All debates

No description has been provided

Bestiality - Sexual intercourse between a human and a non-human animal --Structure-- R1. Pro's case; Con's Case R2. Pro Rebuttal; Con Rebuttal R3. Pro Rebuttal & Summary ; Con Rebuttal & Summary

No description has been provided

I will take my own arguments from the avengers movies and civil war primarily. I say that the avengers should remain vigilantes and protect their identities.

I guess this is my pride month contribution

Unmoderated. If I've already done a Rap Battle with you, you're still welcome to accept.

NOTE: This is not a moral debate, this is simply a debate questioning whether from a legislative perspective (religion aside) that the LAW itself is bad for the people. I will take the stance that affirms with the statement, opponent takes the contrary to the statement

Worst Rap you Can Make

I used to be a Debate.Org fan, but it got so broken so I couldn't use it anymore.

Join please.

Read description.

Messi is better than Ronaldo.

My position is that an intrinsic moral code that outlines and defines good as an objective standard, rather than a utilitarian standard or Kantian Maxim, cannot exist without a supreme and objective outside source defining an action or mode of action as good. Your position (con) would argue against that hypothesis, and that a code of objective values CAN exist without God, OR, that a subjective system of ethical values could be as strong of a system.

No description has been provided

Is Pansexuality a Legitimate sexuality? I think it is. Feel free to try and change my mind, though! Im always up for a good argument