All debates
Total debates: 3,398
My opponent is to provide the logical structure (just premises and form, no defence) of the ontological argument they want to defend in round 1. Structure: Round 1: Pro Waives, Con States the argument. Round 2: Arguments & rebuttals Round 3: Arguments & rebuttals Round 4: Rebuttals and summing up (no new arguments)
I believe the Bible is what formed Western society for thousands of years.
Enter this debate at will.
Enter this debate at will.
We will be debating Israels "right to exist". Does israel have a valid claim to the land? Pro will be debating that Israel has no "right to exist" and Con vice versa
Enter this debate at will.
The purpose of this debate is for Pro to establish that there is enough credible evidence to question the current theory of the origins and purpose of the Great Sphinx and The Great Pyramid of Giza. Con must demonstrate compelling evidence to support the current belief system. It is the accepted system so compelling should be easy. So both parties have to build a case.
No description has been provided
lets debate ! What say you?
Resolved: Adam & Eve contained the entire human genome
res ipsa loquitur
Enter this debate at will.
I content that Donald Trump, in his capacity as President of the United States, has harmed LGBTQ+ individuals more than he has helped them.
The Debate will focus on how the Democrat Party, from its beginning and all the way to the 21st century has been and continues to be anti-black.
Hot debates
Nothing here