All debates

Total debates: 4,224

christianm's avatar
VS
whiteflame's avatar

The subject of this debate is whether individuals should be allowed to sell kidneys to each other. The government could observe the transaction if necessary to make sure all parties are in agreement. This debate doesn't negate the possibility that the government could buy organs independently and give them to the poor.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
8/8 43 2
Mall's avatar
VS
Conservallectual's avatar

No description has been provided

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
5/8 3 3
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
4/8 15 3
Ehyeh's avatar
VS
Novice_II's avatar

Anime is superior to other mediums of entertainment.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
3/4 6 3
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
3/6 6 4
Octavius's avatar
VS
shabdak2.718's avatar

Pro me will argue that Marxism supports democracy Con will either deny that claim or say that it is the opposite

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
0/4 11 1
Nada's avatar
VS
Novice_II's avatar

So here I want to discuss about character of tv show How I met Your mother

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
1/4 4 1
Ehyeh's avatar
VS
SATAN's avatar

The Problem of Universals asks three questions. Do universals exist? If they exist, where do they exist? Also, if they exist, how do we obtain knowledge of them?

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
5/6 36 0
Best.Korea's avatar
VS
RationalMadman's avatar

No description has been provided

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
4/4 28 1
Mall's avatar
VS
Americandebater24's avatar

No description has been provided

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
3/6 2 1
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
4/4 6 1
MisterChris's avatar
VS
RationalMadman's avatar

I, PRO, believe that, on balance, the Christian doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement is ethically tenable. As CON, you believe that the Christian doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement is ethically indefensible.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
6/6 143 4
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
8/8 5 1
Americandebater24's avatar
VS
Lair77's avatar

Today there is a heavy debate on Donold Trump and his chances of willing in 2024. Pro wins if: 1. establishes a persuasive argument to why Donald trump won't win or 2. can provide sufficient evidence that supports the high probability of Donald trump's upcoming conviction. Con wins if : 1. they prove that donold trump has a good chance of victory in 2024 or 2. makes a convincing argument that he wont likely face a conviction.

Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
4/4 6 0
Finished
F
Published:
Updated:
Type:
Standard
8/8 4 1

Hot debates

Nothing here

Hot tags

Statistics

4,131
debates
927
tags
56,457
comments
9,985
votes
22,373
arguments
1,443
participants