3RU7AL

There is no question that Locke, Madison, Hamilton, would call for Trump & Co. to hang for their many treasons (Russian and otherwise) from the cherry trees lining the Reflecting Pool before the Lincoln Memorial.

I'm just finally glad one of the crew finally stood up and is actually making an effort to get what they want. Think of all the atheist members that left the board that will come back. Because the idea of all of you going someplace and having your own space isn't good enough for you, you actually have to be in the religion forum blocking theists. It's one of the most extreme  expressions of bigotry I've ever encountered.

Do you know what ad hominem actually is?

This argument is complete ad hominem because of what you tried to dodge with the personal jibe.

The goal is for the atheists in the religion forum to block every theist so they have their own little private forum. They don't have to read our posts, they don't have to respond to us and they can say whatever they want and it not come back on them by the mods cuz all they have to say is well they can't read anything.

They could silence you overnight and you wouldn't know until you felt so ignored.

This isn't about me, it's about your proposal. I don't need to justify a single thing I do in order to say your proposal is what it is.

YOU ONLY BECOME INVISIBLE TO THE SPECIFIC PERSON WHO BLOCKS YOU

YOU DO NOT BECOME INVISIBLE TO ANYONE WHO HAS NOT BLOCKED YOU

That's a lie, it just depends what the mods feel like.

Have you ever considered I'd not be a fan of the block button if it disallowed me to read content?

Fair points,

But for some reason, I'd prefer not to use such a method, myself.

And that is exactly what the atheists have been working for in the religion forum. Removing all theists from the site. All one has to do is complain. This is the guy who wanted fair moderation basically if somebody complains about you you become invisible. I can't think of a bigger POS on the site.

That sounds more corrupt than anything I have ever heard mods do in my whole life.

That would be gaslighting of the most extreme kind and be so cruel to the user deemed inappropriate.

and usually scratching my head for why someone thinks every it's worth my time

My 'intolerance' to your intolerance is shared by many. You're a tyrant posing as an anarchist.

If someone does something worth being addressed,

What matters is that someone did something worth being addressed,

• Is this technically feasible?
  
• Would mutual intra-invisibility render some forums unintelligible?  That is, in some conversations with a lot of masked out replies, do we risk making forums hard to follow because of lack of connected replies?
  

You skipped past the part about clarifying what a desire is and the role it plays in choosing.

When you say property, are you referring to personal property?

And/Or Private property?

How are you going to make the rules quantifiable? Are you aware this is outside the scope of what a President on this website can do?

i've switched my position on ANARCHY recently

For or against? 

And this is why I said to Benjamin that our presuppositions play a huge role inhow we examine this issue. What is a desire, and how responsible are we for them? Is a desire considered to be an internal influence or an external influence? Are desires just an illusion produced by chemical reactions in the brain? These are all questions that affect how we view human will and what it means for a will to be free.

I believe humans have a will that is free to make choices, but it is not free to make spontaneous choices free from any prior desires or inclinations. We choose according to our strongest desire at the moment of the choice.

Are there any other subjects/current events you find interesting? 

???

I don't agree that's an issue. If you're with a person you don't get along with, there's no need to force yourself to live through hell. It's not even better for the children.

Due to monogamy being normalised,

It was a great campaign. Thanks for not splitting the vote! A truly selfless and mature move by you.

way to take the conversation in a completely different direction at random

Why are you quoting texts that are not quantifiable and up for interpretation?

3 out of 3. 

I believe unanimous but I could be wrong 

Even if you could possibly do so, the amount of research needed to create a perfect law would take billions of dollars, when you can just get perfection through trial and error

and this is the primary vector for corruption of the legal system

The reason case law is used in civilized countries is because you can get pretty absurd, trying to precisely define things. 

By Kate Shaw, Ars Technica Between the courtroom antics of lawyers, witnesses and jurors, reason doesn’t always prevail in our legal system. But judges are trained to be impartial, consistent and rational, and make deliberate decisions based on the case in front of them, right? Actually no, according to a new study in PNAS,

It is still a veto of the ban. Just like in the real congress, they may overturn a veto with a super majority vote

Even in the real world, there are lapses in precise quantifiability in law, it's why judges are humans and not robots, so that they can adjust sentences to the severity of violation and judge the sort of character of the criminal and how likely they are to reoffend vs rehabilitate.

Sorry RM, I am done playing polite with you. You are being a huge douchebag to airmax, and it's pathetic. Especially coming from someone who seeks to represent the community and the website. 

You were never polite to me, so much so you even disrespected consent regarding screenshots of me elsewhere.

You are a very impolite guy overall and pride yourself on being it so I'm unsure why this would be something you think would surprise me. You have been a complete displeasure to deal with during this campaign process, not because you are against me but the way you've done it. You go beyond what others do and directly try to make me seem evil and sinister.