Mall

Correction: Yes there's no scripture that says Christianity came from God nor has ordained from the foundation of the world.

Man invented the religion of Christianity. Where it says people were predestined or predestinated, it says holy, not christian.

If you say so. I don't know what your agenda is on the subject you're talking about.

Topic has nothing to do with what you've been asking me.

Does the value of a baby depend on how it was conceived?

I thought this may be the question but I want clarity.

I guess that depends on the person as the person sets different values which creates the pro choice position.

To some it doesn't, that creates the pro life position.

Like I said I'm not taking a position here so I suggest you digress.

If you disagree that consented sex is consented pregnancy, say so. Otherwise I take it that you agree.

I guess a slave to another one. Unless you can prison break out the monetary prison, all those who are participants of the economy are subject to it.

The alternative to what?

Are you asking to working or not working?

First off pregnancy is not a risk but an inherent function.

It's like the function of pressing the button on the TV remote to turn the TV on. It's not a risk being an expected inherit outcome as the point of that remote.

Which is the function of that remote.

You may refuse or reject the function like you would a risk you'd avoid. You don't want the TV on but you're doing the act that is structured to execute. I'll say structured. Apparently people struggle with the word "designed" .

In this day and time, function has been reduced, downplayed to an insignificant entity treated as more of a probable risk trying to use methods to evade it.

The consistency for pregnancy to occur is anticipated for something that is structured to the point of it occuring . Unlike a risk that is arbitrary inconsistently based on hit or miss variable factors.

The question of how can the abortion and birth control dilemma and controversy end will never end because the expectancy of something to function to not inherently function as it does is false.

Banning or legalizing abortion which some believe legalizing is a step towards no abortions by compromise which is false, this has not ended the dilemma and controversy.

People are criminals and still do things regardless of the law in one instance or another.

To end all of this, you have to start with the mindset of every individual when it comes time to look at playing with fire.

Fire will burn . Now either stay away or take on the aftermath of being exposed to the heat.

Like I said I don't know why you asked about harm to non consenting people.

Maybe you meant consenting people.

Simply not holding a pro pedophilia position causes illegal policies to exist around children and sexuality.

According to perspective it would be necessitated upon that.

Very good.

Ok medical surgical professionals. Who else than they?

This is what I thought.

Do you not believe in controlling children for their own good?

Do you believe their personal so called rights, individual autonomy needs to trump what an adult knows better for them?

Example, if the child doesn't want to be fenced in to be able to go out of safe boundaries in which the child is ignorant of , which is ignorant  of what is safe and dangerous.

If a child doesn't want his or her hand held while crossing a busy street.

The issue you run into with trying to make everything else child danger proof is that it becomes astronomically factorial of all the different scenarios that could be perilous never conceptualized.

It's directly practical to just safeguard the child.

That's under constraints, rules, control, generally no bargains.

A responsible parent that takes ownership of the parental role does not allow the child to run off in the mall, into the parking lot, into town with this ridiculous unrealistic system of trying to make every element the child can come across child hazard proof .

Medical professionals.

Is consented sex consented pregnancy?

Then I don't know why you ask about non consenting people being harm. Non consenting people are forced to sexually subject.

You asked how does a sexuality harm non consenting people.

Don't we agree that non consensual sexuality is harmful?

Suicide from harassment alone.

Apparently Biden'ers do .

Do you mean from an accepting pedophilia position, why would it be illegal?

You know a lot of things today scientifically doable were looked at as impossible 1000 years ago .

If a mother didn't own what was in her body owning her body included, then the violation of rights would exist for that unborn person.

If you're going to be about rights, where and when does it start for a person?

You believe in a trading agreement you can't pinpoint where even the child signed onto. How can you do so with unborn baby's rights?

If we're talking about the holy scriptural kingdom of heaven, it's not possible.

Really straightforward.

The human population is stunted or in compromise each abortion and every manipulated birth controlled sexual action basically.

This also includes individual lifestyle choices pertaining to health and well being.

Homosexuality does harm the population as abortion.

No matter how high they supposedly went up into the heavens, they never made it to the kingdom of heaven. But it was a great attempt.

No matter how high they supposedly went up into the heavens, they never made it to the kingdom of heaven. But it was a great attempt.

I don't take a position here.

But to add substance to the topic, consented sex is consented pregnancy. Non consented sex is not.

Hope you get it.

To me yes.

You're in a conflicted position supporting homosexuality while not being for abortion.

I don't take a position on that. So I'm not giving a yes or no. That's not even on topic.

That's a new one.

Right on.

Oh killing the babies instead of the rapist, right.

I'm glad I wasn't killed because my father forced my mother.

You say you know but you never know.

Just like your views and positions in the dark today may see the light tomorrow against abortion/same sex marriage and transgenderism.

So do you or don't believe parents go into a trading bartering bargaining compromise with children like an agreement?

Watch this:

So you believe parents go into a trading bartering bargaining compromise with children like an agreement.

Let me ask, when is this agreement initiated and executed ,when the child can sign on the dotted line?

So we take ownership of children.

We own the responsibility.

Yup you can choose to be a slave .

Apparently consent is important in sexual matters.

Was it really about debunking God's kingdom of heaven?

Do parents own their children?