3RU7AL

That means your premise must demonstrate independence from one's mind

At the end of the proverbial day, there is One World and One People....All full of expectancy, and all feeling let down and blaming others.

3} is black market irrelevant to the above?

2} does you above apply to other messages of exchange ex bitcoin etc,

1} that control varies fro 20 differrent nations?..ergo no global control,

Are there actually controllers, or is everyone a part of a system.

According to quantum mechanics, no two particles can occupy the same quanta (read: space). Since there is a finite and not an infinite amount of space in your brain, there is in fact a finite potential for memory, since information can't be stored without particles to record it. However, this theoretical limit is not important in practice. Your brain basically sorts out the important information and forget the non-important information. Your brain would also collapse into a black whole if you started to approach the quantum density limit.

Is it "control", I think of it more of global 'function' of trade.

Think about it.....Money is a make believe system of global control.

These questions sure are thought-provoking. If anyone has an opinion, please explain to me what "I" is and how you answer these questions regarding its nature.

Did I not say in my #28 "...so, they, too, are on that path of wish > hope > plan > execute > fail > revise plan > succeed > revise plan > improve > revise plan > achieve a perfect light?"

 your memory is estimated to be roughly 2.4 petabytes.

Yes, but is that the max potential volume, or merely current state? I suspect the latter, since I am still learning and creating memory.

Those who cannot, by some flaw in the mortal construct of reproduction, and will not have children in mortality, if they prove obedient to God, becoming gods themselves, will have perfect bodies in the resurrection,

So, your (eternal) mind is not yet "eternal", but at some point in the future will be "frozen"?

Does this mean you will no longer be able to learn anything?

No, my mind is in progress within an eternal existence, a progression that is, itself, eternal. Eternal, being of its own nature, would indicate that knowledge, and the ability to acquire it, is also eternal.

Bearing children in heaven seems pointless.

Perpetuation. I believe that as man is, God once was, and that as God is, man may become, and that this sets up just two generations that are exemplary of infinite generations wherein gods beget men, men become gods, and so on. eternally.

I am free [I do not have restrictions to achieve] and I will to make my plans happen as planned. Thus, free will allows my ambition,  planning and execution;

By that logic, were I Thomas Edison, I therefore cannot conceive of a light bulb, let alone invent it.

Strictly as a comparison of solipsism to the idea that God is everything, I suppose there is that suggestion,

C: The conclusion of your syllogism, therefore, the entire syllogism, therefore, as most tend to do, fails.

P2 fails because one has an array of choices not necessarily ever embarked upon and experienced before. I have the choice to begin smoking; something I have never done before; totally lacking that choice and experience.

P1 fails because one can choose to not change one's future, i.e., choose to not choose; to remain static.

Unless there is some inherent randomness in how the present affects the future

I'M NOT SURE "GENETIC INTENT" IS AN ACCURATE CHARACTERIZATION.

As defined by admittedly generational sequences of DNA in a single mortal human lifetime, yes, it is accurate enough, allowing for its potential to mutate [by gradual telomeric degradation, among other effects] with each cellular generation, which, according to some biologists, in the human species, are completely re-generated every 7 years. Whatever your mortal life duration will be, divided by seven, is the number of times you will have become a new person, biologically, long-term memory notwithstanding.

HAVE YOU EVER CHANGED YOUR (ETERNAL) MIND?

In it's current, mortal 'containment" phase, when I am not yet aware of all things, of course I have. many times, in fact.

HOW MANY BABIES DO YOU HAVE WHEN YOU'RE IN HEAVEN?

I don't know. Not there, yet.

This also accounts for the fact that the intent of genetic pairing of m/f gametes is strictly a male or female zygote. Intent is not the same as actual outcome. Meiosis can result in a gamete mutation affecting the resulting zygote from either meiotic sperm or ovum, but this is, after all, mutation, and not genetic intent. 

I disagree. The mind, which I equate to the spirit, is an eternal form that preceded neurology, or, in fact, any physical and mortal property whatsoever.

Just another point on which we disagree. It's allowed. However, since I am convinced the spirit is the part of us that continues beyond death and ultimately is resurrected into a new, perfect, and eternal physical body to which the spirit [whereas, for now, death is just the last enemy] is permanently fused, never to separate again, I prefer my version of the hereafter.

Of course, there are 7 billion versions of human DNA. However, there are only two human genders.

and it does not take long for the delusional solipsists to go after God, the creation, the universe, etc,

it's simpler to assume that which could have and should have been done after the fact.

Solipsism is self defeating anyway.

Because to transfer such data relies upon experiences that exceed the self.

There is no "solution" for soft solipsism. We cannot verify the "realness" of reality without presuming that it is. It really doesn't matter however because even if this is all illusory we can still learn the rules and optimize our experience. 

A door, when closed is not; it is a wall. When open, it is not, either. It is an opening in the wall, thus, the empty space is not a door.  That's solipsism.

No. You haven't substantiated that time is outside of your thoughts. How is your perception of time any less constructed than your awareness of your conception?

It seems to me that a necessary precondition of thought is time within which to have that thought. It can't be the other way around.