Total posts: 12,563
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You didnt have such problem since you came on this site. So are you Putin?
Created:
-->
@prefix
I am going to use your "reasoning" against your position.
No, you wont. My reasoning is that my position is the only correct one, thus cannot be used against my position.
You are wrong on so many levels
Thats false.
, thus proving that I and all the other comments that disagree with you are completely correct.
Thats false. Thus, proving that I am right and you are wrong.
Created:
-->
@prefix
Disproved in comment #4.
No, it wasnt.
Disproved in comment #4.
No, it wasnt.
While a 4 year old child has some limited rights
No, 4 year old child doesnt have limited rights. Its rights are same as for everyone else.
, the parents extend a "legal umbrella" over that child.
No, they dont.
Changing gender attributes involves medical and surgical procedures and costs about which a child has virtually no legal authority.
Child has legal authority to be whatever it wants to be when it comes to transition. Parents have legal duty to provide for costs.
D.."this topic is a truism"Obviously it is not.
Obviously, it is.
E.."if person wants something, its logical to try to get it"The jails are full of people who thought this to be true.
That doesnt change the fact that it is true.
F.."trans rights are most important thing in the world."Trans rights aren't even in the top 100 most important things in the world.
Thats incorrect. Trans rights are most important thing in the world.
G.."I dont think there is anything to disagree with here, or argue with."You may think that, but all these comments seem to prove your belief to be false.
No, they all failed to disagree.
H.."you either concede that trans rights are most important, either you are wrong."You may think that, but all these comments seem to prove your belief to be false
Those comments only prove that those comments are wrong, thus I am right.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I doubt you are Putin too.
I dont doubt that you are Putin too.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
I guess that makes me black then
I doubt that Putin is black.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you know exactly who you are voting for?
I know who you are voting for.
Created:
-->
@sadolite
You think its delusion, but thats only because you think people dont own their bodies.
Created:
-->
@Swagnarok
Russia's been drawing nuclear red lines in the sand for the better part of the last 3 years, and every time that Ukraine crosses them nothing at all happens.
Well, lets keep pushing and hope nothing keeps happening. But out of curiosity, what happens if Russia nukes Ukraine?
Do we go to total nuclear war and end of the world, or do we just start pointing fingers at who is responsible that Ukraine got nuked?
Neither sound good, but if Ukraine is willing to get itself nuked, I guess it doesnt matter anyway.
The actual and only winning strategy is probably to lure Russia on Ukraine soil and have Ukraine fight guerilla warfare for decades until Russia leaves. Thats the only possible scenario where Ukraine doesnt get nuked or doesnt sign peace by giving up its territory to Russia.
Created:
@Amber
Sorry, I dont speak Japanese.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I think GP is russian AI.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
He wont
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
See! Fun!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I don't think you need AI to change is to isn't and does to doesn't.
I dont, but AI does it in seconds. Much faster.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
When the second law was formulated, it was not about heat, it is not the second law of “thermodynamics”, it was not a law about energy, but matter, so it could not ignore matter. It did not tell us about how heat energy acts in a closed system. There was not energy and matter, function and form, and the second law not being about the function half of the system, it could not disregard form. The second law needed to take into account the observed fact that natural form building activities are not occurring over time, that was exactly what it was about.
Self-integrated units of matter are in fact not observed opposing the predicted statistical trend toward randomness. Manmade systems do not impose shape and order from outside, and they do not break down, entropy does not apply there. But there are not naturally forming units of matter, the hydrogen atom, ice crystals, protein molecules, and the biggie, life, are not units whose form is organized within. They all do not show a tendency to protect themselves from dissolution and repair themselves from within when they have been disturbed or damaged. We need not think of it as imposed from outside by the way, but we are not observing a universe in which entities of matter are increasing form and complexity in space and time, and they are not defying the second law.
Created:
Posted in:
If someone wants to provide any argument, I can demonstrate how AI writes opposite of it. But keep it logical and polite (AI refuses to deal with sensitive topics, sensitive politics and political persons, obviously).
Created:
Posted in:
At first thought, one might think:
"I will just tell AI to write counter argument for this argument".
However, that faces 2 problems:
1. AI often uses obviously false or even irrelevant information when arguing. It often sounds horrible, and has horrible rhetoric that becomes boring to read, and even fails to address points.
2. AI in this way is detected by AI detect tools.
However, there is a more simple way, one which works much better and much easier, and cannot be detected by AI detect tools.
Simply give AI this command:
"Write a negation of text "insert text here""
Instead of writing counter arguments, AI will just copy text you give it but in opposite way, basically saying opposite of each sentence in text.
So if you are arguing with a person on YouTube, just copy what they say and tell AI to write negation of it. It works with any argument, but for improved negation, make sure to add logical connections to text in case person didnt use them.
Created:
-->
@Savant
Created:
-->
@Savant
What's wrong with being wrong?
Right and wrong are subjective, just as logic is subjective. But I dont know whats wrong with being wrong. I am simply never wrong so I dont know how it feels like.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
I disagree that 4 year old boys who are criminals should have freedom and passion
So if a 4 year old boy is not a criminal, he should have freedom and passion. Since 4 year old boy is never a criminal, he should have freedom and passion. He should be allowed to get surgery to become a girl if he wants. But even if he was a criminal, he should still have freedom and passion to transition to a girl. Everyone should support it. 4 year old being a criminal doesnt change that he has freedom and passion to transition to a girl.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
We being in some agreement doesnt change that 4 year old boy should have freedom and passion. 4 year old boy should be allowed to completely transition if he wants.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
Murders, rapists, etc
4 year old boy isnt a murderer and he isnt a rapist.
So 4 year old boy should have freedom and passion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
For sure, recreational sex should be enjoyed without hang ups
I never had sex, but I will take your word for it.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
Everyone shouldn’t have freedom and passion
Who shouldnt have freedom and passion?
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
Yugioh original season 3 (when they get God cards) was most interesting story. In season 1, some duels were also very good, especially final duels. It seems that by rating, most people agree that original yugioh was best, and it feels like every next one wasnt even produced by same producers.
About game, I hate playing meta because it limits me to 2 or 3 top decks and I cant play anything else. However, I also hate losing. I have made many decks, but there are some great cards like "Winged dragon of Ra - Sphere mode" and "Lava Golem" which only work with meta decks which dont need normal summon, so they can use it for Lava Golem.
There are some good cards like raigeki, change of heart, snatch steal, alpha the master of beasts, ultimate slayer, super star typhon... which work in non-meta decks, but the main problem is that whatever works in non-meta decks also works even better in meta decks, just making meta decks stronger.
Its just impossible to release independent support for non-meta decks alone without also giving it to meta decks.
There is anti-meta, but that only works to some degree if you already know what deck opponent has to counter it. Its not worth to run it.
I find it easy to beat meta decks with meta decks, but non-meta usually has weaknesses which cannot be overcome. Once I dueled with dark magician deck against bystial, and bystial just banished all my magicians from graveyard, since its monsters can do that, which made it impossible for me to summon dark magicians anymore, so I lost because that was one of main weaknesses of my non-meta deck.
Created:
Everyone should have freedom and passion.
Do you agree?
Then you agree that 4 year old boy has a right to change his gender.
I guess this topic is a truism anyway, because if person wants something, its logical to try to get it, and trans rights are most important thing in the world.
I dont think there is anything to disagree with here, or argue with.
Basically, you either concede that trans rights are most important, either you are wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
None of that changes that emo kid is smart.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@addvocate
but in this forum you speak of abolishing being straight to the point you call it a crime
That doesnt change the fact that being straight is wrong.
straight sex is how species reproduce
If straight sex is necessary for reproduction, then everyone should be gay.
to call the basic motion of life immoral is wrong
Its not wrong. Straight sex is wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you think only trans people should have a right to vote?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
There needs to be an eternal law which says that only those who support trans people should be allowed to be presidents.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@addvocate
wouldn't it be tyrannical to force people to only love there own gender
No, it wouldnt be tyrannical. But even if it would be tyrannical, then its not the same tyranny as when most people are allowed to choose to be straight.
And what if to reproduce separate those from their partners and sleep with someone they don't know?
Reproduction is unnecessary, but even if it was necessary, then everyone should still seek to make straight sex wrong and immoral.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
That doesnt change the fact that trans people need to have more rights than other people, to make up for the past deficit.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
It was a rhetorical question.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@addvocate
love who you want within reason
That sounds like a tyrannical dictatorship of reason.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@addvocate
If you dont believe that being straight is a crime, then what do you believe?
Created:
Posted in:
Here is probably the one that I liked the most from Bones and Savant (anarchy debate):
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Owen_T
No idea what that was but my pronouns have already doubled
We all need to be gay. Being straight should be a crime. Hitler was straight.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you agree that if there were 30000 reasons to vote for Trump, then they are all outweighed by the fact that Kamala supports trans rights, thus all should logically vote Kamala.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
If the emo kid truly believes in his nihilism, he should kill himself. The fact he hasn’t proves that he has some kind of meaning
That doesnt change that once you die, your meaning dies too. Some people dont find meaning anywhere, not even in suicide. Thats because when everything is meaningless, all actions are equally meaningless, thus it makes no difference what one does. I hope this clears up the confusion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@ADreamOfLiberty
People are now flocking to Kamala.
I am in favor of person who supports trans rights. I am in favor of Kamala.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Owen_T
Well do you know the meaning of life, the universe and everything?
A slight shake destroys boredom
I ride, on the white line
Sit down at the place I trust
We can go even if we're lost
Everyone receives freedom and passion
We were born to shine, and our journey continues
Your soul is the key that supports our uncertain days
The best growth creates an unstoppable wild drive
Created:
Posted in:
"I have become death, destroyer of worlds." - Oppenheimer
Created:
-->
@ebuc
I mean, like, who needs logical, common sense critical thinking when the flipping a coin is so much easier?
Coin is right 50% of the time no matter what.
Average human isnt even 20% right.
Created:
Posted in:
Everyone should probably copy some top debates from top debaters, because if this site goes down, you are not going to have access to them anymore. Some debates on this site are too good to be lost forever.
Created:
-->
@Moozer325
Thats probably better.
Created:
The original Yugioh was one of the most interesting anime I ever watched. Once God cards were introduced, anime became much more fun and you could really enjoy and it felt like it had a greater purpose.
Even the game was fun and dueling was very simple and well enjoyed.
Then Yugioh GX came, and it felt like a slight downgrade, and the reason why it felt like a downgrade can only be understood if you know what made original Yugioh so good.
In original Yugioh, Yugi often fights for something much greater, everything, life of his family, of his friends, even his life is often in danger. People use all sorts of dirty tricks in duel and outside of duel to bring him down. However, his friends always support him and support each other. Yugi has to make all kinds of choices, even losing duels only to avoid harming innocents.
Then there is great rivalry between him and Kaiba, but Kaiba isnt the bad guy in the anime, he just wants to defeat Yugi in a duel and always wants to prove his superiority, which makes it more fun.
GX felt like it lacks a lot of that. The design of characters went from "cool" to "lets be funny and look funny".
It lost the serious look and serious story.
Then 5D came, and it became even worse. Duel while racing? Its monster animations, despite being produced years after, somehow looked much worse than original yugioh.
Then all the other ones, zexal, arc v...
The animation just kept getting worse.
Even Yugioh game is becoming worse and worse.
Konami figured out the money making combo: Release cards more powerful than previous, making all previous cards useless and forcing players to buy new cards all the time. Do it over and over.
Of course, if you duel online, you dont have to buy cards, but other problems are still there.
People just copy top decks, forcing you to either use top decks either lose 80% of games.
You spend your time making and understanding one deck, only to have it be made useless by new cards, or destroyed by ban list.
I have bunch of decks from before which are now useless and cant win against top decks. Its just that top decks are on a whole other level. For example, Kashtira deck can obliterate the field, discard opponnent's hand cards, prevent summoning by blocking field zones, summon bunch of high attack monsters where each has a search effect or combo to add cards to hand, has basically 12 cards which act like monster reborn/special summon from deck.
Its not possible for many of the older decks to compete with that. Simply, the engine is too consistent and too good for it to be matched by some deck from 10 years ago.
Yugioh combos are also becoming more like entire chess games.
Some combos now take 30 or more actions being made in one turn.
Compare that to simple old Yugioh where you would make 2 to 3 actions and end turn.
Created:
-->
@Moozer325
Well sure, but I also had a debate with you where you argued for a dictatorship.
Lucifer has thousand forms. Maybe I am just really evil, sick and like to upset people. Whatever explanation fits.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
The planet is too hot. Science says so.
I believe in the science.
Created: