Total posts: 12,563
Posted in:
Option 1. If I am doctor and you lynch me, you certainly kill at least 2 town players because scum will take out another town and I cant protect.
So you risk 3 town players.
Option 2. If you lynch Wylted, you possibly kill scum and I die anyway by scum.
So you risk 1 town player or 2 at max.
If I am scum, I will survive to dp3, then you will be certain I am scum anyway and can lynch me.
So its an obvious choice to lynch Wylted.
Scum would have to be extremely bad to actually not kill doctor.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
And if you lynch me,
Same case applies if someone else who can confirm his role doesnt vote me, because then only 3 town players at max would vote me.
If I am lynched and turn town as I will, what do you think who is the next obvious target?
Who was so eager to lynch the player who is the only confirmed town player alive in the game?
Its interesting how all I had to do to find scum was set bait for them to attack, and only scum would think that we should lynch doctor who wasnt cc by anyone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Maybe we should lynch joebob
Lets see.
We are at 5 - 2.
If joebob is town, the only one who can lynch him is scum because:
1. I wont lynch him
2. He wont lynch himself
So that means only 3 town voters can vote him, so one of 4 necessary votes would have to be scum.
Go ahead. Lynch him. Lynch him and expose yourself, because if he is town and I am town, which will be proven soon, one of the votes lynching Joe must be scum.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I actually think I would prefer a no lynch over voting bullish for now.
Its 5 - 2 likely.
If we lynch, we are at 3 - 2 in case of mislynch.
If we skip, we are at 4 - 2, then if we skip again we are at 3 - 2.
So I would agree that no lynch twice in a row gives us more time to read.
Created:
"The researchers considered factors like genetic predisposition to smoking, smoking, and brain volume. They concluded that genetics may lead to smoking but that smoking significantly drives brain shrinkage."
Created:
Smokers literally tell their children
"You should never start smoking."
Then the question
"Why did you start smoking then?"
I even heard stories of smokers beating their children when they catch their children smoking.
And to make it even dumber, smokers often smoke in same room where their small children are, not only poisoning them but also increasing chances of addiction and health problems.
Whats even dumber is that children of smokers are more likely to be smokers themselves, but smokers still refuse to "quit smoking to decrease chances of their children smoking".
So smokers are bad.
But are they stupid?
The most common argument of smokers, when I point out that smoking is unhealthy, is them saying "There was this guy who smoked a lot and lived 100 years." and "I only smoke a little.".
The first claim is so stupid that it literally causes physical pain in my brain.
The second claim is usually a lie, because when smokers say they only smoke a little, they actually compare themselves to biggest smokers they know.
For example, if I smoke 40 smokes a day, but someone else smokes 80, then I "only smoke a little.".
If this proves anything, its that smoking literally kills some parts of your brain so in some cases you cannot even form an argument as the damage is that severe.
Created:
You can even get addicted to second hand smoke.
Created:
-->
@Tradesecret
I have informed my wife I choose to be attracted to her.
Thats great.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
We have to collectively agree to some sort of action that will likely not be the first choice of most of the people agreeing
I am kinda hoping for the two I listed, but the 3rd one would be Bullish.
So,
1. Wylted
2. Pie
3. Bullish
In that order of priority.
Created:
-->
@FishChaser
I really suggest that you watch World Conquest Zvezda Plot.
Twice if possible.
It will guide you towards the light.
Created:
-->
@FishChaser
Pedophilia is wrong because it is inherently harmful
I agree in some cases, but "harmful" and "should be punished" arent exactly one and same.
Tobacco is harmful and kills people, yet you dont see anyone saying "arrest all tobacco people".
And second-hand smoke is horrible.
There are plenty of things which are harmful.
It doesnt translate into "yeah we should really hate those people like they are our mortal enemies".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I think I already listed two.
1. Wylted
2. Pie
And in that order.
Now, I dont have a 3rd target, and I doubt I even need it given that I die by scum irrelevant of what I do this dp.
But if it wasnt for Wylted and pie, I guess the only other two options would be bullish and joe.
Created:
Posted in:
Before I start reading in detail whats been posted by now,
From my point of view, Pie and Wylted are obvious scum.
They are both making bunch of false claims, or just posting nonsense to seem active or bait lynch.
Also, Pie never even engages Wylted but is focused on engaging me and even saying nonsense that doctor isnt a confirmed town.
Well, no one has cc me with anything, and there is almost always doctor in the game, so take from that what you will.
The way I see it, if pie is so eager to defend Wylted for no reason and ignore all scummy things he says, and still come after a doctor rather than vanilla, then pie is scum and Wylted is also likely scum.
I will admit that my first targeting of pie was just to see reactions and possibly reveal scum by seeing who will jump on me.
Given that pie and Wylted were the only ones to jump on me for almost no reason other than that I am jumping on them, is a scum tell.
Also, pie keeps making up nonsense arguments, such as
"best.korea's game isnt same as previous game".
Well, maybe thats because my previous game was like a year ago, and the fact that you think my gameplay wont change during that period is quite funny, given that my debating style itself changes every month.
And Wylted is literally deflecting all over the place just to bait a lynch on someone.
This is about as scummy as scum gets, but JoeBob isnt very far from them either.
Created:
Posted in:
Since pie is not confirmed town and I am, and since pie already led 2 bad lynches where he lynched town player and exposed doctor so scum has the advantage, lets not give pie a third chance to screw up.
Notice how pie never came after Wylted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
You are refusing to make your case, but asking me to make mine.
You are just making false claims.
Also, I dont plan on answering your questions.
You already led 2 bad lynches and are probably going for the third too.
I will make this game more simple.
VTL Wylted
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Sure.
Wylted is expert who is constantly making false claims like you do and does scum slips.
JoeBob is a new player who likely makes scum slips only because he is a new player.
Now, go ahead, make your case for Wylted, if you want for my vote to go elsewhere.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
So ur willing to lynch JoeBob now?
I am a bit more willing to lynch wylted.
Created:
Posted in:
So JoeBob, Wylted and Greyparrot are all vanilla.
I guess if we are done with claiming, now comes lynching.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Oh, sorry, too many posts. Must have missed it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Well, I think you need to claim.
Unvote
VTL JoeBob
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
You are just saying lies. I never said I wont cooperate with town.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
So let me get this straight. You wouldn’t even lynch a new player in MYLO/LYLO?
We can afford one mislynch now.
Besides, there is no guarantee joe is scum.
Its not "They are scum and I am refusing to lynch them".
Its "They might be scum, they might not be scum, Wylted might be scum, you might be scum leading another charge on new players to cover yourself".
So yes, its complicated.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
And what if new players are scum? What are you going to do? Lose the game?
No, but I definitely wont jump on them in dp1 even if they are very scummy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
So if we are in lylo
Are we?
Were we also lylo in dp1?
We are most likely 5 - 2 now. We must get one of the next two lynches right, and sure, I will change my strategy but only to a point where we lynch him if he refuses to claim. Thats how much I can yield.
So your vote has no teeth.
Sure, you can say that, but I am not leading a failed lynch of a new player unless new player refuses to claim. There, happy now?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
I only agree to get claim from Joe, but not lynch him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
And going out of character for a moment, "don't target new players" is a bad policy, and it won't help them either.
Thats your opinion, and I dont plan on debating it here or changing my opinion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Why? He admitted to doing something scummy.
As I said, I dont target new players and Wylted is just as scummy.
Created:
Posted in:
But given that we lost cop and are about to lose a doctor too, I dont see why shouldnt everyone just claim before we decide to lynch.
If I am wrong, someone correct me.
Created:
Posted in:
I aint coming after Greyparrot either.
This seems more like Wylted deflecting all over the place.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Oh please.
For most people, it takes more than one game to become any good at this, let alone one dp.
I aint coming after him because its quite possible he is town and didnt realize it would make him look scum.
I dont know how many mislynches town can afford, but lynching new players is not any skill just pure guessing and hoping they arent just town being unaware of how game works here.
Created:
-->
@7000series
No. I have convinced you that you have convinced me that I have convinced myself that I suck at math.
Created:
Posted in:
I keep my vote on Wylted.
When other users come online, my role should be confirmed, and then the only choice for lynch is Wylted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I cant help but noticing that you are putting too much focus on me even after I claimed.
No one is going to cc me, and I am not voting Joe because I dont find it fun to target new players.
I noticed that people here target new players even if it costs them the game, just because new players dont fit in.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Why did you protect Bullish
It was shot in the dark. If scum target him, then I confirm he isnt scum if everyone survives.
and what is ur justification for being the doctor?
I save forest.
Created:
Posted in:
I guess the choice for lynch is obvious now.
I am doctor.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
I am vanilla
Ah, yes, the role which can be scum or town and isnt even confirmable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
Well, you dont have to vote.
You can just tell us who would you vote for, and then that person claims.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
Its up to you. Me or Wylted.
We are both at 2/4.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@JoeBob
Vote Wylted so we get a claim from him.
Also, I forgot, there are 4 votes needed to lynch, so dont vote if anyone is at 3/4.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I will claim only if and when I am at 4/5.
Even if that happens, it will be Wylted's turn next.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
@ILikePie5
@JoeBob
Help me get a claim from Wylted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
Lets first get a claim from Wylted.
If it is vanilla and his character seems made up, we have our scum.
He does tend to make up roles as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
"I AM not the big mafia boss"Implying that he is the small one.
Implying =/= saying
Created: