Total posts: 4,920
Posted in:
-->
@coal
Who said I did?Nothing about my comment was inappropriate.
2 comments from my knowledge were reported. Yours and Annie's. It would have to be between the two of you because from what I heard from bsh1 is that something can't be done about a public issue if it isn't reported. Unless of course Speedrace has set a new precedent for without telling anyone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AvoidDeath
I have to agree with you. It is an abuse of power, but my main goal of the forum post was not for anything to happen like that.
That isn't my claim. That was bmdrocks claim. Read my actual 1st comment. To make it simple:
He did something that has never been done before. Locked a user created thread that doesn't violate the precedent which warranted a lock of a thread. For example spamming.
Values locking threads over suspending people who use threats.
No new rule was established that the thread topic must be followed and I know bsh1 didn't agree with me which is why he didn't anything about it. Speedrace did way after you made your first comment that wasn't about the resignation. That is inconsistent for him to lock the thread if he cared about the topic which was bsh1's resignation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Annie_ESocialBookworm
I have no way in verifying this and you being a liberal queer Muslim really makes me doubt you can be honest about your inconsistency.I didn't report you. If you said something wrong, I would've called you out.
If you'd like to discuss the bsh issue, you could always DM people if they're willing to talk. But honestly, this isn't as bad as bsh DELETING my comments the other day.
If it was the thread that bsh1 stated he would remove at a period of time then yes your comment was deleted but the entire thread was deleted as well. If this is the case just another example of you being an ideologue missing out more important information that doesn't suit your narrative.
Why would I DM you? Your stated a public opinion. I argued against it publicly. I see no reason to speak about it in private.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
His first day on the job, he dealt with the Chief Moderator doing some vile and the man who appointed him stepping down and resigning from the website entirely
First day on the job doesn't mean that Speedrace hasn't set an new precedent while also belittling my stance.
His first legit day, he was bogged down by reports of that forum
2 reports. I checked when I made that post earlier. If he can't handle that then why was he appointed anyway? That is under the assumption he had no other moderator duties to fulfill which I think is a poor framing on your part. It should be His first legit day, he was bogged down by the duties as a moderator on top making a very radical decision.
He is 16, we have a life too. He has done a fantastic job at moderating overall, and fmpov has made the right decisions
If his youth is a reason that makes him ineffective as a moderator. Remove him. If his life makes him take radical positions often enough. Remove him. Simple as that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
There is nothing cool or useful about raging at a guy at his first day on the job.
There is nothing cool or useful about his offensive comment to comparing me to a cashier is involved in a health violation as if it wouldn't impact me because it would since I do work there and I would be partly responsible given it is likely for cashiers to do multiple jobs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
I don't really want to continue this conversation. Next time I'll just go straight into commenting what I want instead of asking you questions in hopes to not require even more questions to understand.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't like discord to much. Mainly whenever I get into it. I just forget about it and just carry on doing other things.Ya'll want me to set up a discord for touchy topics? I started then thought about how only like, 2 dudes would join max
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Maybe you didn't. I assumed you cause you were the only one that could've taken to offense
From what I read coal's comment was reported. I didn't even know he commented so I have no real way of personally reporting it. My comment was reported. I guess Annie didn't want to argue against me so Annie reported me. I don't see a reason why I would report my own comment so I will leave it at that.
I don't have the best memory so maybe it was me reporting myself and coal but I doubt it.
Just skimming the entire thing what exactly would I report. My own comment or coals who I didn't even care to read?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
This is like a restaurant getting shut down for health violations. You're just the cashier who knows nothing and is just trying to pay bills. Stop blowing it out of proportion.
Can I say I was offended? Are you going to relinquish your post as well? No because bsh1 had the deceny to step down when he did something wrong that PressF4 didn't find offensive but here you are saying something wrong while also being offensive.
It is wrong because you are belittling my point as the cashier even though I am a veteran cashier. In your scenario given the health violation my long running job compared to my long run here will be ending because of something I did not do. I will have to find a new job because of a fault of the higher ups like this dumb f*ck Speedrace. Why wouldn't I be mad about this?
Shut up and learn from the other moderators before you try to double down on your offensive stance.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Why not remove the comment and ban the person? I was still arguing yet Speedrace had to go out of his way to do something that wasn't even necessary. If you remove the threat then I can carry on arguing.You didn't threaten anyone. The closure was not cause of you
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
You have flagging my posts to get it taken down I assume
Please link me to the posts. I did do it for the literally stupidest person something comment or maybe I didn't because it was green when I looked at it and assumed it was me but I don't remember flagging anything recently. Maybe linking it to me would help me remember. I don't remember flagging you. I remember arguing against you. Now if you don't believe me then don't. I am not asking you. The only way you can truly know is by asking the moderation team to tell you if it was or wasn't me. Maybe this time it would happen given Speedrace the dumbf*ck who is the one doing unprecedented things without warning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Lol comparing a user created thread vs a moderator thread. One is created by an authority which creates threads as a means to state what occurs on the site that is part of their moderating and another is a person using the threads like a user should do. Come on where is someone better defending this case? Virutoso, Ragnar anyone.It was at our discretion that locking the thread would stop various distasteful behaviors and CoC violations. This is just like when bsh would make threads that he said would be locked eventually because it would generate behavior like that. Only difference here is that a mod didn't create the thread.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Above moron.
This time tell me when I can't verbally abuse moderators not institute another rule expecting me to know what you did before you ban something I am apart of.
Created:
Posted in:
I didn't just randomly do it, we all agreed upon it...it was originally gonna be Ragnar but I wanted to. It wasn't random lol. And we kept getting flagged posts from that thread. It was a petri dish for distasteful behavior.
Where was the warning? Why the immediate action? This is a first for this site and stop using someone else to support your side. Ragnar can come here if he wants to defend your case but like what I say to him where was the warning?
Stop acting like it was an attack against you personally. It wasn't. Your name wasn't even mentioned in the discussion to close it.
Who said it was? What you did do was prevent me from arguing against 2 people who were calling me out. If someone was giving threats you should've banned them not lock the entire thread. If it wasn't clear this is a first for this site and it is a first that you put thread locking over taking threats seriously.
I much rather have bsh1 who I disagree with tell me what the rules are then this dumb f*ck who doesn't even bother to tell users on this site when there is a new precedent. I can't believe he left.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
From my knowledge when someone without creating a thread but making a comment that is a CoC violation will be given a warning or suspension not that the entire thread is stopped. This is a first for this site and they haven't even made it clear that this was what they do.If there were indeed personal attacks and threats, the makers of the threats and personal attacks are to be held responsible. This, as far as I can tell, wasn't a callout thread, so I am not aware of any CoC rules that would require it to be locked.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
I concur. This is an absurd abuse of power.
I know you take a freedom of speech route but do you see any rule in the CoC which allows Speedrace to do what he did?
I can't find it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
@Speedrace
Answer? I appreciate one over another.
Created:
Posted in:
I have never seen bsh1 do a thing like what Speedrace did. I have done what I did on forums plenty of times but now Speedrace is on charge I am supposed to shut up when other people can't be bothered to counter my arguments instead resort to gaslighting me? bsh1 (correct me if I am wrong Virtuoso) locked a thread against the CoC. Where in the CoC does it state Speedrace is allowed to do this?
"While we respect freedom of speech, this thread has an unhealthy number of personal attacks and even threats."
I did not threaten anyone. Maybe instead of actually preventing me to argue back against opinions people have why not ban or give a warning to the people who are giving threats? I personally attacked people's arguments. I didn't in no way attack a person for simply who they are.
"As a reminder, the topic is Bsh1's resignation. If anyone feels they did not get to share their thoughts on that specific topic, we of the mod team would be happy to unlock it for continued topical discourse. Just try to chill out."
Mine wasn't about the bsh1 resignation but neither was the first ever thread on the topic. It was AvoidDeath's turn to issue his personal grievances against bsh1. Please don't use that trash argument when the person who even created the thread didn't abide by it. I know for a fact bsh1 disagreed with me on going out of the topic from a thread which is why he didn't lock threads that weren't about the topic at hand but here we see Speedrace with no prior warning changing a rule.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Your first reply to my claim to you was a clear example of it not being an argument. You don't understand how you are defending someone yet you carry acting like you are not doing it.I am not going to keep arguing with you. I can't change your beliefs, nor will I attempt to change them
Created:
-->
@Imabench
I dont want to get too bogged down in the math of things so ill just give shitloads of money for any thread that is beefy enough.Also since I routinely bump my massive 'Running Primary Poll' thread it would give me an unfair benefit since 90% of the conversation in that thread is just me posting in it after a while.
Why not call it Imabech's tickets? For every thread you get a ticket.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Would you say humans are different DNA or humans have DNA?In order to determine which individual organism the cells are members of, DNA testing would be required.
If a sample contains an overwhelming majority of human blood cells, then that sample is, in all reasonable likelihood, from a human.
A biologist stated Rhesus monkeys have blood types in common with humans. Are Rhesus monkeys human?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
No I am not going to take a message down. If you don't take my word, then that's fine then. I have done nothing wrong. You are stirring up controversy that was never there in the first place. Don't believe me, that's fine
Nothing important to say still have 2 lines of writing.
Life is about winners and losers. You can not just claim that the Hall Of Fame is biased. You got an equal chance to get in. Everyone did, arguable the mods got a better chance, but because they are mods
Doesn't discredit what I said and a false allegation. There is a different between inequality in the HoF as in there is a winner and losers compared to biases. A Winner and losers is an inequality. I can't believe you misinterpreted this while also lying.
You are accusing them of actions, not who they are. If I tell you who they are, it is not defending them, but stating a factual note
Guess a defendant in court should say I am not defending myself I am stating straight facts. Lol.
I am someone who doesn't hold grudges unless you severely hurt me. Grudges are fucked up... that is a moral value I kept throughout my life
Another meaningless sentence. I don't care about your personal feelings because I have no way verifying them to be true like with your anecdotes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Your [LINK] stated this "So, basically, there is not a lot of difference among the blood of different species of mammals. In order to identify the origin of a sample of blood, one would need to do DNA testing.".What does this mean?
Answer?
To the best of my knowledge.
Are you telling what makes a human is their blood cells?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
One link did not mean I didn't like you. I mean if Virt said that I would say that is the stupidest thing I have heard, if anyone said that quite franklyMy mom gets on my nerves, I still love her. Just because someone gets on my nerves =/= hate
Why would I believe you? You could've take the message down but it is still there. I am guessing you disliking your mother is not on tape so if your mother or you don't hold grudges then it is forgotten. That is not even talking about your intentions. Your intent doesn't matter. When someone says this it is probably a showing of dislike to another person but here I am supposed this rare case where you don't actually dislike me but you said it and you haven't asked for it to be taken down.
You reference leaderboards as inequality, and I countered with a person w/ -1k forum posts in HoF. The HoF is not inequity because they still are treated like a normal user, but there name is plastered on a site. Whoopie
Why are you talking about treatment when it comes to the HoF? The Hall of Fame is an event congratulating the best of this site through votes. This just so happen people voted for more than another which means they are not equal to another. HoF goes against equality because there was a winner not a draw.
At a single time, 1000 is the limit. On seperate occassions, about 300-400
Guess you went down the arbitrary route which ultimately in both scenarios leads to like I said before "another feelings that is not well thought through." Just remove the plural in feeling then it fits right in.
Genuine friendship is key. If my friend wore an outfit that was vulgar, obscene, and idiotic, I would tell to take it off you look stupid. Or if they wore something really stupid, I would tell them that. I also give praise when praise need be. Just because I have been genuine with you does not mean I hate you
Personal anecdote. I have in no way discrediting or agreeing with this. It is just your feelings. I have nothing to argue against here.
Wrong. You said, why are these people conducting everthing with little posts. I told you they were from DDO
I accused two users of something and asked them to defend themselves with the question I asked. You answered it thus mounting a defense for them. This logic is sound and I have yet to see you actually challenge it. Let me try and make it even more simple:
A defense against an accusation is a defense.
sigh
You have shown that you don't actually argue against the points instead talk right past it. When you do otherwise you have shown that your side is arbitrary or filled with anecdotes. This entire thing is a waste of time because of how incompetent you are at understanding what I just said. I need a second opinion in pretty much any conversation here when we have people here feign ignorance to an obvious thing that they did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Your [LINK] stated this "So, basically, there is not a lot of difference among the blood of different species of mammals. In order to identify the origin of a sample of blood, one would need to do DNA testing.".
What does this mean?
From this I gather human blood tested by using anti-human serum which is gained by injecting the blood into rabbits and waiting a period of time for the antibodies to kick in. When that is done the blood is drawn then tested on human serum proteins to see if it clumping. If that happens it is human blood. Correct?
Created:
-->
@Imabench
Okay.(Basically we're going to fuck around and act like we're better than everyone else, for fun)
If Political Threads > 10 posts, value of your estate is increased $5,000,000 eachIf Political Threads > 30 posts, value of your estate is increased $50,000,000 each
1) Can it be 5 million for 10-19, 10 million 20-29 threads so on so on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
"So, basically, there is not a lot of difference among the blood of different species of mammals. In order to identify the origin of a sample of blood, one would need to do DNA testing."
Is your claim DNA?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Annie_ESocialBookworm
I would like to thank Castin for recognizing that he made a mistake.
I am adamant you are leaving out things that do not suit your agenda. Just this quote that you linked to proves this to be the case
"One ill-considered uncomfortable joke on a message board, made by someone who momentarily forgot the other person's age and didn't even have it consciously in mind when he made the joke, has been compared to literal and deliberate child abuse, predatory grooming, and real statutory rape."
This clearly shows that you do not care about the context instead only if bsh1 did bad so I will complain about it. Please tell me how you didn't miss clear information that Castin did state here.
Inappropriate comments like this shouldn't be made, period.
Islam is nothing close to peace so taking advice someone who preaches something worse than the Old Testament is laughable. Objective morality doesn't exist. Your God has yet to be proven to exist.
as a progressive/liberal queer. I put Islam as a placeholder in lieu of me not having figured out a firm religious stance and Islam is most of what I have known for my life.
Really bad placeholder to have. Please go do some reading if you even cared about who you are as a progressive, liberal queer. Almost everything you are is antithetical to Religion you support. It is like saying I believe in free speech but I also believe in Islam. The problem of course is that almost any Muslim majority country across the world doesn't allow you to freely talk about Islam. This is under the assumption they are following their Religion properly. My case would be better than yours because I am not denying every single Muslim across the world's opinion to make my position clear and the Religious book would be in favor of my claim.
Furthermore, my lack of forum posts or contribution to the site has no relevance to the moral responsibility of calling out gross behaviour.
Please stop preaching as some sort of good person or authority figure. You are not good for supporting that Religion. You are not an authority figure. All we have to go on is who you are on this site. All I see is less than 100 forum post user. Am I supposed to take a person who hardly even uses the site opinion seriously? No would be the best answer because if I took your opinion seriously then any other new user would also have that same treatment. It would be bad to understand what would be best for active users.
Everything else I didn't make a comment on would be stated as feelings as in things I can't change. If you want me to actually talk about the other claims actually add in facts instead of your feelings that I can't argue against.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
Keep your thoughts to yourself if you have nothing worthwhile to contribute. No conspiracy theory is not informative. You are just muddying the water instead of actually talking about what is going on.It's my thoughts. fuck u
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
If you geniunely think I hate you, please PM me. I do not hate you...Just cause we disagree does not mean I hate anyoneI do not even hate RM, and he is arguably my biggest rival besides Goldtop.
You have already stated it to be the case from the link I gave. You didn't even acknowledge what you said so why should I believe you now?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Leaderboards do not symbolize inequity. Virt has about 900 forum posts and he is in HoF. leaderboards are only an illusion to class in your weird and wild head
By arguing against inequality you are giving an argument for inequality. Virtuosos is not equal to others comparing forum posts and Virutoso wasn't equal to people when he was voted on in the HoF. I am taking the position you are ignorant or intentionally. Guess feelings comes before reason for you.
What are you even alluding here. I did only a certain amount of times. You did 1.8k times 1.8k > 50
Now if I go down this you have to admit you are being arbitrary or you are inconsistent. For some reason me doing some x amount of times is bad but you doing it less than x amount of time is not bad. The question of course where do you draw the line? I await another feelings that is not well thought through.
I never disliked you, you disliked me because I told you that spamming to 3k is not quality posts.
I show you proof that you hate me then you decide to say no you do without proving anything. Please come back with facts instead of feelings.
I have even complimented you and have engaged in memes with you, and that is a high praise
Saying this doesn't change that you hate aspects of me which you did make it clear in the link I gave. That is if I agree that you were being geniune when you praised me but are being genuine about a backpedaling of your dislike towards me.
That proclaimation is a defense because YOU initiated me to respond to it as a defense.
I am convinced you do not know what you talk about. When I ask questions I ask the person to defend themselves. What part of that don't you understand? You basically said here a defense is whenever I say it to be case. How about me saying it is a defense? Please tell me how this wasn't a special pleading fallacy.
It doesn't make sense, that's why I am talking past it
This has got to be a joke. I have clearly demonstrated my side. You didn't say how it was wrong then you say I don't make sense. You have got to be living in a different reality where you value your own personal feelings before having a reasonable conversation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
You said who they were, I said who they were. This is not an arguing point. I simply responded to your answers and what you asked.You do not make sense
You are talking past my point. Maybe actually address it instead talking to about I didn't make. I made it so clear. I am now beginning to think you are intentionally missing the clear point I made instead doing what every other ideologue does.
And to answer your question, every deserves an equal say in the community here no matter what the forum post is. You spammed your way to 3k and yet you see no one us treating you below the line of what they are. If we are being honest, you deserve about 2k forum posts abnd DRF deserves like 1.4K. They are allowed to the same opinion you are
1) If everything is equal why is there a leaderboard showing the inequality?
2) Please hypocrite you were treating Dr.Franklin different for spamming.
3) You don't know what I deserve or not. Stop preaching to me like some sort of pastor and realize me spamming was not against the rules. I don't care about your purity tests because all that matters is if it was against the rules or not. Turns out it wasn't until they changed it. Please don't preach from an implied higher position when you were doing the exact same thing.
4) You don't get a say on who is deserving at what when you say this to me while also making it clear here that you dislike me. Making it really clear that you had something against me as a person instead of actually making a good argument. That is if I disregard what you said in this very thread.
If anything, if you want to make the debate, they are more important and have more say. They were the base of DDO and came onto DART too. They didn't like bsh1 as mod, but they hailed from a site with great glory
If you do not see this as a defense then I need a second opinion because this feels like yet another gaslighting on this site.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Your intent does not matter so don't bring in something I have in no way proving you are lying or not. I even made it clear in my last comment. I am accusing them of something and expected a defense. You jumped in addressing the accusations which meant you are defending them. Can you not comprehend that?How in that way is that defending them? It did not suggest that nor was I suggesting that. This argument you are picking with me is silly
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AvoidDeath
goddamn it guys.drama alert, got fricking frack 50 notifications in less than 24 hours.
My problem was that this was supposed to be about the resignation about bsh1 then you decided most of the first comment to be your opinions about bsh1 not specifically about the resignation.
I don't know about others you just have to speak to them when they decide to reply.
Clear examples:
I've been on this site for 4 months, counting Gatorade, and I've seen a lot of good things bsh1 has done. But the recent stuff is complete and utter bullshit. (#UnbantheHam). I feel as if he did not do what was right for not just the community, but also the mods. This is just my opinion.
You have even made it clear with the last sentence you typed. It is that obvious.
According to bsh1 himself, he said that I was the former user Club. That is also bullshit, but I see where he is coming from. Also, he himself said that I could be Type1. And that is bullshit too. Maybe he does a lot of bullshit things, but he has done some good.
Yet again you are stating your problems with bsh1 then decide he did good without saying it. None of this addresses his resignation. These are your personal problems.
I am saying, I kind of believe in what Wylted/Dr.Franklin is doing with more community-based things, more of than just mods. Mods should be chosen by the community.
This has nothing to do with bsh1.
Finally, just saying, people that have bullied other people and have said racial stereotypes and defamed people should be held to a higher priority to mods then mulit-accounters. It's not fair to the multi accounter or the victim of the attacks.
I don't even know what you said here. I am guessing it is a general statement that racist talking points or insulted stated by people is worse than multi-accounts. Yet again nothing to do with bsh1's resignation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
That question wasn't directed at you. You answering the questions for the them is you defending them.I simply responded to question, I don’t know what else you want
I didn’t defend them. Find evidence that I did
You answering the question is you defending them. If you can't see that it is your problem since you haven't told me how that isn't defending the person I had the question for.
Do I have to make it clear that I am accusing Annie and Shab of things and I expect them to mount a defense?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
I am asking for you to give me a study that scientists (or other standard) have stated a thing is human cells.Are you asking for a study that proves that some cells are human and some aren't and that a laboratory can tell the difference?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
and then 71Fam I didn't say anything, why are you after me
Fam read the comment above. You are addressing something they should. Stop defending them if you are not willing to carry on from the 1 sentence you typed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
You telling me who they are is defending them because my question specifically speaking to the two involved not you. Just to make it even more clear, don't butt into a conversation you are unwilling to follow through on.WHAT THE FUCK DID I SAY! I LITERALLY TOLD YOU WHO THE FUCK THESE PEOPLE ARE, NOT DEBATE YOU ON THIS
Here is my question directed at ShabShoral and @Annie_ESocialBookworm
Why are less than 100 forum posters dictating what is right or wrong? Please give me a break.
Please don't @ me if you have nothing productive to say. Carrying on eating your popcorn angrily while the two decide to be brave enough to answer the claims I brought forward.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
I inferred this from Annie's profile. Annie might as well be the only person who doesn't take that stance.1) Annie says Islam is a religion of peace and
Everything else I would say you summed up correctly.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Eat as much as you want but when you realize it is empty or finally you would comprehend you are wrong. Don't come crying to me when you understand you are essentially defending the people I am calling out. Don't butt into a conversation making claims you are not willing to defend.Fam. I don’t why you are mad at me but go ahead and rant. I will sit here and eat my popcorn
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Citing papers is supporting your claims. Saying essentially go ask scientists and implying you would be right is an argument from authority.Citing "papers" IS AN ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY.
I haven't shifted-the-burden-of-proof-to-you because, I haven't asked you to PROVE anything.
You serious? I asked a question. You gave answer an by saying go ask someone else and implying they would agree with me. You shifted the burden to proof to me to support or not support your claims depending on the results.
Please don't get hysterical.
I am serious. Do you have a study or am I going to go to a scientist to prove your claims to be correct or wrong?
Consulting a laboratory is a practical approach.
Yes but do you think that is a reasonable request to me? I asked you a question and you said go to a lab and find out.
Created:
Posted in:
Take a biopsy of the object in question.Send it to a laboratory.Ask them if the sample is 100% human.
You know this is clearly an argument from authority because you are not citing any papers or study simply pushing the burden on me to prove your claims or if you are wrong then it would be supporting me. At that point of me actually getting this done you would've forgotten about the subject entirely or even discredit the thing I just did. Do you have a paper on this or are you going to carry on pushing the burden of proof to me?
Now if this doesn't support your claim/ an argument of authority why aren't you answering my question which is "What standard are you using to declare a thing having 100% human cells?"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
Please you have to ban the IQ stuff about black people. That is so false that at this point people are intentionally parroting misleading information in attempt to get people to go ahead with their awful ideas or would like to muddy the water. This hate speech directed at a race even though there is no scientific backing for IQ and race.
For Wylted to even call Speedrace a person who wants to remove opinions shows how little he knows about him which should make you consider why is someone not even knowledgeable about a particular subject talking about it. I hope you already know this and disregard his opinion because I sure do. Another thing he stated is that liberals are commies. If it wasn't clear already he doesn't know what he is talking about so his opinion should be discredited given the chance that he is speaking about things he doesn't understand. That chance has already been demonstrated countless times so this can't be used as a universal rule to pretty much anyone's opinions only people who talk about things they are not knowledgeable at.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Is this regarding post 67 or a different one? Because 67 seems pretty clear to me. Not saying that I agree or disagree, just that it is hardly 'word salad', whether it is right or wrong.
If it wasn't clear he is yet another ideologue on this site who doesn't care about fact instead if that facts confirms his values. He is not here to have a worthwhile debate where both sides are willing to change their mind instead wants to virtue signal his agenda like he is some authority on this site. To this date he has no official role on this site only the role he appointed himself. Kinda shows the ego he has but maybe I am wrong.
This also goes to show like in his long-ass thread is that if the only thing you have against me is ad-homs or name calling you must really find it difficult to argue against my points.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
I just read through your word salad response to Annie. Get help.
Please a conspiracy theorist telling me I am wrong. You need help.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Why can't they say it? Is it because they can't dog-pile me just like what they did to bsh1? Stop doing something what I asked of them.What are you arguing with me about lmao... all I told you those were popular DDOers on the website. You pick a fight with me when that's all I said was the backstory
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Then don't even attempt to defend them if you don't want to be involved. You chose to say that and if it wasn't clear I do try to answer comments that people direct to me. Next time if you are not able to defend your stance don't even bother telling it to me or in a thread I have stated my problems as if I won't answer it.This is not my fight to bear, argue with them
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Just another question:
Anything that is living and comprised of 100% human cells.
What standard are you using to declare a thing having 100% human cells?
Created: