Total posts: 8,861
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Excellent post from you there shila. Credit where it's due and all that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
You are very clever,
Well, that is for others such as yourself maybe, to say, gasconading isn't really in my nature. But there are one or two here that just love to let you know their high intellectual status in the theological field.. Indeed, there is one member here, an absolute fascinating character that just cannot shut up about himself, his qualifications and high standing in the church and all that it entails. And his lifetimes dedication to memorising the bible and knowing it backwards and forwards since he was a child. Not to mention is high flying in the judiciary.; defence lawyer, if I remember correctly.
But I feel that you are far too quick to make judgment about my intellect (or lack of) considering you have been here less than a month and only responded to me less than five times out of some 60 posts made by you, Sidewalker. Still, I suppose some believe themselves better judges of character than others? It must be a gift of sorts.....from God perhaps?
your atheist religion is strong,
I am not sure what one would call my position, to be honest. I just cannot accept the scriptures as they have come down and been passed on to us. I have over the years come to believe that there is another story just below the surface. Do you not find them confusing, contradictory and ambiguous at times? You have yourself pointed out the many translations over hundreds & thousands of years and by unknown hands too, that must have had some detrimental effect on these ancient scriptures. Not to mention the agenda of each individual author of those ancient times.
and you are devout,
I have a devoted interest in many things. The scriptures being perhaps my favourite. I find it fascinating when read through one's own eyes rather than the eyes of others don't you? I have already mentioned that I believe at its basic, the bible OT to be a book of war and conquest. The bible NT to be the sketchy accounts of a power struggle between the Jewish sects and other factions in 1st century Palestine.
your intellectual analysis of ancient scripture is very humbling.
Not sure why you would say that. I simply enjoy reading and studying theological matter.
Nice talking to you, mate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
I would suggest that the "giant leap" came with the rapid development of intellectual ability.
Indeed. It is the speed at which it appears to have happened is what I do find fascinating.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405
the Witch wrote: God, straight white men are so bitter.TWS1405 wrote: Says the bitter intellectual coward bigot/racist.
You forgot misandrist.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Shila wrote: Jesus spoke about god at a very young age. His views did not evolve over time. Jesus even believed This childish god was his father.The Boy Jesus at the TempleLuke 2:41 Every year Jesus’ parents went to Jerusalem for the Festival of the Passover. 42 When he was twelve years old, they went up to the festival, according to the custom. 43 After the festival was over, while his parents were returning home, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but they were unaware of it. 44 Thinking he was in their company, they traveled on for a day. Then they began looking for him among their relatives and friends. 45 When they did not find him, they went back to Jerusalem to look for him. 46 After three days they found him in the temple courts, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. 47 Everyone who heard him was amazed at his understanding and his answers. 48 When his parents saw him, they were astonished. His mother said to him, “Son, why have you treated us like this? Your father and I have been anxiously searching for you.”49 “Why were you searching for me?” he asked. “Didn’t you know I had to be in my Father’s house?”[a] 50 But they did not understand what he was saying to them.51 Then he went down to Nazareth with them and was obedient to them. But his mother treasured all these things in her heart. 52 And Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man.This story has always amused me.Here we have a woman chosen by God himself above all other women on the planet to be birth mother of his son and not even noticing that their "treasured" holy charge was absent until after a whole day's travelling!? And they only recovered him after three whole days!!?Some "blessed among all women" she was, wasn't she? I am sure social services would have something to say about that if it were to happen today. 😂And why on earth were they "astonished"!? Had this "blessed among all women" forgotten that the child that she had given birth to was gods son?Why didn't "they understand what he was saying to them"!? He was the son of God!What is really hard to believe is how our spiritual detractors can make claims to being more "intelligent" and "logical" while demanding literal translations of religious narratives, anyone with even a basic understanding of religious narratives, would not call this "intelligent" or "logical".
Yes indeed. The whole New Testament is, as you suggest above, full of " illogical and unintelligent" ambiguous half stories told by men that didn't t even know him. This story of the son of god being lost by the god chosen mother of all mothers for 4 days in particular has to be among the most "unintelligent and illogical" (not to mention the silliest) in the bible.
The Bible is a book that includes history and prophecy, poetry and love songs, allegories and parables, none of which is conducive to any kind of literal translation. The information in the Old Testament was passed down verbally through many generations before it was finally written down in Hebrew and Aramaic, not exactly the most precise way to transmit information. Then, four hundred years after the Old Testament the New Testament began and it was written is Koine Greek. Until the invention of the printing press, each written copy had to be transcribed by hand, which we all know is a very inaccurate process. For the oldest books of the Bible this went on for over 3,000 years, every single copy was transcribed by hand for generations and generations, and it started with information that had been handed down through the generations verbally. The language journey was roughly, verbal transmission in ancient Hebrew and Aramaic, initially written down in Koine Greek and Aramaic, then translated into Latin, then German, and finally English.
Thereby rendering it in anyway a reliable source of the life and times of Christ in 1st century Palestine. Very well put I must say, 'Sidewalker'. 10/10
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Deb-8-a-bull--> @StephenYou.You crazy cat.You are Man of the match every game. ( if there was a TEAM Atheists ) .You never get acknowledged for the thoughts you provoke and the interlect that you bring to the forum.'Tips hat 'Shila wrote: Here is a sample of Stephen’s thoughts. See post #35Stephen wrote in reply to@Sidewalker “ I couldn't prove many of my personal beliefs about God or scripture either. If I cannot prove my beliefs, ideas and reasons for my opinions on these matters, I simply have to admit as such. Which I have done on numerous occasions. I have said that I have no problem with those that have a faith, hence the distinction between faith and belief. But that's just me. You shouldn't get so upset and be so concerned about such trivial opinions such as mine.For instance. I believe Jesus and John the Baptist were in conflict if not full-blown enemies and more likely half-brothers rather than cousins. But I cannot prove it. I believe Jesus and or his followers had a part in John the Baptists death, but I cannot prove that either.I believe all the so-called miracles said to have been performed by Jesus can all be explained with common sense. After all, he wasn't the only one going around preforming such things, was he?Still. I enjoyed your OP.#35
Thanks for the repost.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
What he is trying to say is .His like a different type of atheist.Bat shit crazy in like a serious sence..His our key player over here at the atheist alliance institution place. Of doomHe never gets rested. NEVER.You may have a chance at confusing for like a second when it comes to scripture translations because he gives people to much creditBut we here are yet to see someone get around him,.I doubt anyone could. Real fukin logical , call it like it is and not much more.I got him to laugh one day. Real close we are.Who are ya on bout, Deb?You.You crazy cat.You are Man of the match every game. ( if there was a TEAM Atheists ) .You never get acknowledged for the thoughts you provoke and the interlect that you bring to the forum.'Tips hat '
Well, you have got me to laugh again Deb. And I will doff my cap in return.
Stepping Hen .
🤣
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
What he is trying to say is .His like a different type of atheist.Bat shit crazy in like a serious sence..His our key player over here at the atheist alliance institution place. Of doomHe never gets rested. NEVER.You may have a chance at confusing for like a second when it comes to scripture translations because he gives people to much creditBut we here are yet to see someone get around him,.I doubt anyone could. Real fukin logical , call it like it is and not much more.I got him to laugh one day. Real close we are.
Who are ya on bout, Deb?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Well, we are into 326 pages of argument now. So are you ready to deliver you verdict?You are still arguing about rape.So raping ten year old children is what Christians are doing to increase their numbers. You really talk shite a lot of the time.Try to stay on topic.
Nope. The thread - THE TOPIC - is concerned with if or not atheists are hypocrites, you cretin. And it was YOU that brought rape into the thread not me.
Here>>.
"in the news was a 10 year old girl raped and pregnant forced to have the baby. That too is part of the solution to grow the Christian population".#320
I simply replied;
"So raping ten year old children is what Christians are doing to increase their numbers. You really talk shite a lot of the time".#321
So don't even attempt to put your perverted opinions and thoughts onto my shoulders. AND STAY ON FKN TOPIC!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405
When those of us with intelligence read and reason with the Bible, we see a fable, a mere historical record to be read and treated as just that. A fable intertwined with human history and some actual events and places, but still a fable. A very long one at that.
Yep. That's me. I take the bible OT to be a book of historical, never-ending wars and conquest.
The bible NT a book of power struggles among the many Jewish factions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Are they really completely uninformed about the subject they are discussing?And are you informed about the subject you are discussing?Yes, I even know how to use a dictionary.
But the subject here is not the dictionary, or the use of, is it?
But hey, you’re the expert, if I’m doing it wrong, please do teach me how to be a theist.
What is it that you believe you are doing wrong? I think you made a half decent (childish in part) OP and I commented on it.
You don't have to listen to me or agree with me. I couldn't prove many of my personal beliefs about God or scripture either. If I cannot prove my beliefs, ideas and reasons for my opinions on these matters, I simply have to admit as such. Which I have done on numerous occasions. I have said that I have no problem with those that have a faith, hence the distinction between faith and belief. But that's just me. You shouldn't get so upset and be so concerned about such trivial opinions such as mine.
For instance. I believe Jesus and John the Baptist were in conflict if not full-blown enemies and more likely half-brothers rather than cousins. But I cannot prove it. I believe Jesus and or his followers had a part in John the Baptists death, but I cannot prove that either.
I believe all the so-called miracles said to have been performed by Jesus can all be explained with common sense. After all, he wasn't the only one going around preforming such things, was he?
Still. I enjoyed your OP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405
Polytheist-Witch,Atheists are hate-filled and angry with theists because they think they're better than them. Most resent their parents for being religious and making them learn any type of religion. They constantly argue the Bible is fact and then get upset when someone says they think the Bible is fact. They constantly talk about how we abuse our children and we're mentally ill and that's why they're better than us and our children should be taken from us. They're here to vent that hate because if they did it on the people they know that were theists they wouldn't have any friends or family. It's more than sad it's actually kind of scary. The atheist here is evangelical in their atheism.Wow, you’re just full of yourself. Delusions of grandeur for sure.Atheists are NOT hate-filled angry with anyone. Anyone!!!The problem with theists is their fanaticism with their religious faith to the point where they have such vitriol for those who don’t agree with them. Your comment above is a shining example of that fact. History is also repeat with example after example of the violence done in His name in order to “spread the word.” So no, it is to you theists who are the “hate-filled angry” ones with anyone and everyone who just wants to be left alone to live their own lives, culture and faith as they have done their entire lives, generation after generation.
I don't think I could have put that better myself, TWS1405.
A+1
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Jesus spoke about god at a very young age. His views did not evolve over time. Jesus even believed This childish god was his father.The Boy Jesus at the TempleLuke 2:41 Every year Jesus’ parents went to Jerusalem for the Festival of the Passover. 42 When he was twelve years old, they went up to the festival, according to the custom. 43 After the festival was over, while his parents were returning home, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but they were unaware of it. 44 Thinking he was in their company, they traveled on for a day. Then they began looking for him among their relatives and friends. 45 When they did not find him, they went back to Jerusalem to look for him. 46 After three days they found him in the temple courts, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions. 47 Everyone who heard him was amazed at his understanding and his answers. 48 When his parents saw him, they were astonished. His mother said to him, “Son, why have you treated us like this? Your father and I have been anxiously searching for you.”49 “Why were you searching for me?” he asked. “Didn’t you know I had to be in my Father’s house?”[a] 50 But they did not understand what he was saying to them.51 Then he went down to Nazareth with them and was obedient to them. But his mother treasured all these things in her heart. 52 And Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man.
This story has always amused me.
Here we have a woman chosen by God himself above all other women on the planet to be birth mother of his son and not even noticing that their "treasured" holy charge was absent until after a whole day's travelling!? And they only recovered him after three whole days!!?
Some "blessed among all women" she was, wasn't she? I am sure social services would have something to say about that if it were to happen today. 😂
And why on earth were they "astonished"!? Had this "blessed among all women" forgotten that the child that she had given birth to was gods son?
Why didn't "they understand what he was saying to them"!? He was the son of God!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ehyeh
with being an atheist, there is no flavours too it, you either are one or you aren't.
Basically, I believe the bible, but not as it has come down and been passed on to us by pastors and priests over the millennia and of course minus the miracles. So I am not sure what that makes me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
-->@Stephen @zedvictor4Dumb and Dumber.Talk about letting the TEAM down
I gave my response to the OP here Deb
>>>> #5
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
> @zedvictor4Hi Stephen.I would contend that man polluting his environment is a natural occurrence.That is a reasonable observance, Vic lad.The difference is that man can avert the pollution he is creating but he cannot do anything about what the position of the planets and other heavenly bodies have on the earth in relation to the devastating effect they have.If the surrounding planets and heavenly bodies have such an adverse effect on earth why is earth the only planet that sustains life?
Don't you know? Those schools you attended were a complete and utter waste of time to you weren't they.
Revelation is, well, revealing too. Especially when it speaks of inflation and a loaf of bread costing a day's wages- at the end of the age.“A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius". Outrageous if you ask me Vic, lad. Especially the barley part. That is used in making beer . How much has your beer gone up lately?Outrageous inflation in other words.In Revelation 6:6, the writer states that he hears four living creatures saying a quart of wheat costs a whole day's wages. Out of a quart of wheat, you can make a loaf of bread. In the near future, the way inflation keeps going up, a loaf of bread could cost $200 or a whole day's wages.
Why are you repeating what I have said.
That hasn't happened yet. The author must have invested heavily in bread stocks.
You may not be far off the mark with that comment. I don't know what ill-educated god forsaken place you originate but here farmers over the last few decades have been paid to replace wheat and barley crops with rapeseed/rape oil seed. Irish farmers are being offered huge prices to kill their cattle.
Dutch farmers are up in arms and protesting because their government have told them they must reduce their herds or stop producing livestock altogether. the reason given is "emissions". On and on it goes. Driving up the price of everything edible. They are purposefully and wilfully re-enacting the stories from scripture, imo.
No, there is a lot to be said about this ancient book of which one idiot pastor here once said, "is only a book that is full of words that mean nothing".That is why the pastor was called an idiot. He should have got a translated version of the Bible in the language he spoke.
It wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference to the cretin of a pastor I had in mind.
How's Mrs Vic doing these days? All good, I hope. Give her my best wishes.So you saved your best wished for Mrs. Vic.
Indeed, for according to Mr Vic she has been through a worrying and anxious time. But is partially on the mend.
--> @zedvictor4Evolution:Indeed, it is an interesting subject I have found. Right up until it comes to Homo sapiens then there appears to a giant leap in man's progress that even Darwin failed to explain. Hence my point that man in his natural state is not one suited to the natural world.Actually it proves man in his natural state responded well to evolutionary forces which enabled him to make the giant leap in man's progress that even Darwin failed to explain.
Nope. How many times? Man in his natural state cannot survive without external heat. How long does it take before the obvious sinks through your dense skull bone. Obviously a Billion more years of evolution in your case.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Evolution:
Indeed, it is an interesting subject I have found. Right up until it comes to Homo sapiens then there appears to a giant leap in man's progress that even Darwin failed to explain. Hence my point that man in his natural state is not one suited to the natural world.
Regards to you and yours Stephen.
Thank you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Hi Stephen.I would contend that man polluting his environment is a natural occurrence.
That is a reasonable observance, Vic lad.
The difference is that man can avert the pollution he is creating but he cannot do anything about what the position of the planets and other heavenly bodies have on the earth in relation to the devastating effect they have.
I am sure I do not have to explain to you these effects and what causes them. The educated ancient priests understood perfectly well what was happening when these natural disasters occurred, they just didn't explain them to the ignorant, illiterate superstitious masses of the time but instead used them for their advantage.
According to the elite educated parasitic priests, the ignorant superstitious population had angered god and were now being punished. What was required to quell gods anger was usually more donations in one form or another. You see, it was all man's fault he'd brought it all on himself through his behaviour.
Of course, today these parasitic priests wouldn't dream of getting away with claiming that a natural devastating disaster was sent from God.
In this new age we have new "gods" better known as corporations. Governments are their priests that come with new age reasons for the causes of the natural disasters we are experiencing today, but ultimately it will still come down to man and his behaviour and we now have to pay for it- pollution tax being one of them. The gods will have their pound of flesh in one form or another. I am sure you get my meaning, Vic lad.
This is nothing new, it has happened many times, and before even Jesus' time too. Jesus knew about it. He was an educated priest and had been taught "the secrets of heaven". This is why he was capable of telling his close circle what happens at the end of every age.
Matthew 24:3-7 “Tell us,” they said, “when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” Jesus replied:
Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places, etc etc
Revelation is, well, revealing too. Especially when it speaks of inflation and a loaf of bread costing a day's wages- at the end of the age.
“A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius". Outrageous if you ask me Vic, lad. Especially the barley part. That is used in making beer . How much has your beer gone up lately?
Outrageous inflation in other words.
No, there is a lot to be said about this ancient book of which one idiot pastor here once said, "is only a book that is full of words that mean nothing".
How's Mrs Vic doing these days? All good, I hope. Give her my best wishes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I think you would be hard pressed to find a grade schooler that doesn't know that belief in God is a matter of faith,
Of course, it's a matter of faith and as you say; most 21st century grade school students understands this.
how is it possible that so many Atheists can't grasp that concept?
Atheist probably understand this more so than the theists.
Are they really completely uninformed about the subject they are discussing?
To my knowledge, it is the atheist that studies these ancient scriptures more deeply than the theist. The theist for the most part is happy to sit back and allow the pastor or the priest to read out the biblical stories and have them translated and explained to them. and the reason for this I found is obvious- it is time.
This mantra that if you have "faith" then you have a "burden of proof" so I win, is beyond childish.
Well not quite. It is a case of belief and not necessarily faith. One may well have faith in what he believes, and I have no reason to disbelieve that devout theists have faith in what they believe in. But if one believes in something such as a god, then the burden of proof is most certainly on the believer when questioned about his beliefs - not to be confused with faith.
But this forum has covered the burden of proof many times to the point where the believer will attempt to completely change the universally accepted fact that the burden of proof lays with he that makes the claim.
Are they really completely uninformed about the subject they are discussing?
And are you informed about the subject you are discussing?
so I win, is beyond childish.
You are welcome to your opinion..... "tradey".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
But that is what the topic is about, “ Atheists are hypocrites.”I am here to read the arguments and verify if Atheists are indeed hypocrites.
Well, we are into 326 pages of argument now. So are you ready to deliver you verdict?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
The present extinction event is unique because the changes that the earth is experiencing, such as rising water levels and temperatures, are the result of human activity.BULLSHITE! You are falling for that old government chestnut of man-made climate change that they have purposefully conflated with man polluting his environment. And thicko's like yourself have fallen for it.Didn't you learn fk all at school concerning the movement of the earth around the sun? Here are some clues. The earth has a perigee and an apogee. On every completed cycle the earth retards 1arc degree = 1 arc second.Now off you go and work the rest out for yourself.Climate Change and global warming caused by human activity.
Nope.
Perigean and Apogean Tides effects are minimal.The greatest difference between high and low tide is around Full Moon and New Moon, known as spring tides or king tides. During these Moon phases, the gravitational forces of the Moon and the Sun combine to pull the ocean’s water in the same direction.
Proving that the heavenly bodies have an effect on the earth in relation to its position to the sun and other heavenly bodies.
Perigean spring tides have around 5 cm (2 inches) larger variation than regular spring tides, while apogean spring tides have around 5 cm (2 inches) smaller variation than normal spring tides.
Proving that the heavenly bodies have an effect on the earth in relation to its position to the sun and other planets.
What happens up there has an effect down here. "On earth as it is in heaven".
Natural Disaster Trigger?
Yes. The closer the earth is to the moon and the sun means more gravitational pull on the earth. And the earth is closer to both- its perigee, in the present age. The further away; when the earth is at its apogee the earth will enter another ice age.
So we see, these natural disasters are nothing to do with god/gods sending anything. Unless you are deifying the heavenly bodies and calling them gods, which was certainly the case in ancient times.
So we can stop the bullshite of conflating natural disasters with man polluting his environment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @Shila--> @ShilaHuman bodies haven’t changed much. But we cover them out of modestly.I would think that losing one's body hair only to have replace it with the hair of dead animals for warmth is a giant leap from one's natural state. Something which you have also failed to explain.Shila wrote: Obviously you don’t read your Bible.Don't kid yourself.Shila wrote: The advantage humans have over animals is when it is cold they can wear their fur and when it is hot they can take off their fur coat.Animals have less control over their environment.No animal has control over its environment including humans. What the weather does it does. But animals can cope better with their environment than humans can cope with theirs.Grow up and stop being so silly.I don't know which part of the world you live but here in 21st century England many are expected to die this coming winter through hypothermia. How many Emperor penguins do you think will suffer the same fate?
Shila wrote: There have been five great extinctions throughout the history of the world.
So what?
Many experts argue that we are now facing a sixth. These periods of mass extinction have resulted in the loss of 98 percent of all organisms that have ever existed on planet earth.
Yes, only the strong survive. Didn't your mother explain this to you.
In order for an event to be considered a mass extinction, around 75 percent of the earth’s species need to go extinct over about 2.8 million years.
And your point is what exactly?
Past mass extinctions have been due to one-off events such as a volcanic eruption or an asteroid impact or caused by phenomena such as rising sea levels or drastically shifting atmospheric temperatures.
So what is your point?
The present extinction event is unique because the changes that the earth is experiencing, such as rising water levels and temperatures, are the result of human activity.
BULLSHITE! You are falling for that old government chestnut of man-made climate change that they have purposefully conflated with man polluting his environment. And thicko's like yourself have fallen for it.
Didn't you learn fk all at school concerning the movement of the earth around the sun? Here are some clues. The earth has an apogee and an apogee. On every completed cycle the earth retards 1arc degree = 1 arc second.
Now off you go and work the rest out for yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @ShilaHuman bodies haven’t changed much. But we cover them out of modestly.I would think that losing one's body hair only to have replace it with the hair of dead animals for warmth is a giant leap from one's natural state. Something which you have also failed to explain.Obviously you don’t read your Bible.Don't kid yourself.The advantage humans have over animals is when it is cold they can wear their fur and when it is hot they can take off their fur coat.Animals have less control over their environment.
No animal has control over its environment including humans. What the weather does it does. But animals can cope better with their environment than humans can cope with theirs.
Grow up and stop being so silly.
I don't know which part of the world you live but here in 21st century England many are expected to die this coming winter through hypothermia. How many Emperor penguins do you think will suffer the same fate?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Human bodies haven’t changed much. But we cover them out of modestly.
I would think that losing one's body hair only to have replace it with the hair of dead animals for warmth is a giant leap from one's natural state. Something which you have also failed to explain.
Obviously you don’t read your Bible.
Don't kid yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
-> @ShilaGod did not give animals or birds control of their environment. They are totally dependent of nature. Bu5 humans have dominance over their environment.Nope. Just one recent 21st century example; Two thirds of Pakistan was flooded just weeks ago; many people lost their lives and properties were totally destroyed and lost for ever. So, it is not just animals that have no control over their environment, we humans just like them, are at its mercy. Stop talking bullshite.God has sent great floods before. But here he saved the majority of Pakistanis unlike Noah’s flood where he destroyed the Jews.
No. The flood was another natural disaster that the superstitious of the time believed it was sent from god because the priests of the time told them so. And they were Hebrews, not Jews. But again, those that drown in the deluge were unable to survive under all that water. so much for your man having "domination of the seas".
God saying "have dominion over all the animals" simply makes us an apex predator. Tell me; how does a human in his natural state go about having dominion over a frenzy of great white sharks in their own domain? Or just one great white shark?Shark hunting by humans is actually driving the sharks extinct. Shows humans are masters of the sea.Stop it ffs. So, you can stay under water without coming up for air longer than a whale or a dolphin, can you?Scuba divers out manoeuvre sharks.
No, they can't. Stop being so fkn ridiculous. And I asked you "can stay under water without coming up for air longer than a whale or a dolphin, can you"?
And that would be scuba divers using artificial breathing apparatus. You are terrible at answering without thinking, aren't you.
And you didn't answer my question>> Tell me, if we humans are so adapted to the NATURAL world, why is it we lost our natural fur coats only to have to hunt down and kill other animals for their coats?God made Adam and Eve bare naked so he could ogle at their nakedness.So, are you saying that humans didn't evolve from apes and that humans in their natural state have always been naked?That is why God noticed their naked bodies and grew obsessive.
Try answering they question. Are you saying that humans didn't evolve from apes and that humans in their natural state have always been naked?
Genesis 3:7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.The verse 3:21 of Genesis says different.Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins and clothed them.But either way, according to the contradictory bible, it was either God or themselves that made artificial covering for these two earthlings. Which is not their natural state by any means.After banishing Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden they were no longer protected. God then tried to protect humans from the prying eyes of angels. Bu5 even here god was unsuccessful.
So, then they were not in their natural state, were they, you clown.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
God did not give animals or birds control of their environment. They are totally dependent of nature. Bu5 humans have dominance over their environment.
Nope. Just one recent 21st century example; Two thirds of Pakistan was flooded just weeks ago; many people lost their lives and properties were totally destroyed and lost for ever. So, it is not just animals that have no control over their environment, we humans just like them, are at its mercy. Stop talking bullshite.
God saying "have dominion over all the animals" simply makes us an apex predator. Tell me; how does a human in his natural state go about having dominion over a frenzy of great white sharks in their own domain? Or just one great white shark?Shark hunting by humans is actually driving the sharks extinct. Shows humans are masters of the sea.
Stop it ffs. So, you can stay under water without coming up for air longer than a whale or a dolphin, can you?
And you didn't answer my question>> Tell me, if we humans are so adapted to the NATURAL world, why is it we lost our natural fur coats only to have to hunt down and kill other animals for their coats?God made Adam and Eve bare naked so he could ogle at their nakedness.
So, are you saying that humans didn't evolve from apes and that humans in their natural state have always been naked?
Genesis 3:7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.
The verse 3:21 of Genesis says different.
Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins and clothed them.
But either way, according to the contradictory bible, it was either God or themselves that made artificial covering for these two earthlings. Which is not their natural state by any means.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
You say: "Humans go skinny dipping at night in his natural state". Then they get out of the water, dry themselves off and dress themselves and maybe sit in front of a nice warm fire. The only animal that needs external fire /heat and cannot survive without it.You say: "Humans dominate planet earth nearing 8 billion in population." This simply means they are prolific breeders and has nothing to do with surviving in the wild in their natural state.You say: "Humans don’t have mating seasons. They can mate anytime of the year". But again- This simply means they are prolific breeders and has nothing to do with surviving in the wild in their natural state.You say: "Animals live in zoos. Humans live in planned cities." There is only a tiny fraction of the world's animals in captivity at the will of man. Animals do not need to build cities. The natural world is its natural home and habitat.Tell me, if we humans are so adapted to the NATURAL world, why is it we lost our natural fur coats only to have to hunt down and kill other animals for their coats?It’s call dominance.Genesis 1:26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
And Jesus said, "Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns". Yet man has been having to reap and sow and store all of its existence.
God saying "have dominion over all the animals" simply makes us an apex predator. Tell me; how does a human in his natural state go about having dominion over a frenzy of great white sharks in their own domain? Or just one great white shark?
And you didn't answer my question>> Tell me, if we humans are so adapted to the NATURAL world, why is it we lost our natural fur coats only to have to hunt down and kill other animals for their coats?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @Shila--> @ShilaHumans were better suited for survival and outpaced every other animal species.That is the biggest load of old bollocks I have ever heard. Humans are the most unsuited species for nature than any single species on earth. Humans will very rarely last one single night in his natural state in the wild.Humans dominate planet earth nearing 8 billion in population.So what!?Humans go skinny dipping at night in his natural state.So what!?Humans don’t have mating seasons. They can mate anytime of the year.So what!?Animals live in zoos. Humans live in planned cities.So what!?That is evidence “Humans were better suited for survival and outpaced every other animal species.”
Stop talking rubbish.
You say: "Humans go skinny dipping at night in his natural state". Then they get out of the water, dry themselves off and dress themselves and maybe sit in front of a nice warm fire. The only animal that needs external fire /heat and cannot survive without it.
You say: "Humans dominate planet earth nearing 8 billion in population." This simply means they are prolific breeders and has nothing to do with surviving in the wild in their natural state.
You say: "Humans don’t have mating seasons. They can mate anytime of the year". Buy again- This simply means they are prolific breeders and has nothing to do with surviving in the wild in their natural state.
You say: "Animals live in zoos. Humans live in planned cities." There is only a tiny fraction of the world's animals in captivity at the will of man. Animals do not need to build cities. The natural world is its natural home and habitat.
Tell me, if we humans are so adapted to the NATURAL world, why is it we lost our natural fur coats only to have to hunt down and kill other animals for their coats?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @ShilaYou aren't making sense. Either the rate of births is the same as Islam or it is not, yet here you are telling me about abortion rates in the west being the same as in Africa. In Islam women are not allowed to terminate a pregnancy. In Islam the man can have more than one wife. Yet here you are telling us that the rates of births are the same.Islam is outgrowing Christianity all around the world. Christianity is on its last legs and the only growth is shown to be in only some African countries.There were more Christians than Muslims.There may well have been, but you can be assured that Christians are being outnumbered all over the world. Christianity/Christians is/are in decline. These are facts.Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world.That is why Christians in America have banned abortions to help bridge the population gap.
makes no difference. And doesn't prove anything but that Muslims are out breeding Christians.
By banning gays and LGBT as well Christians will increase their numbers. Plural marriage is also under consideration.
That makes no difference whatsoever.
In the news was a 10 year old girl raped and pregnant forced to have the baby. That too is part of the solution to grow the Christian population.
So raping ten year old children is what Christians are doing to increase their numbers. You really talk shite a lot of the time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @ShilaHumans were better suited for survival and outpaced every other animal species.That is the biggest load of old bollocks I have ever heard. Humans are the most unsuited species for nature than any single species on earth. Humans will very rarely last one single night in his natural state in the wild.Humans dominate planet earth nearing 8 billion in population.
So what!?
Humans go skinny dipping at night in his natural state.
So what!?
Humans don’t have mating seasons. They can mate anytime of the year.
So what!?
Animals live in zoos. Humans live in planned cities.
So what!?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
You aren't making sense. Either the rate of births is the same as Islam or it is not, yet here you are telling me about abortion rates in the west being the same as in Africa. In Islam women are not allowed to terminate a pregnancy. In Islam the man can have more than one wife. Yet here you are telling us that the rates of births are the same.Islam is outgrowing Christianity all around the world. Christianity is on its last legs and the only growth is shown to be in only some African countries.There were more Christians than Muslims.
There may well have been, but you can be assured that Christians are being outnumbered all over the world. Christianity/Christians is/are in decline. These are facts.
Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
More over, if the Son is the Father what of Mary getting pregnant? Is this not an incestuous congregation? The Father has sex with the mother to conceive the Son who is also the Father.....so technically the Son, who is also the father, had sex with his mother"...Wylted wrote: I am from the southern part of the United States. I speak for every southerner when I say, that fucking my own mother is nothing to be ashamed of.
😂
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Humans were better suited for survival and outpaced every other animal species.
That is the biggest load of old bollocks I have ever heard. Humans are the most unsuited species for nature than any single species on earth. Humans will very rarely last one single night in his natural state in the wild.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
If humans evolved from Apes then why are apes still with us. So May I ask what are you doing here?
They are here because they remained apes. That is to say although we humans are said to have evolved from apes doesn't necessarily mean the apes have to die out. The better question for me is why is a chimp still a chimp?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
> @Shila->@ShilaChristian countries are breeding just as fast.Where. In Africa?Africans are converting very fast to Christianity. But Christians breed just as fast in every country.And your evidence for this is what exactly?Rate of Abortion in Christian countries.
You aren't making sense. Either the rate of births is the same as Islam or it is not, yet here you are telling me about abortion rates in the west being the same as in Africa. In Islam women are not allowed to terminate a pregnancy. In Islam the man can have more than one wife. Yet here you are telling us that the rates of births are the same.
Islam is outgrowing Christianity all around the world. Christianity is on its last legs and the only growth is shown to be in only some African countries.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
->@ShilaChristian countries are breeding just as fast.Where. In Africa?Africans are converting very fast to Christianity. But Christians breed just as fast in every country.
And your evidence for this is what exactly?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
--> @ShilaSlavery was not practical to the Jews because it would be impossible to teach the slaves all the different commandments and restrictions required in Jewish households.Are you saying Jews didn't keep slaves?Only a minority of Jews kept slaves.
By this do you mean only those Jews that could afford a "slave"?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Christian countries are breeding just as fast.
Where. In Africa?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Slavery was not practical to the Jews because it would be impossible to teach the slaves all the different commandments and restrictions required in Jewish households.
Are you saying Jews didn't keep slaves?
Created:
Posted in:
@ the Witch
Why do men bring women flowers and rings and rare gems from the Earth.
To get his leg over.
Why do women cook meals
Because its fkn dinner time. Men do the same when they too are hungry.
and wear clothes men find attractive on them.
For the same reason men buy all the drinks and pays for dinner.
Why do friends buy gifts for one another.
The answer is in your own question.... friendship and not worship.
People "worshipping" one another. Gods are no different if you're going to ask gods for things they wants stuff in return. Again it's like any other relationship.
Stop talking tripe. A man wanting to get his leg over followed by a nice meal is not the same as worshipping.
Would you kill someone for your friend? Or on your friends command?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ehyeh
Atheists are hypocritesWhat have atheist to be hypocritical about?read my very first post.I did but I am failing to see the hypocrisy. So do you have any examples of atheists displaying hypocrisy? You appear to be saying that a theists are more noble than atheists simply because they believe different to you in that the do not believe in the existence of a god. Am I correct?I cant be bothered explaining, just know there's a reason why idealists exist.
So you don't actually have any examples of an atheist being a hypocrite then. I thought not.
Created:
-->
@Shila
--> @ShilaShila wrote: It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Muslims confuse Jesus with their own prophet.Stephen wrote: I am sure they understand the differences between a man that preaches "turn the other cheek" and one that preaches " do not take Christians and Jews as your friends".Shila wrote: Muslims see both Jesus and Mohammad as prophets.Yes I know. It was you that said Muslim" confuse " the two.Shila wrote: She deliver on that promise. Jesus is seen as saviour , lord and King to billions of Christians.Stephen wrote: So you keep saying, but what is your evidence of this dying and rising god-man ( of which there have been many) saving anyone? And you are still hopelessly appealing to numbers. Not to mention the other failed prophecies promised to his mother.The evidence for fulfillment is the billions that worship Jesus and call him Lord, King and God.There you go again, appealing to numbers. It doesn't prove anything.This discussion has now turned circular.Numbers matter. If you slap someone on the head enough times it will change his mind.
And if you indoctrinate someone into believing they will burn in hell from childhood to adult hood I am sure the numbers will increase daily. Your appeal to numbers is nonsense.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ehyeh
Atheists are hypocritesWhat have atheist to be hypocritical about?read my very first post.
I did but I am failing to see the hypocrisy. So do you have any examples of atheists displaying hypocrisy? You appear to be saying that a theists are more noble than atheists simply because they believe different to you in that the do not believe in the existence of a god. Am I correct?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ehyeh
Atheists are hypocrites
What have atheist to be hypocritical about?
Created:
-->
@Shila
Shila wrote: It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Muslims confuse Jesus with their own prophet.Stephen wrote: I am sure they understand the differences between a man that preaches "turn the other cheek" and one that preaches " do not take Christians and Jews as your friends".Shila wrote: Muslims see both Jesus and Mohammad as prophets.
Yes I know. It was you that said Muslim" confuse " the two.
Shila wrote: She deliver on that promise. Jesus is seen as saviour , lord and King to billions of Christians.Stephen wrote: So you keep saying, but what is your evidence of this dying and rising god-man ( of which there have been many) saving anyone? And you are still hopelessly appealing to numbers. Not to mention the other failed prophecies promised to his mother.The evidence for fulfillment is the billions that worship Jesus and call him Lord, King and God.
There you go again, appealing to numbers. It doesn't prove anything.
This discussion has now turned circular.
Created:
-->
@Shila
Appealing to numbers counts for exactly zero. Billions of Muslims see Jesus only as a prophet . And we know that "the greatest prophet that ever lived" appears to have gotten it all wrong.800 million Muslims are illiterate. The prophet Mohammad was illiterate.800 million Muslims out of 1.4 billion are illiterate: Dr Farrukh Saleem
Christians were and many still are illiterate. They only went and go by what the pastor or the priest spouted to them. Like I have said, your appealing to numbers counts for exactly zero, which was my point.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Muslims confuse Jesus with their own prophet.
It wouldn't surprise me but I am sure they understand the differences between a man that preaches "turn the other cheek" and one that preaches " do not take Christians and Jews as your friends".
She deliver on that promise. Jesus is seen as saviour , lord and King to billions of Christians.
So you keep saying, but what is your evidence of this dying and rising god-man ( of which there have been many) saving anyone? And you are still hopelessly appealing to numbers.
Not to mention the other failed prophecies promised to his mother.
Created:
-->
@Shila
But you haven't bothered to address the point of the thread. Why did god omit to tell the gory details of her son's wicked and torturous demise? This is not mention all of the false promises he made to Jesus' mother the very blessed among women.According to scriptures Luke 1:26-35 Mary was told of Christ’s divinity.
Indeed. Mary the" blessed among all women" was told and promised many things about her "divine " son, non of which came anywhere near to fruition.
She deliver on that promise. Jesus is seen as saviour , lord and King to billions of Christians.
Appealing to numbers counts for exactly zero. Billions of Muslims see Jesus only as a prophet . And we know that "the greatest prophet that ever lived" appears to have gotten it all wrong.
Created:
-->
@Oldschoolpancakedummy
I'd delete this thread since everybody is getting so bent out of shape, but this site doesn't let you delete anything. Adios amigos.
Well that aged well.
Created:
-->
@Shila
John only baptized Jesus. John never anointed Jesus.
A baptism is an anointing, but anointing to what status isn't really made clear. Was it to the kingship or the priesthood or other?
In fact John even expressed doubt Jesus was the promised one.
I totally agree. John doubted Jesus from the off. In fact the bible makes it clear that John believed it was Jesus that was supposed to be anointing him! The verse makes it clear that this was a confrontation down by the river but Christians like to make out that it was somehow John being subservient to Jesus. Strange don't you think that after all of those years crying in the wilderness and proclaiming about the one come that "the greatest prophet that ever lived" didn't even recognise him when this alleged messiah finally did arrive?
Matthew 11:2 When John, who was in prison, heard about the deeds of the Messiah, he sent his disciples3 to ask him, “Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?”
Yep, I have mentioned this verse many times to Christians . But Christians don't like to be reminded that "the greatest prophet that there ever lived" could get it so, so wrong. Indeed, John certainly backed the wrong horse, didn't he.
But you haven't bothered to address the point of the thread. Why did god omit to tell the gory details of her son's wicked and torturous demise? This is not mention all of the false promises he made to Jesus' mother the very blessed among women.
Created:
-->
@Oldschoolpancakedummy
I just converted to Catholicism, ask me anything.
What did you convert from and why?
Created: