Total posts: 4,276
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
We had the sensor on banana. Why not track Mharman?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Plus, he doesn’t need Austin to push for Banana. The PoE he’s been operating with all game has already convinced town it can only be Banana and I. Dude has had no hard reads all game, just “here’s who’s slightly the scummiest in my PoE” all game long.
Well, sensor will determine banana's affiliation, so it makes little sense to form a plan based on lying about her.
Created:
Posted in:
If banana was about to be cleared by the sensor, would it make more sense to kill her?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Austin was the only one outside of Banana who at least considered my read on Mikal
banana very blatantly accused Mikal
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
lawyer plus Mikal being scum is possible
Not very likely though.
The real reason is because Austin was the only one outside of Banana who at least considered my read on Mikal
No, it's because Austin was near town confirmed.
Created:
Posted in:
And even though I think Mharman is guilty, I agree that no one should vote until we discuss this.
Created:
Posted in:
Killing Austin rather than Moozer would be basically forced for banana if she knows the sensor will implicate her. Even though it's likely a lost cause anyway since Moozer has been confirmed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@Moozer325
@iamanabanana
Less than one hour until hammer
Created:
Posted in:
Dear scum,
Creating this post is Savant's hidden agenda.
From,
Luna
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@Moozer325
@iamanabanana
I'm the hammer. Gonna give another two hours for people to finish agendas, then I'll hammer. If anyone hasn't finished all your agendas, real and fake, plz do so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
in spirit, we don't lose a lynch. The whole reason we're even going for an Earth lynch is because we fear the politician. FYPOV, the PoE is set anyway, so you're getting an elimination on Earth from that too.
And what if Earth is scum? Then I just killed myself for nothing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
It'll be as if we lynched Earth and you died in the night, except Earth is around.
If Earth is scum, then I died for nothing. If Earth is town, we still lose a town member and a lynch overall. So no potential gain but still potential loss.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Eh, displaying a picture of Hitler is not automatically the same as endorsing all of Hitler's actions. I think WyIted does support Hitler in other posts, but those aren't avatars and are thus bound by different rules. Maybe you could use a case that said posts should be used as context for evaluating whether the avatar implicitly endorses hate, but the guidelines are kind of gray in that regard.
It does open a slippery slope, like what about having a profile pic of George Washington? He owned slaves. What about FDR? He authorized internment camps. Who decides when the good a person did outweighs the bad enough that the profile picture is allowed?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Have you done all your challenges, real and fake?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@AustinL0926
@iamanabanana
Have you done all your challenges, real and fake?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@Moozer325
@iamanabanana
You're the only ones who I don't think have done any agendas yet. Make sure to get those done.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
How do you know Banana is guilty by virtue of there being one scum on the train?
Well if Earth is inno (I assume he is) then the scum off the train would be either Moozer or banana, and it's not Moozer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Did you get one of these names mixed up?
No, why?
Created:
Posted in:
That's better actually imo since Moozer is basically confirmed innocent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@Mikal
@AustinL0926
We could also hammer earth with:
1. Mharman
2. Mikal
3. Austin
4. Savant
If only 1 scum is on the train, we know that banana is guilty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FishChaser
Power is different from money, there is more of an evolutionary basis for that but it still isn't on the same level.
But there's still an evolutionary basis for both. That's why women are attracted to strength...because it's a source of power. We've evolved to the point where women can be attracted to power in other forms because the human brain understands how power works. Humans pursue power even in abstract forms.
There are stories of women being more emotionally hurt by a FWB ghosting them than a relationship that lasted over a decade.
Maybe, but it's probably not the norm.
as long term is usually settling for financial and emotional security
Call it settling if you want, but women choosing financial and emotional security would be evidence that they do in fact value those things. You could just as easily say that women who choose attractive but incompatible men are settling for good sex even though their personalities don't get along well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
@iamanabanana
Please try to complete the rest of your agendas (real and fake) soon. Don't rush it, but get it done today if possible. We want some buffer so we aren't scrambling at the deadline.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@Mikal
@AustinL0926
@Moozer325
Please try to complete the rest of your agendas (real and fake) soon. Don't rush it, but get it done today if possible. We want some buffer so we aren't scrambling at the deadline.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Is the dp ending in 2 hours
Ends on 5/25 according to Luna's post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Didn’t see this
Well I asked in PM, you can ask him too if you want.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
Let’s all be on earths lynch except her
Luna confirmed only 4 people can be on the train, no more.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FishChaser
People value money as a means to access resources, this is different from evolving inherent mechanisms that trigger the desire to reproduce and be close to someone because they have money.
Ok, but they still value it. Evolutionarily, people value sex as a means to create offspring, but they still value sex. There are inherent mechanisms that make many women want to reproduce with someone powerful, it doesn't really matter the form the power takes.
do you REALLY believe that women value guys they see as friends more than guys she sees romantically?
People value family members more than the person they've been hooking up with for three months, so I imagine they'd value long-term friends more than that person as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FishChaser
money hasn't existed long enough to play a part in how women's attraction instincts have evolved
Ok, by this logic no one should care about money at all because it hasn't been long around for us to evolve to care about it. Except we do, and some people are even gambling addicts, because we've evolved to the point where we can understand power even as an abstract concept and have a strong desire for it.
valuing your genes is synonymous with valuing you as a mate
Valuing you as a mate isn't the same as valuing you as a person. By the same token, valuing your money and power is synonymous with valuing you as a spouse.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FishChaser
The physical attraction is a prerequisite for caring about your personality.
And money and power aren't? Why not?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FishChaser
Women who marry for money and power are just using the guy.
Isn't it effectively the same with marrying for looks? They're using you for your appearance even though they don't care about your personality. At least money actually has a use outside of attracting women.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@iamanabanana
he could have saved whiteflame last day phase which would have been good for POE
Yeah we reduce PoE by one but we also get one less lynch total, so it cancels out. Also if WF had been scum, it would have just been a waste.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
lynching me doesn't stop that threat
Well it mitigates it. If scum is either you or Mharman, for example, then in a scenario where scum has the politician, lynching you reduces scum by 1 and the politician wouldn't win them the game. If you're town, then we can afford not to lynch scum today. That's why lynching you today hedges our bets.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Guess I should ask here so everyone sees your answer: When does the sensor get distributed? Is it possible for a townie to get the sensor and then get night killed?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Once everyone has done all their agendas, real and fake, then we vote on Earth with the wagon: Austin, Moozer, banana, and Earth himself
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
So the question is if he’s scum would he be the only one who could use it or could his team use it as well.
Even if it's one scum member, Earth's partner could have gotten it and then Earth claimed to have it. I mean, either way we hedge our bets by lynching Earth first.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
Well technically a single vote allows scum to hammer with two votes + potential politician
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
I town read Earth, but if I'm wrong, scum can hammer, might get vote manipulator and win automatically. So you should prob unvote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
You gotta unvote. The second cop confirms you are innocent, but just because Earth was telling the truth about you being innocent doesn't mean he's innocent himself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mikal
We're not lynching you anyway. Moozer/Austin/banana/Earth vote Earth.
Created: