Total posts: 12,563
Posted in:
Yemen, Syria, Somalia, Niger.
So why isnt USA under sanctions by the international community? 🤔
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Sorry, forgot to make it dumb so that you can understand 😊
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
What ever happened to "live and let live", what happened to "mind your own business", what happened to "you do your thing and I'll do mine".
That ended when you circumcised me 😀 and forced me to get vaccinated 😀 and then tried to force your ideology on me 😀 where misgendering gets me fired 😀 plus you kinda meddle in everyone's life and then complain when others meddle in yours 😀 You do realize that you cant raise a child without meddling in child's life, so your ideology of "non-meddling" is nonsense along with your castration ideology 😀.
Created:
Although, in the era of porn and all sort of nonsense, not really sure if seeing breasts alone is good enough.
Created:
-->
@Kaitlyn
For example, there are some guys who attend women's rallies (particularly the bra-burning or slutwalk ones) just so see women's breasts.
Yes. Breasts are good to look at.
Created:
Oh no, where are the puppies
Created:
Posted in:
weirdo
No. Right now, I identify as "puppy". Please use correct pronouns and refer to me as "puppy".
Created:
Posted in:
That’s coming from a guy who has R-18 Anime all over the walls of his bedroom
Ouch.
Created:
Posted in:
You’re making that up. I never guessed your bra size did I? I just expressed concern that you may be flat chested.
Yeah, how very caring of you.
Created:
The punishment for rape used to be marriage. No idea why they changed that.
Some women are not even capable of telling the difference between rape and sex, and some run around with false claims.
Created:
@Iwannarosevelt
So a woman can call a man a rapist if he raped her, even if she can’t prove it in court.
A woman can call a man a rapist even if he didnt rape her, even if she cant prove it in court that he did.
And calling someone a liar, when they are telling the truth, is defamatory
And calling someone a rapist when he isnt... is also defamatory.
Get it? No? Okay.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
So her defamation case will be a failure. Case closed.
Created:
-->
@sadolite
nothing will ever be your own damn fault
Well, sadly, yes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
Its not really that complex, but okay.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
Why not have a third sports category open to anyone without discrimination and get trans women out of women's sports?
Well, that would be ideologically difficult.
If we say that they are women, then it is hard to get them out of women's sports.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@b9_ntt
There are levels of abominations. Not every abomination is same.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I mean, if he is able to prove he didn't do it, sure.Â
He doesnt need to prove that he didnt do it.
She needs to prove that he did.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Yeah, it would be better if he was charged with the rape.
Sounds like you ignore the fact that there was no proof for rape? Nice.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I believe Trump should sue her for defamation now.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I mean, I personally have heard him say that as a wealthy man he can sexually assault women.
If you mean "grab them by the pussy" video, then no. Nobody asks a woman "can I grab you by the pussy?". That dude would not reproduce.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Well, that clears it up.
So a woman can call a man a rapist, and that is not defamation? But calling her a dirty liar is?
Nice.
Created:
So if he says that he didnt rape her, he is sued for defamation?
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
America has done shitty things.
Well, good that you admit that both Russia and US are bad. Now move on, talk about what you want.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
your topic is still unrelated and has no impact on what we were talking about
Doesnt change the fact that you havent refuted it. If you cant refute it, you might as well admit its true so we move on.
Created:
Posted in:
@iwannaroose
this is how conservatives think
No. This is how I think. Most conservatives would disagree, I believe.
Created:
Posted in:
@Iwantroosevelt
Ok, you seem to have issues with women.
No. I have issues with people thinking women are equal or above men, when they are not.
Created:
Posted in:
Now what about women who yell at their co-workers? Is that sexist too?
No. Usually, when a woman yells, you have to apologize for being yelled at.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
That's like saying you are trying to "cure" people of being black.
No. Those 2 are not equal. Being black is not the same as being homosexual. Most black guys dont go around to have sex with other men, I hope so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
So i'm just going to hope you're a troll and not the monster your comments describe.Â
Not really sure why you bother talking to me then. I am pretty sure there are plenty of people on this site who will tell you pretty stories about princesses and other shit. Like, I give 0 fucks about your feelings, and reading my comments will never make you feel better.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
ok, so you are definitely a monster.
No, I identify as a puppy today.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
You seem to be on about some nonsense about relations and how we should talk about things that you like.
Still, nothing you said refuted my arguments or was relevant to them, so I will consider them unchallenged for now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Implying that it is not ok to be the person you were born is an ridiculous level of bigotry.
Nice ideology. Except when someone is born homosexual, we try to cure it and surpress it.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
so your argument is what exactly? That you recognize that Russia is doing something horrible, but since the US did bad things we should just let Ukraine be conquered?
No. I believe my argument doesnt say anywhere "US bad, so it okay".
My argument supports our logical inconsistency: where when NATO does bad = it okay, but when Russia bad = we mad.
I am not really sure how could you miss my argument, when I pointed it out clearly.Â
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You are trying to talk sense into a gay. Its not possible.
How can a gay understand that it is unappropriate to indoctrinate children into "gay is okay" ideology?
Created:
Posted in:
Even women have told me that men shouldnt be nice to women. Women dont care about men being "nice", but about men being respected by others and having money to provide for family.
If society respects you, women will be more attracted to you.
There is no exact science about how woman's brain works, but being respected will attract more women than being nice, so try to get respected and approved by others if you are into that shit.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
I mean, he screams at female co-workers to the point he needs to be sent home for the day. He calls female colleagues from a burner phone to send them threatening texts when they get the job he wants. And these are just the ones that get reported publicly. This isn't some poor guy who has said one or two stupid things. This guy has a long history of being a sexist jerk.Â
Yeah, screaming is wrong. But its not like you can talk to a woman without screaming at her. Being nice to women is a path to failure.
Created:
And the military industry that feeds on war.
Created:
We dont need logic when we have love.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
They have invaded a neighbor
Yes. Russia needs to pay for its illegal invasion of Iraq, I mean Ukraine.
Unlike NATO.
NATO invaded Libya and killed lots of people there.
But its okay because no one cares when NATO does the war.
Why should we try to be logically consistent?
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Therefore nothing that does not exist has rights.
No. Future generations exist unless you destroy them. There is no going around this. If I destroyed you in the womb, you wouldnt exist now. Your liberty, and life, would be destroyed.Â
No. The moment I existed is the moment the potential was realized.
'No" sounds like great denial of reality, but whatever.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
No liberty is denied if no future generation exists.
Future generations exist unless you destroy them in the present. Simple really.
Potential has no rights? So rights are only given to those you choose? Werent you also the potential?
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
What is the difference between life and death when in the end death is the outcome?
The death is the opposite of life. While it is true that life also results in death, it is also true that the result of "life and death" is not the same as the result of "just death and without life". We value life, not death. Therefore, the first option is better in results for us, since only the first option gives life.
The difference is the fact of existence.
Existence, you mean in the present? So I can destroy your future liberty, but not your present liberty? The results of both are same. If you value liberty, why only value it in the present but not in the future? Why deny the future generations of their liberty? If you only value liberty of present generations, then the liberty is a privilege, not a right.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Yes. Just use some text program to write an argument, then copy paste it in debate.
I used to type directly on dart debates, but the risk is too great. Plenty of things can happen: page reload, exiting page on accident, or phone malfunction.
This is especially so because on phones its very easy to close page accidentally, especially when you are switching between pages which you have to do to copy links.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
 I define killing as the act of ending the life of an organism or functional system. If you define it as not acting to create an organism or functional system we are not talking about the same thing.
And what is the difference between ending and not creating, when their results are the same?Â
which is the greater crime: To rape an unwilling woman on a deserted island or to kill all the children you could have?
Killing all the children you could have is a greater crime. We could use an example that the man and woman are last humans on Earth. If they are unwilling to reproduce, humanity ends there. If they reproduce by force, some liberty is violated but humanity continues to exist and their children get the liberty and life.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
potential children are not children
Potential children are children. Every one of us was a "potential child" and then also a child.
Without these "potential children", there are no children nor adults nor humanity.
No one else has a right to someone's labor
Without someone else's labor, we dont have our liberty. So what you are saying is that liberty is not a right.
It is an entirely different moral circumstance to kill someone without their consent.
When a person commits suicide, he is also killing own children without their consent. Not having children is the same as killing them. That person probably could have had children, but decided not to. So really, if I can only have liberty under the condition that my parents provide it, and if my parents have right to take away my liberty by aborting me or starving me, then my liberty only exists if my parents dont use their liberty to destroy mine. So when liberty gives you the right to destroy liberty, it all falls apart.
Created: