutely Deb.

Though "hallucination" has a tendency to come with negative connotations.

So, thinking about what you did yesterday is consciously revisiting and reconstructing recently acquired data....Remembering

Though I think that evidence would suggest that the comparative  accuracy of remembered data is questionable.

A bit like where you have  60 seconds to look a a picture containing 20 different items.

Picture is removed.

And then you have 60 seconds to remember as many items as you can.

Did you get all 20 Deb?