Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
RM likes to be bullied. He is totally a sub irl. If you step on him and say airmax, it will turn him on.
Btw there is something about how this is worded that makes me think Ramshutu wrote it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
How do you justify to somebody that believes something is true that you know 'for a fact' that what you believe is true contradicts their truth?
In the end 'facts' are what we believe so firmly that we'd never allow ourselves to admit it's an educated guess, it's how we stay sane in an uncertain reality.
We could be in a simulation right now, at the end of the day who really can know? I'm not saying that mental health doesn't matter and that educated guesses are irrelevant, instead I'm saying that educated guesses are the foundation of all 'facts' and actually everything is some layer of theory build upon other upheld theories that are rooted in things known as axioms.
There is a reality, objectively, I'd agree to that but to know whether you are right or the other is right just because you're with the majority and it seems to make sense to your brain is never an objective absolute (and I don't consider this an 'educated guess', instead I consider this part an axiom).
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Are you insistent on abstaining?
Created:
-->
@TheHammer
@3RU7AL
@Lemming
@Reece101
@airmax1227
See above, please.
Created:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
@Outplayz
@ILikePie5
@oromagi
@FLRW
Please see above.
Created:
This is NOT a callout thread. I am EXPLAINING my stance, this is not a subliminal.
~~~~~
I want my previous supporters, most of whom are either abstaining or heavily considering to vote 3RU7AL due to familiarity, to stay with me here and understand why I've endorsed Airmax1227. I was not 'played' which may make you think there is some kind of game going on, I want you to all fully understand my stance. Ignore all toxicity towards me, ignore the tone or words (don't have to ignore it but just asking you to for this thread) and pay attention to the situation, the platforms and the agendas at play.
Agendas as RM perceives them
RM - Make the site grow by stopping big bans by more gradual intermediary moderation as well as a general 'clean up the site' approach to induce harmony and repel less users away.
Wylted - Stop RM doing that. Increase freedom, keep the mods in check and push hardcore freedom of speech and expression. Main motive beyond stopping RM is to stop the site dying.
3RU7AL - Push for more quantifiable rules, apply them uniform.
Airmax - Don't give much of a damn clarifying stance on moderation, push for the site to grow incredibly much but only if he wins.
TheHammer - Oppose Airmax for the luls, hey RM I will vote for you in good faith.
Now, I want you to watch something that happens when we analyse these agendas.
There are 3 users trying to stop the site dying:
RM, Wylted and Airmax and based on prior track record from years ago I can tell you that Airmax is equipped to stop a dying debate website from truly dwindling, he was overcome by brutal adspam and lack of admin access to the website. At least that's my understanding.
There are 2 other users;
3RU7AL and TheHammer.
I don't know a politically correct or polite way to say that TheHammer is running as a joke candidate, your vote to TheHammer will be wasted in my opinion, sorry to say it. I based this both on public and private discourse and a bit of knowledge about the user from the past. If I am wrong and Hammer is sincere then I do apologise.
3RU7AL wants to do something that can't be achieved by a President (make qualitative rules become quantifiable) as this is a moderator-only capacity to change. Furthermore, with regards to pushing for the site's popularity or event, I doubt this user will use their powers at all.
This here is a summary of why I unironically and genuinely dropped out to endorse Airmax1227.
I encourage my previous supporters to see this as a necessary evil (that they are appeasing a user who for all intents and purposes will not help the website nearly as much if he loses the presidency and I would go as far as to say it's out of spite).
I do not like Airmax, I respect his ability to make a site stop dying, specifically a debate website. It's that simple.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I am free to talk about Airmax without you harassing me actually. However, I will ask for RO that we don't talk about each other anymore, until then you can try your way and I try my way.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
He called me a gaslighting abusive bully, I'd rather be called a snivelling cunt personally.
That said, I agree with something here, I am down for the mods making crystal clear where the line lies and applying it equally always. If the line lies more lenient than the past, I'll adapt and if it doesn't I'll also adapt.
I am still completely requesting them to put an RO between Lunatic and I as I am not interested in being his latest victim, he is free to pick on others. If it helps Lunatic for me to admit something, I am happy I am out of this election drama, he is not wrong... Except I am not out of it and he has been harassing me throughout both before and after my dropping out. Thanks and bye.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
If I dish it like that, regularly then I get banned; I want equal harshness to all. It's either pure freedom to abuse or same standard to all.
I have been told if I get banned again it will be permanent, the mods always promise amnesty when they come in and yet when I was wrongly banned for 6 weeks it was for basically nothing other than a series of singularly unbannable offenses that amounted to some combination that not only I'd already been banned by bsh1 for but that basically seemed to just be 'you're too toxic'.
I want the mods to make crystal clear what is vs isn't okay. It should not be based on who the victim of abuse is, it should be based on what is vs isn't allowed. In a way this is the one time I am actually agreeing to 3RU7AL's platform of quantitative criterion for punishments but I also know that what the veto does isn't allow the President to change the qualitative nature of rules, so it's not a part of the platform I can vote based on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
- callout thread
- cross-contamination toxicity happening over multiple threads and in retaliation even I began to have to participate.
- the 'atmosphere' of the website becoming more hostile and toxic is infectious and not only leads to others becoming more toxic or being driven away but repulses onlookers to not want to sign up.
You can believe what you want, I know one of the root things driving people away from this website. Nobody I have ever shown this website to ended up joining it except those who would join anyway as they were into DDO despite its toxic environment.
I have yet to meet a single person outside of this website who sees this website and feels it's overmoderated, even though my ban was wrong the slew of toxicity and spitefulness as the norm here is a major deterrent. About the only attractive part of the website is the formal debating arena as most of us there, other than in a rap battle or something, have generally got decent conduct these days.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
If you continue to bully me on behalf of others, I will simple report it. I am letting you know that this shit isn't cool with me, so do not keep at it.
Also kink-shaming is a very strange lowblow when the person saying it is too much of a cuck themselves to reveal who they are, makes you wonder if they have a masked gimp kink combined with a switch tendency to humiliate ruthlessly as the dom/domme.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
It's textbook behaviour of a toxic harasser. The shaming for going to authorities to get protected against them is part and parcel.
He is honestly a very abusive personality whom relishes in the agony he causes. I am not wrong to get the mods to stop this, instead this is precisely the right time to get mods to intervene. Once he cannot pick on me, he will pick on others and then the mods will realise it's not a me thing; it's a him thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
So much for this lolololol
You'll get the last word here too, so that you can then accuse me of:
1. Not respond out of laziness
but just before you get it, I want to point out who it is who does the other stuff and prides themselves on it.
Yeah, all of this is more gaslighting, at risk of repeating myself. And yeah, I will get the last word. I will continue to drain you mentally here. I am just getting started. The more you have to say the more I have to say. This is fun for me.
There is only one of us with a toxic gaslighting agenda here and you've been doing it to me for my entire campaign. My campaign is over and you're still doing it.
I would have expected this from you if I'd endorsed 3RU7AL, the fact you're doing it anyway when I endorse Airmax is a big issue for voters who supported me (yes, they really exist and existed). You can play your game here, have your last word and be nasty to me. I am not interested in your abuse anymore this is a callout thread anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
It's not cowardice for airmax not to respond to RCB's vitriol, because RCB has an agenda. Airmax is more than willing to debate and engage professionally with any serious questions that people have about his campaign. Even if you want to argue with him about it. But he shouldn't be encouraged to respond to blatant manipulation, so I will be the one to do.
It is. My agenda is simple, if Airmax doesn't disassociate with your severe toxicity, it's going to badly hurt his image. The sooner he gets that, the sooner he can be saved from an inevitable defeat as he neglected this community for years and nobody owes him for anything anymore.
You have this romantic idea of him, I have the real idea. He's an antihero motivated by an ego rush. There's no other sensible reason for a guy to give absolutley zero crap about a community until there's a power position to compete for and to promise us that basically if he loses, he won't bother with us anymore.
I know what his real agenda is and I support him anyway. It's not faked and you will not succeed in driving me away from voting for the best hope the website has at not staying dead af.
Where you go wrong is you think I need to like Airmax to vote for him or support him. Like either I worship him or I hate him. You got to get some nuance, learn it.
Created:
Posted in:
We will see if it's feigned or not when I give my vote.
This thread is just an extension of your ego being incapable of handling negative feedback while you pretend I'm the thin-skinned one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
I very much enjoy the live mafia games we do on Friday nights, and I hope we can get larger crowds for that as we make it a regular thing, but I'm wondering if there is an interest in other hangout type events.I'd like to see us engage in competitive and cooperative video game nights, movie nights, and other things with some level of formality, as well as informal events where members can just hang out at some regular intervals. Let me know your thoughts on this, and if you have specific ideas for community gathering type things we can arrange.I think it might be fun just to watch someone stream some new video game, or watch a sporting event together, but that might just be me, so let me know if you have any thoughts about this at all.
That's stuff we all can get elsewhere but I got nothing against extroverted people into those things having a bonding experience.
None of that has anything to do with debating but you are wiser than I am when it comes to appealing to people so if that's how to make the website appeal to people what am I meant to say or think?
I do think you forgot one significant thing though... In the end, you will end up agreeing with me and my platform. Nobody ruins the site's image like either a very severely toxic user who continually harasses others or a user who posts hate speech regularly.
Those were 2 pillars of my platform that my haters called overzealous moderation. I'm also not going to force you to take a stance on it because you've hinted you kind of agree already and your opponent is also vague on their stance on such things.
I am busy now for the next day and a half overall and won't be replying much.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Show us your debates on the forums please, which page of your posts should we go through?
Do you know which of us likes our safe space?
You.
You sit in forum games where you're safe to type your vitriol and bully with your 'buddies' and you consistently struggle to cope in said forum games if your friends don't turn up to back you up. You can barely endure the website if your bestie Mikal isn't there as your emotional support. You only ever engage people in arenas where you think you're more popular within it in the first place. Show me one exception. Before you bring it up, 3RU7AL's campaign thread was something you engaged in after you saw it was only Athias defending. I engaged from the start.
Let's be fucking real here, I've been around the block, lasted through a 'permaban' to show my love of debating and withstanding hostility and disagreement, not flinched or given a damn. I debate among the most active on and off the forums on this website overall. You are throwing stones out of a greenhouse, Lunatic.
Let me guess, you think you getting the 'last word' here constitutes a win, that's why you stick to forums. I don't have an issue with forum-only debaters. I just think that you are confusing you continually harassing me as something that somehow is 'debating'. You're not debating me, you're just coming after me trying desperately to hurt my feelings to soothe your precious ego against the 1 on 1 domination happening right here right now. This isn't your Discord, you don't have authority and don't have some bunch of buddies to laugh me out the room like you did on DDO.
I gave you a genuine burn, if you were actually thick-skinned you'd have said 'damn I'll take the L good one RM' but you can't do that because you can't recognise it for what it is.
If you're gonna come to anybody on this entire website and say this:
You were banned because you are unequipped to handle the stress of people not agreeing with you. You don't debate logically, only emotionally, and only gaslight individuals.
You should have picked on somebody else. I debate anybody, anytime on practically anything (within reason and time constraints). You are the one who sits in your happy zone with your friends to back you up whenever you feel too heated and need approval so you @ them and laugh at me hoping they pile on me. I stick up for myself, my voters never spoke for me once yet clearly stated they'd vote me and why is that? I am not somebody who ever needs to rely on others for any kind of debate or conflict (unless we are talking physical life threatening conflict, but that isn't debating and I'm not about to risk dying to prove what a 'man' I am until it's absolutely necessary).
You are somebody who needs your feeling of power and 'buddies' before you really can debate. Guess what? Nobody cares.
Go on, have your last word now. You 'win' this forum debate because you get the last word. Well done, pat on the back.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I am referring to the ban I received on DART in Sept 2020, genius. If either of us can't handle the stress it's mr 'I play forum games to feign genuine debate activity and compensate'.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
You can call me out on my bullshit all you like, my vote will do the talking for me on election day.
You did more to ruin Airmax's image than anybody could.
My old voters are now more inclined to vote 3RU7AL thanks to how you abused somebody they actually backed and liked in a thread where I endorsed him.
You are blinded by an ego and rage that I find very irritating but I guess I'm growing numb/used to it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
"RationalMadman's pride must be protected at all costs! Any and all who offend him shall be banned!"
Oh I was banned for far less, I am used to inconsistent moderation though and as I said this is without a results-oriented mindset.
I see you violate rules, I click report. Whether you abuse me, Pie or another user or Jews in general. It is not of a concern to me.
If I say anymore it can be misconstrued as a threat of mod action. I am clicking report until you stop breaking the rules, whether by your own volition or the mods doing their diligent duty to protect site users from bullying.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
I truly don't want to play any political games which is why I'm trying to just ignore anything that I don't believe is asked/stated/presented in good faith, or simply isn't productive. I don't want to spend my time on that kind of stuff, I want to engage with the community in a genuine way about my intentions and plans for the future, and I'll just concede everything else. If I lose an election as a result of my desire for this approach, then that is probably for the best anyway.
You have it backwards. The things you are dodging are specifics, what you specialise in is vagueness such as here:
While part of this goal/plan involves a certain philosophy of moderation, and I will be eager to share this philosophy with the moderators (especially in relevant incidences),
This was a whole lot of saying nothing about your approach to moderation. You and I both know your approach is as simple as:
Target outcasts that get too annoying and appease the popular people, letting them get away with repeated ad hominem to the point of harassment and bullying.
I have seen you moderate before, it's a shambles and killed off all outcast personalities on DDO one by one. As things progressed, the only people left on DDO (I mean really left, not guys like me who showed up on on its death wanting an active debate crowd to go to, curious where the community would move) were the people who either were in a clique that all had one thing in common ~ they admired and complimented you or alternatively they were stuck in the modless wasteless of the Religion Forums of DDO.
Ramshutu has it backwards, you should only be the community organiser we'd be very wise to keep your hands off of the mod-side of things but the Presidency has both and regardless you have power to persuade whiteflame so what good will stopping it being official do?
If we were able to rank everybody on the website in who should or shouldn't be a mod, I'd rank you the near the bottom. I don't respect your moderating style, your style is as 'establishment' oriented as it gets. What I respect is your ability to lead a website even while it's technically dying to an impeccable level of resisting that 'death'. I respect that enough to drop out and endorse you and respect that enough to not care that you probably won't wield the ban-veto power in ways I'll entirely agree with.
When I ask you questions like what you think of Lunatic's behaviour, it's to give you a chance to win over voters that are alienated by how he's carrying himself. He's even made anti-semitic remarks about you in Mikal's thread by fake-quoting me regarding you being a 'Jewish bully' when you being Jewish is never ever something I have fixated on or in any shape or form mentioned really. I don't even get the joke and am disgusted he fake-quoted it. The question is if you endorse this kind of humour, Mikal called you a Holocaust survivor and said he has seen your massive dick in the OP of your 'official' campaign thread before this one. This is not funny to many and really is beyond cringe to the point of directly insulting for others.
We need to know if you do or do not condone vs condemn how your campaigners have carried themselves so that we, the voters, can decide where to place our vote on election day. If you keep dodging everything because you fancy doing so, it tells voters you will ignore them as bad-faith if/when they come to you with a problem later on.
You have quite literally answered nothing I've asked in this thread, at all. My question to you is why, when that will actually help voters know where you stand. There really are voters here who can't support someone too afraid to take a stand of any kind.
Observe the behaviour of your avid supporter and tell us if you condone or condemn it.
Created:
Posted in:
RM is just mad airmax didn't reply to him more. He needs a friend so bad and it shows.
You need therapy and it shows too.
Whoever you are, after all I have no definite knowledge.
But what I lack in a friendship with Airmax I have in ability to say stuff to people's face.
If I really needed a friend so bad, I'd be super nice to you all and beg for your approval, including Airmax and Wylted.
It's not hard to be fake and get friends, the hard part is being yourself and allowing people to like and dislike the real you, it's something you all should try some time and why truthbox works on you, you can't say the truth with your usernames attached though the person who said this particular one probably can it doesn't take away the point I'm making.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
He can meme all he wants, in the end the toxicity stacks up, this is the same mod that banned me for stacked up poor conduct that was barely close to as bad as what Lunatic has done these past 2 weeks.
However, what he does isn't my concern, I am just reporting things that violate rules as that is the duty of any member of the website.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
I'm not following, it's very offensive to devout religious people because it uses god's name in vain.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
What exactly would OMG be politically correct for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
You assume all my supporters listened to my recommendation.
However, I assure you that more of mine will than yours. It's your supporters who will even stronger go for him over what they see as a complete wild card who didn't contribute.
I really do hope Airmax is here to help the website. I also hope he wins as if he loses, he'll probably just ditch us most likely but if he wins I hope this goes far.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Truthbox: Airmax1227 is called the best mod of DDO because he didn't let any others moderate it, even when he should have. He is a workaholic bitchboy who only knows how to act all big and mighty when he has to win an election and charm somebody.
On PMs, he stopped replying to me after he realised that not only he had nothing more to gain as I'd dropped out to endorse him but that despite that, I was not gonna fall for his fake charm.
Report me for the 'bitchboy' remark, you laissez-faire poser.
You're overrated and I can say it to your face.
So, drop the act that we're friends and just at the very least reply if you support or don't support Lunatic's actions. Give me the respect to reply to what I write, I don't deserve your blind eye anymore, see me and respond.
Created:
-->
@Athias
And you can sift through the numerous exchanges he's had with other members, including yourself, and I challenge you to find an ad hominem in his statements.
3RU7AL opts for sarcasm instead, such as in this thread where I cornered them and the reply is 'thank you for your opinion(s)' type stuff.
Created:
-->
@Athias
Since Airmax1227 also barely had debates on DDO and has had absolutely none here, I can't compare along those lines.
I would say that 3RU7AL having this unique custom debate system that continually results in the other taking an easy win is problematic for debating integrity but since they're custom and thus unrated, I guess it doesn't matter.
That hardly shows teamwork though, I actually had better rapport with Type1 than 3RU7AL had and I defeated Type1 and even exposed him for being Sparrow.
3RU7AL doesn't have many people-skills that I can see, I just don't buy it.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
I'd argue that 'oh, my lord' and 'oh, my gosh' were examples of PC versions of 'oh, my god'.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
It's not the poor that feel such burning resentment,
You've probably not interacted much with the neglected poor of nations that truly neglect them (as in 100% neglect, I'm talking Honduras, Kenya, Nigeria, Bangladesh, India excluding the parts where they have some sharing with and caring for the poor so on and so forth).
The poor are absolutely left to rot in many places tha embrace familial favouritism. There, you will find the problem.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
We don't 'pretend' that favoritism is okay -- favoritism is okay. It's the foundational principle of love. A mother favors her children. A wife favors her husband. A child favors their family. This isn't exclusive to the rich, but to the poor as well, who also dream of having something to leave to those whom they care for, to provide for those whom they value far into the future, and would not break bread to feed the whole city block if it meant that their own children would go to bed with half-empty bellies. You do love to wrap the mantle of the poor around yourself, but poor people by and large aren't animated by the same venomous spite and resentment that you are. They have families and other human ties which adorn their otherwise dire circumstances, and make them more bearable. It's not the poor that feel such burning resentment, but those who have isolated themselves and failed to make and hold on to healthy human bonds and a supportive community.
Yes, you absolutely pretend it is okay.
It is why your crowd, politically, let people rot homeless and neglected, uneducated as they could never afford it, sick and malnourished for much the same reason with parents who themselves were left by the wayside.
I don't mean in the US alone, there's nations more right-wing than US, just look at most of Africa, a lot of South America (excluding Venezuela) and a huge portion of South Asia.
When you neglect your poor continually and let inheritance be the entire decider of one's start in life being pleasant vs abhorrent, you're just another scumbag who poses as a proponent of justice and fairness when what you really support is corruption.
Created:
-->
@Athias
No. Not all voters and candidates who posted during that time helped create that "acidic drama pool." It was primarily you and Wylted, with some help from Lunatic.
I can name others but I will accept the responsibility, I contributed to a hostile environment that I am happy to be out of.
I hope Airmax wins, not out of liking the guy but out of respecting his ability to make a debate site grow.
Created:
-->
@Athias
Once again, 3RU7AL intends to offer counsel and target the moderators' capacity fundamentally--i.e. their ARBITRARY QUALIFICATIONS. This is not as "flashy" as boasting something which he can't do.
Let me agree with you.
If Airmax is lying and bluffing and wins but lets DART stay dead, I won't forgive him or ever let any of his crew win another election.
It comes down to me believing him, it's also why Wylted dropped out. We believe he can bring DART out of its practically dead status.
Created:
-->
@Athias
Once again, you are grossly overestimating the capacity of this office, RationalMadman. And I know of no better member who can bolster the image of this site image than one who demonstrated integrity, decorum, respectfulness, and the initiative to cooperate with others--3RU7AL.
Please list me examples or hint at moments where 3RU7AL has demonstrated decorum, respectfulness, and the initiative to cooperate with others.
I will admit the user has integrity, the rest I have either not seen or seen the opposite of but I will let you back it up as frankly thanks to a certain user's behaviour, I have grown sick of Airmax and his support base already.
The reason I am backing Airmax is that I believe that nobody else is going to help DART become less of an unpopular tiny place that nobody on the Internet except like 20 of us, care about. If Airmax stays true to his campaign promises, I will be ecstatic about the site's success.
I am unsure whether you and 3RU7AL offer the same hope, the way I see it even at your best, DART stays relatively dead. I say that without any spite or resentment because honestly the same would be true if I'd won, though I think by cleaning up some of the more toxic mess, I could at least deter less potential users away.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I don't recall asking you but as per usual you insert yourself and try to speak for Airmax.I asked Airmax and only Airmax, don't be to Airmax what Athias is to 3RU7AL if you hypocritically condemn it at the same time.I want Airmax himself to speak on whether he does or does not endorse your behaviour and treatment of myself and Pie in particular, during this election. It is important to voters sitting on the fence to use his replies to things like this to ascertain where he stands morally on matters that divide and destroy the community, which I firmly believe you have been doing throughout this election campaign process.I have 0 care in the world what you reply to this, Lunatic. I will await Airmax to reply.
Thank you for your copypasta, enjoy mine.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
I don't recall asking you but as per usual you insert yourself and try to speak for Airmax.I asked Airmax and only Airmax, don't be to Airmax what Athias is to 3RU7AL if you hypocritically condemn it at the same time.I want Airmax himself to speak on whether he does or does not endorse your behaviour and treatment of myself and Pie in particular, during this election. It is important to voters sitting on the fence to use his replies to things like this to ascertain where he stands morally on matters that divide and destroy the community, which I firmly believe you have been doing throughout this election campaign process.I have 0 care in the world what you reply to this, Lunatic. I will await Airmax to reply.
Again, I state this, thank you for your concern.
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
I don't recall asking you but as per usual you insert yourself and try to speak for Airmax.I asked Airmax and only Airmax, don't be to Airmax what Athias is to 3RU7AL if you hypocritically condemn it at the same time.I want Airmax himself to speak on whether he does or does not endorse your behaviour and treatment of myself and Pie in particular, during this election. It is important to voters sitting on the fence to use his replies to things like this to ascertain where he stands morally on matters that divide and destroy the community, which I firmly believe you have been doing throughout this election campaign process.I have 0 care in the world what you reply to this, Lunatic. I will await Airmax to reply.
What I replied to your reply, elsewhere, I am not reading your posts any longer. I am asking Airmax to make a statement for others to know if he endorses your conduct or not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@airmax1227
I don't recall asking you but as per usual you insert yourself and try to speak for Airmax.
I asked Airmax and only Airmax, don't be to Airmax what Athias is to 3RU7AL if you hypocritically condemn it at the same time.
I want Airmax himself to speak on whether he does or does not endorse your behaviour and treatment of myself and Pie in particular, during this election. It is important to voters sitting on the fence to use his replies to things like this to ascertain where he stands morally on matters that divide and destroy the community, which I firmly believe you have been doing throughout this election campaign process.
I have 0 care in the world what you reply to this, Lunatic. I will await Airmax to reply.
Created:
-->
@airmax1227
Please comment on Lunatic's behaviour in this thread, voters need to know whether you endorse a primary supporter of yours conducting himself in this way.
Created:
-->
@airmax1227
Do you endorse how Lunatic is carrying himself and treating those that even support you let alone those that oppose you during this election?
- Me, elsewhere
Please release a statement on this matter.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Do you endorse how Lunatic is carrying himself and treating those that even support you let alone those that oppose you during this election?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Do you endorse how Lunatic is carrying himself and treating those that even support you let alone those that oppose you during this election?
Created:
-->
@Athias
3RU7AL intends to use the president's "seat of power" within its capacity to execute his platform.
This is untrue, 3RU7AL thinks the capacity of the seat is solely to sit there and do nothing while softly advising something to mods.
The seat of power can be used to host community events, directly veto mod actions and be a massive boost to the site's image.
Created:
-->
@Athias
An acidic drama pool which you in part helped create.
Sure, if you want to play semantics, absolutely all voters and candidates who posted during this time helped create it but some far more than others.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@airmax1227
Do you endorse the way Lunatic is defending you here and in other threads like this? Is this behaviour something you endorse?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I never have mentioned about him being Jewish, this is only something the rest of you talk about.
Created:
Posted in:
@Lunatic
Nothing you said there is true, least of all the 'only' but at the very least Airmax could say it himself. You are currently doing for Airmax what you said Athias was lame for doing for 3RU7AL.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Your perma ban was eventually lifted and you remained and posted on the site for months before we off
Not on RationalMadman which stayed banned (it got unbanned after DART began due to a glitch on Juggle's end that reset almost all banned user accounts to become accessible).
He just got lazy. I was officially still permanently banned and only lifting it several years later is still not laissez-faire.
This isn't about me, I am asking about others.
Created: