Total posts: 2,865
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I'm pretty sure Casey is going to flip town at this point. Like seriously, lynch whiteflame, and then when he flips guilty, we'll decide who to lynch between you and Joebob. Heck, if whiteflame is innocent, I'll be the first to vote myself next DP (but believe me, it's not going to happen).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
If you're town, whiteflame is doing a brilliant job of making you look scummy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Look at how hard whiteflame has been defending Joe. Like at this point I'm scumreading Joe not even because of anything he's did, but because of what whiteflame is doing. It's ridiculous.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
You knew what you were doing when you said this. Trying to put it back on me for calling you out is just fucking rude, dude. You can say it wasn’t scumreading, but you’re trying to build a narrative with it that relates to how you see me as scum. At least own that.
The only thing related between the two things you quoted were that they were in the same post. Awareness of votes is a scumtell separate from me forgetting to tag you. But sure, keeping spinning it on me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
@Savant
What are your thoughts on whiteflame here? Like I genuinely don't understand why no one else sees how scummy he is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Well, if something is 95% likely, its as good as confirmed in a game which just happens to be based on guessing and hoping we guessed correctly. Besides, even mod asked a question about if he should notify a doctor. So, if that doesnt convince you, nothing ever will.
Huh, I forgot about that. Yeah, I think you're tentatively mod-confirmed then (I feel bad that Moozer is giving us an unfair advantage like this, but you gotta take what you get).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
I care that you posted a long response to me, gave specific reasons why you sussed me, and voted me in a series of posts without tagging me on any of them. That’s basic common courtesy. You know how the tagging system works on this site, so yeah, I’m a little frustrated that you posted that much and conveniently kept me out of it. You want to scumread me for calling you out for it? Fine, whatever.
I'm not scumreading you for pointing out that specific mistake of mine, and you know that. I scumread you for everything else this DP. More strawmanning please.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
I think it's more likely that whiteflame is the outlier here tbh.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
That's not confirmable, that's just inherently likely due to the setup. They're distinct things. Now I'm starting to doubt the other players who claimed they're confirmable.
Created:
Posted in:
On the bright side, that confirms my suspicion of whiteflame even more. Doctor, bodyguard, and bulletproof/bleeder is a ridiculous density of protective roles in a C9 game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
And you were the person who claimed... "100% confirmable" earlier. Seriously, do people just not understand what confirmable means these days?
Created:
Posted in:
Omg people stop claiming your number of shots, WHY would that help town in any way
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
First off, I don't know why you'd give me all these responses without fucking tagging me. That's bullshit dude, especially when you're putting a vote on me.
Fine, my bad for not tagging you. I've been playing mafia on another website these days and it auto-notifies people when you quote, so sorry on that.
That being said, you seem awfully sensitive to votes on you. I wonder why...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I guess it depends on what roles are left to confirm him, track him or whatever. But if he dies to protect a town player, it is just as good for town because it wastes scum's night kill and increases amount of future targets for scum (more confirmed town players, so with 1 kill per night, scum cant keep up with town lynch due to too many confirmed town players as targets).
Yeah, but the problem is that with Earth claiming Cop, it's pretty unlikely that there's a Tracker who can confirm whiteflame, not even to mention it wouldn't confirm his role. The only way he confirms his role is by protecting a town player, but I predict that he'll "conveniently" miss the NK target each night. I know this because I was in a past game with Barney where he fakeclaimed bodyguard and no one thought twice about his lack of success.
I am not lynching whiteflame this dp. I know even town players can act scummy, so if you think he is acting scummy, its not exactly an obvious choice.
I mean, scummy players act scummy. If you don't lynch scummy players, how do you win? Mechanics are nice, but you still need some behavioral analysis. Not to mention he's also been backtracking on his claim, which town players just don't do.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Still, he is a bodyguard, which I find a bit odd that both doctor and bodyguard are in game, but I am not ready to follow that trail to death now, but wait until more evidence appears in dp2.
Can you explain how you're confident in this?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I am hoping that at least 2 out of 3 (austin, barney, whiteflame) will confirm themselves, so we are only left with 4 targets (savant, joe, casey, and one of 3 which is unconfirmed). If that happens, our win is mathematically guaranteed.
But how will whiteflame ever confirm himself? If he's scum, he can just "conveniently" protect the wrong target. And as town, all he can do is... visit someone... which probably can't even be confirmed if no one has a Tracker role (very possible since Earth has cop)
I dont buy that Earth is scum faking cop. To be clear, almost all games have cop and doctor, so logically, we should consider these roles confirmed when claimed. Also, we cant afford to increase target count from 4 to 6 based on assumption of very unlikely setup, since that greatly decreases our chances.
I agree, cop seems pretty likely to be in the game. However, whiteflame isn't a doctor, he's a bodyguard with a questionable claim that he's backtracked several times on.
Created:
Posted in:
VTL whiteflame
This argumentation (strawmanning, false dichotomy, and quoting me saying something I didn't say) is so bad I literally can't believe it ever came from town. Like whiteflame, if you're town, you need to reread your win condition. Town!whiteflame has always engaged with me in good faith and I am not really seeing that in the slightest here.
Combined with the attempt to strongly backtrack on a confident claim of confirmability earlier, consider this my vote for today. I might be convinced for Casey, but likely no one else for now.
Created:
Posted in:
Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale.I did respond to your "evidence," but you chose to ignore those responses, so fine.You're tying yourself into a knot here. You believe that isn't JoeBob's actual role, but since you believe he wouldn't CC Savant, you're granting some probability that Moozer created this role, otherwise the CC wouldn't shake your conviction. Fine, so that long post establishing all the reasons Moozer couldn't have done it was not nearly as solid as you made it out to be.
Hm.. somehow I'm slightly skeptical you're engaging with my responses in good faith. I stated, repeatedly, that I have to weigh the balance of probabilities - because as much as I'd like to believe I'm right, at least one of my ideas - either Joebob faking the role or Joebob not being willing to so easily CC - must be incorrect. I stand by my post establishing my Joebob is likely faking his role, but that doesn't mean I'm going to blindly ignore the fact that yes, odds generally favor the CCer, especially on D1.
That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).You've clearly been been very selective in your reading of my posts up to this point if you think I'm "backtracking". I said this in post #278: [I’ve never seen my role given to scum, but it’s also going to be very difficult to firmly prove, so I doubt I’ll ever be fully townread once I claim it.So I acknowledged difficulty confirming it. What did you want me to say? That I'd probably only confirm myself in death?Also, you and I have very different concepts of what "100% success rate" means. It means I protect my target at the cost of my life. How the fuck is that OP compared to, say, a doctor who protects their target without cost? Sincerely, I don't have any idea how you view my role as OP, especially since you acknowledge that it can be stopped or circumvented just like any other protective role.
Except it's not just "very difficult" to firmly prove, it's literally impossible, because the only way you'll prove if is if you're dead. The focus on Tracker results in particular makes me suspicious because, as I mentioned, it was right after Earth claimed cop. I'm not suspicious that your role can't be confirmed, I'm suspicious that you claimed it does when it is even close to being so.
Furthermore, I literally said the opposite of what you claimed I did. I said that if it's 100% success rate, it works *regardless* of interfering factors. Not even knowing how your own role works is strange, to say the least.
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.Trying really hard to push attention onto me, aren't you? I said confirmable with help (fun that you keep leaving that out) and then, when asked to provide more details, stated that confirmation would be difficult even with help well before I full claimed. And for some reason, you're scumreading me for claiming after Earth did. I was only asked to do so after Earth claimed - I wasn't going to just full claim to look townie.Also, this is all pretty rich coming from someone who has so far refused to claim their role at all, as though that's somehow less sus than claiming after someone who was being widely scumread for his behavior.
Confirmable with help, sure. But it's not confirmable even with help - that's the problem. All it does is show you have a visiting role, which is... about 75% of roles in existence (based on a qualitative random sample of 20 roles from Mafiascum I just did). The fact you keep doubling down on this is very strange.
And again, you're not engaging with what I'm actually saying. I'm not saying that claiming late makes you scummy, I'm saying it lends far less credence to (your already scummy) claim.
And I said my role is confirmable - genuinely confirmable, not the "I can visit" confirmable you seem to think the word means. Not sure why you're trying to deflect onto me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Like whiteflame basically has free reign to do whatever he want as long as his NK target and visit target is different if he's scum now. I think whiteflame is smart enough to know what "confirmable" is, and this isn't it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you not find it strange in the slightest that whiteflame straight up and said "I'm confirmable" and it turns out his role, is, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to any visiting role (which conveniently, scum always has)? And that he clarified his role right after Earth revealed what flavor of investigative role he is?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
I said it was confirmable with help. I would have to be either tracked to my target or watched at my target, or I'd have to just die protecting someone, though my death automatically confirms my role whether I used the BG to guard someone or not.Also, how the hell is this role OP? I die using it to shield someone else.
That's... not confirmable in the slightest. Or at the very least, it's no more confirmable than a role like Barney's decoy last game was. How do we know you're not framing or lawyering or stalking your target? Backtracking on your claim looks pretty scummy imo.
And your "role" is OP because if it really is 100% success rate, then you essentially guarantee that a crucial player, such as Earth, lives for a night (regardless of other interfering factors like roleblocker or strongman, I suppose).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Somehow, I think you're creating a false dichotomy. I believe that this isn't Joebob's real role based on the evidence I've given (which I note you haven't responded to), and I also believe that Joebob, who we both know to be cautious as scum, would be unlikely to CC Savant on the basis of poor-risk-reward ratio. I have to weigh two likely yet mutually exclusive propositions here and I'd like to see more behavioral evidence to tip the scale.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Alright, given Earth's claim (which... come on man, at least don't claim you're not confirmable, that's part of the reason you've been pursued all this time for a claim), I agree that it makes sense to just out at this point.I'm the bodyguard. The way it's framed in my PM is that I have a phantom shield (had to look that up) that I can use to protect others. As for the justification, it's honestly a little confusing, since he said initially that the shield is used to protect myself and others, but it doesn't protect me at all. It's just, as he put it, a "100% succes rate" BG that I can use on anyone (it's not limited to a single character like Sam's was last game and I'm not required to use it).
I guess that's technically confirmable...? Honestly I'm becoming a little bit skeptical of all the people claiming "confirmable" roles if this is what they mean.
Oh, and that role is overpowered.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Hard to say. In terms of behavior, while I initially townread Casey for their claim, I don't like how they've essentially been coasting on the claim ever since, while the Joebob/Savant and Earth stuff has distracted us. In my experience, newbie scum tend to give an appearance of activity early on and then drop off once town gets occupied.
In terms of mechanics, I think Granny has to be a fakeclaim, if it is one. For any other mod, I would find it unlikely - but I can totally imagine Moozer recycling some stuff from his first setup and thinking "oh, Granny, that's a great fakeclaim so scum doesn't get investigated," not knowing that this role is policy lynched half the time. So 50/50 toss on that.
In summary, null to slight scum, mostly on behavior.
Created:
Posted in:
Assuming no one CC's or psuedo-CC's Earth (e.g. some other alignment-determining investigative role), I think we can treat him as mechanically town for now. I don't buy that Moozer wouldn't put at least some level of investigative power in his setup.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Alright scum had to have fake claims then. one of these major characters is scum. Austin, whiteflame can you role claim? I have a feeling I know austin is but I think we just mass role claim here because im pretty sure their would be a town cop, didn't expect it to be earth though. One of those major characters has to be scum. Which takes austin and whiteflame back off the "confirmed town list"
I'm not going to roleclaim today unless you really insist on it. I can confirm myself (not in the sense of weakly confirming myself like through tracker results, but as an actual consequence of my role like yours) but I don't want scum to interfere with my actions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
What I don't understand is why people seem to be shoving the Savant/JoeBob situation off as a non-issue. I disagree with him, but I can better understand why Barney's pushing a lynch on JoeBob than just ignoring it entirely. I know we don't want to lynch Savant this DP and it doesn't seem like a lot of people scumread JoeBob for his claim (I certainly don't), but we have the information this DP to know that it's likely one of them. If we're not lynching one of them this DP, they need to be top of the list next DP.
Because as history as shown, neither Joebob or Savant are terribly subtle as scum. You should know this, having been partners with both of them. Their claims are not going to disappear; their alignments are not going to change. As long as they continue engaging, I'm confident that we as a collective town can eventually figure out who it is. Mathematically, there's no difference between lynching them now and lynching them later - but in terms of gameplay value, lynching the correct person first is far more valuable for town. And for what it's worth, I have a lower null read on Joebob and a lean town on Savant. Not out of the ordinary for Joebob, but I seriously don't think Savant could have improved his play last game (where he got caught within 4 pages, mind you), to this extent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Not really going to engage with that response because I think you're still ignoring how many assumptions we need to make to consider Moozer actually putting that role in. Seriously, he needed to get that role from somewhere. Mafia42 was also the only site I found (in my independent research) to have a "Soldier" role anywhere close to x1 Bulletproof - and of this obscure site (despite no other role apparently being taken from there), Moozer only took half the role? You're claiming it's not impossible, but the balance of probabilities doesn't support your theory here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Why would you claim your exact number of shots...?
Created:
Posted in:
Maybe I'm confirmation biasing a bit here, but Earth seems frustrated in a way that isn't really town. Generally, town players become defiant and angry when they perceive they're being unfairly pushed - here, Earth just seems like he doesn't care. Considering that it's likely that a partner (either Savant or Joebob, unless you buy the pseudo-CC theory) is going down, as well as the fact that this setup seems mechanically biased in favor of town, I could imagine Earth just cutting his losses.
Created:
Posted in:
As much as I'm skeptical of Joebob's claim, I also agree that it's a stretch to assume he'd so confidently CC. Considering neither Savant or Joebob are particularly subtle as scum, I'm fine with letting them live for another DP and forcing them to participate more, which will probably reveal their alignment sooner or later.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
This is clearly not the role on mafiauniverse, which functions as a Vig, but it is the role as described on some websites, e.g. https://mafia42.fandom.com/wiki/Soldier. It's not clear from my reading of either that role or the one JoeBob claimed that he can survive any NK, just the mafia NK. Worth asking about, though I'll note that even if it does soak up the Granny shot, it would have to be confirmed by JoeBob that he no longer was BP in order to confirm both of them, and we don't know if he'll receive a message to that effect.
If this is really the case, then that makes Joebob look even worse. Quoting directly from the page you linked:
With the Passive skill [Bulletproof], you can survive from Mafia's attack for one turn.
So, in order to assume that Joebob is really a soldier, we'd have to assume the following:
- Moozer got no input from Pie on the role names
- Moozer ignored the exact same role being completely different in a previous game
- Moozer decided to make a role immune to night kills
- Instead of going to either Mafiascum, Mafiauniverse, or Mafia.gg, which all list the role as "Bulletproof"
- He went to Mafia42
- I'm not even sure how this happens honestly. I searched for "mafia game role ideas", "mafia game role list", "mafia role that can survive kill", and I didn't get a single hit from that website. (Feel free to verify)
- Moozer then didn't even implement the role as it's described
- Since that role apparently is also immune to negative actions, which Joebob never mentioned
Like... that's a lot of assumptions. Combine that with Joebob saying that his role is confirmable when it isn't, and hopefully you can understand why I'm a bit suspicious.
Created:
Posted in:
Ok... not very helpful from Earth. Anyway, rereading the DP closely rn.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Can you explain why exactly you claimed your role is confirmable here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Ok. I am soilder. I can survive one mafia NK.
That's... definitely a bit odd. That's not how I've seen Soldier in any other game - this sounds like x1 bulletproof.
I find it really weird that Moozer would give Soldier like this version, considering two things:
-He was advised by Pie, who uses a different version of Soldier.
-Moozer's first game on here, chess mafia, included a different Soldier role as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Not to read too much into it, but I did a similar thing in my last game as scum (Heroes of Olympus) while under pressure. I logged in, realized people were asking me for a claim, and promptly logged out to figure out a good fakeclaim. It's definitely a bit odd to not acknowledge the thread at all for sure.
Created:
Posted in:
Yeah, like I feel with this many confirmable roles, the game should be mechanically solvable as long as we can confirm alignment. Even if not, we have a good starting point for POE.
Created:
Posted in:
Also, just a thought - for all the people who have claimed their role is confirmable, they should also probably say whether their role confirms their affiliation (because I'm going to lose it if someone "confirms" themself as a double-roleblocker or something later on). I'll start by saying my role strongly supports I'm town, but doesn't quite prove it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Yeah, despite my belief that all four of the Champions are likely town, you’re the biggest outlier in terms of behavior, timing of your claim, and being unconfirmable. A full claim is in order.
Pretty much my own thoughts. At the very least, we'll hopefully get some activity from him. In general, I tend to sus active people less because they're holding themselves accountable for later behavioral analysis - with inactives, there's nothing to go off of and it's annoying to lose because of it.
Created:
Posted in:
We must lynch someone to confirm Lunatic, however, we shouldnt lynch casey before we get role claim from Earth. His role might give us a clue, especially about if all roles from previous game are used, which is what I am wondering about.
I don't think that's the case - I don't remember Luna's role being in the previous game, and he's about to confirm it (hopefully)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I suppose Casey could be fakeclaiming, but I've never seen a mod provide it as a fakeclaim because it's inherently a bit of a scummy role. Then again, Moozer is pretty new, so I could imagine he wanted to redo the setup, decided to scrap PGO, and had the "brilliant idea" to give it as a fakeclaim.
That being said, I'm leaning more on Earth for behavior. He's been coasting along without providing much, and while I know he's usually inactive, as town he usually would have given something by now - not to also mention that weird comment about thematic analysis being "cheap".
Created:
Posted in:
I agree with whiteflame here - claiming one of the six, as scum, would almost certainly require a fakeclaim. The only alternative scenario is one in which Moozer mysteriously only puts four or five of those characters in and scum are the last to claim, but that seems highly unlikely.
I don't really see the point in speculating on fakeclaims honestly - either Moozer gave one/two or he didn't. It's just something to take into consideration as a factor that makes a person more or less likely than random chance to be town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Probably https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/11093-breath-of-the-wild-mafia-dp1?page=8&post_number=234 although I don't really think that mechanic will fly.
Created:
Posted in:
I'd honestly prefer not to lynch Savant today, and not just because he hasn't made it to D2 once in his life. In the last game he was really transparent as scum (so much so that I caught him by the start of page 4). If the themesplit theory pans out and he is actually scum, he's going to slip up sooner or later.
In particular, that readlist of his feels pretty naturally constructed - I can say that as scum, faking genuine reads is something I really struggle with and I don't see that kind of forced or awkward logic there.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
It could help in late game if we get down to 2 scum vs 2 town, but I'll admit it would be very unlikely for him to live that long at this point.
I'm pretty sure town just gets endgamed in that situation. I'm going to ask Moozer about that right now though, because that would be enormously overpowered.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
To be clear,The game is divided on 6 main charactersAnd 3 (austin, lunatic, savant) who are not main characters.Lunatic is pretty much confirmed town by the end of this dp.Austin is, by his role description, most likely town, even tho I am curious about his role.Now, I dont think scum was given 2 fake claims. They were likely only given 1.So only 1 out of 6 main characters could be scum.That leaves Savant as other scum.I know this logic has its flaws, but I find it hard to believe that scum was given 2 fake claims or that scum had courage to fake claim to be two out of those 6, or that 1 scum was given fake claim of one out of 6 while the other also dared to fake claim one out of 6.Maybe I am overthinking this, and yeah, I agree that we should let Savant play to dp2, and its up to lunatic to decide, but we are going to have to lynch someone this dp, as I dont think we can have no-lynch because lunatic needs to confirm his role this dp.I still need to hear from Earth about if his role is confirmable, but so far the only non-confirmale roles are granny and bleeder.
This post feels genuine, but at the same time I'm somewhat uncomfortable with this logic - you're basically banking everything on the assumption of a simple themesplit and scum having just enough fakeclaims to blend in, but no more.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Just realized something. Couldn't we vote for whoever Luna tells us to, and then he gets to keep his power for later? Still puts the onus on him to prove his role tmrw.
I mean, we could... but I don't see the point. The utility of Luna's role is in confirming his affiliation, nothing more - in terms of actual gameplay value, it doesn't give town anything we can't do ourselves.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you have any problem with claiming your role now, since I dont think scum will target you regardless?Since its a negative utility role, it would help town to know what it is in advance, so if what you are saying is true, do you have any reason not to claim role?
There's a reason for me not to claim. It'll become apparent after N1.
Created:
Posted in:
Reads (taking into account theme and mechanics):
Town:
Lunatic - role is undeniably confirmable (no mysterious night action shenanigans), and it's pretty much guaranteed to be town-aligned, as otherwise it would essentially bring LYLO a day early. Just to ensure Luna isn't fakeclaim covering a similar role that requires X votes or X% of votes to lynch, we should ensure that there are zero votes on the player we plan to lynch.
Lean town:
BK- If he keeps it up, Pie might start letting him back into his games. Some pretty legitimate effort at progressing the game through thematic/mechanical analysis that I don't see any ulterior motives behind it.
Slight town:
Casey - Behaviorally slight town lean, acting pretty casual without a lot of worry for how they look (usually I see newbscum be either very fluffy or very lurky). They also claimed their PGO role 5 minutes after I mentioned what a SOP role was - and while it's possible they got help from a scumbuddy during that time, the quick response and early claim seems more likely to come from earnest town.
Savant - Thematically out of the six. His behavior in general feels towny in the sense of being uninformed and going along with what's happening in thread. I also think his post pointing out an apparent contradiction from me demonstrates attention to detail that I generally don't see from scum (since it's much harder for scum to put effort into scumhunting).
WF - I usually townread him regardless of alignment early on anyway. So far his posts give me a town vibe behind them, especially that interaction with Savant.
Null:
Joebob - Hasn't posted much, what he has posted has been pretty mid. Basically coasting for now. I'd like to hear his reads.
Barney - I tend to prematurely scumread Barney because he fluffs a lot, so I'll refrain this time. None of his posts so far have really seemed alignment indicative.
Slight scum:
Earth - Pretty inactive, but his post about thematic analysis being "cheap" made me a bit uncomfortable. It's one thing to say it's shouldn't be relied on too much, but dismissing it out of some sense of fair play feels like a cop-out to avoid explaining why he doesn't want to do it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Alright im caught up. You know what? I'll go ahead and full claim, I don't really see any reason not to, except for I guess if I wanted to use wagonomics to see how people voted and reacted, but honestly any analysis garnered from that is more or less WIFOM anyway.I am King Roham, the ruler of Hyrule. He's the old man you meet in the beginning of the game. Turns out you find out later on that he is King Roham (kind of a spoiler for me I guess since I haven't got to that part where that is apparently revealed, but it's been a year since I started the game and have only played it a few times casually since picking it up, so it's my fault for not finishing it earlier I guess).My role is "King" (Ironically a role I've wanted to use myself for a while), I can unanimously decide the day's lynch at any point in the game. Like I said earlier I was planning on using this day phase one anyways, since I usually die pretty early as town (last game was an exception).I don't have a ton of reads at the moment, other than I am town reading BK who seems to be putting in a great deal of effort compared to their usual play. I am getting a good feeling from BK overall. Not sure who I will unanimously lynch yet, but I am in no rush. I will use the role at some point before EOD.
Wagonomics, EOD... Mafiauniverse has gotten to you already :)
I honestly think that role is kinda negative utility (in the sense that it denies us the opportunity to analyze voting patterns and such), but it will confirm you at the very least and I can't imagine Moozer giving it as a scum role. I don't see the harm in using it ASAP, but I would prefer if a majority of living players agreed to it first.
Created: