Sidewalker

You think Trump's the manager of WinRed?

And it wasn't just the website; there was a spike in Google searches for "Donald Trump donation". 

Trump is so incompetent, his Winred donation site imploded and shut down. What a loser!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13478269/Trump-campaign-website-CRASHES-donations-guilty-verdict.html

Well I bet none of them have TSD.

You put the zag in exaggeration. For sure.

two fundamentally distinct substances cannot interact

Wow, I was actually worried he might just end up getting off on most or all of the charges. I guess not! Considering how all the polls I've seen indicate that support for Trump drops significantly in the case that he is convincted of a crime, I'd say Biden's chances of winning this election have gone up significantly. 

I wonder if they are now allowed to say what the underlying crime actually was.

I am just saying President Lincoln and Zelensky had a fundamental difference of opinion.

If you want to smear Lincoln as an armchair president, feel free. You wouldn't be the first. (his monument is him literally in an armchair, lol)

Trump teaches the devil in TDS world.

Remember that Trump said Republicans "eat their young" when they attack him.

Yeah, that does not surprise me nor any other degratory and suggested violence Trumpet espouses.  Some percentage of hi Moronic MAGA/DADA Cult members are bloodthirsty, so they love this kind of blood thirsty talk.  End date for humanity 2015 and counting.

Elections don't have to be a one-day, "show up at the polls at the same time" affair. That's the conventional way of doing it, but there are alternatives. They could do a mail-in vote. Or an in-person election spread out across several weeks. Or heck, do it over a phone app, provided there's some sort of verification in place to prevent fraud or citizens in occupied territories voting at gunpoint.

Point is, it's the job of the Ukrainian government to figure out something and then arrange for it to happen, on time or nearly on time. You don't just give up on elections because they're hard.

The context of "pro choice" in this topic is abortion or non abortion, so let us not shy away from that.

We're not talking about freedom of choice to do anything or unlimited options because you'll have a problem with that.

Instead of biting off more than what you can argue, let us stick to the options in this topic.

When you're pro choice in the case of pregnancy ok, you stand in support of the freedom to go with abortion or non abortion.

I mean really to be blunt and just answering that for you .

That's what it is. Pro choice= pro abortion.

"Pro-choice means you stand in support of the freedom to choose"

You stand in support of the freedom to choose what?

After all, we all think we are right, otherwise, we'd think something else.

I have lost count during the last few months but this must have been at least the 600th "trump bad" thread.

You have no logical common sense critical thinking to offer and I think your trolling cause my frustration in two threads now.

Get your mental state together of leave me alone, please

How can you be pro choice of the abortion without be a champion of the abortion itself?

Well, I wouldn't be surprised. It is only 1 out of 3000 chance to accuratelly guess the correct God.

Every God is the correct God. You don't get my message. You don't understand. A God is a personal responsibility, a preference. If you want a God as a cash cow and you perceive it works as such, then it's the right God for you. If you choose your God because it was the one that is geographically, culturally, socially, financially, militarily, intellectually, traditionally fashionably, scientifically or spiritually right for you personally for whatever reason, even if it's not real, if coerced, phony, evil, perverse, or anything else it's right for you.

A god is something, someone or someplace which is of supreme importance to someone. Zeus, Jehovah, Satan, Kim Jong-Un, Eric Clapton, Frodo, knitting, sex, boating, gambling, idols, Jesus, Shiva, Amaterasu, Buddha, Heaven, the universe, the sun, the Big Bang, science, math, fertility, drugs, money, food, or any of the 3000 you mention. The 8 million or countless gods of Shinto, the nameless god in the temple Paul referred to in the book of Acts and all the others I've not mentioned. The difference between a god and God is that titles, like names, are capitalized due to Identification, grammar and syntax, respect and formality, tradition and convention. (Source) So Jehovah is the God of Jehovah's Witnesses and myself, but to unbelievers Jehovah is only a god or, for identification in Christendom, traditionally, conventionally God of the Bible. That doesn't mean other gods can't be God to someone else in some other place or context. 

If someone thinks God is their God but in reality, their God is something else, like tradition, money etc. then their God isn't what they think it is. For example, if someone thinks their God is the God of the Bible because traditionally and socially, they act as if it is, they go through the motions, attend church and pray, worship etc. but their actions reveal that science or money or sex or drugs or food etc. is more important to them, then their God is not really the God of the Bible but science, religion, money or whatever. That's why the God of the Bible, Jehovah, said he was a jealous God, have no Gods before (more important) than him. He said they don't know him. Cain is a good example of that. He picked fruit up off the ground to sacrifice to God as if God were, to him, a trash can while Abel chose the most valuable of his flock to sacrifice. That's why Paul said that it wasn't a big deal eating meat that was, as customary, sacrificed to "false gods" because he knew those gods weren't God's to him. In only that sense they weren't real. It didn't matter if they were real to the people sacrificing. 

That's why faith is more important than knowledge and why atheism and theism more often than not are only ideologies. That's why atheists can have gods without knowing or acknowledging it and why theists think they are theists of a specific God when they aren't. That's why religion is so divisive, syncretistic and destructive, contentious and pretentious.

If you were going to give away a fortune but you wanted to make sure it went to people who genuinely cared about you and who wouldn't piss it away would you advertise an event where you were going to give a fortune away?  

That, @Stephen, is what the emboldened text was about. The love of the greater number will cool off, the Bible foretold it because it was obvious that would happen.

Mark 4:10-12: When he was alone, those who were around him with the twelve asked him about the parables. He said to them, “To you is given the mystery of God’s Kingdom, but to those who are outside, all things are done in parables, that ‘seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest perhaps they should turn again, and their sins should be forgiven them.’” (Isaiah 6:9-10)

This is a poll for believers and unbelievers.

What if you were wrong? Would you want to know? And if so, why or why not?

Yep, I think you nailed it, the age-old debate as to whether religion is a plane engine has finally been resolved. 

I didn't say religion was a plane engine.  I'm saying a plane engine can make messages in the sky from the exhaust, but that shouldn't count as a sign from god.

How come no Christain can genuinely respond to this?  Maybe I've solved the religious debate.

Me and probably a dozen other people have made suggestions that didn't go into account.  The argument is that it's too much to handle.  So then have there be multiple developers.  Find someone willing to help out and then they develop the website further.

Some time later today, the sun will set and the sun will rise tomorrow.  One of 2 things will happen tomorrow:

1. There will be hundreds of iterations of, "The X religion is the one true religion" (X being something like Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.) in changing colors so we know it's not a plane engine.
   
2. There will be no hundreds of iterations of that sort in the sky.
   

I will convert to whatever happens to be the result tomorrow if you agree to do the same in advance.  If situation 2 happens, then atheism is the assumed winner.

What's the alternative?  

Are you ever fooled by trans women or ladyboy types? LOL.

Why do you think I'm interested in ladyboys. Haha. C'mon, man.

Let me tell you, though, that today's transwomen look so much like real girls so it's difficult to recognize one at first sight. We have to be careful, at least in the countries where the gender transition technology is advanced.

As I lived in Brasil I have some tips to avoid being fooled. First, if (s)he is taller than 5'7", doubt!! Another tip would be the voice, but less trannies have truck driver's voice. Also the smell when they sweat, transwomen have a typical smell that is not like real girls.

Spacetime has no objective reality

please explain gravitational lensing

Spacetime has no objective reality

please explain gravitational lensing

The reason why is because being gender neutral is a product of Anglo American Civilization.

I'm proud of my country, I'm proud of my race, and I don't hate minorities for theirs.

So much technology was invented by white people.  I don't hate non-whites and I don't take personal accomplishment of what other white people did, but if Americans can be proud of their country being the first one to land on the moon while those Americans never went to the moon (while not claiming Congolese are inferior for never going to the moon) and not be called racist, then I feel I am entitled to the same liberty.

Whites also were the ones that led the abolishment of slavery worldwide (OIP.bwLpG5IDuWtnBumuLdIf8wHaDw (474×240) (bing.com)).

In this context, white power!

Which is a good point. Is "Science" science? As the speaker in the video points out, very often science is "science." In other words very real science is corrupted, like religion was, for profit or whatever. You have to be published, you have to have funding and often you have to keep tenure. 

So, this distinction is often made "that isn't actually" or "real" science as if science can't be corrupted, abused or neglected like religion, truth, data, etc. Like gold isn't gold unless it's pure. But that isn't the case. Religion, truth, data, science, theology can't be pure in the sense that (I suppose) gold can be. 

Gold and gods. 

A few years ago I read a Psychology Today article that said it is because we can project ourselves into the scene,  so while you are watching two women in a sexual situation but what you are seeing in your mind's eye is two lesbians making an IlDiavolo sandwich. 

Well, we can project ourselves very well into a scene of a sole woman.

I don't just refer to porn but also a real scenario. Just thinking about the idea of being with two lesbians gets me really hard and I don't know why.

Since I started to have sexual desires at age 13 the lesbian sex turns me on so badly, much more than heterosexual sex. Even now, lesbian sex gets me very excited and really hard. In fact, one of my wet dreams is to have a menage a trois with a pair of lesbians and enjoy watching them make out but I couldn't so far because it's difficult to find two lesbian hookers.

Why is that? Do you have any explanation?

Gradually; it's not like I can talk to 40 million black people at once.

I've done that with minorities before and they are fine with it.

If I cite that poll, then most black people who take serious issue with it will accept it.

I heard Trump is growing a narrow black mustache under his nose.

We are constantly bombarded with claims that Theism is illogical, irrational, and unscientific, but none of those spiritual detractors will ever debate it, not ever.

I’ll debate you

Cool, it will be my first time so be gentle :)

We can make the subject of the debate:  It is reasonable/rational to be Theist.

Now let's figure out how to set it up.

We are constantly bombarded with claims that Theism is illogical, irrational, and unscientific, but none of those spiritual detractors will ever debate it, not ever.

I’ll debate you