All debates

Don’t think I need to do any description, but if I should, ping me in the comments.

No description has been provided

The weakest basis if not one of them to be an atheist is a lack of evidence.

A Fetus is a human being, Murder is wrong, therefore abortion is wrong.

No description has been provided

The Pro side will be arguing that AI is ruining the art of debate and that AI is making humanity stupid in general. And the con side will argue that using AI does not ruin debate, but it rather enhances it in some respect.

Let's open this up for anybody else available.

Prove "Triadic Dimensional-Distinction Vortical Paradigm" is NOT very versatile in explaining numerous facets of reality without contradiction numerous facets of reality; in meaning, it explains many of our realities as in the way we see the world in the normal scale, without contradiction; for there to pose no opposition to the explanation of many of our realities as in the way see the world in the normal scale.

The resolution "Relationships Don't Work" centers on the idea that our relationships with family, friends, colleagues, and others will always disappoint us when we depend upon them to meet our needs.

This debate doesnt deal with if God exists, but if belief in good God is likely beneficial even if God doesnt exist.

Theists often claim that without God, objective morality could not possibly exist. As an atheist, I technically agree with them, though for a particular reason -- my stance is that morality is subjective EVEN IF God exists. Socrates_had_a_baby has agreed to debate me on this topic. Let's discuss!

By joining this debate, con supports a pro-life standpoint (is against abortion access).

A serious debate on whether humanity is simply delaying our self-destruction, or do we have a shot at peace and long-term survival?

Hedonism is the most logical ideology and therefore any logical person would be a hedonist.

Evil = causing or have caused harm to person