Total posts: 12,563
-->
@Vegasgiants
If those millions of people dont reveal their secret regarding how they do it, then I cannot solve my problem.
Created:
-->
@Vegasgiants
Okay, please explain to me how to change my sexual attraction.
Created:
I wish to change my sexual attraction. However, I cant. Not even with prayer. Being attracted to children is most definitely not my choice, but I cant change it.
Created:
Posted in:
Smart kids were favorite targets of bullies when I was a kid. It was considered that if you are smart, you are also weird and asking to be punched.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
I view intuition, vague understanding,As part of intelligence
I personally dont like when people call me smart. It makes me feel like there is something wrong with me.
Created:
-->
@IlDiavolo
It's curious to see you encourage suicide when you're supposedly a Christian.
Plenty of people in the Bible committed suicide when life became unbearable. Besides, torturing people so much is pointless.
Created:
Posted in:
The problem with IQ tests is that they make person seem smarter than person actually is. For example, being lucky and guessing the right answer has nothing to do with intelligence, but still adds to the score lmao
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
smart on Dart:Best.Korea
I am not smart. My IQ is literally below average lol
Created:
-->
@DavidAZ
criminals be killed/executed. Justice served
No. This wasnt about justice served. This was simply about helping prisoners who want to die.
Justice can never be served in society built on injustice.
Since all people are unjust, its not possible to have justice, ever.
Really, justice is just a wet dream sponsored by cartoons.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
The difference is, bullet in the head is different from other ways, such as hanging or stabbing yourself in the neck.
Bullet just makes it much easier to die, especially if high caliber.
Some people hang themselves and end up surviving even after 20 minutes of hanging.
Same goes for stabbing.
Bullet, on the other hand, gets the job done in 1 second in 99.99% of cases.
Life in prison is no joke. Try sitting in an empty room without anything for a few days. Now imagine same, but for the rest of your life.
Then imagine on top of that, being beaten and abused daily for the rest of your life.
At that point, society should at least give a person the chance to die easily and quickly.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
Why specify 'pedophiles in prison?
Well, prison is different for pedophiles. For example, a murderer usually gets respect. Pedophile usually gets abused to the point where life is simply not worth living anymore.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Would you agree that people should be able to choose death penalty?
For example, just bullet in the head for those who wish to die.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
Suicide in prison is not simple. Many try, but few succeed. The problem is that in prison you are rarely alone for long enough to commit suicide.
Even in freedom, people often fail to commit suicide, when they have more means available to them than prisoners do.
Created:
Given that some pedophiles are sentenced to 300 years of abuse in prison, death penalty seems like a relief at that point.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Well, says so on their profile, so I went with that.
Created:
Well, I only have two options:
1. Vote for republicans, who promote hate and guns
2. Vote for democrats, who promote child castration, abortions and sexual perversions
So yeah, this is one of those "bad or worse" scenarios. A person simply doesnt benefit from either option.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
No point. She is in Russia. Law doesnt apply to Russia.
I do agree that this is crazy, but anyone who chooses to follow this is evil with or without these advices.
Free speech taken too far, sure. However, I always held a stance that talking about crimes helps refute them, where punishing the talk about crimes only makes crimes hidden, not solved.
Created:
Posted in:
I use smartphone instead of a computer.
I know how to fix software issues in computers(just re install system), but same applies to smartphone and smartphone just seems much more practical than a computer.
Computers are hard to carry around. I mean, sure you can buy laptop, but smartphone and laptop arent that different.
I did use linux. There are many versions of linux. I am not sure which version is the best. They all looked somewhat similar. I like faster internet speed. The internet speed in linux seems faster than in windows. I like linux over windows.
Windows is overrated. Other than playing games, its mostly just annoying. It has plenty of viruses. Viruses are annoying. You need antivirus. Antivirus slows down computer. You need to slow down computer.
Besides, the amount of security updates on windows makes my head hurt.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
has nothing to do with anything I advocated.
You advocated for only 2 things:
1. Its okay to hurt children for innovation
2. Its okay to hurt children for freedom
Really, none of your positions make any sense, since 1. Hurting children harms future scientists, therefore harms innovation. Besides, government or citizens can fund all those innovations you mentioned directly without using porn as middle man.
2. I already explained why 2 doesnt work
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
It would stifle innovation and the energy of the internet
No, it would not.
We could formulate a similar argument, such as: people having knives in their home entails that some percentage of people will use that knife to stab someone.
Yes. Ban knives.
I could make a similar argument too:
P1. If you say it is okay to hurt children for pleasure, then you say that child porn is okay.
P2. You say it is okay to hurt children for pleasure.
C. You say that child porn is okay.
P1. If you say that it is okay to hurt children for pleasure, then you say that sex with children is okay.
P2. You say that it is okay to hurt children for pleasure.
C. You say that sex with children is okay.
There are only 2 options that you have:
1. Reducing harm is more important than freedom
2. Freedom is more important than reducing harm.
Option 2 throws you into a slippery slope where you have to legalize everything that is freedom and causes harm.
And pretty much anything else that causes "pleasure" and that harms children.
Therefore, you cannot maintain your position without legalizing everything that causes harm to children and increases pleasure.
So yes, when you pick freedom over preventing harm, you end up legalizing bunch of small harms. Bunch of small harms turn into great harm. You end up legalizing great harm.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZ
My prediction is that in about 20 years child marriages will be legal, or sexual activities with children will be decriminalized in USA.
That will happen with or without muslims, but muslims are also included in pushing to make it happen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Anyway, we can clearly see that some muslims are publicly arguing for child marriages and doing long debates about it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
People dont understand what they are saying until they put it in premise-conclusion form.
For example, his first premise would be:
"P1. If harming children allows high speed internet, then children should be harmed".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
My porn addiction started somewhere at age 10.
I saw porn at 7, but I wasnt really addicted to it until about 10.
The main problem with modern society is that they dont understand that addictions at a young age are very hard to solve. You cant compare someone who got addicted at 18 with someone who got addicted at 10. Someone who gets addicted at 10 has it much worse, as increase in porn use means decrease in social skills. 10 year old cannot really afford to decrease his social skills. 10 year old cannot afford to watch porn, for his own good. If person has bad social skills, that means more likely to be suicidal, depressed. Porn at age 10 means more likely to be suicidal, depressed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
The study I quoted shows that 10% of children see porn before age 11.
Thats 1 in 10 children.
So if its worthy to harm 1 in 10 children over this, then we might be more corrupt than we previously thought we were.
However, about 50% of them sees porn before 13.
I agree that children have sexual desires. However, if we make an argument that porn solves those desires, then we are making an argument that children should be allowed and encouraged even to watch porn.
As long as society holds position that porn is harmful for children, society cannot justify giving children porn. Making porn easily available to children means giving children porn. Society cannot justify making porn easily available.
I agree that there are some benefits in orgasms, but the downsides are worse. Sure, orgasms might make you smart. But they also make you more depressed and suicidal. Western society, filled with porn and perversions, is the most suicidal society as a group.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
The modern high speed internet, with streaming video, 3d graphics, and so on, may not exist without pornography
Hurting children so that you can have faster internet is a good argument, but irrelevant given that removing porn will not remove faster internet lmao
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Debate from "Modern debate" that deals with the topic of defense of Muhammad and minor marriages in general.
I know its 2 hours long, but watching the first 40 minutes is enough to understand Daniel's point of view.
Daniel is a muslim debater who often crushes his opponents badly.
Created:
You see the difference? Democrats are fundamentally better people than Republicans
Better does not mean good, contrary to the popular belief.
Created:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
child drag shows (even giving an example) where you can find them acting no different than some strippers
Its called lowering the bar.
You know, slowly adapting people to accept something.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
If you listened to the words and not just the chorus, the message is that they're coming for your children and will convert them into caring adults who believe in equality and justice for all.
Equality for all means equality for minor attracted people.
Created:
Posted in:
When talking about things regarding future:
For example,
If causing homosexuality to be illegal harms people, then homosexuality should not be illegal.
Causing homosexuality to be illegal harms people.
Homosexuality should not be illegal.
Created:
Posted in:
Do you like conditional syllogism?
It is very simple form of logic, and its also cute.
Let me give you an example.
If it rains today, then I will bring an umbrella.
It rains today.
I will bring an umbrella.
Let me give you another example
If prices went up, I will buy less.
Prices went up.
I will buy less.
Or in the form of an argument
If gay people arent harming anyone, then gay people should not be harmed.
Gay people arent harming anyone.
Gay people should not be harmed.
So it is simple despite the complicated name.
Conditional syllogism is useful in an argument, as it lets you establish a link between two sentences.
If sentence 1 is true, then sentence 2 is true.
Sentence 1 is true.
Sentence 2 is true.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
It is better if:
Every individual is possibly gay.
All people are individuals.
All people are possibly gay.
Or
All people are possibly gay.
All individuals are people.
All individuals are possibly gay.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Best.Korea,YOUR FOOLISH QUOTE WHERE YOU ASSUME I'M A TROLL: "He has a unique style of trolling. I hope he doesnt get himself permanently banned because of it. This site needs him."First of all, as I have said COUNTLESS TIMES before, my job is to make bible-stupid christians the fools that they are!For you to assume I am a troll is PRICELESS COMEDY at its best! So at your embarrassing expense again, why don't you show the membership how stupid you are.Ready, BEGIN:NEXT MEMBER LIKE BEST.KOREA WHO CHOOSES TO ADDRESS ME AS "TROLL" WILL BE ...?
I will miss that.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Gay is possible.All people are possibleAll people are possibly gay.
Thats not a proper form.
You are going with
X includes Z
X includes Y
I includes Y
The conclusion doesnt logically follow.
It has to be in one of these forms:
X includes Y
Y includes Z
Therefore,
X includes Z
Or
Y includes Z
X includes Y
X includes Z
Created:
-->
@Savant
I understand that problems could arise if premise is false or easily disproven, or if you are forced to go off topic to defend it. But thats what usually happens in debates anyway.
However, categorical syllogisms are important, so I wanted to start with them.
Created:
Posted in:
He has a unique style of trolling. I hope he doesnt get himself permanently banned because of it. This site needs him.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
How rude.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Do you agree that people should be called the way they want to be called?
Created:
In the form of including, it goes:
Living beings include animals.
Animals include cats.
Therefore, living beings include cats.
Or in another form
Animals include cats.
Living beings include animals.
Living beings include cats.
Created:
Who likes categorical syllogism?
I sure do.
Now, dont be scared by the name "categorical syllogism".
Its actually not scary, but very simple form of logic.
Let me give you an example.
All cats are animals.
All animals eat food.
Therefore, all cats eat food.
Simple, isnt it?
Its like math:
X = Y
Y = Z
Therefore
X = Z
Or in a different form:
X = Y
Z = X
Z = Y
In the argument form, it goes like:
All people deserve human rights.
All gays are people.
All gays deserve human rights.
Or in another form:
All gays are people.
All people deserve human rights.
All gays deserve human rights.
And that is categorical syllogism form of argument.
Created:
-->
@sadolite
Now the term "minor attracted" is being replacing pedophile
Pedophile is an ugly word.
Minor attracted person isnt an ugly word.
Lets look at these two sentences:
"Look at that pedophile over there"
"Look at that minor attracted person over there"
Sentence 1 is very insulting. Sentence 2 not so much.
LGBT started an ideology that says how people should be called the way they want to be called.
Minor attracted persons want to be called minor attracted persons.
Or map, if hard to remember.
Created:
Apparently, the belief that children can choose their gender doesnt always prove to be correct.
Created:
Trans grooming is starting to turn against trans itself, with that against LGBT as a whole.
Created:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
Created:
-->
@TheMorningsStar
child "drag star" that essentially participates in non-nude stripping (which is already still recognized as pornographic and sexual in nature) in front of grown men.
Well, are you saying that child shouldnt do non-nude stripping in front of grown men?
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
In other words team backlash is trying to put pedophiles in the LGBT boat because they think it will sink after they do that. Maybe, but if it still floats... now there are pedophiles in the boat
Yes. People need to understand that if LGBT need to accept pedophiles to justify LGBT position, then LGBT will accept pedophiles to justify LGBT position.
LGBT is being pushed to go in that direction.
Created: