Total debates: 19
No description has been provided
Some believe Autism is a disease. As a sufferer of this disability, I want to challenge those who view it as such.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I take the position of Christianity. You take the position of atheism.
Rules: Pro must establish that America is not a democracy and does not stand for freedom. Con must prove the opposite.
No description has been provided
Many people with criminal records cannot find decent housing and employment due to the availability of their criminal records, which is then used to stigmatize them. Without Criminal background checks being available for public access, many ex-cons would have a better chance of gaining a meaningful life and not resorting to crime.
The burden of proof is on both the Pro and Con, Con must prove Trump is innocent and the Pro must prove his responsibility and or guilt.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
There is a great misunderstanding of America's first Amendment compared to other nations' understanding of Freedom of speech. the rules of the debate are as follows Pro must establish Freedom of speech has no limits as well as justify why this should remain the case. Con has to either prove that freedom of speech is in fact limited or give a strong argument as to why it should be limited even if it is not the case at present.
Is morality objective? Or is it only subjective, and based on principles of right and wrong that differs for each individuals own personal framework?
No description has been provided
Today there is a heavy debate on Donold Trump and his chances of willing in 2024. Pro wins if: 1. establishes a persuasive argument to why Donald trump won't win or 2. can provide sufficient evidence that supports the high probability of Donald trump's upcoming conviction. Con wins if : 1. they prove that donold trump has a good chance of victory in 2024 or 2. makes a convincing argument that he wont likely face a conviction.
No description has been provided
I am an atheist and stand firm on the opinion that god is fictional and no evidence can be presented to substantiate otherwise,
A debate surrounding socialism and communism. my argument is that Marxism creates a environment that helps people.