Total posts: 4,920
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
temperatures in cities are warmer than the surrounding areas as I'm sure large parking lots etc this is and has been a measurable thing. Do those things have a global impact? I'm not sure.
I mean when you do say something please try to go somewhere. I don't know what I am supposed to take from this. Skepticism even though there is evidence?
I don't believe the earth will end in 10 years, but we can hope.
Is that agreed upon by the majority of scientists?
which is nothing new as it's been happening for decades and yet here we still are no worse for wear.
If we weren't worse for wear why did the UK experience the most forest fires in 2019?
First thing that came to mind because I saw it somewhere and I remembered it.
Given they have been wrong every single time
So we shouldn't trust scientist?
They are wrong now even with current data?
Please do finish your train of thought instead of simply stopping at a cliffhanger.
Imo there is little to no hope any drastic change could or would ever be made, they would wait until it's much too late,
I don't disagree like I said earlier people would react when they actually see the problem more than simply realizing it would be a problem of the future so they can basically wave off for tomorrow until the tomorrow is when they house burnt down or something.
that's just the nature of the animal.
Weird comment. Nurture is also what defines humans not just nature.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
It seems like you didn't even read your own link because it is supports me.
Quote:
"here is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities", in particular emissions of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane."
though the definitions of the terms can be problematic imo, change does not always = negative outcome.
Yes change isn't always negative but I am not applying a moral judgement to climate change. I am just saying it is the case. Do you agree on that and that it is "attributable to human activities before we make moral claims?
the answer I keep hearing (solution) is doing away with fossil fuel, cars, cows etc. Though how that would really change things is a guess at best. Besides being impractical it would cost trillions of dollars and the biggest offenders wouldn't "clean up their act" (pun intended) We should strive for the cleanest air and water practical and there is more we could so. Izak Walton leagues often do road side and waterway cleanups. Organized cleanups like adopt a road type things don't require government involvement, just community. Anyway the point is, if people really cared and believed you'd see more personal involvement, accountability and responsibility don't you think?
Which is why I say were fucked. Given how much of a tremendous feat the entire Earth has to commit too it is almost impossible for global change to occur. Theoretically it would be all nations agreeing to do X which reduces the impacts of climate change but given tensions around the world I don't see that to be likely.
I don't know about Izak Walton which is why I didn't comment on it. I am simply saying were fucked as in a large group of the world's population would not do anything until they have personally felt the impact of it.
Anyway the point is, if people really cared and believed you'd see more personal involvement, accountability and responsibility don't you think?
I think the numbers would have to be in the billions to mean anything and that might not be enough if it isn't close to the number of people on Earth.
Created:
Posted in:
I guess you are stating might equals right. I don't disagree.the likes of Obama, Decaprio, democratic candidates, children giving speeches or organizing rallies, no they are not "intelligent in the field?" But when has being informed or intelligent about a subject hindered anyone?
You have the scientist alarmist and the scientist deniers, which one to believe?
The people who use evidence because that is the best way we can separate opinions from facts.
There are two sides to every story, somewhere in the middle is the truth.
That isn't true. If one side is that climate change exists and another is climate change doesn't exist. The facts go heavily on the side of climate change existing so there isn't always truth in the middle.
Do you have a qualified scientist denying the existence of climate change or are you not going to answer the simple question I made more specific here?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
they sure seem to think so since they were on tv preaching their gloom and doomI ain't scared of no flood (I ain't scared of no ghost, ghostbusters!)
Let me repeat my question and hope you understand it this time.
Are they intelligent in the field?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
This.point it's divine finger and go ha ha ha you stupid human twats
Created:
Posted in:
Were fucked.
I only hope I have enough money to move somewhere so that I am barely impacted by it until my death.
So how's your day?
Created:
Posted in:
She's more paler vs spray tan now. I personally like a bit of color vs pale in a brunette
Then it must be whatever she has on her lips then or her jaw line. I don't know but there is something I don't like about her face.
(she died hair blonde but imagine that with brunette)
Brunette, black hair and blonde are relatively the same to me. Maybe blonde is my favorite and a close second would be black hair with strands of brown hair or maybe the other way around. Personally I care more about the look of the hair then the color.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
First picture looks like a fake tan or bad lighting while also different color hair. That is why I like the 2nd.She does, I did a zoom up of each face.
Mollys IG is better than a google image search
She is hot but I don't like the tan or something else about her face.
Created:
-->
@NotClub
Me judge.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Do you want my honest opinions on hottest?
Whichever you decide. Honest would be what I like.
Supa's Preference(brunette)
And large breasts.
Not what I would pick but hot.
She was hot in that.
I liked the second one more. Mainly because the face looks better.
I cant' believe I forgot about her. She is hot.
2 I like. Shakira and Kate. I don't think I would pick Molly even though she is hot. If Demi looks like what she does in the second picture normally then I might pick her but that is after other people I like more.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
If you are curious, even Snow doesn't make my top 30 or whatever. Her nose and lips don't suit the facial build to a 'perfect'degree in my eyes.You see, when two people look very similar, often the alteration in one, makes the rest of the face and body not 'fit' it as well.This is why I rank those three highest even though scarlett is a different type to the other 2 and Hayden is more childlike in appearance than the other 2.It is about a 'fit'. I feel every part of those 6 (3 females and 3 males) makes the rest of their 'imperfections' appear to perfectly fit the rest.
Deep. I personally only have things I like and don't like. I don't decide to make a tier list because I am pretty much making things based on my feelings which I can't really be sure about. This can apply to pretty much everything but with other things I can engage with societal norms instead of simply making my own stuff up. Making stuff up is difficult so that I let others do it and see if I like it or not. I guess I am more accepting concepts then creating new ones.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Brittany snow is extremely attractive to me with beckinsdale 'hot' but not uber hot as she has this dominance to her that I don't like but if we are talking about 'complete hotness' it involves many categories in my eyes.
Okay. I just picked them because those were the first women that came to mind.
This is totally subjective anyway so how can you act as if we are arguing?
Wait where was I making this something like a debate? I was simply stating my feelings since I don't think there is objective beauty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Created:
@RM
There is a user who calls themselves a fan of mine in their 'about me'.
Who?
This user ignored me completely in both messages and being added as a friend (as well as pick and choosing what to reply to and what to ignore with my forum posts very selectively).
Guess he must be a predator or a secret fan. Not that secret since they declared it in their about section if they did that is.
This user is not my fan.
Maybe.
I was also curious what you can have in your 'about me' and how indirect or direct you can flame others via it.
Ask bsh1 or other moderators. I would anything that isn't agreed upon that is negative or you state that you intend for something negative to occur.
How can I call someone out for being fake on their 'about me'?
Just tag them in a forum post. Have a good argument then let the games begin or not if they do not reply.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Your the only one to take this seriously.
Females:
Nah.
She looks better.
#2 Scarlett Johansson (obvious choice, no male I know finds her offputting at all but to me Blake Lively is just fucking perfection)
She's hot but she is better.
#3 Hayden Panettiere (yeah, if you can't tell I got a type)
- https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/hayden-panettiere-discusses-nashville-with-the-build-series-news-photo-631036650-1563307085.jpg?crop=0.668xw:1.00xh;0.141xw,0&resize=480:*
- https://fullhdpictures.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Hayden-Panettiere-Photos.jpg
- https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5f/3a/78/5f3a7857426fdbb9c06f65421755e2dd.jpg
Guess you like blondes. Here is one. I have never heard of Hayden before and don't think she is that attractive.
From the 3 I only like Scarlet. I can think of others but no point to bombard you with a ton of women.
Males:#1 Milo Ventimiglia (interestingly, he was a main character in a show where Hayden Paniettre was supporting Char)
- https://i.pinimg.com/originals/2c/a3/02/2ca3022cae56ca26da8fbdbdc202c91d.jpg
- https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/milo1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&strip=all
- https://gl-images.condecdn.net/image/kpdMEqNQnG4/crop/320/f/mventimiglia_GL_9feb09_pa_b.jpg
#2 Bradley Cooper (like Scarlett, obvious choice but for me Milo has this irresistible allure to him that is unparalleled by other famous men in general)
- https://data.whicdn.com/images/17075699/large.jpg
- https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6d/aa/3d/6daa3d21d937f34794ca757ed7fb738c.jpg
- https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/mm/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeopledotcom.files.wordpress.com%2F2016%2F08%2Fbradley-cooper-435-43.jpg%3Fw%3D435&w=400&q=85
#3 Ian Somerhalder (another obvious choice)
I seriously can't rate men. I mainly go by feeling with women and I don't get the same feeling with men.
I am sorry for them all being white but it happens to be what I find hottest, personally, and it's not my fault.
Me too but I don't apologize. I simply accept what I like. Don't worry about it.
I take it this is out of famous ones, yeah?
Anything but famous does help me recognize some instead of researching about them.
Feel free to post the URL into imgur, uploading it there and viewing it there. Imgur screens links and images in a fast, secure way. I am not a fucking untrustworthy source, I wouldn't want to get banned for posting something bad.
I used their IMDB for their pictures. I could've done something more beach attire friendly but you didn't do it or something else.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
Thank you. I think they would be happy with either. Both don't disrespect part members like Bernie so it should be okay.So Greyparrot's claim that the DNC will try to rig the primary for Warren is complete and utter horse shit
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nemiroff
I liked the ending even the End of Evangelion one. If you don't like story watch the movie ending. If you like story watch the series ending.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Someone more intelligent on this subject has done so. If you actually care about the truth you should ask him instead of asking a spectator. You would get a better response from Ramshutu.
Just see post #2 to find out what is wrong. There are other posts as well but that is blatant but like always you brain goes numb or something whenever a person demonstrates you are wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Ramshutu has already. I have. bsh1 has. Heck it would be difficult to find active users who can't find false information you spread that doesn't lead to a negative response. This is also excessive.
Actually addressing what you said instead of demonstrating the same deceny you showed to me, this forum post. Like I said earlier Ramshutu already has before and here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nemiroff
Neon Genesis Evangelion all the way.
At least it has the deceny to end it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
Look at what he is doing.
He is spreading false information that can lead to harm.
This 100% falls under excessive trolling.
Created:
Posted in:
@Greyparrot
Okay so Perez and Ellison. Did they specifically say anything about not supporting Biden?
What in specifically in the .org does it state it won't support Biden?
Created:
Posted in:
@Greyparrot
Who are the DNC elites and any proof that they want to remove him?
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
I was apologizing on your behalf. You can't comprehend when you are wrong and you started this entire thing about a double negative then you talked about social kills then you will leave but here you are. Please next time when you think you have a good idea think about it just one more okay because even when you moved the goalposts to a different subject I still rebutted your claims.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
Doesn't Amy have a great record?
Too bad she is not electable.
So I am guessing it is between Warren and Biden right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Thank you.
Sorry about what occured. I was trying to mitigate [Insert bad words that bsh1 doesn't like] but then he didn't even argue against the points.
Created:
Posted in:
I am not the moderator here, I can't enforce anything. You were a troll abusing the platform development request feature, in order to make the admin frustrated and insecure.
You keep saying I did something but can't demonstrate it. It is almost as if you have no proof like the previous conversations you can't substantiate your point. It is a recurring theme and you still haven't worked on it.
I had his back in a way bsh1 never would, that's all I am proving here. Bye. I don't give a single damn what you have to say back to this.
From here we can learn:
- RM has an ego. So big he can't admit to wrongdoing.
- Thinks I am trolling DA even though he can't demonstrate it.
- Doesn't even know what a double negative is.
- Calls me socially inept even though he is the one who doesn't have a grasp on how to make others understand what he is talking about.
DA can remove bsh1 from the site. You saying you had DA's back doesn't mean anything. If he found bsh1 problematic to a point then he can remove him because he is the site owner.
Created:
Posted in:
It is moments like this where I see that I am very clearly not the stereotypical autistic nerd that people think me to be.
A [Insert bad words that bsh1 doesn't like] doesn't understand when he is wrong so he resorts to parroting nonsensical ideas.
I don't even comprehend how someone can be so socially-numbed that they bully while feeing like the victim in a situation that from the very start was them asking a question they knew the answer to, just to test the 'human subject' they were testing.
So basically instead of defending the statement that I am bullying you are not. Instead you have used that as an axiom for this. Why not justify your axioms? Trust me it is possible unless of course your a liar and can't admit to it like you can't admit to not knowing what a double negative is.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
You asked a question that you already knew the answer to. You proved this by the very same reply with which you tried to make him feel shit for'misunderstanding' your question (which he perfectly understood and answered).
I rephrased what I said so that I can get clarification.
You flipped this around purely to troll and pretended like the Admin made a mistake
Still haven't demonstrated why I have some ill intent to DA or it can even be seen. I wanted clarification. You are using that as me trying to troll. So basically me simply asking for clarification is me trolling? Gotcha. Another thing to add to RM's nonsensical ideas.
If you genuinely struggled to grasp why he answered 'nope', you need severe social skill training and maybe shouldn't live under a rock.
Double negative? Is that word invisible to you? Oh wait you see it but you don't want to comment on it because you know you are wrong which then followed by you resorting to ad-homs.
You even selectively picked out responses from my last comment. You didn't even bother commenting on you not trusting the owner nor did you even challenge the double negative.
Created:
Posted in:
This isn't a debate. This is you preying upon someone who is not a native English speaker, trying to troll them when they correctly read your question which flipped the dynamic to a 'not' for no reason at all just to troll with the next reply.
Can you prove it is a troll?
I am sure you have claimed DA to be a liar so why do you trust him now? Is it because you have no real ideas only things you flip flop too to suit your agenda?
Correctly read? You don't even know what a double negative is yet you still don't realize that. Are you blocking you being wrong from your mind? It really is a problem and you should get that checked if you actually care about being correct not some random person who spouts nonsense without backing it up.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Can't admit you were wrong. Keep stating the same to expect a difference. Still waiting for an argument. You have been in enough debates to realize when you are debating against the point at hand. You are not and if you don't see it well you are a [Insert bad words that bsh1 doesn't like].You are the bad guy here, trolling the admin of this website with the 'not' question like you did.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
Instead of actually rebutting the claims brought forward. You resort to ad-homming. You have an ego and you can't comprehend when you are wrong. Next time actually make a coherent argument so that you don't resort to ad-homming if I bother to argue against what you said.
Created:
Posted in:
Against the overuses of all 3 of those things. Some people want US government to mirror EU nations that tax the poor at 40% and be at war with every nation including Russia. Some people want so much regulation a poor person has no chance to compete with the monopolies that control DC.
You didn't really answer my question.
I'll present it in the standard format.
What do you consider to authoritative policies?
If there are good and bad ones which do you consider to be bad or good?
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."
A government small enough to barely give anything you want is a government small enough to barely take anything you want.
What is your point?
I unblocked. Add me as a receiver next time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Good one. I guess he would say bad authoritative policies is what he opposes which he has to state what is. I am sure he is not against taxes, military, regulations etc.What good is government unless it is authoritative?
Created:
Posted in:
Your double negative was understood in the wording you used right now. His answer was 'no' to the question you asked now, he ignored the 'not'.
"Double negatives are two negative words used in the same sentence. Using two negatives turns the thought or sentence into a positive one. Double negatives are not encouraged in English because they are poor grammar and they can be confusing; but, they are sometimes used in song lyrics and informal speech."
"A double negative is a grammatical construction occurring when two forms of negation are used in the same sentence."
Please stop lying. It took me one Google search to state you are wrong. Do you have some inclination to use your gut instead of actually understanding what you are saying?
Hope your ego doesn't cloud you from a clear problem. You say one thing but two more sources which are much better sources information don't say what you say.
Read up on this please: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative#English
Created:
Posted in:
Your double negative was understood in the wording you used right now. His answer was 'no' to the question you asked now, he ignored the 'not'.
My question:
"If a user is banned can I not add them as a receiver?"
Saying yes to this would mean I can not add them as a receiver.
Saying no to this would mean I can add them as a receiver.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Let me rephrase what I said:
If a user is banned can I add them as a receiver?
If you say yes why can't I add Dr.Franklin as a receiver?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
If a user is banned can I not add them as a receiver?
Created:
"pathetic coward who runs from tournaments"
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Do you have an answer to the above question?
Created:
-->
@blamonkey
No wait I can't either.
Does the ban prevent us from adding him as a reciever?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Trent0405
Didn't say it was better.I don't know what this is so you might be right when you say it's better than IE, but I am going to die with IE, I aint changing for nothing until nobody supports IE on their site.
Created:
-->
@blamonkey
What did you do to annoy Dr.Franklin for him to block you?
Tell me please.
Created: