Total posts: 2,897
-->
@Speedrace
ngl that was a nailbiting finale. Good job
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
you brutally murdered me I thought we were friends ;-;
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Undefeatable
I appreciate that. You're definitely up there as well (at least on the philosophy debate we had, you were definitely on par with the likes of Speedrace). Looking forward to our cyber debate, as it will help me gauge how well you do with policy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Checkmate
There's a lot... Whiteflame is of course a contender for the top spot in my book, Blamonkey also is immensely talented. I'm not sure I've seen Ragnar go full strength, but I hear he is really solid as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sum1hugme
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
I'm going to guess you already decided against doing that though.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
You should forget about targeting Elminster with the vig. I think he's ultimately the most town confirmed player we have.
Created:
Now that Drafter has quit I stand by my original town reading of Lunatic, Elminster, & Drafterman (well, Drafter's replacement now) respectively. Within this bunch I think we have a solid town block.
Whiteflame is more difficult to read... While I agree his posts haven't been super substantial & he comes off pretty whiny when defending himself, it fits his town meta (Ofc, that doesn't mean much as he's good at appearing town as scum). Ultimately, I think I would've hopped on the lynch for the sole reason he claimed JOAT and yet wouldn't give us his full role list. If you're about to be hammered and you're still withholding information you have your priorities fucked.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
edgy = funny to some people which is fine. Others are just sexist feminist radicals. Ultimately the same reason "kill the Jews" is still a thing.
Created:
OK I lied folks I may have to read this in the morning ;-;
fuck school
Created:
-->
@Puachu
you could debate in another language, just realize not many potential judges here can speak languages other than English.
Created:
I'm currently studying/doing homework, will catch up & post before I go to bed tonight
Created:
I received a copy/paste response of what Elminster says from Pie.
"If a Cop asked how a doctor works, I wouldn’t. If a Cop asks if they can investigate a doctor, I’d say yes"
Drafter said:
"Interesting because he's been answering my questions about how my role interacts with others."
Pie has explicitly stated that you can ask about how your role interacts with others.
UNVOTE.
Created:
Before anyone hammers, I'm waiting on Pie to answer the question for independent confirmation.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
@ILikePie5
@Elminster
Sorry, I refreshed my page and a whole lot got added lmao.
Yeah I'm gonna VTL Drafterman.
If Pie lied then we'll just give him hell.
Created:
OK....
Lunatic's pivot on his claim rubbed me the wrong way initially, but as I think about it I have to agree that there is ultimately little utility in him complicating his role as scum. As far as I know (I could be wrong), mods don't have to tell you if your role is weak or some other variant, so that checks out... I'm not 100% sold on Lunatic but I'm leaning town.
As for Drafterman... Drafterman is mostly playing to his town meta with tunneling Mikal & now Lunatic... But that doesn't mean a whole lot. Regarding Lunatic's theory that Drafterman is pivoting because he isn't actually a strengthener and is scum... If he were scum, his "strengthen" role could simply be getting his scum buddies to not hit his "target" with a roleblock or visit them at all in Lunatic's case... If he were scum he'd go along with Lunatic's plan to "confirm" himself, so I don't see this as an admission to being scum. Really, I think Drafterman is being a stubborn ass townie as usual. When it became clear Lunatic's plan was a gamble, he got frustrated and wanted to lynch instead.
Regarding whether to lynch/vig elminster.... He's looking town to me & contributing. I haven't seen him whine about quitting since the beginning of the game. I see no reason to push for his lynch/night kill any further. I think our efforts are better spent questioning some of the quieter parties.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
My communication with pie. Kill only goes through if I target the mafia who targets me.
What? Why? Is it a vig variant? Why doesn't the vig just.... kill its target.
Created:
As for the plan to vig Mikal... I'm OK with it, but that doesn't confirm Lunatic or anything obviously if the kill goes through... Just means that either Lunatic or somebody he's buddies with has the ability to kill. Trackers and watchers should be all over this, if we have any.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
huh? Explain.
You said you were going to vig Elminster, and that Drafter could strengthen you.
Where are you getting "I can only kill mafia if I'm targeted by mafia" from?
Created:
As far as whiteflame being non committal, its been discussed ad nauseum that he tends to come off that way as both affiliations. So i'd ultimately call it a null tell but I cam reference the christmas mafia game where he was scum and see if there are any glaring warning signs besides that I am missing.
Have to agree, this is Whiteflame's meta whether town or not.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
If mafia roleblock you, I would assume my kill should be free of being blocked obviously, and go through. If it doesn't, then mikal was the mafia carrying out the night kill and you guys know to lynch him next day phase.This way we satisfy killing mikal and we don't have to debate mikals intentions to throw the game all of day phase 1 (which is one of the more important day phases in the game typically in my opinion).
I'm confused as to how the kill not going through translates to Mikal being mafia.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
Fair enough. Who do you suspect so far?
No one so far. Although I'm ofc watching Drafterman to see if his claim was a gambit or not.
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
whew
*wipes sweat from forehead*
Created:
-->
@whiteflame
Oh crap! Uh... I meant that I'm Ben Shapiro!
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
Not sure if it's a dems mafia republicans town though. Usually his theme splits are kinda complex
This isn't the theme split. I for one can attest that I'm a town Dem.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
Created:
Not gonna comment on Drafter's claim yet. I think I know what he's trying to do.
Created:
wasssapppppp... heads up, may not be super active next week due to testing, I'll try my best to stay active tho
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@gugigor
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Trump is guilty of Criminal Negligence.Criminal negligence refers to conduct in which a person ignores a known or obvious risk, or disregards the life and safety of others. Federal and state courts describe this behavior as a form of recklessness, where the person acts significantly different than an ordinary person under similar circumstances.
I agree with this assessment. Not sure whether it necessarily warrants a 2nd impeachment, but I know I won't be voting for him anytime soon, even though I was all set to before this all went down.
As I've said before:
Trump created a hungry, uncontrollable monster, pointed it towards food, and then asked it to sit quietly.
Created:
-->
@Danielle
Actually the delay is cuz of me.. sorry. I said I couldn't join unless it started Friday or later.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
#losethelamb #erasetheewe #obliteratetheovis
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
There are over 1 billion sheep in the world... Sheep are a particularly useful domesticated animal because they can be a source of clothing & sustainable food (sheep milk + meat).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@gugigor
yeah I can see that. What do you think of artists like 2cellos?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
yeah everyone else left. Sum1hugme is our only remaining site member
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Not my favorite, but I like their sound... it's fairly close
Created:
Democrats would rather censor the views they dislike than discuss them rationally. Discuss-ting!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
Either way it's good you brought it to our attention
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
I created a test account to confirm what you were experiencing. When I create a new account there is nothing for me to click to certify I have read the voting policy... No button except a "was this helpful?" questionnaire. That's not good, because before there WAS a way to do so. Something's changed...
Notably, I do not have 100 posts/2 debates on that acc. Maybe that's a prerequisite to the button appearing, in which case maybe the system is simply lagging for you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
you have to certify you read the policy by clicking a button at the bottom of the page (from what I remember)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
Hi! I'm a voting moderator. Seconding what Theweakeredge has already told you, since you have met the 100 post quota, all you need to do is read the Voting Policy & CoC (Code of Conduct). You can then vote freely, although realize that you will be held to the standards outlined in the Voting Policy.
Created:
Trump (or Instagram) removed the post.
Created:
THIS is his response?
"We had a landslide election stolen from us but yeah don't be violent or anything lul"
You gotta be kidding me.
We're fucked.
Created:
I thought we were anti-riot? What happened to that? This is just embarrassing.
"tHaT wAs BeFoRe ThEy StOle ThE ElEctIon"
The "evidence" for widespread fraud in the 2020 election is no greater (and I would argue far less) than the "evidence" for widespread fraud in the 2016 election... and after that election, weren't Republicans the ones talking about how the Democrats should accept the results?
"wE sHouLd INveStigAte"
I agree, and we DID. Qualified people looked into it, they saw no good evidence for widespread fraud, and decided that any further investigation is unnecessary.
Weren't we the ones that were against the "wasteful" Russian hack investigation?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Jasmine
no, we don't. Get banned, fucker!!!!😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
Created: