3RU7AL

And when a family member is part of the State, the danger is on your home. Member against member; it happens more than you'd like to admit.

Paid sick and child care leave. Free or low cost libraries and museum. An education system. Minimum wage. Civil rights. Essential services like fire fighters. Infrastructure.

In saying what you are NOT advocating for, it leads me to wonder what DO you advocate for as an economic system?

So, obviously, was I. But, danger lurks, lack of privacy lurks, even in your own home. And safety lurks in some crowds.

And this paper's hypothetical value enforced with soldiers uses what as collateral?

LOVE is not CAPITALISTIC.

Would acts of love be necessarily excluded within a capitalistic framework? If so, why?

in my refusal to assume the cost burden--while also rejecting the concept of my being coerced into it--of another individual, am I denying that person's intrinsic value?

Communism does not permit "willful participation."

I'm not suggesting that the act of charity is intrinsically Capitalistic. You however suggested that within a Capitalist framework, gifts would only be given if and only if there was an incentive for long-term profits. Why?

I found myself stymied in taking the quiz by its seeming presupposition behind some of the questions. Such as raising the tax on the rich. I am not so much in favor of that as simply not allowing anyone to attain more wealth than they can actually reasonably use in one lifetime in the first place.

It's because we're not perfect that Christ is needed.

The design is not flawed,

1) Socialism: A "rich person" isn't to be trusted to own a portion of private property.

2) Marxism: All people are not to be trusted to own private property.

But, by the 4A, the State must not take the authority to search without warrant.

yet a family member turns against them in the home.

We cannot be coerced to be perfect.

The notion that God can only create perfect things is just an excuse to attempt to demonstrate that he is not,

To think that God is omnipotent does not mean that he must always act omnipotently.

The natural man is an enemy of God.

to act by his nature, which is carnal, sensual, and devilish

The assumption that God created robots is contrary to what is given in the creation account, strictly because among the gifts given to man was dominion, and that dominion is possible only by agency to act for and on behalf of himself, but as importantly, for the whole Earth. Gen 1: 26. Had God wanted to be a puppet master, he'd have retained the dominion for himself, but we're supposed to learn how its done in order to become like God, ourselves.  That's not blasphemy if we truly act to deserve it.

So, now security is privacy?

7. Privacy. Uh-huh. Show me the word in the Constitution. Don't bother, it doesn't exist. Not to mention that a woman's privacy ends with her body. A fetus is not part of her body.

atheists say the universe could have caused itself.

Which atheists are these? I am uncomfortable even asserting that the universe does or doesn't have a cause.

At the moment there is equal evidence that the universe caused itself that it had an external cause or that it in fact did not require any cause whatever.

I do wonder how you intend to enable laissez-faire capitalism without the threat of state organized violence such as that provided by a militarized police force... since you don't believe in violent suppression of political opposition. 

I may not fit neatly into any box you have lying around in your head.

Nope. That sounds more exciting and more unpredictable than appearing before your followers.

OR, maybe you realized you screwed up their design, then you decided to hide from them so they never heard from you or saw you.

And no other work of literature has had such a profound, lasting, or universally influential effect on humanity as the Bible has.

I mean at this point knowing what we know about the risk covid poses to children (basically non existent) and the fact that there is a vaccine that has been available to all adults for over half a year forcing children to wear masks is nothing but child abuse.

Doesn’t sound like a crisis worthy of a federal response to me.

whats the point.

God created us to do good I think that's the point.

The double standard seems to be that ethnic groups which have been historically marginalized are entitled to superior treatment than those groups which have not been.

Nigeria is just too Black. There aren't enough other races represented in Nigeria because Nigeria is racist. Blacks are in power and causing systemic racism to oppress any racial group that isn't Black. This is clearly a result of racist Blacks and Black supremacists.

Nigeria should have far more Asians, Jews and Middle Easterners to the point where Blacks are the minority in Nigeria. This multiracial state wherein Blacks become the minority will not be a bad thing, but rather a source of Nigerian strength. Racial quotas should be immediately implemented to force Blacks out of political power, and instead make sure there is sufficient Asian, Jewish and Middle Eastern representation in Nigeria. Every race's voice needs to be heard except for Blacks because they are racist and oppress the other racial minorities in Nigeria.

Middle Easterners living in Nigeria should be paid mandatory reparations for Nigeria's slavery policy wherein some Middle Easterners of the past were slaves. This needs to be mandatory because slavery is not okay and Middle Easterners are still suffering from slavery. There should be a 'sorry day' in Nigeria for Nigeria's involvement in slavery in the past. During this sorry day, the Nigerian national anthem should be played and all non-Black people should be encouraged to kneel and boo during the anthem. Anyone who opposes any of this implicitly condones slavery and racism.

Any pro-Nigerian speech should be labelled hate speech as it is racist and Black supremacist. The Nigerian laws should be changed to make hate speech legally binding and punishable with a jail sentence. All anti-Nigerian speech should be allowed and encouraged because Nigeria is racist and engaged in slavery in the past. Anyone who speaks out against anti-Nigerian speeches should be labelled a Black supremacist and should be fired from his/her job.

Anyone who says 'it's okay to be Black' is anti-Asian and needs to be put before a court for hate speech and racism. Saying 'it's okay to be Black' ignores all of the racial struggles that Asians face in Nigeria. Nigeria needs to be Asian focused as they are a minority and suffering from racial oppression, racism and Black supremacy in Nigeria.

Hopefully, Nigerians will read these words and realize how bigoted and racist they are, and then start implementing these policies to make Nigeria more tolerant and less hateful.

If there is no systemic racism, behavior is going to be a result of a genetic mesh (genetics and environment interacting with each other) resulting from heritability.

Specifically for crime, things like the MAOA gene (warrior gene) and lower self-control ability of Blacks will represent this heritability in functional/genetic form.

Sometimes the person is being a pain and you want to make fun of them.

Sometimes you just want people to laugh.

Sometimes you're bored and are looking to entertain yourself or others.

Who decides what is perfect and cant be improved? 

And assuming facts support policy when they are not facts can also derail actions that are assumed to be policy, but are not. A double failure.

Thanks for your comprehensive answer to my first question!

It doesn't come close to systemic racism, either. Even if it did, it's in the past. Even if it was in the present, Ramshutu and I was talking about the US.

In order to discredit them.

In your opinion.

Have you considered that perhaps it's because of SYSTEMIC RACISM ?

I have considered it.

I see no reason to believe it.