Total posts: 10,910
-->
@Greyparrot
Yeah but what about the justification copy/pasta part?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I misread the pm and then was copy-pasting the justification and missed what you said before
You copied and pasted the justification, not paraphrased it? You mean in this post?
Also when did you realize it was about investigators and not visitors?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I don't mind dying since my role isn't much utility for town.
If your town, dying might even be more pro-town in your case. If anyone claims an investigator ability and you flipped town, they would be sus.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Well why else would pie pick electrician for town?
It's just interesting you jumped to the conclusion it was whiteflame, rather than another scum.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Plus pretty sure WF had a investigate thinghy from his fish ability, which means I am doubly useless for town
How do you know that?
Created:
-->
@Bullish
How he said his role works today is what it says on the wiki. So he's not lying right now. I think he can be careless both as town and scum but more likely town.
Whats your top scum read right now? Thoughts on speed? He was early on the whiteflame lynch but he didn't have the most substance for it either.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
Do you think greyparrots lack of bringing up his role working for investigators is a town slip or a scum slip?
Created:
So prior to the start of the game I was trying to convince pie to start with 11 so we didn't have to wait so long, I brought up how 11 players games are that wierd spot where 3 mafia is kind of balanced, but sometimes more mafia sided. He said he aims for designing games that give town three mislynches. I wonder if that accounts for the vig, and mikals roles? I am not sure if he went with three mafia here, or 2 and a third party.
Pie's history of games with over 11 players:
Narcos: 12 players, 3 mafia - Allows for four mislynches
13 reasons: 12 players, 3 mafia - Allows for four mislynches
Civil War generals: 12 players, 3 mafia (1 semi vig role with SA's bookie) Allows for four mislynches (3 if vig works)
Legend of Zelda: 11 Players, 2 mafia, 1 third party (1 semi vig role with Lunas Avenger) Allows for 5 mislynches (4 if vig works)
So I definitely think he accounts (and overestimates) lynchable and killing roles like mine and mikal work. Probably counts them into the math relatively. Also this game was originally desinged around 12 players. Given legend of zelda, I don't think it's a stretch to assume 3 scum. Could be 2 and a third, which would suck, but oh well.
Created:
-->
@warren42
He was still arguing with me about why I should be lynched if WF was town on the very last page
Created:
-->
@Vader
@WaterPhoenix
Any results before we lynch GP?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I misread the pm and then was copy-pasting the justification and missed what you said before
You copied and pasted the justification, not paraphrased it? You mean in this post?
Also when did you realize it was about investigators and not visitors?
Created:
-->
@warren42
I'm not gonna read into it because I have trouble reading into anything water does, but I think that if anything that'd be scummier. Most players would have been getting on the whiteflame lynch or distancing themselves from whiteflame, but I don't assume water behaves like most other players, I think that he'd be defending a partner there
Even after the hammer?
Created:
-->
@warren42
I actually provided some input at the end of the day phase. I still don't particularly like GP given it breaks his meta. If he's town then I'm happy I'm wrong but this feels like something I want to pursue until I am actually proved wrong. How many times have you not seen him claim instantly as town?
Maybe once? But I can't remember the game and I could be wrong. I feel like it was his next game after my recycled roles game where he was caught as scum right after. I specifically remember the topic being brought up again and him saying that he was going to stop doing it because people didn't like him instantly claiming. I distinctly remember this conversation, however can't find it anywhere. I got bored of looking for it the other day. Regardless, he did go back to dp1 full claiming afterwards. So yeah I still find it sus, though I really don't like the logic in general.
What I am more concerned about with him is, GP repeatedly used the word "visiting" instead of "investigating" all of last dp. Also the clarification after the fact and in mid conversation I brought up how his role was different from the MU version, and he didn't say anything, but is now clarifying it is the same...
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I misspoke when I said "visit," my role only works when being specifically investigated, which means it's likely scum has an investigate ability (or had if one of the fisher abilities from WF was to investigate)... maybe town has one too who knows.It's essentially the same as this.I know the wiki page says it's a scum role, but I am town.
Woah, woah, woah. Why didn't you say anything when I said your role was different from the mafiascum version here? You responded to me right after but didn't clarify that it was indeed the same role...
Secondly you spent the whole day phase referring to it as an investigation, not a visit. Repeatedly saying that mafia has a visiting role. You never once called it an investigation role. Why is that?
Created:
-->
@Speedrace
Isn't that around the time he started playing again?
he's always been around. Usually breaks for a game or two but yeah. he was in croc's game not too long before that
The only revealed role so far that I've heard of is Strengthener and my own role. I've never heard of any of the others
You've never heard of vig? lol jk. Yeah I am not opposed to believing it's a role pie experimented with. But it essentially functions the exact same way as a gramps from my understanding of what grey has said
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I am the electrician able to see anyone who visits me whether it is scum or town. my justification is because my representative is big in the energy field.
Do you just get the name of a visitor or are you told their affiliation? Do ninjas effect your results?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Created:
-->
@Speedrace
Makes sense. I think I'm townreading Grey also because he's sheeping you like he usually does as town
I definitely don't town read him for that lol. He only recently started that in your MCU weapons game. That said, I am still suspicious that he didn't immediately claim when he said himself it was his town meta. Also Pie has been in games with the gramps role, and grey's role functions just like a gramps. I think it's weird he wouldn't just call him a gramps instead of an electrician. Also whiteflame was the first to immediately unvote grey after he claimed. Idk how I feel about grey yet, but we can circle back to him later.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
I seems our reads are very aligned, although for once I would have preferred if you didn't shoot.
Hitting essentially the doc sucks. I wouldn't have fired if we mislynched yesterday. I didn't get any vibes from chris that he was a power role though. Also he is kind of a weak doc so it doesn't hurt us too bad, still sucks though.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I am guessing you saw no one visit you last night?
Created:
-->
@warren42
vtl warren for a claim, activity, reads, anything. I think of the remaining players we have the least substance from him. I already know he wasn't told of the game, but regardless, he knows of it now, and I'd like to see some activity.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Who were elminster's scumreads?
"I think I'll be looking at speed / water / and warren tomorrow"
Created:
-->
@Speedrace
Everyone else is null. Water is slightly sus for defending whiteflame but he would do that as town. Bullish, warren, and Supa have all been too inactive for me to say anything about them
Water was still defending him even as whiteflame was pretty close to being lynched though, so I think that makes him look town. Because if he had inside knowledge and knew whiteflame was scum, he wouldn't have been telling town to scum read me if it was a mislynch. It seems to show he didn't have inside info and was genuinely concerned we were mislynchign whiteflame I think.
Created:
Claimed
Drafterman - ???? - Strengthener
Lunatic - Lauren Boebert - 1x Vig
Bullish - From Florida/Not GOP
Chris - Democrat
Greyparrot - Harold Rogers - Self-Watcher
Unclaimed
Supa
Speed
Warren
WaterPhoenix
Created:
Waterphoenix is hard town to me right now, based on his comments about scum reading me expecting whiteflame to flip town. I feel like if he was scum then he would feel like saying that would make him look bad. The argument that "Leading a mislynch" means you should be the next lynch prima facia is kind of dumb, but if he had inside knowledge I just don't see him saying that.
Created:
-->
@drafterman
With elminster dead, are you planning on playing out the game or are you still pissed about the mod stuff?
Created:
I ruthlessly murdered misterchris.
Here's why:
1. We could afford a mislynch if I fvcked up.
2. He's been really inactive
3. His initial joke vote with whiteflame felt forced, and not authentic. His overall interactions with whiteflame were to defend him early on but it didn't take much for him to switch to whiteflame at the end.
4. I thought he scum slipped here when he said "While I agree his posts haven't been super substantial & he comes off pretty whiny when defending himself, it fits his town meta (Ofc, that doesn't mean much as he's good at appearing town as scum)". I don't know what he meant by that, because whiteflame hasn't really been scum all that much and the couple times he has he scum slipped monumentally or the game ended very early. So it seemed like BS justification for letting himself change his stance on whiteflame so as not to appear scummy for not being on the wagon in the chance whiteflame was lynched and flipped scum.
RIP misterchris.
Created:
-->
@WaterPhoenix
Why does that matter? Lol
Created:
-->
@MisterChris
Yeah im waving tonight
Created:
-->
@WaterPhoenix
i honestly don't think whiteflame is scum. if you guys lynch him and he flips town i advise to lynch lunatic next dp. i'm going to sleep now, wasn't very active today, i'll be much more active tomorrow hopefully.
lol why am I the only one culpable if he flips town? I single handedly gave the most reason for lynching him of anyone on the wagon.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
Lol I didn't want to bring this up, but it is you who needs to go back to school -- the amount of times you've used "your" in place of "you're" is physically hurting me.
yeah ima keep doing it to piss you off, in fact ill miskepll errything frum now un cunt
Created:
-->
@Bullish
Although the way lunatic was pushing him this game was pretty bad. Lunatic said he didn't call whiteflames post "contradictory" even though he literally used the word "contradictory" in the post where he called out whiteflame.
Bruh you just skim and dont read anything I post than talk shit lol I called out extensively for like 2 days why I think whiteflame is scum.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
Does your role justification draw on recent events?
Kinda
Created:
-->
@Bullish
Are you trolling? drafter's entire role is about interactions between other people's roles. Can u imagine if pie sent drafter a role PM and was like "you are the strengthener, but I can't tell you what it does cause that's against my modding policy lulz"
Are you trolling? You make 0 sense. My role isn't all that hard to understand. Poorly designed yes, but not that complicated. Go back to school nerd
Created:
-->
@Bullish
You are making no fucking sense bruh, up to that point drafter was confuse, I was confused, whiteflame was confused, and speed was confused. Your obliviousness of how confusingly you've presented yourself, and your convoluted analysis on drafter's motivations make no sense at all. This reminds me of a game played in early 2020 where you and drafter had extensive in-game bickering and your turned out to be scum.
If you are confused, talk to pie. Again I've literally copy and pasted all the mechanics that people have asked me about when I ask pie a question.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
That message only describes how your role works in a small subset of all ways that the night actions can play out, so no, you haven't explained what I wanted to know. I'm over here reading page 13 and people are still confused about how your role works. Idk how you can possibly at that point blame drafter for not knowing how your role works.
Who are these "people", all I see is you fam.
Also I can literally ask the mod any question you have about my role, so ask.
Created:
-->
@Bullish
attempt to over complicate the strengthener/vig dynamicNo, more than 2 people are confused about this and it stems from the way YOU have presented how your role works.
I have literally copied and pasted the messages pie has sent me regarding the mechanics of how my role work, and I think your the only one still confused mate.
Created:
-->
@Elminster
If you were hypothetically strengthened a roleblock would not stop you
Created:
-->
@Speedrace
@Elminster
I think I'm pretty settled on whiteflame.Agreed
Agreed
Created:
-->
@Elminster
Pies Response - Can't talk about roles other than your ownI want you to ask pie this and copy paste it"If I was enabled, would a roleblock still stop me"
I asked him, though that is very similar to my other question of "Would the STRENGTHENER role allow other roles to succeed even if that player is killed that night?"
But maybe since I am asking in reference to me personally he would answer? Idk I guess we will see.
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
YOU have the power the re-rail a wagon wherever you see fit. Be a leader, and steer us back if you think we're on the wrong path.And we've previously established that I'm shit at doing that. It's one of the major problems with my play. One of these days, that might change. This was not that time.
I am bad at it too, but I still try. I am not FourTrouble, Raisor, or Yraelz, but I know nothing gets done if you don't try. If your objective is to win, it's what is neccesary. If you aren't succesful, it's a learning experience for the next one. If someone gives you sh1t for being a leader and pressing a lynch but being wrong, ask them what they did to help.
So in your mind the grand solution is to do nothing and just wait for scum to out themselves?I don't know how I can clarify this any better than I have. I'm not saying do nothing, I'm saying that we don't push for a lynch until we have the information from the NP to give us some guidance. You believe a lot in behavioral tells, and maybe I should as well, but I don't yet, and I like to be able to see how things actually play out before assuming that someone should be lynched.
Like to see how what plays out? I've seen games go three to four phases with 0 results. Last game was that lol. What do you do if nothing plays out? I hope we get results on scum, but I wouldn't rely on them by any means.
Yes, we did set a precedent in that game, and it wasn't good. I contributed to that, as town, and that's a failure on my part. I'm happy to pick up activity in DP2 when we actually have some information to go off of, and frankly, that was the plan
Can you clarify what you mean by "waiting for information to go off" because you as well as I know that is not a guarantee. Most likely one of us already claimed roles gets killed, you learn really nothing new. Or our cop or other investigative role gets killed, and wala, no info. And we are back to square one. Waiting for things to happen gets us nowhere.
If you don't want to wait for that, then lynch me. I'm honestly just tired of this back and forth, and I'm tired of being defensive. I'm also tired of constantly correcting you when you misquote me, as you've done here as well. If you're unhappy with my play, then that's not going to change because I pointed out why I did it.
I haven't mis-qouted, and if you think my inference that you are particularly less helpful this game than in others is wrong, you are welcome to prove me wrong at any time. Your not forced to be defensive. You can be the aggressor at any time. Pick a target and pressure them to be active, or ask their thoughts if you don't want them to claim, just tell them you aren't pressuring them for a claim.
I understand that you want to correct for what went so wrong in Bullish's game. I understand that I, like so many others in this game, was part of the problem there. And if you want to punish me for not making changes to my play to improve things, then I guess I'm guilty. Always appreciate the feedback.
I am not doing or saying any of this to punish you or be vindictive. I actually genuinely scum read you for not participating. I tend you further scum read people who double down instead of try to make a change or admit they could be doing more. Your in this wierd spot where you admit to doing nothing, but are certainly fine with doing nothing, and also mentioning that mostly bickering is occuring when you could change that.
Created:
-->
@Vader
@Bullish
@warren42
Yall need to help as well.
Created:
-->
@MisterChris
Whats your activity plan for the day phase? Who are your scum reads? Your are in the same boat as whiteflame here.
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
Who are they and why aren't you pressuring them then?Because the only reason I tend to put pressure on people in DP1 is to get information, and at this point, I think we have enough information to be able to interpret what happens in the NP. Until then, I don't think getting more information does anything to further our cause, though it gives scum more known targets.
Is the only information worth getting, someone's character and role?
Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I didn't say there's nothing to behaviorally read into the posts that have gone up, but enough of this has been focused on their infighting that I think it's entirely appropriate to call much of this a pissing match, and I think it's a little odd that you can claim this is 17 pages of grade A content that should afford me every opportunity to pick out scum. It's not.
I didn't say it was grade A content, but not all of it has been two people, and there have been others posting in between. It's content. And if it's not sufficient enough to meet your standards, then guess who has the ability to influence the day phase with their voice and vote? Only you can prevent wildfires.
Normally, when I've done that, it's actually sussed me because I tend to jump on and off of lynches, especially in DP1, on the basis of getting more activity or claims. Activity is above average, and we have more than enough claims. I'm not interested in getting more to interpret what happens in the NP. I've said this several times.
I don't think i've ever sussed you for that, in fact I note it's usually your town tell. The three games you've played as scum have been closer to this one then any of your town ones. Also claims aren't the only thing that come from a day phase. You shouldn't rely to heavily on them in the first place, they are generally better for helping mafia pick out power roles.
From your post #417: "I asked for reads yesterday and got a nothing post, and earlier today a contradictory fence sitting post." Yes, you did say contradictory. I started off nonplussed (appreciate your use of that term, btw), but I gave an informed decision nonetheless. I've straight up said on multiple occasions that I don't like lynching in DP1, and this is no different, but I provided reasons why I'd still consider it. I wanted to get other insights before voting because if I did vote, I would be seeking to lynch, something I've never committed to in a DP1 for a reason.
You don't have to want a dp1 lynch, but you should attempt to get as much out of the day phase as possible. Mafia can communicate constantly, 24/7. Town get's short 3 day gaps to plan who we are lynching each time. That is the time we use to sus out people and work our magic. Mafia have the whole game. Why waste it letting poeple lurk, or do what you are doing and do virtually nothing? I get your stance but do you think if everyone shared your stance that anything would ever get done? Bullishes game is proof that sitting around and waiting for something to happen gets town no where.
Created:
-->
@Elminster
Unvote drafterSomething to note. If drafter was scum , would he replace. I think he would be more likely not to because he would feel invested with his scum buddy.That leads me to believe he is town, because pie did in fact confirm that he was being replaced to me.
At this point I think he is town too. Just hope he decides to play seriously or hope pie finds a replacement soon.
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
Again, didn't say nothing happened. I hop on for short periods of time over the course of the day. I provide shit feedback because whenever we start to get into something that looks interesting, it seems to get derailed by a wagon on either Elm or Draft, and whatever consequences spin out from that.
YOU have the power the re-rail a wagon wherever you see fit. Be a leader, and steer us back if you think we're on the wrong path.
Shockingly, I don't want to add to those wagons and make the problem worse because I see them as problematic beyond the scope of this single game. I also don't think there's enough information on anyone else to push for a lynch, and I'm consistently wary of lynching anyone in DP1 for much the same reason.
So in your mind the grand solution is to do nothing and just wait for scum to out themselves?
If you think that's lazy, then I guess I can't change your mind, but no, the attitude isn't the reason why town loses games. It's bad in later DPs to not push for a lynch, and I was pretty upset in Bullish's game that we didn't get a lynch in DP2. I think it's also bad in DP1 to push for a lynch with no or next to no information beyond some small behavioral tells. I think that tends to lead to a lot of mislynches.
We set the precedent for inactivity in by being inactive in dp1 of bullishes game. No one taking the charge and leading anything, led others to act the exact same way, it was a problem that persisted the entire game, and we as scum let it happen, because why wouldn't we? I'm not gonna let it happen this time though, and if your town you shouldn't either. If you like no lynches dp1, that's fine. Im indifferent to the outcome of a lynch as long as everyone did their part in the day phase and there is plenty of content to read for investigators to sift to. If you don't lynch by the end of the phase that's fine, but you absolutely shouldn't have reads or have tried to do nothing the phase, and say things like "The whole day phase was bickering" when you could have created an alternative outcome.
Created:
For anyone who shares the opinion "I have no reads because nothing has happened"
Be the change you want in the world. No reads? Create some. Look harder. 400+ posts isn't just "bickering". Rather than complain about a lack of value create some. Other wise you'll have games like Bullishes last one where we no lynched every day phase and scum win with little to no effort. You wanna win? Play to win. Or be lazy, be part of the problem and reason why mafia dies here. And be okay with town losing every game. Up to you
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
There are also many who haven’t contributed much, and those who have have largely done so by hopping on and off lynches that others led, or leading a lynch that they never seem to care much about after voting.
Who are they and why aren't you pressuring them then?
I’m just frustrated that so much of this DP has been anything but productive. You can call 17 pages of posts productive if you want, but so much of this has been either a pissing match or a set of distractions that I’d hesitate to call it that.
I wouldn't say all of it's been a pissing match in the slightest. Theres been a few posts here and there that seems intra personal between drafter and elminster, but to say there's nothing to behaviorally read into any of it is absurd. Also all the people posting between. It's willfully lazy to say there's nothing wrong, or that's just a convienent response to justify your lack of significant contribution.
I’m not particularly interested in addressing behaviors I do commonly and already know aren’t perfect for this game.
Having played with you in just about every game recently I do not think these are common behaviors. You can and have taken stances on players with much less content than this.
And I don’t know how I could be any clearer about how my posts weren’t contradictory
I didn't say contradictory, just fence sitting. You could go either way on him, and are generally seeming non plussed about either mislynching or policy lynching him. You'll go with the crowd right? Maybe not what you said, but your not really saying anything so that's the only interpretation I can make.
Created: