Total posts: 2,865
Posted in:
Two inactives posting comments elsewhere is... not great. I'd give them the benefit of the doubt that they might just have forgotten though - I remember when I first started on this site, it took me a couple weeks to realize that there was a message function. IMO newbs tend to be pretty readable so as long as they post some content I think it should be fine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Okay, something new is bothering me. Lunatic is online, but he's been mainly just fluff posting. If Luna is scum, he might be trying to slide under the radar but just showing enough activity so that he doesn't get lumped in with the non-posters. In a normal game, Luna's behavior would be seen as suspicious. In this one, we might be more worried about people who aren't posting at all.But if Luna has enough time to post, why has he contributed barely anything? Especially when posters need to carry this game a lot because of how many people aren't active? Someone who knows Luna's meta might be able to say if this is normal for him.VTL Lunatic
Off my memory of Luna's meta, he usually doesn't post much D1 and picks up later on. That being said, it's hard to gauge whether it's because he's just in town meta or lurking here, and it would be nice to get some content.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Not related to the game but I think Austin has a done a great job and behavior analyzing. I know it's been a while since I played but it seems like he's grown a lot as a player. I was going to wait to the endgame to say something but I've noticed from the last few games he has his improved a lot...Not affiliation indicative but I think it's worth pointing out
I appreciate it, I'm always trying to learn and grow as a player.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
It's basically WIFOM. The more we suspect the strategy is bad and he wouldn't use it, the more useful of a strategy it becomes, etc. It's not a great reason for a sus, but it's the only one we have, and the WIFOM logic (however weak) doesn't apply as much to the new players.
I can see where you're coming from, and I think it's genuine. But like, idk, I feel like I'd have to really be reaching for a read to solidly scumread Wylted just for doing absolutely nothing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Yeah, WyIted has been in games before, he's less likely to forget about it. If anyone is using their absence as a "strategy" hoping we'll ignore them, it's WyIted. The others might have just forgotten, and if they are scum, they'll probably fail their night actions anyway and we don't need to worry.
I mean, if it's a strategy, it's a pretty bad one, considering we're going to lynch him by default lol. But yeah, I guess I do have a slightly higher expectation for Wylted? I dunno, if the absence is just due to forgetfulness or irl it doesn't mean anything either way tho
Created:
Posted in:
Oops, I forgot to elaborate why Vader's thought process on Savant is towny. I think it's indicative of genuine curiosity - there's a clear thought process of Vader seeing something that pings him, checking back past games, and then putting it in thread in a way that feels more like he's trying to start discussion rather than start a bad push. I.e. it's a thought process with some nuance and depth.
Created:
Posted in:
Vader's thought process on Savant is like... towny?
Idk, I'm having a much harder time getting reads than last game, just because there's so little content to work off of and no one's being that scummy. So I feel like I'm trying to force out some reads with limited info and I could easily be wrong - but we all have to start somewhere.
Kinda towny:
Savant
Vader
Pie
Slightly towny:
WF
GP
Null:
Luna
(Egos)
(Redeemed)
(Wylted)
Created:
Posted in:
That being said, it is pretty frustrating to just have three people completely absent. For all we know, we could just be running in circles. I think lynching one of the noposters is better than no lynch at all if only to narrow the POE, but I'm generally just not a fan of the day phase being focused around picking low-hanging fruit because it doesn't make anyone readable - i.e. it's very easy for scum to blend in for town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Is there any particular reason you prefer Wylted over one of the newbs? I.e, do you think his absence is more alignment indicative compared to the others?
Created:
Posted in:
I'm not on WF's list. I'm on Season 2.
Vader asking about fakeclaims is a lil towny.
Pie checking my meta is pretty towny.
Created:
Posted in:
I buy that.
Savant probs town, don't think he immediately goes for me considering he's seen me get in a lot of protracted 1v1s and often not back down. In general, for mafia, it's not really a great play to get caught in a 1v1 because even in the best case scenario where they win, they don't come out looking good.
Thread feels reasonably towny, might be 1-2 in the players who haven't checked in yet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Ok, I buy this. I don't think Austin would lie about eating lunch just to throw off suspicion.Unvote
Hm. If I was scum, how do you think I would've responded? Because I probably would've replied the exact same way I just did as either alignment.
Created:
Posted in:
Mixed feelings on Savant so far - I think his initial sus on me is kinda towny and shows good thought process, but his weird focus on GP could be performative - atp, asking GP whether he copy-pasted doesn't change anything and could come off as fake concern.
Probs still throwing him in the townbin for now.
GP's role is probs just town-alignment from rough balancing analysis, it's simply a useless role for mafia to have since no one will listen to them after they die. That being said, it's not confirmable so it's only towny if true. I'd consider it slightly town in a vacuum. I think his focus on Savant is indicative of genuine curiosity, I tr him a lot more for that imo.
Vader, Luna, feel ok.
WF's casualness and thoughts so far feels slightly towny but he always does regardless of alignment so I'm going to call him null for now.
Pie's claim and willingness to be a policy lynch is very likely town. Technically confirmable although I'd advise against it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Austin's first post comes off a bit scummy to me. Maybe it's just because of how many times I've played with him specifically. As town he tends to start with posts that move the game forward, whereas when he's scum he's more likely to make posts that try to avoid any suspicion. i.e. "just checking in" or "Pie SOP claiming makes sense" which contributes very little.VTL Austin
Believe it or not, eating lunch is not alignment indicative.
Created:
Posted in:
Town played pretty cleanly in this one. Sorry Savant, you deserved better for successfully RBing the NK, haven't seen that in a long time lol.
I think it'd be close to balanced if GP hadn't been given the reviver role. It's an order of magnitude better than the other protective roles because it guarantees a protect and verifies the target's alignment as well.
With GP's role, town getting away with a mislynch sort of scot-free was a bit much.
Anyway, thanks Luna for modding, cool game.
Created:
Posted in:
Good to know my reads weren't horrific lol.
Ggs all, fun game but tough for scum, looks pretty townsided.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
The way Earth interacted with Vader is NEVER scum-scum, trust me on thisWait till Luna confirms the vote didn’t count.
Doesn't even matter imo, their interactions on D2 just aren't paired lol.
Created:
Posted in:
Locktown:
Earth
WF
GP
Almost certainly town:
Pie
Not particularly town:
Casey
Created:
Posted in:
Oh, Ninja should also confirm WF since he claimed an investigative category.
Created:
Posted in:
The way Earth interacted with Vader is NEVER scum-scum, trust me on this
Created:
Posted in:
WF probs town by role because why else did I get options for Miller and Gravedigger.
GF probs town by role, if we lose to that than w/e.
Casey, Earth, Vader, Pie.
I'd probs take Pie out for the check and the mech that Casey is claiming, as well as generalized aggression that I associate with town pie.
I think it's correct just to have Earth place his vote on Casey and shoot Vader, and then we decide from there.
Thoughts?
Created:
Posted in:
Vader's behavior is scummy af but am very surprised no one has considered the consequence of Earth misfiring
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Does losing your vote apply permanently or just this day?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Do not shoot just yet
IF YOU ARE TOWN MISPLACE YOUR VOTE IT COULD BE AN AUTO-LOSS FOR TOWN
You misshoot, it's 4 v 2.
It's MYLO and we need 4 votes to eliminate scum. If your vote is wrong, it's physically impossible to do so.
Even if we no-lynch, we get taken into LYLO where scum leaves you alive and it's still impossible to lynch scum.
Created:
Posted in:
I will not be voting outside of Vader today. I very rarely blame people for their own lynch, but if Vader flips town, it's entirely on him for cutting 60 hours of discussion short and lying about his worldview.
Created:
Posted in:
I think Vader's quickhammer was outing.
It's complete garbage to do as a townie especially since he was yapping d1 about how my choice to choose hammerer was bad for town. Put simply, his decision to rush the day conflicts with his stated philosophy.
He also made several posts about how it could be a frame by mafia to implicate both himself and Savant. So claiming that he was "certain" Savant was scum is simply a provable lie.
That aside, he's attacked Earth and me for "anti-town behavior" which is pretty classic scum play because it's much easier to push people for doing anti-town things rather than scum indicative things.
Created:
Posted in:
I'll sort out the mech tmrw, looks pretty complicated but I'm pretty sure it's provable that at least one person is lying.
My working POE is Savant/Vader with maybe a side of Casey.
GP town by role and behavior
Wylted town for behavior and genuine solving yesterday as town that melded closely with my own thoughts
Pie town for the way he handled his role claim + cop clear + pushing me yday in a way very uninformed of my alignment
WF probs town for good faith solving
Earth probs town for reaction test and excitement at pushing Vader
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
Did you ever claim the other options you were given?
Created:
Posted in:
Earth's reaction test was towny I think. His push on Vader is also kinda towny now that I looked at it, it's just more absurd. If Vader's scum, then it's great, if Vader's town, don't think Earth tries to push a non-existent scumslip, I remember him being more passive as scum.
I think there's strictly 1 (not 0, not 2) scum in Vader/Savant. I think they've both been individually suspicious at various moments, but the way they're treating each other doesn't feel like scum on scum at all.
Idk who the other would be.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
Can you explain exactly what the supposed slip is.
I don't get it.
Created:
Posted in:
Ftr it's nice being conftown but I'm not going to strongarm the lynch.
I'm going to give my thoughts and we'll work this out democratically.
I'm leaning scum on Savant but it's not a lock read, willing to hear him out today.
Frankly I have no idea what's going on with Earth and Vader.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Public apology my friend. I’m sorry
It's fine, it's just a game. I'd also be more annoyed if town didn't get an insane amount of information from it :)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
As I said, I'd prefer the Savant lynch right now. He's at L-1 from what I can see, though, given the Hammerer role. So I'm not placing my vote yet. I'd also be willing to lynch Pie, mainly to ascertain the truth of his information. I understand that you see him as town as do many others, though I'm still not so sure.
Pie is town, mostly confident enough to bet the game on it.
He's preemptively taking credit for a lynch in a manner that is extremely uninformed of my alignment. Scum doesn't say that *his* information guarantees I'm scum, scum doesn't say that *he* found a scumslip. If you go through past games, scum disproportionately are players who hop on bandwagons or casually egg on town-vs-town violence, not the ones who initiate pushes.
Created:
Posted in:
Don't know why you'd post a vote on yourself since it's automatically placed on the lynch. I get the gesture, but it's kind of pointless.
Town's not going to reeval and lynch the obvious scum since changing reads is seen as a level 0 scummy play, if scum want the opportunistic mislynch might as well make it easier so we can move on to the next day
Created:
Posted in:
People think flipping reads is scummy when my scum meta is literally just tunneling players into the ground with zero reevaluation whatsoever
Also sketchy self-meta disclaimer etc but I'm a good scum player and if I was playing scum I wouldn't be in this position
Created:
Posted in:
VTL Austin
Just lynch and revive me and get it over with so Pie can stop tunneling me bc he doesn't understand hypotheticals and we can solve for Savant + [Casey/Vader]
WF is obvtown, Pie is obvtown, Wylted and GP are town by role and behavior, and Earth is town bc I have the solve
Just lynch and revive me and get it over with so Pie can stop tunneling me bc he doesn't understand hypotheticals and we can solve for Savant + [Casey/Vader]
WF is obvtown, Pie is obvtown, Wylted and GP are town by role and behavior, and Earth is town bc I have the solve
Created:
Posted in:
Ok I'm going to sleep.
If I wake up and find that I've hammered myself, then w/e. GP will revive me, and I'm pretty sure I've got a winning POE.
Always fun getting blamed for randing a negative utility role and trying to mitigate the damage.
Created:
Posted in:
Y'all got to choose between four roles and pick your favorite ones.
I got to choose between roles that would get me fake guiltied, lynched, or lose control of my vote.
You're acting like I chose to take negative utility on purpose because I wanted to have a towny category. No, I got stuck between four bad options and now everyone is getting on my case for it. If you were in my shoes, I guarantee that any option you chose would have been judged just because people apparently can't fathom that the mod gives the roles, not me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Granted, I know I fall into the category of choosing for role confirmation, but all my roles were confirmation roles and I chose the one I think would be the less damaging to town while also providing the most utility
I am also still irked by the way he chose a role that would likely benefit himself more than it would benefit the town as a whole. His behavior since then makes me lean more into that logic.
I had the choice to choose Miller, Gravedigger, or Hated. If I had chosen any one of those, y'all would have complained that I didn't choose the confirmable role. I didn't HAVE a choice to choose the most utility, I had the choice to choose the role that would be least likely to throw the game for town.
Hammerer is literally the least negative utility because it does nothing to change the outcome of the lynch if people don't just L - 1 for no reason.
But go on about my choice just being to benefit myself. Like scumread me all you want for behavior (I understand that some people might get what I'm doing, some people might not), but I don't really appreciate being judged for picking the best role for town that I saw out of four bad options.
Created:
Posted in:
I said we had two good lynch targets, lynching either of you would give information and be better than random chance. I said "Of course Pie could be wrong and erroneously confident and we have two townies going against each other, but Pie's intuition has been good before." But I did not think it was likely a town v town fight. Why would I be accounting for it being some weird gambit from you? Face it, even if it was a reaction test, that's not a usual town v town conflict. Hence why I did not recognize it as one.
Savant scumslipped here btw by admitting that it is, even when he doesn't townread me.
Not much to say, his reasoning here is lacking because the whole point of town vs town conflicts is that the townies involved don't recognize each other as town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
I don't think this is that inexplicable. Obviously if you're scum, you don't want to be lynched, especially not on DP1, and townreading someone who is pushing hard for your lynch is generally a towny thing to do. If you get lynched as town DP1, oh well, it's not that bad, unless you're a good investigative/protective role, which you're not. The town at least gets some information they can use to help them make a more informed decision next time. Except in this game, it's even less bad for the town. In fact, it's a positive, because you become a confirmed townie and lose your negative utility status thanks to GP's role.
It loses town a lynch. We have three lynches to hit scum. Mislynching me doesn't kill a townie, but it puts the game on evens - 3 v 5. Now town only has two lynches to hit scum.
I'd be less annoyed than in a normal game for sure, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to be hunting for scum D1.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Casey_Risk
I think that your reasoning is coming from a genuine place, and that you believe in it - because yes, at a surface level, it looks weird to do. That's why it's not scummy - because as scum, I stay under the radar, go for easy mislynches, and otherwise don't really mess around.
I genuinely don't think I could have done what I just did if I was scum because it takes a huge amount of mental effort to ignore the path of least resistance and just consistently townread my biggest pusher and instead focus on those on the sidelines. That comes from a place of genuine solving.
The main point here is that it looks opportunistic. It's only opportunistic if Savant is town, that's all I have to say.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Savant
So in other words, I was right to lean toward trusting him over you? I'm being scum read for not trusting the accusation you admit you completely made up?
It's not towny to force a dichotomy. It's especially not towny to say you'll lynch me and then lynch Pie WHEN I flip town lol.
Also, this is a ton of backtracking from you. Pie accused you first. That's not the time to start lying. Whenever you've been scum before, you usually ended up flipping on something and saying it was all part of a master plan. One time was when you claimed you were miller and had been hiding it for some reason. There was a game a long time go when whiteflame was accusing you and you changed your role claim in an attempt to get him off your back. You've done similar gambits as town like the supersaint, but those are usually confirmable.
False analogy. I'd love to hear the scum agenda behind me townreading my biggest pusher.
Created: