Outplayz's avatar

Outplayz

A member since

3
3
5

Total posts: 2,193

Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@disgusted
What was your belief before the movie the Matrix was made? Or aren't you that old? Why do you people always use fictional stories and fictional characters to support the fiction you believe in, do you realise how much man made fiction you people present in your attempts to justify your beliefs?
I have had the same suspicions for a really long time... even before the movie Matrix. Actually, Matrix type platforms don't make much sense to me to be what's going on anyways. And of course the only thing that will line up with metaphysical beliefs is fiction, they are both the same in a sense. I just use analogies to show its possibility. Bc that's really all you can do short of proof at this point.  

Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
That isn't really what we teach.
I'm curious then, what does it teach about believing? Can you be someone like me that is agnostic towards if Jesus was real or not? 

It isn't popular in America at this time. Other places it is more popular.
That actually makes sense if these other places are not like the west countries. In places where there isn't a strong lean towards science and technology, i can see the 'original' being more popular. But somewhere like America, it would make sense the Jordan Petterson way of looking at Christianity is the most popular. Although his way isn't the most popular currently, i predict a very metphory way of looking at it will be the one that gains in popularity as time goes on. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
Well, even then, that doesn't really tell you much about Jesus. To some people, that might mean you are a Christian. To us Orthodox that means you could be accepted as a catechumen, go through classes, and be educated so that you actually know what all that means. Then, after you have been educated about what all that really means, you can be baptized if it is clear that you understand what you are saying you believe!
So, a lot of people are damned to hell then?

Oh yeah, easily. It goes all the way back to the beginning.
If it is the first, i personally would say it's the best by being the original.. but i don't think it is. I'm pretty sure a lot has changed up bc that is what humans do... ruin / corrupt things. But if the argument is besides what i think of it, i would say the original by default should be the best obviously. But i do think being marketed as the original will also make it least popular among Christians.  

Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@Greyparrot
I haven't read 1984 but that is when i was born lol. I knew what Orwellian means (deception) and i just looked up what newspeak means... i've never heard of that one. It means political propaganda right? So i pieced together you meant deceptive political propaganda. 

Yeah... jealousy is a hell of a motivator... made worse by the Orwellian newspeak, but honestly... it won't win. Too many girls find white guys attractive and vice versa ;p     
Created:
0
Posted in:
Jesus = Fact
-->
@3RU7AL
Exactly. Even if he was real and even if his miracles and spiritual experiences where real... it doesn't mean god of the Bible. I've had experience too, and so have thousands, if not millions of other people, of all faiths, beliefs and philosophies. If anything, it does point towards an afterlife or an extra dimension humans aren't aware of... but once you start saying with certainty you know what that is, you're just another human trying to be better than other humans and get very human emotions of feeling right. The true reality of things could be... there is a god for every single person. It could be a simulation. It could be a robotic race that downloads into human forms, it could be a super hero reality where Thanos turned all super hero's into human beings without powers as punishments... i can literally keep going. 

However, you can logically determine which beliefs are least likely (edit: and more likely). And in my opinion, any belief that says it's the only one and that you must believe it to be saved fits in that category (least likely).  

But with all that said, that is also why i believe there is sufficient evidence to at the very least suspect either extra dimensions/realities or even an afterlife. The frequency in which spiritual experiences happen and that for countless of years in human history, or from the very beginning even, we know intuitively this isn't it... pretty convincing we should stay open-minded. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@Greyparrot
I should add, it's a feminazi term against males. I have no idea why they call it "toxic masculinity" ... i imagine they are thinking of the type of guys that drug girls at parties and take advantage of them... or are super arrogant and walk over people to succeed... but i don't see how that has anything to do with masculinity. I knew a gay guy that is very feminine that was horrible in not caring about who he fucked over, and probably would try to rape you if he could. It makes no sense why they just don't call it "toxic humanity."   
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@Greyparrot
It's fucking ridiculous. Toxic people are toxic... that's it. Masculinity and femininity are just words to describe peoples outward attitudes / attributes. Masculine people can be toxic, and feminine people can be toxic. It has nothing, or at the very least just little to do with masculinity. I can conceive that masculine people may be more toxic than feminine people... but really, i'm not even sure about that. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
The story has a picture. If that picture is real, that's pretty impressive. And the crazier part is the camera caught something and notified her. This is probably one of the best stories i've seen regarding apparitions. But i wasn't only talking about the story, did you read the comment section? I usually follow comments to see trends and it's fun sometimes, i've never seen so many people come out with stories. Bc usually the comment section will say how it's fake. But i guess the story is convincing enough for people to open up. 

I don't know if you're really getting the implications. Literally, only one story needs to be true for ghosts to be true. Just one needs to have really happened. If you are going to say it is all grief and delusion... than i don't think even if you witnessed a ghost you would be convinced. I think for you, a ghost has to manifest, sit down, and have a conversation about the afterlife with you. While of course it is being recorded so you don't later think you were being deluded. Is that fair to say? Bc i really don't think you are open to this stuff at all. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@mustardness
I've already mentioned i think a wall is really the last thing that we should focus on. But guess what, he said he'll do it. We voted him into office to do it. And he is trying to do it. If it's good or not, effective or not... he is setting a good precedent all presidents from now on should follow... do the things we voted you into office to do. I give props where it's due... the man is doing what he said. I can only hope this trend will continue. Your hate is blinding you to the silver lining. Like i said, it is impossible for everything he is doing to be wrong. And if you think so... you are too extreme and deluded to reason with. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@Greyparrot
Man... our world is so poisoned by deception that it's really hard sometimes. But thanks, i do actively try to throw that shit up... bc that's what it is, puke.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
Well, anyone can say they believe in Jesus.
Okay, my bad. You're right. I wasn't being specific enough. You need to believe Jesus is lord and savior, died for our sins and surrendering to him and his ways. That's what makes you Christian right?


How it is different depends on what you are comparing it to. Could you give me something to compare it to? You have to understand that there are thousands of churches under the protestant/evangelical/nondenominational umbrella that can all be very different. What sets Orthodoxy apart from all of those churches, which at the oldest are maybe 500 years old, is our church is 2000 years old at least.
 So Orthodoxy is the oldest?

Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@mustardness
You know it's people like you that opened me up to the right? I thought to myself one day, there is no way everything in like half the population is wrong. These people believe wholeheartedly just as much as the left do. All i was listening to was from the left, all i was hearing in school was left concepts... so i just sat back and thought, i need to do some research bc there is no way an entire group of millions is all wrong. So i looked into it, and guess what... now i'm glad to say i don't believe in either side bc factually... both sides have good ideas and bad ideas. Actually, every good law that gets passed is in some way centered bw the two parties. But freaks that are on polar opposites slow us down to this progress. You are one that is on the polar left... or just on a polar opposite type viewpoint. Do what i did and research why these people support what they do. There is Youtube now, there are still books if that's your fancy... Bc trust me, they aren't "all" wrong and to think they are is societies problem. Indoctrination isn't only for religion. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I was at work and couldn't add some more thoughts... i've never seen a ghost either. Although i've had experiences where they could suggest ghost stuff, i've never seen one. So i know how you feel. I read all that and thought no way too. My first reaction is skepticism. But there are a lot of accounts that we call delusion, a lot of pictures we call fake or not clear enough, a lot of sounds or etc., we just ignore. The anecdotal accounts are suggesting there might be something there bc that comment section isn't even close to how many people have these experiences plus a variety of different experiences than just "ghosts." 

Anyways, i had a question i thought of after i posted real fast... Wouldn't you say that picture, if true, is pretty good evidence? I was wonder what you would consider unequivocal?  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
I thought the only thing necessary to be Christian is to believe in Jesus.... well, not the only thing but the main one. So other than that how is it different?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I've lost 4 grandparents,  2 parents and a wife but I've never seen a ghost.   But I know how much people want to because I'm human too - bereavement is not easy.

Consider all the people who have died... and not one unequivocal example of a ghost. 


If you can read all of those comments and the only thing that comes to your mind is that "you haven't seen it"... i mean come on man, really..You can't see how that sounds? Furthermore, there may be reasons why you can't see it or shouldn't. That's one thing about spirituality... it's intelligent. It would know if it's a benefit or detriment to the person that gets knowledge of it. Or it just might be the condition in which you are here if taking the game analogy again... you manifest here not being able to sense these things by choice. There are many reasons why if you think about them... But overall, we cannot at this point in human history have proof of an afterlife... it has to be elusive and unproven. It would make sense then, why it doesn't happen to everyone. So there cannot be unequivocal examples, but there are examples.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
but if you think this creation is lawless then I don't know what to say other than ok, have it your way. 
So you're telling me i can't have my paradise? Bc one of my paradises as i always say would be to be a vampire. In any case, nothing is lawless. Everything and every decision has its consequences. If you become a murder... then you will also have to put up with the repercussions. Every experience has its pros and cons. That is how the laws work. Not that you get punished in some kind of eternal prison, that's a man-made concept to control. Eternity is being infinite. Living is to be finite and subject to consequences. Those are the only implications that make sense of a non-dual infinite consciousness platform. You are everything and everyone... try to imagine those implications and you'll see what i mean.      

Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
Not really.   It stems fromthe view that life and consciousness are physical processes.  When the body or brain breaks life and consciousness cease, just as the current from a dynamo ceases if it breaks.
Yeah, i shouldn't have said it like that since that is the main reason there i'm agnostic. It "looks" quite convincing. But i think once someone tells you about all of the philosophy, all of the experiences, all of the possibilities... if you're still like nah, you're wrong death is death... i think that person has something against the possibility.

In any case, look at this story i'm reading this morning. The story itself is pretty convincing it's not a fake, but more importantly... read the top comments. Experience after experience, and literally only one needs to be true for the implications to be wild.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
I personally think that a great rediscovery of The Orthodox Church in America is inevitable as information is now more available about it than any other time, and as the other churches continue to compromise and bend to the whims of culture rather than to stay steadfast in truth.
Actually by stats, the number of religious are decreasing due to technology and will continue to decrease. There will be a boom in the "non" category, and also in non-duality. That last sentence is a prediction from me so take what you will of it... but, i'm willing to bet that is the future. 

In regards to your Orthodox church, i'm not going to pretend like i know exactly what it is. So, i'll ask... What makes it different than all the other Christian churches or ways of interpretation? Give me a good example and i'll let you know if it is going to do better in the future. I'm really good at predicting societal trends. I would guess if any of them have even a chance to grow, it will be churches that are more new aged. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
Both exist, remember? you can't have a non-dual platform without a dual canvas. This canvas invites Karma, the repercussion of duality. 
I choose to believe in the non-dual platform and being able to choose my next experience, therefore having an element of duality (i should add that's wishful thinking lol). But it could just as likely be random. But i agree in the sense that i feel i individualize and choose my experience... i've found that makes more sense than random given the implications.   

Then everything you do is irrelevant, there exists no cause and effect and that flies in the face of reality, where we observe much suffering. The afterlife is living another experience I do not deny that, but that experience is dictated by actions and desires. 
I don't believe that. I don't think there is any such thing as good or bad or suffering since everyone is one and everyone is infinite. Suffering is just a subjective experience of our world. How do you know these people didn't create themselves here to have an experience of suffering? But also, and more importantly, i think i can choose to be a villain in my afterlife. I don't think that would permanently damn me to always be a villain. These are the implications of an infinite consciousness as the source platform. And it isn't irrelevant. I would be here for my specific experience, nothing more or less. That's the purpose.    




Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
 As far as spirituality is concerned, there are applicable measures to obtain.
There could be. But at this point i subscribe most to the non-dual platform. In that platform, there is no rewards, punishment, good, evil, etc. Death would just be becoming everything again, and the afterlife would be living another experience. So, it's not a good place or a bad place. It could be a horrible experience or the best experience. It's still wishful thinking to an extent, but a lot less than the heaven type thinking.  

Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
No one has any expectations for you personally. 
Come on man, you know that's not true. A lot of people have expectations of me. Have you ever explained your belief to a fundamentalist? You know they don't agree and tell you to believe in their version to get their version of an afterlife. I would call that high expectations. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
That's the point of creation and an afterlife. 
What is the point? Can you explain... I'm not following you.

Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
Do you have an inherent issue with the afterlife (for those who deserve to progress) heaven in which life is of a higher order? that is kind of the point of learning and progressing. While life doesn't end in a heavenly scenario per say it is important to have rewards and punishments otherwise everything you do is irrelevant. 
I have many problems with certain things about a heaven type afterlife. Mainly they are just personal. I personally think, as it is described, it would be hell. So for people to expect me to be there just for their sake is kinda offensive. Plus, i don't like how it doesn't teach to hope people will journey how they will want to journey. It's almost like a parent that never lets their kids leave home. But overall, i think people will get whatever they want. I don't know how that works out overall since their son just might not want it... maybe they'll just think he went to hell. Or maybe they will just go to a heaven type place and be content by themselves. I don't know... i don't tell anyone they are wrong in where they think they will go bc it could very well be true for them. I just know it isn't for me. But in any case, in general... heaven in both Christianity and Islam is purely made off wishful thinking. That's not a bad thing... it might get them to this super place they will never be sad or whatever... but, you have to admit, just 70 virgins alone is wishful thinking.  

Created:
0
Posted in:
debate me i believe in christianity
-->
@crossed
Where do i go when i die? Serious question, but the Christian heaven sounds like hell, hell is hell... and purgatory sounds like hell too. So if i become a Christian... are my only choices hell? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
Neither Christianity nor Islam describe life as you put it. Can you provide a citation of that?

I'm not talking about life... i'm talking about their afterlife beliefs. And if that's what you meant.... even if the scriptures don't exactly describe it as such, people think of it in a wishful way. 


I hope you don't mind me using your post at number 7. I thought it would be a cool addition. 
No problem. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
And what source are you reading from lol? That scenario doesn't exist not even in religion OR spirituality... unless you sow that in creation.
Christianity and Islam... those two have followers in the billions and their afterlife belief could be construed as wishful thinking just bc of what it is. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
Man you gotta stop tripping out with the exact same time posting. I thought i posted to the wrong thread for a second lol. Thanks for the props... i don't think i made any claims that are too out there. It's just where we are presently. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
"Wishful Thinking"
-->
@EtrnlVw
I never thought wishful thinking was a good argument against spirituality in general. But, it is a good description of most religious people and people that are interested in spirituality. The idea of a always sunny, no evil, no illness, happy go lucky it's Sunday everyday heaven (lets not forgot the 70 virgins) is why more than a billion people alive believe in spirituality and would die for it. It's purely wishful thinking. Ideas like an infinite consciousness etc. don't catch on bc it doesn't promise anything in particular. And most of the time, it's pitched as a feeling of nothingness bc you're everything. That isn't attractive to the billions. Why give up 70 virgins to think logically? Screw that... i'd rather continue with my wishful thinking. You understand it's these people that are making your spiritual message really hard to show others? And i for one think an infinite consciousness type platform is most logical... but, it's just not virgins or a heroin atmosphere.   
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@DBlaze
many congressman are saying if the wording changed, they would support it.  If they just called it a fence.
And this is why i think this situation overall is so stupid. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Gamer Girls on Twitch
-->
@Analgesic.Spectre
Would you say that girls, who play the game poorly and have boring personalities, are completely unable to earn money, even if they're hot? 
No, i think i even indicated in my response that they can make money. However, not as easily as a hot girl, that has a good personality and is good at the game can. In that situation, they are probably almost guaranteed to make money. But, on the flip side... it will be harder. The main reason being that people go on to look at good players play. That's why i search or most gamers search for other people to watch. We are good at the game and looking for extra moves we haven't thought of... or to study an opposing players moves and abilities. That is probably the number one reason people search to watch others. Second reason being it's just fun and motivates you to play the game. And probably way last, to watch a "hot girl" play. 

Hence, i don't see how a girl as you named above could easily make money. Sure, they can get lucky and be found. But there are usually thousand among thousands of streamers. It would be hard, but not impossible. Unless the girl shows her tits and gets on the news or something... that's a creative way of being found out. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@disgusted
What would make you claim I hate anything. Your continuous eternal life results in "why even be here" meaninglessness for eternity what a wonderful thought. Everything that has ever lived on this rock has died because that is life, you for some insane reason refuse to believe that and instead claim that they are still alive. How could you possibly come to that conclusion. In reference to an earlier post where you claimed not to know what caveman I referred to, it's every caveman who ever invented gods and afterlife's.
Calling a belief that you can survive death a caveman's idea is just shutting yourself off and acting arrogantly in that you know and anyone that thinks otherwise is stupid.. that's essentially what you're saying. So it's no wonder why i am construing that you hate something about this claim. Bc "everything dies" isn't a very good reason to convince me otherwise of its possibility... at all. Of course everything dies, but what is dying? What is life? Are we all really alive right now or are we inside of a dream that is inside of a dream? Is everything a manifestation of an infinite consciousness? Etc. Etc. There are plenty of good hypothesis which implications would be life after death. And no one, including modern science, has debunked its possibility. So the only reason one would shut themselves of to it is bc there is something they hate about it... That's why i'm curious to know what your reason is bc 'everything dies' is really not that good. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Orthodox Christianity Apologetics Q&A
-->
@Mopac
So the Orthodox Christian church thinks all the other Christians aren't getting it while the other Christians think the Orthodox Christian's aren't getting it? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
God and exoplanets.
-->
@keithprosser
 I am 'agnostic' about the multi-verse. 
Aren't even the scientists agnostic about it? 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@disgusted
I don't know what would happen to say i prefer death. That is too sure of a statement. It could be something insanely cool. It could be the same ole stuff. It could be horrible... who knows. I just doubt it is insanely good bc if it was, why even be here. If i had to guess it's the same ole, boring, dull or maybe even hellish. That's where i would put my money. I wonder... why do you hate considering it as a possibility? 
Created:
0
Posted in:
California Transgender law
-->
@coal
Yeah that's why i didn't look up any criminal stuff. There could be something in criminal against the group as a whole... but i doubt it since there is nothing civil that even addresses it as an offense to misgender. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
California Transgender law
-->
@coal
I didn't look up criminal codes, i just looked up civil. Didn't see anything there other than discrimination stuff. I don't feel like going through criminal stuff, but i highly doubt it is a criminal offense to misgender someone. I could be wrong though... but, it sounds to me it would be unconstitutional anyways since it would go against free speech. I am pretty sure whatever the law is they are talking about has to do with businesses and not private citizens... unless of course there is an element of violence involved in which case, duh. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
God damn California
-->
@Nd24007
Yeah... i live in So Cal. I don't know... i like driving in the rain too lol. I'm not too worried about getting hit since i'm always driving in traffic anyways. And if not, it's just exciting. I'm a very good driver too... I'm really good at predicting what other cars do and actually i find it to be a fun game to play when i'm driving. I can see a bad driver from a mile away so i stay away. And if it is from behind, i usually position myself so i can escape and if i can't... well, good, they are going to owe me a lot of money bc i'm a paralegal for property damage lawyers =) I dare someone to hit me. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
California Transgender law
-->
@coal
I was going to find the law for you but California has a lot of discrimination laws. 37 pages of statues on the program i use. I assume this law is just a tag of other laws that already exist. There are a lot of laws against discrimination, and i am thinking this falls under discrimination. All of them have similar language:

"antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression."

I am not finding any civil codes where someone on the street calls a guy a girl and would get in trouble. That sounds totally made up to me for spinning it in a propaganda-ish type way. I am assuming whatever this law is it affects businesses only. I really don't feel like searching more on this, it could take me some time to find it... bc there are zero actual cases i can reference at this point... and looking with that into statutes takes awhile. But i'm pretty confident this law is more so for businesses than private citizens.  

The closest civil code that could be construed as what he is saying is Civil Code 52.4 ... but this still has an element of violence to it. 

(a)Any person who has been subjected to gender violence may bring a civil action for damages against any responsible party. The plaintiff may seek actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief. A prevailing plaintiff may also be awarded attorney’s fees and costs.
(b)An action brought pursuant to this section shall be commenced within three years of the act, or if the victim was a minor when the act occurred, within eight years after the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within three years after the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered the psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority that was caused by the act, whichever date occurs later.
(c)For purposes of this section, “gender violence” is a form of sex discrimination and means either of the following:
(1)One or more acts that would constitute a criminal offense under state law that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, committed at least in part based on the genderof the victim, whether or not those acts have resulted in criminal complaints, charges, prosecution, or conviction.
(2)A physical intrusion or physical invasion of a sexual nature under coercive conditions, whether or not those acts have resulted in criminal complaints, charges, prosecution, or conviction.

Other than that... i'm not finding anything and think it only has to do with discrimination. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
God damn California
-->
@Nd24007
I personally am loving this rain and i hope it happens more this year. Give me another weeker.. i'm all in. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@3RU7AL
Alien pop reference... be careful you are giving your age away ;p lol. 

But that was pretty impressive you could find that random video. Do you just have a really good memory with movie scenes? I would have never remembered that. 

The main point though i agree with. I am quite acclimated to hearing people say things are impossible. It really makes me wonder how they are so sure. Evidence is something that always gets brought up... but, in general it makes no sense to me. The best way we have found to prove things currently is the scientific method. But the scientific method is a physical process finding out physical things. Things that are repeatable... so it just doesn't work or is a bad method for things like spirituality or metaphysics which are mostly extra dimensional and not physical. So to me it makes no sense when someone says there is no proof bc we really don't even have a means of getting proof other than weak evidence that is anecdotal. But once you start considering the weak evidence... you're hit with a holy crap, there actually is a lot of evidence. So... really, there is only a lack of scientific evidence at this point which also lacks a method to test for these things (which coincidentally is the only way to get proof). I think it's fair to just say it's a possibility at this point.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
trump is wrong to shut down the government for a wall
-->
@DBlaze
I didn't say it isn't effective... i just don't think it is so necessary. Especially bc people will figure out how to go over, under and even through it. It's just not that big a deal to me. I think man power is really what we need the most. Take care of our border patrol, get more and make it a little easier to get on board. The a little easier part is pretty big bc it's actually pretty hard to make it into law enforcement. I would love to personally but i can't bc i've been addicted to pain meds in my past. I haven't tried though so i'm not too sure how good they are at finding that out, but i have wanted to be an fbi agent and i know it's probably impossible to get that fact around them... same with police i think. In any case, man power is most important imo. Technology being second most important, then... some barrier, sure. But it's not so important and demanding that i think we should shut a government down for it. But then again... Trump did say it is a goal and people voted him into office on this promise. If there is one thing i'm impressed by Trump is that he is literally doing everything he said or trying to. So i give props where it's due, and at this point, i think the Democrats have made this into more of an issue than it should be. Overall thought, that isn't what i am critiquing. It's that i think a wall is the least important out of the other two needed at the border. That's my only beef with the situation at present.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Gamer Girls on Twitch
-->
@Analgesic.Spectre
Having said that, I've recently been wondering as to why a girl can get on Twitch, play a videogame rather poorly and receive a bucketload of money. I understand that the girls in question dress in certain ways to enhance attraction, but wow, why do guys give them so much money? Is there some kind of trick? Is it easy to do?
I highly doubt they are crap at whatever game they are playing. They are likely good to some extent. At least, the girls i know are pretty damn good at the game they play. People that play video games tend to watch videos online to get ideas and learn strategies they didn't think of. Or, as just a tutorial run. Lastly, it's just fun watching someone else play a game you like. It's like any sport. When you watch someone else play you want to play or get motivated in playing so it's more fun. 

Why watch a girl? The majority a people playing games are guys... of course they'd rather watch a hot girl play the game instead of a guy. So... in theory, it is actually pretty easy. If your hot and play the game you can make money. However, you can't be crap at the game... so it isn't all that easy since games require a lot of strategy and practice to get good at. If you are just hot and crap at the game... well, you can still get lucky if you have a fun personality to listen to and watch. It requires a specific type of person to be able to be popular on Youtube and other similar platforms. Watch the videos and you'll see they all of the same thing in common... they are good at what they do, they are well spoken, bright, fun to listen too, witty and give off a positive vibe. Put all of that together, it isn't that easy unless you get lucky that you are the one only hot Youtuber that has views... but, if that's all it is you'll like be made fun of instead of actually have interested followers. In sum total... it's not easy. 

And as to your why do people play games, why do people play sports, why do people read fiction, why do people watch movies, why do people go out... it's the same answer. At least with games you are stimulating your mind... unless you are playing slot machine games or something lol... that i don't get other than passing time. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
Lol true. That's why i'm not worried about being wrong... i'm more worried about being right. Although, i'm quite confident the right answer isn't hell in any sense of the word in regards to religions, so i'm not worried in that sense. Unless it's like a matrix thing, that seems pretty hellish depending on the dynamics. All i know is that it will most likely be me having to deal with whatever it is so i'm pretty confident i'll be fine. 

Elon musk said something interesting on the Joe Rogan podcast. He said he suspects the afterlife is so boring that we would rather pick to live here. That makes sense. We escape into movies and games here bc life gets dull... i wonder how dull the afterlife would be to be here. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I suppose its conceivable that something very odd happens at the point of death, but nothing in my own experience implies it will!
That's most definitely true. Although, i hold all of these possibilities bc i've experienced weird stuff, so that's what makes me this rare agnostic atheist that believes more so in an afterlife than the latter. But like you said, i have no tangible evidence or proof so in the end of the day, who knows. You know... a lot of people say i believe in this bc i'm afraid of death; which isn't even close to being true. I'm in no rush, but i can't wait to see if i'm right or wrong. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I have been under general anesthesia. But that isn't a good example bc it isn't death. The connections are interrupted and/or suppressed. Plus i should add people that have out of body experiences while under, but that is anecdotal of course so who knows if it's true. In general, it's not death and counts towards examples of your brain being interrupted. It works how our physical bodies should work. Plus all of this is why i like a infinite consciousness / higher consciousness platform. To go back to this state permanently would be through death. Once your physical constraints are gone, you just become one with this source again. It's exactly like the virtual self example turning off the game and becoming the machine you again death being the off switch. While, everything you experience in the simulation is part of that reality. I don't know, it's a very attractive idea to me bc i can truly see it's possibility.   
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I can't say what you favor is wrong... i just say there's an "or" in it. Or, when the brain gets damaged the connections are interrupted... just like some people can lose memory and regain it. But if it is permanently damaged, they just can't access it the same but is it truly gone? And, the brain can be what contains your consciousness. In a pantheistic model that would make sense. For you would need a vessel that can contain your consciousness in order to experience a subjective life. When the brain dies, or the vessel dies... your consciousness is released into a higher consciousness. I don't see why that isn't also a possibility. 

A metaphor or analogy i use to think of this is say in 1000 years we become fully robotic. If we can become fully machine than that would mean we would be able to upload and download into any kind of computer and/or simulation. Lets say there is only one simulation we collectively download into. You have a body in this simulation and in one way or another, that body will have to be coded to be you. What you are is contained by this virtual body in order for you to experience inside that simulation. 

I truly don't see why something like the above example isn't what's already going on. Also, if we have a source consciousness or an infinite consciousness that can manifest into vessels.. it would make sense out of a lot of things. For instance, it would make sense out of infinite regress. And also other paradoxes and arguments like fine-tuning. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
I'll take that a 'No', then! :)
Well, of course but no offense that isn't a very good question. How can anything having to do with a belief be tangible? How can life after death be tangible? I guess if it is a soul thing, there should be a soul within our bodies but still that wouldn't necessarily be tangible. I mean, i took a loose definition of tangible and by that way spiritual experiences are the closest thing we have to tangible or as i took it 'can be perceived by our senses.'  But nothing can be specifically perceived by touch even if it were true. 

All of the platforms i think are the best aren't tangible. A simulation would be extra dimensional so nothing there. A pantheistic type of platform would be around us, but also extra dimensional. And it also wouldn't require a soul since when you die you just become one with everything again. Basically, they are all extra dimensional so there wouldn't be any tangible evidence.  

This is a perfect example of what i mean about our current understanding of these subjects. You are treating it like it should be testable by our scientific methods and/or tangible. That's just wrong. You cannot (for now i should say) test for an afterlife this way. This is also an example of what i meant in the other thread about liking those eastern religions. They are at least trying to tackle these questions by turning inwards and/or not treating it like western scientists do. Eastern scientists and thinkers have the better approach. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@disgusted
First of all... i don't know what caveman you are talking about since i don't believe in any religion. Also, this isn't an iron clad "belief" which i have repetitively said... It's a suspicion. If life after death is true, then it won't only be humans... it would be every living creature. This of course depends on which platform is right. I guess there are some where creatures don't... but everyone i like the most has a reincarnation element to it, so everything would just reincarnate. In any case, i'm not seeing how this animal surviving thing is any barrier to life after death... Animals and humans could survive death into another dimension. If this is a simulation, reincarnation, pantheism, etc... all these platforms have the implications of all surviving death, not just humans. Whatever platform you are thinking of where animals don't survive death.. i would say it's a pretty dumb platform. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@keithprosser
Do you have any tangible reason for that belief?
One of the main 'tangible' reason in my opinion is that i've had weird experiences. I can think of natural alternatives to explain them, but the natural explanations seem more far fetched than what i actually experienced. So, those opened my eyes up to experiences in general. So i've spent a lot of my life not only researching other peoples experiences but asking everyone i meet about if they've experienced anything bc i'm sorta obsessed with knowing i'm not the only one. It messes with your head bc if i was i would be worried about my mental state. But, at this point, i've ruled that out 1) bc my uncle is a neurologist and i've learned a lot about the mind and delusions; and 2) i'm not the only one. The way i look at it is out of the millions of people reporting experiences, only 1 of them has to be true for the implications to be wild. So, that is pretty crazy in and of itself. But i don't jump to conclusions. I don't know what could explain these. It could very well be something about consciousness that we aren't aware of and has very little to do with any afterlife or other dimension. So who knows what it means... but i'm quite confident they happen. So i think it is enough to suspect something is going on... one of those somethings is extra dimensions and higher consciousness. I believe we know too little at this point to rule these things out. 

Also some reasoning, i don't think we've even begun to test for an afterlife or other dimensions. The closest we come to studying it is in a theoretical type of way like multiverse stuff. Science currently doesn't have any means to test for this stuff. Science is best suited to discover our reality not any transcendent reality. Factor that it, that we really haven't even tried yet nor have the means too, i think it's close minded not to suspect these things especially given how incredibly unbelievable life is in general. We've only begun to scratch the surface of existence and we are already blown away by multiple unbelievable facts about life... i don't see why something like life after death just wouldn't be another unbelievable reality.   

My last reason is just personal. Ever since i can remember, quite literally from the age i can remember which is 4/5 and up, i've always felt like i was somewhere else before this life. Sorta like some young kids having past life memories, i felt like i had multiple experiences already. I remember as a kid imagining some pretty crazy stuff even before i've seen it and as soon as i was old enough to reason, i thought back and thought the things i've seen as a kid were impossible... and that's what initially got me interested in metaphysical subjects. Of course this one is really just a personal feeling and old memories... but they're significant to me nonetheless.   

So all of that together, and of course other things like philosophy, metaphysical hypothesis, observations of this world and even science, i don't think it's too far fetched to suspect something like life after death. I truly doubt this is the only reality that has intelligent beings like humans that has 'ever' existed and in the doubt i can see some pretty crazy implications of our type of mind plus infinite.  
Created:
0
Posted in:
Atheist only thread.
-->
@disgusted
It is all imagination at this point, but how amazing is imagination. We are as far as we know... the only beings that can imagine in a seemingly infinite reality. In any case, i don't think you know or i know. Life is pretty crazy in and of itself... thinking it can continue after death isn't far fetched. You having hands that are made out of the same particles you are typing on and being able to breath and think... that is already insane. I'm not so quick to discount anything insane from being possible just bc it sounds like it's not possible. And no, it isn't bc i'm afraid to die. I actually get more anxiety in thinking about the implications of not dying. You don't have to worry about if death is nothing, you have to worry about if death is actually something.  
Created:
0