whiteflame's avatar

whiteflame

*Moderator*

A member since

4
6
10

Total posts: 6,549

Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@JoeBob
Yes, that’s what “everyone can see the results” means.
I'm not assuming anything at this point, so best to be as clear as possible.
so then don’t vote me until a future DP when I am more useful and you can’t lynch anyone else. Voting me now makes no sense.
Here's the problem with this statement: we have no way of currently knowing whether you'll be useful in the future. You have no way to verify yourself unless you die, and the utility of your Tracking when we get results one full day later is weak at best, assuming you even target the right person. That being said, if you have a better choice of target for a lynch, then state it. Who would you pick?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
I’d be willing to bet scum are half telling the truth about the mechanics after death. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s the scum tracker or has a role where he can see who (via proxy of notation) visited who every night. The odds of mislynching are 7/9 which is around 78%. Assuming we mislynch there’s a 1/8 (12.5%) chance that Joe correctly tracks the NK. For a 12.5% chance we have to lynch a townie? It doesn’t make mathematical sense? 
It's not so much whether it makes mathematical sense based on what we know, but I see your point. The way the role has been framed is, at best, a weak positive utility to town (i.e. even if he tracks the right person, we would then have to recontextualize what happened two NPs ago to make use of it), so while I'm tempted to give him the opportunity to use the role, I don't think the information is worth the cost of either no lynching or lynching someone else at this stage. I want to give it some more thought before I make a decision after work.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@JoeBob
So, again, is Austin just going to post that list publicly if/when you die (i.e. at the start of the DP after you are killed)?

Honestly, this is just the oddest combination of roles. It's like a heavily nerfed Tracker where the results may end up being entirely useless due to the delays built into getting that information and making it publicly available. The only benefit I can see to having the role be restricted in this way is that it makes you negative utility for scum to NK, but the role seems tailor-made to be a lynch target. Sincerely, if this is a fake claim scum came up with, it's one of the oddest choices I've ever seen because you are basically forcing us to consider you as our lynch in any future DP just to get some additional information, and the fact that you're unverifiable until you die effectively puts you at or near the top of everyone's scum pile. And if this is something Austin came up with, then I sincerely feel for you because you'd be sussed regardless of what you did.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
Suffice it to say that I'd like to get JoeBob's full story before pursuing a lynch. If he pushes it out too far, I'm willing to move forward without that information.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
@JoeBob
Lets say tonight I tracked you. When I die im guessing it would look something like this:
NP1: ILikePie5 tracked/visited so and so.
and then NP2 would do the same and so forth.
I echo Pie's sentiment. There shouldn't be any guessing at this stage. How will this information be delivered? Will Austin simply broadcast it or will it be sent to a certain player in a PM? 
He said I wouldnt get to see until I died.
So, again, you're a Tracker who wouldn't get any information, meaning you're only useful once you've successfully targeted people during the NP and died. Alright. That means that scum, at least after this NP (NP1 you'd arguably have some value, since then you couldn't deliver info to town), have negative utility in using their NK on you since you'd provide info to town. That sounds like a pretty good excuse for surviving every NP going beyond NP1, though I'd say your value to town is negligible considering that it's always going to be one NP behind (i.e. if we lynch you DP2, we'll get info from NP1 in DP3).

If you survive NP1, then town has a valid reason to lynch you so long as there is not a common target of suspicion: you can provide info to town, delayed as it is. So you would become our default lynch in the absence of a better choice.

Does that sum it up?

Created:
2
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Vader
I feel you. Hope the semester went well! 

Unvote
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
Dashboard
PLAYER               ROLE                CHAR
1. Savant          Miller+???           Pawn
2. Pie                      ???                      ???
3. whiteflame     ???                      ???
4. Moozer         BG+Protector   Castling
5. Joebob   "Flipped TrackerAlgebraic Notation
6. Lunatic             ???                     ???
7. Vader                 ???                     ???
8. Barney              ???                     ???
9. Earth                  ???                     ???

Everyone so far seems to be a mash-up of two roles, so there is some question as to whether this "Flipped Tracker" is just an odd mash-up of Tracker/Revealer made by Austin or whether it's a poorly fashioned fake claim.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Lunatic
NGL I actually town read this from pie. I don't get the vibe he is tunneling joebob or even thinks joebob is scum yet, but he feels like he is scum hunting and sometimes a convoluted push is the best way to get reactions, and the way joebob is reacting is what is more interesting about the exchange then the initial reason for pie pushing him. I don't think shutting down an open line of investigation for being based on contrived reasoning is really all that beneficial here.
I didn't so much mind the fact that he was pushing on JoeBob as that he had apparently missed the game where JoeBob was scum. I had a different read on JoeBob based on my experience playing with him, but I do think there's value in having everyone examine his past behavior rather than just assuming that this is scummy based on games where he has played as town.
What's strange is that he does seem careful here to me, and it goes against his normal townie IDGAF attitude that I've seen in the few games i've played with him in and hosted of him. When he finally caves and gives pie the claim you notice the shift. I'll grant you posted this prior to that happening. 
Everything surrounding the claim from him is making me question my read on him.
What do you think about the claim? Do you find it odd that he didn't ask austin questions about how his role worked right off the rip?
Yeah, the claim doesn't make much sense to me. JoeBob has a history of having to clarify his claims, which he has done as both scum and town, but the distinct lack of clarity on this one is puzzling. If I had gotten this character and role from Austin, I'd have asked quite a few questions out the gate.




Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@JoeBob
So... I really don't get this role. ChatGPT called you a "Flipped Tracker" and I'm not sure whether that's what you put in or if it just interpreted the role that way. You're a Tracker (you didn't say how many shots) with a caveat, so I'd like to understand the caveat. From what I understand, when you die, information regarding who you Tracked and what they did becomes available to... someone? Everyone? I'm not sure how that information is helpful (if you receive that information, you could tell us those results, which would be confirmed upon your death if you flipped town), unless, as you speculate, it's possible that you don't receive actual results for your Tracking each NP...

Except that makes even less sense because, then, you're functionally useless unless someone kills you. You're effectively Vanilla until you die. If this is real, then scum has no incentive to kill you because you only confirm yourself upon death and the information you garnered is only useful then as well, not to mention that it would require town to piece through previous NPs to try to understand the results. 

Also, I've noticed that you have posted now twice this morning and, given that Austin has posted since then, he has likely responded to any questions you've posed. That information should have been made clear to everyone as soon as you hopped online. What happened? What did he say?
Created:
2
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
I can probably guess what some of the townies have assuming my split is correct. I also have a decent idea of what scum may have.
I’ll keep an open mind about it.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
As of now I think he’s the best candidate to lynch. We have 3 claims already. I’m fine getting a role from Joe and making a decision. Idk where the inactives are which is annoying af too
I’ll consider it, but I want at least a couple of the inactives to chime in before pursuing anything.
The split works with my charscter, and I’m 90% sure it works with yours based on what you said earlier.
In a sense, yes. That’s why I’m considering your proposed split, though I think I need to see a couple of other soft claims before I can come to any conclusion.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
Eh I don’t consider that a game in the first place. There’s a reason why I didn’t play that game. Point taken though.
It is still an opportunity to get some intel on his behavior as scum, and notably, the only one we have. 
Yes exactly but that’s just my point. He’s extremely cautious with his posts. That post screams wanting to seem like he doesn’t know the fact that Savant is definitely town.
It expresses a degree of uncertainty that I would not expect to see in a scum post from him. That caution would have to be his scum partner coming through, which is possible, but I don’t have good reason to believe that yet.
Castling
Pawn
Algebraic Notation

The odd one out is algebraic notation at this point in time. The first two are more niche. A specific piece in game where there are multiple pieces. A move in a game where there are multiple moves. Algebraic notation is universal.
I guess that’s one way to look at it. I think there are several plausible theme splits, though I’ll note that Algebraic Notation isn’t consistently an outlier.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
Alright, having just caught up on the DP… yeah, I don’t get the basis for this push on JoeBob. I think the basis for sussing him is weak at best, and this statement by Pie is just flat out false:
Sure, which makes my point even more valid. He’s never played as scum. He’s more likely to make the mistake if anything.
I can confirm that I’ve played with JoeBob as scum. I’ve seen how he behaves in the role. I think he’d be more careful about his posts if he was scum, since he regularly requested help with those posts in that game. None of what I’ve seen so far matches his scum behavior in that game.

That being said, the character claim doesn’t automatically give much away (though I’ll note that it’s also associated with moves, bringing it in line thematically with Castling), so the information garnered can still be useful without providing too much info to scum.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Moozer325
Dashboard
PLAYER               ROLE                CHAR
1. Savant          Miller+???           Pawn
2. Pie                      ???                      ???
3. whiteflame     ???                      ???
4. Moozer         BG+Protector   Castling
5. Joebob             ???                     ???
6. Lunatic             ???                     ???
7. Vader                 ???                     ???
8. Barney              ???                     ???
9. Earth                  ???                     ???

Since Barney hasn't been on yet (and I want to spend more of this game thinking on themes), I decided to bust this out. I think that's right. I had to look up the Protector role, which appears to fit Moozer's description. I'm not clear if by "protect one piece" Moozer meant BG (i.e. you protect whoever you target by sacrificing yourself in place of them - check the link) or if he somehow gives them a 1X Bulletproof, but I'd like to clarify that (hence the tag).

Also, speaking on themes, it's interesting that so far we have a piece (Pawn) and a move (Castling). Wonder how many of us are typified by one of those sets of roles. I'm kind of in the latter, though I'd be better placed in the "strategy" bucket, which might include moves.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Savant
So Miller + ??? . Any particular reason you chose to wait until now to reveal it? Usually that’s a first post reveal.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@ILikePie5
I’d like to wait until a couple more people post who haven’t yet and make a decision then. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Moozer325
Nevermind about the latter question. You said once, I clearly missed it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Moozer325
I'll suppose I'll be honest. I'm a castling, I can use my ability once to protect one piece (king), and make one piece's next moves untamperable (rook).
Generally not the best idea to reveal information without pressure, but this seems pretty townie to me. To be clear: can you target yourself with either of those (the protection or the immune from manipulation), or are you required to target someone else? Also, is it a one-time use? You should be very careful who you target with these.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Vader
Just trying to spur involvement. How are things by you?

VTL Vader
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Earth
@ILikePie5
Unless Earth proceeds to drop out of the discussion and vanish into the background of this DP, I’m not onboard for pushing him. That being said, you do have a tendency to do that for long stretches, so keep in mind that it’ll make you a target for pushes like this if you do.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
-->
@Savant
Does Pie always demand claims from a lot of players? He did so last game and was mafia.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say “always,” but he’s usually aggressive. I don’t read it as sus.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia DP1
It's late and I'm heading to bed soon, but I did want to check in at least. I know the basics when it comes to chess, but I'll be trying to pick up more info as we go along to explore the theme.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Chess Mafia Signups
-->
@AustinL0926
I'll join. /in
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Barney
Trying to lynch Poe instead of Vader, felt like a gambit. And gambits are most often scum.
Yeah, in retrospect, I shouldn't have held to my guns for as long as I did in DP2. I ended up being right, but that doesn't justify it. Wouldn't have blamed you for Tracking me after that.

Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Vader
I also just dug myself way too big of a hole and limited my selection by pointing out those justifications. I used it to build up town cred for theme analyzing. It was then  going to be used to justify Barney’s lynch in DP2 or DP3. I also was going to see if someone claimed someone like Robot as Vanilla and hard push

I think I just over thought it. 
I did something pretty similar a couple of games ago, though I'd already been copped guilty, so that didn't help. I feel you.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Vader
Appreciate it. Honestly, I get it with the Damien claim. I had a strong gut feeling that Barney was Damien towards the end of DP1, but I was still between five characters that I felt could be his before he claimed, so any of those could have been it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Savant
Makes sense. Smart choice.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Savant
Honestly a little sad you didn't get to use the Mason Recruiter. Would've been fun to be recruited. Also, out of curiosity, who were you planning to pick that first NP?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@ILikePie5
There was nothing I could say or do to change the minds of 2 townies because they’re shit. Zero reasoning capability. Blind trust. And then you had outsiders upvoting comments. Who tf isn’t supposed to notice and believe that
You won't get disagreement from me on these fronts. I understand your frustration.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@Lunatic
The upvote thing also felt pretty dirty. 
Agreed. I honestly ignored it, but it's pretty messed up.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
Honestly, very ballsy fake claims on both Mark and Damien. The latter didn't work out, but I feel you, Vader. That was rough. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Endgame
-->
@ILikePie5
Alright then. You honestly did give a good defense, but even if we'd done the back-and-forth for several pages, I doubt you could have dissuaded me by that point, especially given that we had another DP if needed.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
You can call it what you want. I made my reasoning as clear as I could, wrong or right.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
I made my decision dude, for better or worse. If it's BK, then he's dead in the next DP. Simple.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@JoeBob
Whatever happens, I’m not voting Whiteflame. Lunatic did say he had to make role balancing, and I’m willing to bet one was making someone a vanilla. Before I bet there was 2-3, but with less people there is only one.
Honestly, that's enough for me. If I'm wrong, then BK's the obvious next choice.

VTL Pie

Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
Just look at this guy’s behavior. If you’re town, I implore you to reconsider your decision. What behaviorally has you worried about me. Korea changed is MO in last two pages. Now he’s all defeatist and willing to be lynched. Has he ever done that? What changed
I mean... you were the one who said that he's a troll. He's clearly trolling at this point.
Is your scumread on me an OMGUS? Is it not conceivable that Korea/Vader bus drove you and JoeBob? What’s the behavioral basis for your read. Like I’m genuinely confused.
...How is this an OMGUS? I've been sussing you since last DP, and I'm pointing to specific choices you made as a basis for scumreading you. I'll admit, I often have trouble reading you behaviorally, but I've pointed to a great deal of what I found to be sus from you already. It's fine if you disagree. I'm not trying to convince you.


Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
Again, I already had it on my mind because of the previous game I modded. Also, it makes sense from a balance perspective for Greyparrot’s role that the roles exist. You can call it breadcrumbing but at the worst it’s the exact same thing Korea did earlier.
The problem isn't solely that you presented these two roles. It's that it was also the only explanation you appeared willing to consider to explain the deaths of the four Kates in the face of a much more obvious option based on the given claims. As for it being "the exact same thing" as BK, I disagree. Not having an RB on the scum team would be more surprising than having one, and while the Janitor was more of a shot in the dark, it wasn't presented as a narrow explanation for a series of events that had already happened.
Again, I already had it on my mind. Korea came up with it out of thin air, without knowing any of the other roles in the game. My theory only came after everyone had claimed.
That's not true. Both of his statements about the Janitor came late in the DP, so he knew most of the roles (especially if he picked up on the softclaims). I also don't think this would help your case if it was true.
As I said, it’s you or BK from my POV. We can make assumptions all day long, but just look at Korea’s behavior.
I did.
That’s just not true man. Like I don’t understand why you fail to acknowledge the balance aspect and the fact I had the roles in my game. You also forgot that Korea came up with Roleblocker out of nowhere.
I can acknowledge that you had these roles in mind and recognize as well that your decision to harp on their existence in this game was sus. The two are not mutually exclusive. Also, as another point in BK's favor, think about how the balance would work in this game if Pie is town and BK is scum: we would have the pseudo-protective Bleeder and a one-time use Commuter that only protects the user. So, at best, town could stop one NK and delay another. If BK's town, at least there's some broader protection in play. So if I'm considering balance, it's very odd for Luna to only provide two self-protective (one pseudo-protective) roles.
Sigh. I’ve literally been tunneled since the beginning of the game. 
You say that, but I didn't start pursuing you (and actively pushed back against a wagon on you) in DP1. Even when I had reason to sus you based on PoE, I decided against pursuing a lynch against you because I thought you were behaviorally a bit townie. I probably had to see more convincing evidence than anyone else considering this wagon. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Greyparrot
I mean, I agree that that's how it should be, but having JoeBob on the same page is probably a good idea just in case.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Greyparrot
@ILikePie5
@Best.Korea
@JoeBob
I've been leafing back through the previous two DPs and here's what I've come up with:

Behaviorally, I think a lot of the issues I was flagging from BK have come down over the last two DPs. At the very least, he's showing more independent consideration from JoeBob and GP. In retrospect, though it was frustrating, it was a poor reason to sus him. There are choices he made that I did flag, as has already been called out, including mentioning a scum role blocker early (though scum role blockers are a dime a dozen) and these posts about a scum Janitor:
Now, scum either has role blocker either janitor, and I hope that scum doesnt have janitor, as that would turn the game greatly in their favor since we didnt all claim and they can steal unclaimed role.
Yet if we take out scum in dp1, then we possibly take out janitor or role blocker.
He doesn't do much to justify suspecting a Janitor beyond saying that it's a "nasty role scum can have" before Savant was Janitored... that is until DP2, where he says this:
I was thinking which role could scum possibly have to make up for the fact that town has to mislynch 3 times in a row to lose, and then I remembered that the only such role is janitor which I was seen used before in other game.
Honestly, it's not bad logic. Maybe that's just him trying to sweep it under the rug, but even if I assume that, I'd say Janitor is, at worst, an uncommon position to see.


By contrast, I think there's a lot more to sus in Pie's camp. Not so much in DP1 (honestly, I'm still not following Austin's reasons for sussing him then), but his arguments started looking odd when he starts pushing back on the various points about the Kates. He starts relatively early:
Savant was the NK. That leaves WF, Korea, and Bob. It’s theoretically possible that each scum can conduct 2 actions each. Like a Bus Driver would visit 2 people from last game
So he's early to breadcrumbing the existence of a Bus Driver to address a point about the number of scum visiting roles made by Austin. When suspicion fell to him by PoE, his response now included both of the uncommon-to-rare roles Vader's flip has revealed:
It’s possible there are roles like Bus Driver or Redirector that count as two visits. Austin asked me the same question in my game and I said they’d count as two visits because you have to pick two players.
Note that all of this takes place after sussing BK in two posts about how the NK revealed the existence of a Janitor after BK suggested it back in DP1. That means he actively sussed BK for the very same thing he's doing, and worse, it was for two highly specific roles. I might view the two as relatively equal if it hadn't become the fundamental assumption to support his position that BK is a better target than him... before Vader shit the bed, of course. Pie was stretching hard to make this seem not just plausible, but actual. Yes, the flip shows that it could have happened, emphasis on the "could." You have to believe that Vader opted to reveal that he targeted me and just me (likely to ensure that if a Tracker followed him, his visit would be validated, whereas a Tracker would have seen him go to both targets otherwise), that he specifically chose to target me and JoeBob, and that I'm scum. All of that has to be true for his claims to be accurate, and the only way he could believe it so strongly is if he already knew what the flip would be and that it would support his argument.

I know I'm not scum, but I'll put this to JoeBob: do you see anything in here that's believable on Pie's side, or anything that stands out from BK as scummy? At this point, I see no reason not to hammer, but I want your opinion.
Created:
3
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Best.Korea
I'm just putting my thoughts together, could you hang on a sec? I don't know why you're in such a rush.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Best.Korea
I guess you guys can fight over which one of you we lynch.
I’ve had my fill of that kind of back and forth. I’ll compile my thoughts into a couple of posts after I’ve gone through DP2, then make a decision after some discussion of it. I’m not going to make the same mistake I made last game and rush to hammer just because I have a strong feeling.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@JoeBob
Sincerely, there is no need to rush the DP. Do what I’m doing: go back and read through the previous DP and get the lay of the land. When I get a chance, I plan to post my thoughts comparing what I see as sus from both BK and Pie, but I’m not voting until we’ve had some discussion of it.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
I thought you said you were busy, yet my phone keeps lighting up with notifications from you. If it helps, I promise I won’t vote until I’ve had a chance to discuss what I’m seeing in DP2, so if you’ve got something to write, get to it.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Best.Korea
Barney tracked me and got the result on me.
To be clear, he Watched you, so the result he got was who visited you (GP and him). He didn't get any information on where you went.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
I'm headed out from work and I've got quite a bit to do over the next couple of hours, so I'll reread DP2 when I get a chance. I should be able to check in sometime this evening.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you have any reason to sus BK over pie?
I'm trying to think of one. I'm responding here while I'm trying to read back through the previous DP, so give me a bit.

Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@Best.Korea
I protected Joe, it seemed like the best choice since I thought scum will take out him. I didnt protect Barney because I think most confirmed town player is a more likely scum target for night kill.
That's... an odd choice. Barney was as town-confirmed as anyone by that CC, not to mention he claimed he had shots of other roles he could have used. I guess there was always some chance scum would go after Joe, but it was far more likely that they'd try to take out the only surviving investigator role, which is what they did. I still think it's more likely that you'd do this as town, since I think you'd be more likely to claim that you'd tried to protect Barney as scum, but not the best choice.

Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
Also, just to be clear about this: for all Pie is sussing me over my Vanilla claim, it's notable that he has done nothing to confirm his role at all. The best you can give him is that it's a fitting role. So is mine considering I'm the only claimed human with no powers.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
What Pie is doing here is kind of ridiculous. I gave my reasoning shortly after Vader claimed in the last DP: that one of the Damien Darkbloods was scum (at that point, I remained unsure), and that whoever it was was likely on a team with Pie. Early in the DP, before Vader went basically radio silent, I wasn't sure which of them to trust, but PoE suggested that whoever it was was partnered with Pie, especially when we considered which Kates died. I mapped out the likeliest series of events that could explain all 4 of the Kates being lost.

Recall what happened then: Pie claimed that, specifically, the Bus Driver and Redirector could explain this set of information. In other words, he somehow specifically predicted not one, but two of the JOAT roles Vader had, and this after calling BK out during the last DP for guessing at the existence of a mafia Janitor (who, by the by, could still be another JOAT and have multiple roles). It's legitimately insane that he's calling me out for showing "inside knowledge" when that's literally what he did in the last DP. I'll also note that my explanation (that Vader targeted me and only me with the RB) also fits the series of events so long as BK is telling the truth about his role, though I'll come back to that with him.

As for this notion that my demeanor changed... I don't get this at all. I argued with Pie, like I argued with Vader last game. Even after all this, I'm still concerned that this is a town vs. town argument and that I'm tunneling, which, again, is what I did last game. It's the reason why I'd prefer to be looking back through the previous DPs than continuing this back-and-forth. So I'll let others decide how they see this series of events and I'll avoid engaging too much in this again. 

Created:
1
Posted in:
Invincible Day Phase 3
-->
@ILikePie5
@Best.Korea
Right now, we have JoeBob who is confirmed town and GP who is role confirmed and most definitely town.

That leaves PoE at me, BK and Pie. I’d like to know what both of you did during the NP. At this point, your role should be fully clarified, Pie.
Created:
1