TheUnderdog

What percentage of map have incurable STI?

that pedophiles are more likely to rape kids than orphan leaders.

Thats again, irrelevant to the main point.

Also, you assume that all map who arent allowed to adopt would just remain sexually inactive.

Foster care makes 25% to 50% of prison population. Sexual abuse makes up 14%. Physical abuse makes 38%.

This is an assumption. You can imagine all map as monsters, but thats not an argument.

Wait, do you think that child porn should be legal or that animated child porn should be legal?

Opposing the democrat party.

The issue of wanting exert political power to bring about my agenda.

They (the libertarian) sees that the deep state is currently puppeting the democrat party. 

Yes they do, specifically they think the right is racist and lying when thy say they aren't, misogynist and lying when they say they aren't, bigoted against sexual deviancy and lying when they say they aren't.

I'm asking what the right wing tribe wants.

To defeat the left-tribe.

The right-tribe doesn't need to be pro-pain to oppose the left-tribe. They need only believe the left-tribe is wrong about what causes the greater pain over the longest period.

 Jesus asked a man to sell everything, he didn't force him. If the man could be saved be being forced, then why do we supposedly have free will?

Thats extremely rare, but okay.

Do you believe that orphan leaders are going to be more likely to rape kids than pedophiles that adopt the kids?  Please initially answer yes, not sure, or no, and then justify it.

Thats irrelevant. 

 ignoring physical abuse and foster care children being likely to fill prisons.

And most map arent violent, while most foster care systems are.

i dont know why child labor exploitation for the benefit of the masses isn't talked or advocated about more... but it's obvious the ultimate reason is because it benefits the masses, so the masses like to look other way. 

Allowing some map to adopt would reduce number of children in foster care significantly. Currently, over 20,000 children exist foster care without being adopted. Just kicked out.

Really? You think blowjobs hurt?

You can assume anything, but only 14% of prisoners were sexually abused as children. Compared to that, 38% or more were physically abused. Therefore, physical abuse is worse than sexual abuse. And a lot more come from foster care into prison.

If they do reject sex, who is more likely to rape them?  The government employee who raises kids for the state (and gets paid for what they do, so they have to keep things professional and they are certainly vetted to make sure they aren't sexually attracted to kids), or somebody that has a sexual attraction to kids and pays for 100% of the living expenses for the kids, so they feel entitled to have sex with them (even if the kids have the ability to consent but don't consent)?  I think it would be person #2.

You can make as much assumptions as you want, but sexual and physical abuse is very common in orphanages.

Well, a blowjob doesn't hurt as much.

In foster system, there is much more physical abuse and medications. Physical abuse is more likely to turn someone into a criminal.

And having future of ending up in prison as adult is no good for the child.

 As it is right now in USA, each year, over 20,000 children leave foster care without being adopted. They are basically just kicked out on the street.

I assume they can reject sex in both cases. 

 But there can be a standard for who can adopt. 

A republican is a member of the republican party, a political organization in the United States of America.

I'm a registered democrat because several important local positions were likely to be won by democrats and affecting the democratic primary candidates was the only way to influence local policy, so I guess you shouldn't have tagged me if you want republicans to answer.

As for the right-tribe definition, there isn't a precise one because it is an arbitrary alliance formed under the pressure of a winner-takes-all system.

while it is practically impossible for everyone in a political faction to want the same things for the same reasons or to have the same beliefs.

It has been noted by several social 'scientists' that the right-tribe's perception of the beliefs and predictions about the left-tribe are far more accurate than the inverse.

The right-tribe thinks they are the good guys and knows the left-tribe also thinks they are the good guys. The left-tribe thinks they are the good guys and thinks the right-tribe knows they're the baddies and are lying about it.

So you are right the left-tribe would happily claim the title of "anti-pain faction", but only the ignorant would assume that anyone who refused to join the left-tribe must want the opposite of whatever the left-tribe claimed to want. 

Socialism is government taking your money, not giving money to the poor. If governments could be trusted to help the poor then a hundred million people wouldn't have starved to death in countries trying to implement socialism.

Giving a baby a blowjob is a subset of infant rape which is a subset of child rape.

Maybe by law, but anyone sane would agree that its less bad than vaginal or anal penetration.

Thats how it worked for thousands of years in some countries. When child loses all family, it often used to be that child gets married to an adult. Foster care didnt exist back then, and early marriages were normal. Foster care is definitely a worse system, and a more expensive system too.

But, when I saw you thinking of two-month-old babies as "lovers", I thought "WTF", "Holy Shit" and "this place is a fucking freak show".

In the United States, many entertainment events are restricted to those over the drinking age (21+) or to those who are legally adults (18+). An event that is open to those who are legally children – primarily (non-adult) teens (13–17) and sometimes tweens (roughly 8–12) – is referred to as an all ages event.

The GOP is America's right-wing party, just as the Democratic Party is America's left-wing party.

 In the mid-20th century the GOP underwent an ideological synthesis and has since constituted a "three-legged" coalition between proponents of economic liberalism, foreign policy hawks, and Christian conservatives. At the time all of these interests converged in the form of a communist threat, but post-1991 different factions have vied for power. Post-2016 all three of these groups have taken a backseat and a fourth faction, defined by opposition to mass (especially illegal) immigration, backlash against recent gender and racial identitarian movements on the left, and skepticism of left-controlled institutions, has been largely embodied in the person of Donald Trump.

Notably the GOP did not release an official platform in 2020, and it's unclear if they will in 2024 either.

He didnt say rape. He said blowjob.

. About 40% of children in foster care end up being criminals.

Plus, foster care works like prison, so those who spend too much time there grow insensitive to prison.

 children also get sexually abused

The Lincoln Republicans? The Neocons? The Anti-establishment ones? The nationalistic/isolationist  ones? The globalist/imperialistic ones?

All trees are plants, but not all plants are trees.

When a word means everything it becomes useless.

In the same way that the trans lobby attempts to capture "gender discrimination" to wield cultural and legal power, those who use the word "terrorism" in this way are attempting to annex the negative reaction to the word by redefining it knowing that the emotional baggage will echo for a time.

If violence for a political aim is terrorism then some terrorism is good. Such as the terrorism that freed the world from feudalism and ended slavery in most of the world.

In a democratic republic if any significant number of people are motivated to travel thousands of miles to attack a government building that means power has become too centralized.

The government should be afraid of popular uprisings in general.

 Jan 6 was not terrorism and neither was the attack on the whitehouse. Attacking the government is never terrorism 

Democracies are stable only so long as people believe a ballot works better than a bullet.

 (in the case of the USA power back to the states, if it happens at a state level power back to the counties, etc.. etc...)

The CHOP was sedition, but sedition should be allowed. 

(even though you said from the 1st quote that Jan 6 was done by left wingers).

I did not.

Me: Jan 6 was not done by half the country; just the Jan 6 protestors that entered the white house.

You: It was left-wing insurrectionists 

But I don't expect to change your mind because you have a party to stick too; my mind is free.

Yet you use subverted definitions and get basic facts wrong. Constrained by the whims of other people is bad, constrained by logic is good.

Please provide 3 specific examples of Castleman endorsing sex with infants 

Please confirm you are aware that article writers almost never write magazine headlines.

That is the job of the magazine editor.

Those phrases do not imply that infants love games or sports, they simply imply that there are multiple stages of develpment about which we may generalize.   

 or realize this means that you must prove that all Psychology Today editors are Jewish  and pro-pedophilia before attacking Judaism generally for failing to renounce all the editors at Psychology Today.  Right?

Castleman's religion has nothing to do with his science-based and well researched opinion expressed here. 

Castleman's Jewish childhoood has absolutely nothing to do with his opinion that vaginal intercourse need not represent the whole of human sexuality and ought not be taught as the essential act of sex.

Your response to this very reasonable, highly researched opinion is "you're a jew and a pedophile." 

You did not just criticize one Jew,  you called upon all Jews to denounce Castleman,

Anybody who wrote this OP has committed an act of anti-semitism- that is just fact.  

The most telling aspect of your anti-semetic slander is that you never actually state your accusation.

It was left-wing insurrectionists who entered the white house, and it was before Jan 6 2021. 

Violence for political change is not "terrorism" 

You know, like 9/11.

When they attacked a federal court house that was political violence and revolutionary activity, it was not terrorism. When they firebombed random people's shops and cars and shot people for wearing a MAGA cap. That was terrorism.

It was left-wing insurrectionists who entered the white house

I agree with you; Jan 6 was terrorism.  

It was the opposite. 

Governments should be terrified of popular uprisings

He never talks about children

But he thinks there should be no vaginal or anal penetration. So he just supports massage and blowjobs.

Isn't putting ones own fleeting universal existence first, a tad selfish?

Sex Without Intercourse: A Hot Option for Lovers of All Ages

The government failed to anticipate the size of the threat, that will not happen next time.

Would mass depletion of the human race caused by a naturally occurring micro-organism, be genocide.

Especially if it was an act of GOD.

And in the long term, can you not see the benefits.

I don't know about that, you give a real American a gun with only two bullets and put them in a room with Hitler, Mussolini, and Trump, they will shoot Trump twice.

Like I said, the Biden ad was purposely deceitful.

Needs to reduce World population by at least 50%.

Specifically, something that targets stupid genes. (Men with high testosterone levels)

 So for Biden to create a campaign ad showing pictures of average Trump supporters and then to call them "extremists" 

The reason people like myself take such issue with January 6th is not because we're afraid of a bunch of MAGA idiots ransacking the US Capitol (the capitol police will be far more prepared the next time, btw)

If you want Biden and hate Jan 6, please explain to me how Biden winning would prevent another Jan 6.

I know you are not this stupid, but for the excercise of addressing fallacious logic I'll go ahead and pretend you're being serious.

The reason people like myself take such issue with January 6th is

 If people were voting for someone just to prevent him from getting in power in a violent way or from attacking the government, it kinda sends the message that bad behavior gets rewarded instead of punished.

January 6th happened because he refused to leave office, the only way to avoid another January 6 is to elect him to be President for life.

At the bottom of it all, his supporters are cowards, without a President telling the police and military to stand down those rednecks aren't storming the capital building.

Even if they still tried to, defending the capital would be easy, we wouldn't even need the police or military, when a crowd gathers, we could play the national anthem and have a football player take a knee, they would fall to the ground and cry like babies, then we could send out some drag queens and a few transvestites and they would run away screaming in terror.

But some do commit suicide, so their rape was worse than murder.

Some children do commit suicide.

I dont know, maybe lack of desire to commit suicide.

Some people dont want to live, but also dont have enough will to commit suicide.

Early abortion is completely painless, as fetus then cannot feel pain.