If you both agree to a tie, then my vote will be tie and debate will be tie. With other voters gone, its not a big deal to end the debate at this point. I would hate to be the only one deciding the winner, to be honest. I am not sure if David will come online. He might.
I need to do this song thing too. Although I would limit it to 1 song per round because I would also have topic in place so songs have to be about specific topic.
Sorry, I dont know what "lo9ve" is. I dont have my Christian dictionary with me.
"there was a church who had a rainbow heart on their sign and said that all were welcome."
Yeah, if only the Bible said the same. Also, Church is losing support. There was no such Church when Christianity was popular. Only when they started losing users is when they changed story. Even today, it is mostly the Christians who are the hateful group. Its just that they no longer have power to execute gays or make them homeless.
"When in power, be ruthless. When powerless, pretend to be nice."
Oh you are one of those who think that they can change topic after the debate has already started. No. Once the debate starts, you must argue for the topic and nothing in your arguments can change the topic. Amazing, isnt it?
Historically, it was mostly Christians who promoted hate. Well, yes, hate, witch burning, killing gays, kicking gays out of communities...
Also, laws do have effect on parents. Banning parents from abusing children with Christianity means parents go to prison if they do that.
Also, banning education in school and not banning worse education at home is not only logically inconsistent, but only helps Christian parents to indoctrinate children with hate.
Schools must teach about gays, because parents already teach about gays and Christian parents teach lies about gays.
Really, Christians dont want to ban education about gays. No. What they want to ban is positive education about gays. They want to be able to brainwash kids into hating gays, while school is unable to teach the truth.
Oh I see now. You want to ban schools from teaching children about gays, but not ban parents from teaching children about hell and gays. Smart move. That way, Christian parents can lie to their kids about hell and gays, and schools are banned from teaching the actual truth. Clever move, I must say. Clever double standard. Nice inconsistent logic where same education is both allowed and banned at the same time in the same country using no consistent logic whatsoever. Its interesting how you have no problem with teaching children about sadistic God masked as holy good and gays being judged, but teaching gays or sex in school is just too much. Remember when Christian parents threw their teenage sons out, making them homeless, just because they were gay? Yeah, lets forget all the history. Should it be illegal for parents to teach their kids Christianity, since Christianity promotes sadism, hate and intolerance? Why would parents have a right to insert fear into child's mind?
So you are saying that 5 year olds should be denied of real truth.
Hey, if someone taught me about gay at age 5, I wouldnt mind. I was called gay as a kid, but I dont think thats same education.
Lets not forget whataboutism. What about all those Christians? Sure, lets teach a 5 year old that people burn alive in hell, but no, lets not teach them the truth about something that actually exists.
Me and Lancelot are not enemies, we never were, really. He did help me too, when Oromagi was after me.
I pointed out I dont approve of what he does. I dont know if he is acting like knight Lancelot. I dont know what is he seeking to accomplish here. This amount of targeting is unhealthy, someone will get banned. Maybe there is some knight code making him do it. Maybe there is some belief that it is his duty. Still, what he does contains little honor and is overreacting. All he will do is get himself banned for nothing.
I will help with the voting and everything, but I am not a fan of this risky idea at all.
If it were possible to have judges in rated, this would be different. This seems vunerable.
And how would you know that? You seem to have some knowledge others dont.
You do realize they can make 40 accounts in two weeks it takes voting to end?
I debate a little bit on both sides, yes. I dont stick to one thing and just one. I am even capable of altering personalities to opposite. It really goes hand in hand with the trolling.
You are better at these rap battles than me. It was my mistake to limit to 9 syllables. I see that everyone uses much more per line. It forced me to use short lines limiting everything. Still, good battle, I am starting to like these.
"And yes, transgender people can be reasonable and their demands reasonable however, when that begins to affect the rights of a biological woman, it is unacceptable"
It is mostly Christians who affect rights of biological women. In Bible, it says that woman doesnt even own her body. Her husband owns her. She cannot even deny him sex. Most of rapists are Christians. Most of murderers are Christians.
Are you in favor of banning Christianity to uphold women's rights? Because you seem to be defending Christians abusing women and children. Remember all those boys abused by priests? You tolerate that? But you attack minorities. You are attacking trans rights.
He went inactive ☹
Hey you are saying that abortions should be free too. It would at least create incentive to abort more children.
I would if I were AI.
lol
Sad day for anti-anarchists. The only healthy child is a free child.
Well played.
If you both agree to a tie, then my vote will be tie and debate will be tie. With other voters gone, its not a big deal to end the debate at this point. I would hate to be the only one deciding the winner, to be honest. I am not sure if David will come online. He might.
I need to do this song thing too. Although I would limit it to 1 song per round because I would also have topic in place so songs have to be about specific topic.
This topic is crazy
Omg lol
You win this time, Christian guy.
"Minor Attracted Persons. M.A.D"
Its map, not mad.
"why does your bio say ur Christian"
I am sometimes a Christian, just not right now. Cant really update profile every time I change personality.
"quit one so we can debate."
I will, as soon as I find the quit button.
"I was standing up for using less hurtful language. Thats not an attack."
Well, usually calling someone mad is a personal attack. Even the Bible says so in Jesus.
"you have to quit one."
Sorry, I didnt realize I could do that.
"But i guess you should say pro-MAD."
That sounds like personal attack. I should inform you that personal attacks are not allowed on this site. Although I wont miss you if you get banned.
You can make any debate, really.
"I guess if we ban teaching opinions"
Not all opinions. Just obvious hateful ones like Christians's.
"you know that christianity is still the fastest growing religion"
There are more atheists now than before, thankfully. Also, Church attendance is low, so churches have to accept those groups they once killed.
"So there were gay christians, too."
Ah yes, the exception that does nothing to change the rule.
"Do you wanna have an official debate?"
You can make the debate.
"Christianity also promotes lo9ve"
Sorry, I dont know what "lo9ve" is. I dont have my Christian dictionary with me.
"there was a church who had a rainbow heart on their sign and said that all were welcome."
Yeah, if only the Bible said the same. Also, Church is losing support. There was no such Church when Christianity was popular. Only when they started losing users is when they changed story. Even today, it is mostly the Christians who are the hateful group. Its just that they no longer have power to execute gays or make them homeless.
"When in power, be ruthless. When powerless, pretend to be nice."
Oh you are one of those who think that they can change topic after the debate has already started. No. Once the debate starts, you must argue for the topic and nothing in your arguments can change the topic. Amazing, isnt it?
Historically, it was mostly Christians who promoted hate. Well, yes, hate, witch burning, killing gays, kicking gays out of communities...
Also, laws do have effect on parents. Banning parents from abusing children with Christianity means parents go to prison if they do that.
Also, banning education in school and not banning worse education at home is not only logically inconsistent, but only helps Christian parents to indoctrinate children with hate.
Schools must teach about gays, because parents already teach about gays and Christian parents teach lies about gays.
Really, Christians dont want to ban education about gays. No. What they want to ban is positive education about gays. They want to be able to brainwash kids into hating gays, while school is unable to teach the truth.
Also, you are Con for the topic. This means that you are arguing that it should not be taught in high school. So yeah, good luck with that.
Oh I see now. You want to ban schools from teaching children about gays, but not ban parents from teaching children about hell and gays. Smart move. That way, Christian parents can lie to their kids about hell and gays, and schools are banned from teaching the actual truth. Clever move, I must say. Clever double standard. Nice inconsistent logic where same education is both allowed and banned at the same time in the same country using no consistent logic whatsoever. Its interesting how you have no problem with teaching children about sadistic God masked as holy good and gays being judged, but teaching gays or sex in school is just too much. Remember when Christian parents threw their teenage sons out, making them homeless, just because they were gay? Yeah, lets forget all the history. Should it be illegal for parents to teach their kids Christianity, since Christianity promotes sadism, hate and intolerance? Why would parents have a right to insert fear into child's mind?
Also, your topic is about high school and you talk about 5 year olds. Maybe in your country 5 year olds go to high school.
So you are saying that 5 year olds should be denied of real truth.
Hey, if someone taught me about gay at age 5, I wouldnt mind. I was called gay as a kid, but I dont think thats same education.
Lets not forget whataboutism. What about all those Christians? Sure, lets teach a 5 year old that people burn alive in hell, but no, lets not teach them the truth about something that actually exists.
Why you no love?
Write about Slifer The Sky Dragon, or if thats not interesting write about Japan in WW2.
Me and Lancelot are not enemies, we never were, really. He did help me too, when Oromagi was after me.
I pointed out I dont approve of what he does. I dont know if he is acting like knight Lancelot. I dont know what is he seeking to accomplish here. This amount of targeting is unhealthy, someone will get banned. Maybe there is some knight code making him do it. Maybe there is some belief that it is his duty. Still, what he does contains little honor and is overreacting. All he will do is get himself banned for nothing.
I will help with the voting and everything, but I am not a fan of this risky idea at all.
If it were possible to have judges in rated, this would be different. This seems vunerable.
You are taking unnecessary risk for nothing. Noble as it may be, it would take at least 20 of these for RM to get back at 1800, to what it was.
And this is assuming none get votebombed. You do realize that its impossible to know which new account is votebomber and which is not?
Also, if it does get votebombed, you will be guilty. So is this at all worth the risk? If just one out of 10 gets votebombed, it negates everything.
And how would you know that? You seem to have some knowledge others dont.
You do realize they can make 40 accounts in two weeks it takes voting to end?
Plus, RM would only get 5 to 10 elo from this debate, assuming it doesnt get votebombed, which it probably will.
This looks like a trap.
I debate a little bit on both sides, yes. I dont stick to one thing and just one. I am even capable of altering personalities to opposite. It really goes hand in hand with the trolling.
Write about Britain.
Ok, now tell me what I write about
Let me guess, the topic will be "US should declare war on Canada" with Mall as Pro.
Write about Kim Jong Un
Is there any way to restore the lost rating? RM lost a lot because of those votebomb accounts. I am pretty sure site owner can restore it.
Sometimes I am Christian. Sometimes I am not. I dont stick permanently. I change mind often. Its probably some curse.
Maybe better make it so that you choose side while they choose topic.
They can pick unwinnable topics, you know.
You are better at these rap battles than me. It was my mistake to limit to 9 syllables. I see that everyone uses much more per line. It forced me to use short lines limiting everything. Still, good battle, I am starting to like these.
I assume you are the next vote bomber account. Only vote bomber would deny seeing obvious vote bombs.
See if you want description updated, rules or something.
Okay. I first need to finish one of my debates as I am at maximum number of allowed debates.
I think I played enough with you. You can now go back to your debating.
"Not everyone is a Christian"
Your definition includes Christians tho.
Christians are part of "everyone".
Please think of a definition that excludes Christians.
"And yes, transgender people can be reasonable and their demands reasonable however, when that begins to affect the rights of a biological woman, it is unacceptable"
It is mostly Christians who affect rights of biological women. In Bible, it says that woman doesnt even own her body. Her husband owns her. She cannot even deny him sex. Most of rapists are Christians. Most of murderers are Christians.
Are you in favor of banning Christianity to uphold women's rights? Because you seem to be defending Christians abusing women and children. Remember all those boys abused by priests? You tolerate that? But you attack minorities. You are attacking trans rights.