3RU7AL

Is it ethical or wise that the individual's sovereignty is supplanted with the states' 

Are you an anarchist? If not, this argument is incompatible with your existing beliefs. You see, society and the state in general is by definition suppressing the sovereignty of individuals.

The legislative branch does not have the power to literally protect Roe V Wade as in the ruling made by the supreme court. What they do have the power to do is enact legislation that encapsulates the ideas behind Roe v Wade (access to abortion) into law. And that should be perfectly fine as the supreme court has simply ruled that the right to abortion is not one guaranteed by the constitution. This does not bar such rights being enacted at either the federal or state level.

There can be occasional bleeding that could be mistaken for a period

You cannot have periods while pregnant.

Clocks measure time, maybe you meant machines and body-wise both genders and sexes are biological machines.

and period cycles

we restrict what people are allowed to do with their bodies all the time.

Personally I think to 4 months in as absolute deadline is the correct judgement call. 

Id accept 3.5 month deadline as valid.

I do support a social safety net for people in need and I'm willing to pay for it with my tax dollars, I don't know what more you could ask of me politically 

I suggest we leave this in the hands of gun owners and FFL dealers

I have an issue with one person being forced to provide their organs, tissue, blood for the benefit of another.

Are there actually anyone important advocating for abortion up to the point of birth?

but at least i'm being consistent given i expect women after a couple trimesters to have a moral obligation to the baby. 

if someone intentionally or recklessly causes another person to need an organ, i would say it would be fair to expect the culprit to fork over the organ.

No, but it is much easier to argue in stark black and white moral terms. Nuance is hard.

It boggles my mind that you think that a viable fetus is a living human being that carries moral weight but the woman’s right to choose is more important.

because so many people refuse to admit that even that is immoral

almost none of the people who are for complete legality of abortion is willing to entertain answering the question of what happens when a woman abuses the privilege, and gets a late late term elective abortion for a stupid and immoral reason. i think it shows how weak their position is. 

Do really need more radioactive waste sitting around at various locations?

because anyone who believes in it logically must learn to photosynthesize or starve to death.

If a woman is 26 weeks pregnant she's had like four solid months to consider what to do about the pregnancy, if the baby can survive outside of the womb why would we kill it instead of letting it survive outside of the womb? America is an insanely wealthy country and babies put up for adoption are snatched up immediately. I don't have any sympathy for the wishes of someone who had four solid months to think about what to do about the pregnancy and chooses to abort it after the point where it could survive outside the womb

what's your position on providing food and shelter for single mothers ?

I'm in favor of a welfare state

whose ancestors migrated to the north, should all  move back to regain control of government in 7 southern states.

I'm moving rapidly to the extreme pro-life camp

babies at that stage of development instead of allowing them to be born?

Brittney Poolaw was just about four months pregnant when she lost her baby in the hospital in January 2020.

They are linked in a sense in that I think there are circumstances where it's justified for the government to overrule someone's choice about their body

It's a yes or no question.

But we did know how deadly it was at the time. And by the time there were enough excess vaccines to discuss what happens with the people who voluntarily chose not to be vaccinated, the efficacy of the vaccine was clear too. I didn't think it was necessary to force it. Obviously I wouldn't support forcing people to be vaccinated without knowing the facts about the disease or vaccine

For a somewhat different situation, like a disease where breakthrough infections were much more deadly, or where herd immunity could eliminate it once and for all, yes.

I don't consider myself to have a "godlike sovereignty" over my body

If she's in the US military and develops schizophrenia,

Then the military would get her to take medication to return her to normalcy.

Same as with a guy.

If she's in the US military and develops schizophrenia,

Then the military would get her to take medication to return her to normalcy.

Same as with a guy.

How is doing that to viable fetuses preferable to telling the mother no, you can't do this at this point

Clear and achievable goal is essential, I'd agree.

Difficult to 'do anything without identifying what problem is, what needs to be done.

Often difficult to know if you even have accomplished anything, without identifying goal.

If you were to ask how many children go without getting adopted, the answer may surprise you. Although it is difficult to quantify, roughly 20,000 children “age out” of foster care each year. This means they are now legally adults without ever finding a family through adoption.

i remember back when the late term abortionist Tiller was still alive, and one of the examples of an elective abortion he did was when the mother wanted to go to a rock concert but her pregnancy was in her way. 

Clear and achievable goal is essential, I'd agree.

Difficult to 'do anything without identifying what problem is, what needs to be done.

Often difficult to know if you even have accomplished anything, without identifying goal.

Locations might not 'be comparable.

Different locations have different constitutions, thresholds, likely actions and behaviors.

But if someone did do it just as a whim,

the situation for children who are given up when older  is a lot rougher 

on solid legal ground

And situations 'can be worse if done illegally, than legally.

People make similar argument about prostitution, and drugs, I think.

Though I'm not wholly convinced that consequences are better or worse, depending on legal or illegal.

I 'have tried to help people, and made situation worse.

I'm sure laws have existed, do exist, that require people 'act in situations,

Whether to just call the police, or step in themselves.

One can 'excuse human weakness, but it is not something I should 'aspire to, I think.