Total posts: 10,910
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Do you know what a normal person does when they disagree with a friend or someone? Cool bro, agree to disagree. You took that shit from loving him to calling him a shit human being in like one conversation lmfao
I literally tried this approach with RationalMadman and it simply didn't work. All of the current beef happened because he refused to simply agree to disagree. And now it's spiraled to the point where I am just a bully for having different opinions than him. SMH
Created:
Posted in:
No, it isn't at all.I can already prove it with how a guy who has 80 posts across all years of DART, before the election ends up winning it all. I can prove it in many ways and every bit of effort I put into it will only motivate him to dig into me in revenge as that is his manipulative nature.
His post count here has nothing to do with how he won, and no you can't prove it or you would have done so already. And Max has no interest in getting revenge on you, nor does he have the ability to do so. In what was you do you think he would get revenge on you? He has been actively trying to ignore you, you on the other hand make threads like this begging for his attention, yet you think he cares enough about you to sabotage you?
I am not here to sabotage Max,
That was the entire point of this thread lol
I am here to prevent him sabotaging the website's moderation integrity and if you and Mikal both want Ragnar to step down, then yes you are right; the enemy of my enemies (that are allied heavily to my Presidential enemy Max) is perhaps a useful person, whether ally or enemy himself.
The ragnar issues had nothing to do with this thread, they were talked about elsewhere. Some of the stuff got dragged over here, but this thread was purely so you could call max out after being salty about an election. Also I was waiting for you to say the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" line. That is blatant proof of what we are talking about. You are willing to use one enemy against another you hate worse. That line is used to justify survival, not broaching friendships. People who use that line realize they are having to sell a bit of their soul, idea and belief so that aren't wiped out of existence lol.
Created:
Posted in:
That implies authenticity.A fake manipulator would do everything to stay on the good side of these useful people.
You are the one making the claim that he is a manipulator, and is not authentic. BOP is on you to support these claims, instead of spouting conspiracy theories about his intentions.
Created:
Posted in:
I am not going to apologise for being nice when you helped reduce my ban time. That's just plain dumb, fake or not. It wasn't fake but given your interpretation of me, I see why you take it as fake.Both an authentic and a fake person are inclined to be nice to people they owe.
I never asked or expected you to apologize. I understand that sort of behavior is beneath you.
Created:
Posted in:
Am I supposed to say sorry?
Admitting you can be hypocritical would be too much to ask, let alone ever expecting you to appologize for something.
Created:
Posted in:
Max is a corrupt motherfucker oh yes he is. Thanks, don't talk laissez-faire BS with me about Maxipad. I am the one user who knows his dark side for sure.
This is an extremely biased take that you refuse to substantiate. Also you are judging him for a ban years ago. You don't think you are both different people now?
Ragnar is shady given that you revealed his stance was as it was. However, if Ragnar is against Max and Whiteflame (and Max is very influential over WF, he has a way with words and social power) I absolutely want Ragnar in that position, able to stick it to the man.
RAGNAR ISN'T AGAINST ANY OF THEM LIKE I KEEP SAYING. What makes you think that Ragnar is against max and whiteflame lol. They have been nothing but friendly and cordial with each other.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
You know sometimes life is a sick and twisted joke. The only ones who have been nice to me or remotely open-minded during this time are the people from DDO I resented. I appreciate this experience a lot, let me know where I really stand with people and now I understand exactly what the DDO crowd were saying about DART. There is something seriously backstab-oriented about DART's social landscape.This aged well and ironically backs up Luna's point. You were nice to us (this post was literally about me ) because we were defending your ban
SO true bro.
Created:
Posted in:
Because it wasn't about Pie, it was about your behaviour.
What does my behavior have to do with anything? My beef with pie is mine alone. I could bring up your past behavior with pie if I wanted to as well. You guys weren't exactly friends either.
Created:
Posted in:
You sided with 3RU7AL after calling his campaign sh1t for weeksHis campaign was so shit, Athias hardcarried it.
Right, so you agree with me that you only side with people as a matter of convienence of them being against someone you hate more. Got it.
Created:
Posted in:
You sided with pie, because you hated me moreNo, you hated Pie more actually.I just hated your voter intimidation.
No because after that you started using pie and that thread to serve your agenda, despite that fact that I told you multiple times me and pie worked out our beef via PM.
do you believe Ragnar will stick up to whiteflame and airmax when the time comes?If yes, I want him there.
You are implying that Max will commit some "wrong doing". Ragnar has moderation power here, all Max can do is advise and potentially veto a decision. That is literally it. And as I keep telling you, Max and Ragnar are friends and always have been. My argument with Ragnar is my own. This "ragnar is a man of the people" standard you are setting is irrelevant to the discussion. I am just pointing out that your defense of ragnar is funny in light of the fact that he would have sought out oppertunity to repress you in the past had it not been for me defending you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Side note. Can you confirm we literally have took a vote before with like ten+ people in chat and like 8/10 said no to him being in the discord. Me being ironically one of the two who did not care. like people saying they would not play Mafia or come around if he's there so he doesn't think I'm some overlord dictatorNot that I care , I just want to purge that from his worldview so that he can accept he annoys everyone and it's not me unilaterally deciding it.
I can't remember exactly, I know there was a couple people who said they would not join a mafia game if he was there. But I don't really approve of banning anyone from my discord. I think I called you out for it at the time, and convinced you to unban him.
Created:
Posted in:
Two months down the road when Luna and I disagree on something you will be messaging one of us saying you agree with us and not the other.Why is this me having not real view?
We are saying you side with whoever is against the person you currently have the strongest emotions against. You sided with pie, because you hated me more, despite the fact that you and pie have clashed multiple times in the past. You sided with Ragnar because you hate me more than him right now, despite multiple clashes with him. You sided with 3RU7AL after calling his campaign sh1t for weeks, just because your grudge against me was worse. The only time you ever "Sided" with me was when I first took your side against the mods trying to permaban you two years ago, but then you went back on that when I did the same thing for wylted because you didn't like wylted. Then later you admitted you had no idea of the context for why wylted was being banned, and said you were wrong.
See a pattern here? You only agree with people as a means for manipulation. Whoever you hate the most at the time, you will literally side with anyone who also seems to be "against them". If you stood for something or had a real view you would stay with that view no matter who it was for.
Me and you have been arguing with each other for weeks for example. Ragnar keeps saying the only reason he is lecturing me about things and not you for doing the same things is because I am not reporting your posts. If I wanted you banned or in trouble I could do that, but I don't want you banned. Regardless of your opinion on me, fair moderation is something I have stood for from the beginning, regardless of who it is for or against. And even though you hate me, I do not want you banned because I see you as a valuable member of this website, even if you can be extremely stubborn sometimes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
No I'm brutally honest and you are a whiny bitch. You change your bias based on who you dislike more in the moment. Two months down the road when Luna and I disagree on something you will be messaging one of us saying you agree with us and not the other. It's how you operate. Do whatever you can to justify your confirmation bias.It's literally why you dmed me when I told you to stop responding to Luna. You wanted me to feed into your worldview that he was bullying you and I don't play that shit.
100% ^^^
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
He's defending Ragnar because Ragnar happens to have agreed with him on one topic. The second Ragnar disagrees with him he's going to go back to his Ragnar filled hate rants. He's 1 dimensional and low iq
Oh I know. I am well aware that RM doesn't actually stand for anything. He was doing this all election as well with Max, which is why I kept saying he didn't actually support max lol
Created:
Posted in:
No, are you saying Ragnar came up with the 6 months?
No? drafter was the one who wanted the 6 month ban. He even later suggested permabanning you. Ragnar was okay with three months, and after the fiasco with the thread you made and a combination of me talking to him, he wanted to go to 1 month ban.
The length of your ban is beside the point, I am discussing the reasons for your ban and pointing out to you the guy making those decisions used annoyance as a factor in making those decisions. Hate me as much as you want, but I talked people out of banning you multiple times in that discord. This was all back in Augest of 2020.
They later wanted to permaban you and it seems we had changed a lot of minds at that point.
Virtuoso: @Everyone, thoughts on perma banning RM for extreme toxicity?
Supadudz: Strong No, asbolutely not
Whiteflame: I don't think permabanning is the way to go
MisterChris: I don't think he warrants a permaban
Ragnar: Permabanning him would be like an endorsement
Created:
Posted in:
He thinks I edit all my screenshots because I posted he voted for max as a meme kek
I think it's more about him being stubborn tbh. He is only defending ragnar because at this current moment he hates us more lol.
Created:
Posted in:
Well if Mikal does it why wouldn't you do it? You are the same side of things.
I am not mikal. Mikal is more trolly than I am. Yeah we are friends, but I have told you we don't see eye to eye on every little thing. We argue with each other all the time. I've argued with mikal 10x's more, and in some cases 10x's even worse than I've ever argued with you lol. Ask him yourself if you don't believe me. Ask him how badly we went after each other when Mikal wanted to be president of DDO.
Created:
Posted in:
ok so if I chat to you in private you promise not to twist shit in screenshots?
I have never done that once.
Created:
Posted in:
That is the nature of sheep. It doesn't surprise me.
Yeah, we are such sheep that we actively were the only ones hard core defending your ban despite being in an actual beef with you at the time lol.
Created:
Posted in:
You and Mikal don't even need quotes, you can doctor.
I've never doctored anything you've said. I just link the posts you make themselves.
Good, I now have the information I wanted.This tells me something about Supadudz then, and that is that he is a liar. However, I also know conversely that you lie.So, I will wait and let Ragnar say his piece.
What are you accusing me of lying about?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
I think he can admit it. Anyone when cornered and pressured is less likely to admit fault especially when confronted publicly. If you asked him in a pm"Did you ban RM because he's an annoying bitch"He would likely say yes. In fact I think him and I had this exact conversation. I asked him to reduce the ban from 6 months to 3 months or something and he basically said RM was getting banned for multiple issues that happened over a long period of time that we long overdue. I actually appreciate when a moderator just owns his shit. My man banned RM because he's RM and annoying AF. Tbh outside of providing content and being a doofus he doesn't really add value to anything so I don't blame him
I mean he already admitted it, but now won't admit to admitting it, despite being directly qouted admitting it. He now is playing a semantics game with the words "Frustrated" and "annoyed". And no, ragnar won't change. I have had multiple discussions with him and he always doubles down on the same point before fleeing the conversation. "But the CoC says..." "I am only following the CoC"
The CoC is bible to him. No matter how many times he admits that he can use discretion with appliance of the CoC, whenever he gets called out for a decision he makes, he falls back on his holy bible of the CoC.
Created:
Posted in:
A salty me would not defend Ragnar here. Ragnar reduced my ban length, David manipulated him.
David didn't manipulate sh1t. I was in the discord when your ban went down. It was a genuine "good ol' boys" vibe going on and you were out of the loop. I barely remember David having anything to do with it lol. Ragnar only reduced your ban length after he was called out by me and thett3 and I had a very long discussion with him in that discord. MisterChris probably played a role in the reduction as well.
I do not care that Ragnar found me annoying and wrongly banned me because I am an annoying prick to many and that's a fact.
Cool, I am going to use this qoute against you in the future when you start being a massive hypocrite against ragnar again, inevitably.
Ragnar had more reason than any mod in the site's history to be a prick to me but he was the absolutely most responsive and caring mod to me behind the scenes, you don't know fucking shit.
I do know, because I am privy to all the dm's that are shared in that discord, and you are unaware of how much sh1t was actually talked about you by the mod team there lol.
I do not support him stepping down, that's final I will go to war with you over it if you want, long-term.
War with me? You don't respond to half of what I say. Your just gonna call me a bully and run and hide again.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
I hope to God Ragnar stays, just hope he changes his stances on some attack threads
If ragnar was capable of humility, I would be okay with him staying. But all the dude does is double down when he is called out and will never admit wrongdoing lol. He literally asked me to qoute him saying that he takes personal frustrations into account when banning members. He even went as far as to say he would resign if I did so. I qouted him saying so, and he completely runs from the accusation. I think ragnar stepping down is the right move for him and the site, but I would be okay with him also just reforming his dumb public wrist slapping sh1t he does. I doubt he will though.
Created:
Posted in:
RM you are literally beyond reason. The fact that you just said that and didn't respond to what I actually said proves you are beyong hope. Stay salty and mad little man.
Created:
Posted in:
No you are not. That is over now, I can never get those 6 weeks back. What you are doing is removing from the mod team a member who will stick up to Airmax, it's very see-through.
Ragnar is friends with airmax, always has been. They have had a good relationship for as long as I can remember. My issues with ragnar are my own, not his. It's funny you would normally take my side on this considering what ragnar is saying and doing with his power shows that he is more willing to discriminate someone like you with his mod powers. I am calling him out for that and instead you are defending him because you hate me more. It shows that you don't stand for anything and only care about "getting one up" on your enemies. Since you see me as your current enemy, you will take anyone's side that isn't mine, regardless of what they are actually saying. You virtually did the same thing with pie. What do you actually stand for RM?
Actually this thread wasn't about what you think it was about.He'd been ignoring me and treating me as if he's 'above replying to me' I was seeing if I could get him to finally acknowledge me and he did.
Why does getting his attention matter so much to you? If you hate him so bad, have him blocked, and are genuinely displeased at his presence here, then why beg for his attention like this?
Created:
Posted in:
Why would it need to disappear, he won so what's the issue for you?
I don't have an issue, you do. You are still whining and complaining about this. Are you that sore of a loser?
I got my way if he lives up to his promise. It doesn't mean I don't find it absolutely ridiculous and pathetic the way he's gone about helping us only if he'd win.
Why not wait to call him out after he's had a chance to fulfull some of his promises then? Why are you benig petty now?
Created:
Posted in:
He doesn't just want the role it offers at all, he wants total power and control over the mods even it's why he has you hard-pressuring Ragnar out of the mod team because he knows whiteflame will bend to his will.
He doesn't have me doing anything lol. That is next level conspiracy theory. I want ragnar out of office because he was a better site member than a mod. The qoutes of his I posted showed that Ragnar took into account how annoyed he was by you when implementing a ban. You hate me so much that you don't even realize I am still defending you against ragnar, despite you constantly calling me a bully or whatever else. You are blinded by rage and hate and don't see logic.
Created:
Posted in:
In the analogy, you are implying the people are ungrateful for a selfless act.
Not people, person. It's literally just you fussing about this. In my analogy everyone else indulged in the food.
Created:
Posted in:
RM listen, if you want to keep this going, we can. The more you wanna keep posting, the more I and others will keep calling your bullsh1t. I honestly do not see the point though. Why are you being so salty? What happened to your attitude here: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7209-election-discussion-thread?page=2&post_number=27
You were literally voting for airmax a few days before the voting started, and just changed your mind because I pissed you off. All the stuff you were saying about airmax helping the site didn't just disappear because he won the presidency lol. Are you that salty that you didn't get your way? How long are you gonna keep this going? You lost the moral high ground a long time ago, but this is honestly just pretty pathetic mate.
Created:
Posted in:
A better analogy is that he dethrones the Ethiopian king, demands everybody worship him, all on the promise that he'll only give the food once instated as their ruler.
You should really substantiate the bolded lol. Also "Ruler" implies this position isn't a volunteer community service job. When you wanted to be president was it because you wanted to be this website's ruler?
Created:
Posted in:
RM's reading comprehension is amazing these days.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Imagine if you brought a planeful of food and valuable resources to ethopians, and while the rest of them infulged hungrily, one scrawny, pathetic, half retarded ethopian angrily points his finger at you and states: "Where was this food all these years ago!? We don't want it now!"
Created:
-->
@Lemming
key and peele are the best lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
If someone escalates the situation to outright personal attacks, compliment their fine choice of verbiage, then carefully pick apart their arguments with precision and professionalism.
OH I do max. Doesn't stop the "OMG he's bullying me!" Accusation in the slightest.
Created:
-->
@Barney
I am getting strong impressions you like to be the hand-slapper, and not the hand-slapee lol
Created:
-->
@Barney
I'm still waiting.That I admit that I can become frustrated, doesn't make the many CoC infractions which happened prior to the frustration the result of my future frustration. I wish I was some tyrant with reality altering super powers but I'm not.
What are you still waiting for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
do you guys want a character claim or role claim as mafia
Gonna be inactive until saturday probs. Worked late today, and have 4 job interviews tomorrow after work. I suppose I will post at night but no one will be on to respond to me lol
Created:
-->
@Barney
You brought up the apparent fact that I'm so burned out I've started banning innocent people just because "too frustrating" without them ever violating the CoC, and now you can't find one case of it.
Did you literally ban someone for being too frustrating? No. Do you use that rationale as an argument to defend a decision of banning someone? Yes you do. When thett3 pointed out how all the reasons listed for banning RM weren't rule violations, and I called you out at the time for it you said this:
" I can admit that is the slippery slope we're on. I stand by bans being about patterns more often than a single insult or whatever (with a few exceptions where it was particularly excessive), but we do need checks and balances to keep it from getting out of control (or reigning it into control if already out of control)."
Your opinion on "reigning this in" or "keeping them from getting out of control" seems to vary on the user in question. Controversial users like RM and Wylted are easier to enforce bans on in your mind because the conflict they represent in the forums, you feel you may get more public support for it. Which is why you spun the "wylted is a child predator" thing out of context.
For RM and Wylted, not even getting into the objective repeated (and in some cases serious) CoC violations, your accusation is that I'm "ruling with an iron fist," that I'm citing "too frustrating" as my sole reason to personally ban people... And then you point to rulings from long ago made with Virtuoso as the chief mod... Need I even say it?
David may have pulled the trigger with the wylted thing but YOU were the catalyst for it. Trying to pretend like you didn't agree with the ban when you argued with me about it back and forth in the discord for like 3 days is preposterous lol. "serious" CoC violation is extremely subjective, especially when you willingly choose to ignore context.
The thing that got me riled up against you about the wylted thing in the first place that casused that huge argument was you saying this: "I have not been following the whole Wylted thread. I don't really care about him enough to worry if he is banned or not."
Your distaste for a user plays into your decision making when it comes to how strict you are willing to enforce a ban.
"Dig back through discord chats or anywhere else to find where I banned anyone just because "too frustrating." I'll resign today if there's even one case of that, as opposed to you just making it up because that's how you argue. This isn't your opinion is that I banned someone out of frustration, but with inside knowledge literally that I said "too frustrating." "
Here a qoute from you from the discord: "RM committed multiple bannable offenses, and only recieved a one time ban for 42 days (would have been even less had he not chosen to protest against a length reduction). While they were individually mostly not severe (making up stories of real life crimes people are supposed to have committed, was severe), enough non-severe things add up. I will not deny that annoyance over him wanting to weaponize the mod team to banning everyone who isn't nice to him or has different taste in anime, influenced the decision."
Outside of verbatim saying the words "too frustrating" how is this literally not the exact same thing?
Sorry man, you asked for the qoutes.
Created:
-->
@Mikal
Yeah I agree. My point is that Ragnar interprets stuff differently than they do and gets it right "most" of the time with some of being weird. Once they are all on the same page about when it's good to respond to stuff, I think it fixes itself to like 100 percent
Agreed. I just mostly miss old ragnar, pre mod ragnar lol
Created:
-->
@Mikal
Once Ragnar stops publicly wrist slapping people for "ettique" I think moderation will be moving in a good direction. I have 0 complaints with supa and whiteflame atm.
Created:
Created:
-->
@Barney
You are subjectively and arbitrary deciding which wrists to slap over virtually the same thing.I'm not deciding which posts get reported. Nor am I taking any action over the fast majority of reports.
I am suggesting you do not slap wrists at all, especially publicly. It almost feels like you are encouraging me to report more posts, which for the umpteenth time, is not the freaking issue ragnar.
In fact what I did was formally a step above the "misqoute" troll that was common on DDO to make fun of your opponent,Things have gradually evolved since then. And no one said you must get along, or that you can't make fun of someone; in fact I'm the guy who got rid of the "no insults" rule.
"Evolved" Is one word for it I guess lol. And I am not saying that you are encouraging people to get along, I am simply pointing out how ridiculous it is to talk down to someone, especially a grown adult, in the forums by "lecturing" them about ettique. If you weren't a mod that would be different, I would just laugh at you and dismiss it. But as a mod, a public lecture can be seen as "punishment". Everything you do has the appearance of applying consequences, even if you do not think a lecture from a position of power is as bad as a ban (it isn't) doesn't mean it is neccesary to do.
Please list these users I banned citing that they were "too frustrating" who who were also innocent of CoC violations. If you can't find any, please add all the ones I banned just because "too frustrating" who had CoC violations.
You seemingly ignored anything I mentioned relating to how much I give a sh1t about CoC violations lol. But one example was RM's initial ban, where you pretty much banned him for doing a bunch of "minor" things. Or you stretch a CoC rule to mean what you want it to mean such that you can enforce it.
I had to have a discussion with you guys about a threat that was being discussed as something to ban RM over. The threat was something like "You'll pay when I am mod". Not a physical threat of violence or anything of that nature. RM's whole ban discussion consisted of small things that were becoming an annoyance to the moderators. Similar things happened with wylted, though that was technically David enforcing that ban, I remember you supporting it in the discord. David's response was that Wylted was "glorifying" a bunch of controversial topics as a reason for his ban.
At the end of the day my overall impression is that if you annoy certain mods enough, they will eventually take action by trying to find and use a bunch of accumulative rule breaks against you. You may not have been behind every ban decision, but I have had this discussion with you enough times on and off site to know that you stand for stricter enforcement on some users based rather than others. The good ol' boys club mentality has dissipated with changes in moderation, but you are the only one who seems stuck in the old way of moderation, where you seek to enthusiastically use the CoC like the bible to persecute anyone at any time.
Created:
-->
@Wylted
It's kind of hard for me to tell ragnar that too, and I probably come off more as a d1ck then intended to. But I can't see the role being that fun for him either. You can visibly see the difference he has in tone since accepting the role, it almost seems there is little of "him" left. He takes the job seriously and I think he believes following the CoC as strictly as he does is like following the law. He probably makes a good supervisor somewhere in the real world. Unfortunately while people that are that hardcore about rule application may be needed in jobs in the real world, that mentality just kills the fun of a hobby based website where people come to relax and enjoy their free time. Also it would free up some of his time to participate in some of the other activities I think we can bring to the site involving increasing debate and vote activity, so I have other motivations in requesting him resign. Not that he can't simultanesouly do both as moderator, just that he may get more enjoyment out of the site. Especially since I plan to be much more active here in the future and honestly, if his mindset on moderation doesn't change, I think the mod call out threads are going to continue. I won't stand for silly rule application, and I just really don't wanna keep banging heads with ragnar, since I like the guy.
Created:
-->
@Tejretics
Thanks TUF! Glad to see you around here. Those were good days!
Hell yeah they were! Let's bring em back!
Created:
-->
@Barney
RM has done the same thing with virtually 0 response from youIf no one reports posts, they are unlikely to be reviewed.
Which I am never going to do. Me pointing this out is, again, to point out that I don't want action taken. It's to show you that the person who'se stance your publicly taking the side of is just as guilty. In which case you should probably ignore reports of his in disputes like these, or just not comment at all.
As much as I strongly dislike the sight of people being misquoted and having what they did write taken out of out of context, the samples provided do not seem to be presented as literal quotations to violate the Authenticity section of the CoC. I'm seeing single quotation marks instead of double, and in some formatting as an additional clue. I recently gave an example to show how that works: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7175-something-you-may-not-know-about-airmax?page=1&post_number=21
You are subjectively and arbitrary deciding which wrists to slap over virtually the same thing. None of the qoutes you slapped me on the wrist for in the past were obvious literal qoutations. In fact what I did was formally a step above the "misqoute" troll that was common on DDO to make fun of your opponent, because at least I put it in qoutes, that no one would actually think the person said the thing I "qouted" them saying. Same with RM's qoute here.
I have constructively advised people when the ice starts to get thin, in large part to decrease the odds of it going too much further from anyone. Currently there is discussion of doing away with ROs in favor of more warnings, and ultimately bans without ROs should it become necessary. You can call having early warnings about CoC issues ridiculous all you want but just like RM accusing Airmax of multi-accounting, that only makes it an opinion.
We have established following the CoC like the bible doesn't do your job any favors, and also have proven that you don't always follow the CoC. You can and have used discretion to enforce arbitrary rules, and enforce punishing bans because a user was simply "too frustrating" despite not actually violating a CoC rule. So stop using this argument as a crutch in some situations when you completely ignore it in others.
The CoC can be found at: https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/rulesIf you think it should be changed, start a referendum; it's that easy. In the mean time, complaining that you don't like the moderators so much as remind people of it's existence is odd. This is not over enforcement of blindly following it to ban people at the slightest infractions, this is mainly people being gently reminded of it and advised on ways to do better within it as it stands now.
Publically telling someone how to speak and behave in the forums doesn't come across as "gentle reminding" Ragnar. Especially when you've known the users you've interacted with and have participated with them in multiple website improvement projects on DDO before you were ever a moderator. You realize Dave offered me a moderator job too right? I could have accepted it, but I simply refuse to act and behave like a robot rather than enjoy my time on the site more as a hobby and being able to speak freely. You being moderator doesn't mean you know better than your previous peers, it just makes you seem like an @sshole for calling people out. This has been discussed on discord as well. I really don't understand how you think this public hand slapping approach is the way to go. As far as bringing up the CoC again, please see above.
Public reminders are there because more than just the one person can benefit from them, it's not about taking sides and screaming 'leave Britney alone!'That you believer moderators should not get involved with any CoC issues at all, is an interesting opinion; one which again, you are welcome to start a referendum to get the system changed.
Public reminders are lectures for children. You are used to not getting flack from them probably because you are used to doing it with actual children on the website. You don't tell a grown adult how to behave or act and lecture them publicly like that lol. It's a d1ck move and comes off as abuse of power. Stop telling me to start "referendum's" for things that only you are doing. The other two mods aren't engaging this way.
Ragnar it honestly might be time for you to take a break from moderation, if ruling with an iron fist is the only way you like to do things. You should retire from this and go back to enjoying the site as a casual member. You were a much more enjoyable person before you became a mod. Now your just an arsehole.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
My proposition is that we add more relevant medals and add a site currency that can be exchanged for site itemsYou can exchange or trade this currency openly. You win said currency by placing votes , completing debates, answering questions, or making forum postsWe can call it airmax bucksAlso can do badges on top of medals
I was literally just talking to max about the Raisor Rubles program lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Media AdministratorSimp LordHead of media outreachLord God of Dart and Leader of the simp gangEditor and Chief
We should call you "Airmax's hitman" and make you his body guard. Anyone who defies you will get slain in rap battle like you did to RM.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Why didn't you vote for yourself in the election?If things don't go so well I at least wana be able to say that I didn't even vote for the guy.
lmao thats funny
Created: