All debates

No human ever needs to be validated to EXIST and DIE by some Bible/Koran vomiting imbecile that plays "GOD" in some absurd Halloween Glory Gown Costume.

No description has been provided

Pro (nmvarco) will be arguing that humans are the cause of climate change. Con will be arguing that humans are not the cause of climate change.

No description has been provided

Rape Culture: The idea that rape is supported, encouraged, condoned, or tolerated in a given area.

No description has been provided

Is technology beneficial or detrimental to the classroom in our society today?

Tech is a fucking flow machine.

There has never been two ideologies more ideologically opposed in political history. Prove me wrong.

I contend that the belief of the Trinity is unsupported by the Holy Bible and is an invention of later scholars.

There is no logic in having opinions, beliefs or faith because only facts and speculation/inquiry are valid in discerning objective truth.

“Technology has transformed our lives for the better. This debate argues that technology is a boon, improving communication, education, healthcare, and overall quality of life.”

No description has been provided

Conservatism has been on the uprise in the recent past, and a lot of people, especially young ones, have been choosing conservatism over other ideologies. Is conservatism a threat, just like the dems say? Or is it just a justified, free, loving and choosable political belief?

This debate examines whether modern American conservatism poses the greatest threat to the future of the United States. As the Pro, I will argue that current conservative ideology and policies endanger democratic stability, social progress, and long-term national wellbeing. The Con will argue either that conservatism is not a significant threat, or that other factors (such as liberalism, foreign adversaries, or economic issues) represent greater dangers.