Total posts: 2,865
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
TBH I am 100% willing to believe that Pie would include the main antagonist of the series as a town character. In terms of modpsych, it seems like the sort of thing he'd do. The justification also checks out very well, and Vanillaizer is easily confirmable. I believe Wylted is very likely telling the truth.
Role confirmation =/= affiliation confirmation, just noting. Vanillaizer is most often a mafia-aligned role, I just townread Wylted behaviorally.
Created:
Posted in:
Wylted's char claim doesn't make me strongly lean one way or another, I do think that the themesplit probably wouldn't be that obvious. I think the way he claimed it was, on the whole, towny.
Created:
Posted in:
Being a weak investigation role is kinda convenient because it gives him an excuse for not dying and if it's actually is weak, then there shouldn't be a huge problem with claiming.
His behavior is also still meh.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Interesting. Austin and Luna, what do you two think about this claim?
Unsure. Still debating whether to push for a full claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
I was Mafia in Mayday Mafia. There's admittedly not much of my meta for you to go off, here, since I haven't been Town in a few games.
OH yeah you're right. I have no idea why I misremembered that, kind of have egg on my face now.
unvote because half the reason for my suspicion was wrong and also because of claim.
Created:
Posted in:
I'd VTL Cerulean for claim and as a placeholder vote in case I'm busy later today.
DO NOT PLACE ANOTHER VOTE, THIS WILL HAMMER CERULEAN.
Regardless of his alignment, hammering early = bad.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Well to me it just looks like he’s finding stuff to say that doesn’t help much. That doesn’t really answer my question though. Do you still have the light sus on Cerulean from earlier?As for Lunatic, I read that as null because it doesn’t do all that much to help town imo. The only difference between he and Cerulean is that he isnt subtly asking others to out their roles, then looking for other stuff. I will say that I like what he saying about Earth earlier
Kinda, yeah. Most off meta, he feels different than his town game, it's a lot less proactive in behavioral analysis.
Luna's efforts would help town for sure, dunno why it wouldn't?
Created:
Posted in:
A nightly vanillaizer is an extremely strong role for either alignment. I'm assuming it's real since it's verifiable. I think I've seen it more often as mafia-aligned, so if I buy into WIFOM I kinda don't think Wylted would so readily claim it. Then again, he has a reputation for ballsy plays as scum.
Regardless, if we just leash Wylted and force him to vanillaize either the scummiest player or most negative utility one each night, we're basically forcing the role to help town so I don't see a problem.
Outside of that, I think the way Wylted handled the claim and how he's been playing is pretty towny.
Created:
Posted in:
My main issue with Cerulean is it feels like he's not really reading people behaviorally, more just talking about mech or characters, which feels a lot different than how I remember him as town, e.g. in Mayday Mafia. Talking about game mechanics is fine, but there are some posts, like the odd one about "Earth might need to be a policy chop, or maybe not" without taking into account Earth's actual posting. It's a strange lack of curiosity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Is it possible to get an extension since the original OP had the wrong ending date? I think a lot of people, including me, were taking that as the ending date and it's not exactly fair that we have to rush the lynch because of that.
Created:
Posted in:
Sorry, I was busy yesterday - I would've set aside an hour at the end of the night or so to give my thoughts, but I thought the OP said we had until Jan 5th, so catching up now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Since I was buying into this a bit, I'll expand on my own thought process as well.Don't ask me to find it (it's been a while), but I recall a game in which I was the Lone Wolf, which fits what Cerulean describes: a scum player who is not in scum chat and who both does not know who the other scum are (the remainder of scum don't know who they are, either). It's certainly not common, and I don't know what brought it to Cerulean's mind, but I can at least understand why he'd consider it based on that character description.I don't really buy the idea that Cerulean would give away this mechanic openly if it is in this game and he's scum, since he'd be drawing attention to subtle efforts to communicate between elements of the scum team. I could see this being an effort to draw attention away from other plays the scum team is making and sus players for perceived subtle cues in their posts, so at least for the time being, Cerulean's null to me.
Agree with most of this reasoning fwiw.
Created:
Posted in:
I townread Earth's claim. Probably won't elaborate on this unless he gets pushed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Question: It looked like you had an inkling of a sus on Ceruean of your own. Why townread him so quickly?Same with Lunatic. I didn’t think his post was all that alignment-indicative.
As I said, I wasn't sure. Objectively speaking, it's a specific enough mech post that it could go both ways, but my gut was telling me that the depth of thought going into it was pretty unlikely to come from a player who's already informed about the mechanics of mafia communication. That being said, the only possibility that I would consider explicitly scummy coming from Cerulean is if that mechanic is already in the game and Cerulean is just TMIing it, but I find that relatively unlikely in view of the "asking questions" thing in the OP, as mentioned earlier.
I thought Luna's willingness to put together a character list, is, at surface level, more effort than scum would put in considering it's not something that a lot of people would townread and it requires a certain level of commitment later on as well. Would like to see more from him tho.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
That happened in Bo Burnham mafia, only a few games ago. Though I don't think you were part of that one.
Ah, got it. The last one I remember was Joebob getting CC'd by me in Presidential Elections because I showed up late to the game, but that hardly counts. I think the last time I remember scum getting caught behaviorally was Savant in Mahabharata? But yeah, in general D1s on this site don't seem to hit at a rate much above random chance.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
I'd say that the justification for my role makes a fair amount of sense based on the biography of my character that Pie provided. I'm not sure how useful this sort of discussion is, though. I think we've established that justifications don't seem to be very loose for this game, so what else is there to say?
I like this form of breadcrumbing - the reason why is that it doesn't leak any information about one's role unnecessarily, but it also limits potential claims. Town players have no reason to be scared about needed to claim their true role (which has a good justification), but scum players, who might need to fakeclaim depending on the scumminess of their role, now have to either commit to a good fakeclaim (if they claimed they had a good justification) or endure some pressure for having a poor justification (which, as we've established, is slightly outside the norm of the game so far).
Created:
Posted in:
Right, I have to go for a bit now. Hope to see some more activity when I come back later, it's been a long time since I've seen a D1 hit scum and hopefully this game breaks the streak.
Created:
Posted in:
Town read:
Casey (see above)
Town lean:
Cerulean (dependent on responses to questions, but I think I still like the depth of thought)
Luna (mainly for the willingness to put together a character list, it's a level of commitment that does not feel intuitive to do for scum)
Slight town:
Earth (like the energy)
WF (vibes, realistically it's hard to articulate a reason for even a slight town lean but I just feel that way on gut)
Null/0-posting:
Mharman
ADOL
Wylted
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
I like Casey so far. I'll echo Cerulean and my role and character fairly connect well.
For mine, I can see the connection but it's also not quite my initial expectations for my character.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
Actually, on second thought, considering this line from the OP:As always, Mafia will be given the opportunity to ask if any two roles and if any two characters are in the game at any point in time, to which I will truthfully answer....I highly doubt that there's no scum chat. -CASEY
Oh, I did forget about that. Seems fairly conclusive unless we want to make assumptions about how that would be run with independent Mafia, then. - CERULEAN
Hypothetically, what would stop an independent mafia from simply asking Pie, and being informed if their partner had already used questions? It's an interesting point by Casey but I'm curious why it made you drop the idea in particular.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
It might be worthwhile to say if our characters are on the "Important Characters" list here. I ask specifically because mine isn't. This might narrow some things down.
Sure, that seems like a good place to start. My character is on that list.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
Interesting theory; I'll keep that in mind. A question for the veterans here -- when was the last game that had no private mafia chat, if you can remember?
Haven't seen any in the past year or so I've been playing, nor do I remember any from archived games.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
Not sure what to make of Cerulean's speculation of scum potentially not having full info. It's an interesting idea and I'd be inclined to townread the depth of thought - it's a pretty complex connection to check a potential mafia character, check the character's info, and then extrapolate that to a complex mechanic. The thing that makes me hesitate is that it could be potentially a result of Cerulean actually being mafia and knowing about this mechanic, i.e. having more information than he should. I don't recall ever seeing this mechanic on DART, nor elsewhere. Cerulean, have you seen this mechanic before? What made you consider it in the first place?
Created:
Posted in:
Posts 16 and 17 are sharply towny by Casey. They had similar thoughts to me in regards to discussing roles and checking back Pie's past games to see how he might formulate a potential themesplit is pretty clearly indicative of genuine thought. First townlean.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
Evening, all. I haven't read this series, but I'll take some time to look it up in more detail later. It would definitely be worthwhile to see if we can at least speculate on what Mafia might have access to, role-wise.
Can you clarify what you mean by this? Because pretty much any discussion of mechanics is inevitably going to give mafia information that I don't think we should give. For example, if I say "[X] means that [A, B, or C] might be in the game for mafia", I'm basically spewing myself as not having any of A, B, or C as my role. Also, the potential pool of mafia roles is so large that any discussion isn't really going to bring any tangible benefit mechanically speaking - and by tangible I mean helping to better coordinate night actions, or discussion of results, etc.
Disclaimer that my philosophy (as stated in a fair few of my games) is that mafia not knowing town PRs is one of the few forms of mitigating the informational advantage that they already start with, so I'm generally opposed to mechanical discussion outside of strict results.
Created:
Posted in:
Hi everyone, sorry for getting in a bit late but catching up now. I have some decent familiarity with the books (read them a few years ago) so I can help for any theme stuff.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
@Mharman
Sorry for late reply, I'd be extremely low-activity due to extended family being over until Sunday evening, you can start it before then but just be aware of that and note it being non-alignment indicative.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Going to need to /out, if you need a player after Christmas lmk but I'm going to be traveling from around the 20th to 25th
Created:
Posted in:
Current Mafia:
N/A
Signups:
Pie - Inheritance Cycle Mafia
In the Hopper:
Lunatic-Choose your role!
Casey Risk - ERB Mafia
Mharman - Gunplay Mafia
Austin - Debate Mafia
On Hold:
None
Created:
Posted in:
Pretty fun game, one of the closest and most well-fought I've seen in a while. Town played very well in LYLO.
Imo the correct play there for Pie was to just hard bus Luna and try to mislynch me in LYLO considering both WF and Mharman were leaning me as the partner. Going for WF was a serious risk considering I was leaning Luna and Mharman was holding his cards close to hist chest.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Cerulean
Thanks for modding, the game was well-balanced.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm not scum. So if we just lost, then it'd be to a WF/Pie team and I find that pretty unlikely considering Pie was considered towny and could have just waited for me or you to vote Luna instead of going through all this.
Created:
Posted in:
dude if you're scum just end it. if not then idk, I'll be around for a bit then I gtg sleep.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
idk what you want me to do. it's a cross with 2 votes on each side - everyone in the game except you knows the scum team from their point of view. argumentation now is pretty pointless, just reread and make the right choice.
Created:
Posted in:
Okay, so here I go with my vote. Here is everything I’m basing my decision off of (the higher the score, the more town points they have):
- Miller - A Miller exists in this game and it specifically mentions alignment investigations. This leads me to conclude that there are at the minimum Cop roles out there. The question then is whether Casey’s JOAT had multiple alignment investigative roles, or they were distributed between 2 players (him and WF). This point, I agree that it’s more likely that one lay with Casey and the other with WF. (1-0 WF)
- Voting - Whiteflame was on or supported every wagon this game. He explicitly voted for GP. Something that I caught was that GP called WF scum early in the game. WF brushed it off, but later participated in the lynch quite enthusiastically. In DP2, he was quick to call Wylted scum as an investigative JOAT, knowing that Wylted had claimed Miller. He very easily believed Mharman’s results and was heavily supporting Wylted and said he would vote for him when he got back. The WF I know would be a little more calculating and suspicious of Mharman, vs just believing him outright. (1-1 tie)
- Let’s assume for a second that Casey had 2 investigative abilities in his JOAT, then Luna’s role works very well with the Miller because even upon Casey’s death, an investigative ability is available for town to use, and thus the investigative JOAT becomes redundant because in a likely 3-5 DP game, 2-3 investigative abilities utilized can be game changing. This theory though is still a little less likely and #1 but I wanted to highlight it. (Still 1-1 tie)
Now I’m going to analyze who I see as their respective partners.
- Austin - The anticlaim talk at DP1 was out of the blue. As I mentioned then, from anyone else, it would be town, but Austin is smart enough to say that as town, and I think that’s what’s going to bite him. The anti-claim feature could have impacted Mharman’s results since Wylted was the only person who had claimed at that point in time. Because he had claimed, he could be messed with via the anti-claim. I think this in itself is very incriminating. (2-1 Luna)
- Mharman - I genuinely don’t see Mharman’s endgame by lying about seeing Wylted. It seems more likely that scum messed with his results via the anti-claim to get Town Wylted lynched, and then get Mharman lynched for lying. The only alternative theory is that Mhar/Luna planned this as an appeal to absurdity and it was a crazy risky gamble. Would Luna do it? I think he would, but I don’t think Mhar would agree to the risk on team. Luna I think would also hesitate cause I was still alive and so was WF. (3-1 Luna)
- Mharman - The fact that Mharman asked everyone if anyone visited him before outting his results is a red flag to me. I believe by that point, Wylted had said that he visited Casey, so why hold off on just saying his results and ask who visited him (Austin said he did and only then did Mharman confirm). This is very odd to me in DP2. (3-2 Luna)
- Austin - After both votes were over in DP1 and DP2, said something along the lines of: It was obvious GP and Wylted were town after they did “XYZ.” It’s almost like he knew that they were town at the beginning and didn’t say it. I found this really interesting because it kinda shows he has an informed perspective (4-2 Luna)
There is a 5, with Mharman town slipping in my opinion, but I realize it’s still WIFOM and could be faked, especially if the appeal to absurdity argument is correct, so I’m going to leave that a tie.In short, most, if not all of this is WIFOM. But I’m going to choose to believe what I believe is most likely assumptive of affiliation, and what isn’t. Austin and Whiteflame as scum make more sense from my POV than Mhar/Luna after highlighting all of these things (they have more town points). If I’m wrong, well played to you Mhar/Luna and apologies for Austin/WF, but after comparing the two teams, I see WF/Austin as the scum team.VTL WhiteflameWith that, I’m going to sleep, and the DP should prob be over when I wake up.
ok this post is bad btw. should be self explanatory that he's counting a lot of small points to make them seem equivalent to the important ones
Created:
Posted in:
ok all I can say is - I can't give decisive evidence that I'm town, but I've shown why WF is town - either we're town-town or scum-scum, and it's up to you to choose
Created:
Posted in:
ok my heart was racing
yeah fmpov the team is confirmed now
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Luna
I don't see myself not making this vote today. This loses only if Mharman and WF are scum, and frankly, if that's the case, I'm not finding them anyway. And Pie would snapvote me in F3 anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Austin, do you agree with Whiteflame’s assessment of Pie?
It's materially irrelevant - i.e. if WF is town, Pie is always scum, as otherwise a town-on-town vote ends the game. So no, I'm not taking that into account, I'm reading Pie's alignment off WF, who I think is town.
Created:
Posted in:
Pie is like materially misrepresenting WF which isn't explicitly scummy considering that from his POV if he's town WF's alignment would be confirmed and he doesn't need to worry about arguing in good faith, but it's also not a reason to vote for WF. I.e. saying that WF turned around his read on Pie, which he should bc Pie is scum confirmed from his POV. Idk what his last post is either
Created:
Posted in:
I can only be scum if I'm exactly with WF, otherwise I hammer WF there.
Created:
Posted in:
I feel that final 3 will be a lot easier if we find out one of the scum's roles today. But we have to choose right in final 5 first :/
Created: