All debates
Total debates: 4,183
I, PRO, believe that, on balance, the Christian doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement is ethically tenable. As CON, you believe that the Christian doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement is ethically indefensible.
No description has been provided
Today there is a heavy debate on Donold Trump and his chances of willing in 2024. Pro wins if: 1. establishes a persuasive argument to why Donald trump won't win or 2. can provide sufficient evidence that supports the high probability of Donald trump's upcoming conviction. Con wins if : 1. they prove that donold trump has a good chance of victory in 2024 or 2. makes a convincing argument that he wont likely face a conviction.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Important rules The team supporting the motion must not shift its point of view. ... If a speaker makes a statement, they must be able to provide evidence or reasons to support the statement. Facts presented in a debate must be accurate. Speakers may not bring up new points in a rebuttal speech.
No description has been provided
argonian vs. kajit
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Hot debates
Nothing here