Lunatic

Actually I made a more detailed case later on, dude atleast don't be a liar. my case stated the same thing I just stated to you about SA. You should have bussed him instead of stubbornly sticking with your philosophy when his death was imminent anyway

The fact that you would offer zero on press shows you don't care about scum hunting.

Like I said, your analysis is shitty, because you have to use fallacies, because you are scum and the truth is inconvenient for you. Here is why I almost always win, whether scum or town. It is because even as scum I still usually stick to the truth. If I am scum making that sort of analysis it would be logically consistent with no fallacies, but you are weak as scum and combined with your philosophical stance against bussing and not being on two very obvious scum lynches, we know for a fact what your affiliation is

SA was obvious scum. I stated that myself on DP1, you have a reputation for being against bussing and just because one person you view as scummy doesn't mean you lynch them yet. Why the hell should we have lynched you before supa and SA?

No, the scum team did not pick up on that, and it is retarded. If the scum team picked up on that, they would have allowed pie to live. Pie is poor at reading players and would have likely misused his abilities. 

Actually Supa only joined the wagon when it already had enough votes, so it was obviously a ploy to get town cred for helping a lynch he had nothing to do with. He was on the scum preferred lynch most of the time.

Another retarded statement. It makes more sense for him to save you until lylo or mylo if this logic is true, because by this logic we should lynch him if you flip town, meaning he just lost the game by pushing your lynch too soon

Retarded, it would have been better if drafter pretended to be offline and just let the lynch fail, not to mention you would have to be a real shitty player to not see what was blatently clear, which is that SA was obvious scum.

It is of value, when you have 2 competitive lynches, one which is on a clearly scum player and one that is on a town player, then it is valuable to see who was pushing for the preferred lynch of the scum team. Most lynch wagons are kinda useless but not in these rare circumstances. I think the mafia scum wiki discusses the importance of analyzing competing wagons as well. in their strategy guide

This is stupid. No experienced town member is this stupid. What is important is an independent analysis of SA, not whether we lynch scum quickly or slowly. Not to mention I think I have seen charts showing quick dp 1 lynches tend to be more accurate than the slower ones

No the strongest reason to lynch was he was displaying the following scum tells; Breaking up reads instead of scum hunting, speaking in an unnatural and guarded manner, witholding his vote and trying to look too consistent which is a noob scum thing. Town doesn't care about consistincy they care about continually evaluating and updating their reads to be more accurate

I gave a legitimate case for SA as did others on DP1 and you were even lying then and saying it was nothing but sheep. 

Why is it not pro town? DO you have inside knowledge that AROSE is town?

Something seems off about you, and it isn't your newness

unvote VTL Siranonymous

Hopefully this is more pro town in your eyes

You agree with my post 218 here, right?

At a computer now. I can address a few of the retarded logical fallacies you used.

Your read is nonsensical and you are still breaking up reads more than scum hunting.

I have seen you intentionally misinterpret things me and drafter have said.

Intentional misinterpretations is a scum tell. Like I said that if you were town you would not fight your lynch this hard because your mindset would be that we could afford a mislynch. 

This is the same shit you will be saying in the end game. 

 You are breaking up reads, making absurdly long cases filled with logical fallacies and inconsistencies and then asking  people to address your gish gallop.

 You shouldn't even be fighting this. You should just concede defeat.

He clearly is not scum hunting, and merely engaging in psychological warfare.

And the entire argument against AROSE was "He play different."

On the slim chance you are town, I hope this puts to bed this "omg no rushing, use every last second of the day phase emrergerd!" Nonsense. 

He's literally lying about his own analysis now.

If the speed of Sirs wagon (days)b you, why didn't the speed of AROSE (10 hours)?

His analysis helped get me over my reservations on lynching Sir. Before that, he was basically sheeping, which gave me pause.

You know, just like all the sheep on your wagon should have given you pause.

I was originally going to vote Lunatic based on Drafter's analysis, but now I'm confused. 

I read your analysis. It is shit. If you are around tomorrow still I can point out the intentional logical fallacies. Fallacies that are in actuality beneath you. Sometimes I will mock town players by saying the logic they use is beneath them and feigning a scum tell on them so I can hopefully encourage them to be more rational. You though, I think you are more rational than I am. You commit less fallacies, are more careful with your logic